Open Access
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 57, 2021
Article Number 16
Number of page(s) 17
Published online 11 August 2021
  • Ahmad I, Tang D, Wang T, Wang M, Wagan B. 2015. Precipitation trends over time using Mann-Kendall and spearman's Rho tests in swat river basin, Pakistan. Adv Meteorol 15. [Google Scholar]
  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M. 1998. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56 − Crop Evapotranspiration, FAO, Rome, p. 300. [Google Scholar]
  • Alley WM. 1984. On the treatment of evapotranspiration, soil moisture accounting, and aquifer recharge in monthly water balance models. Water Resour Res 20: 1137–1149. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ayuntamiento Presidencia Municipal Cozumel. 2015. Programa parcial de desarrollo urbano de la zona 1 de Cozumel, Quintana Roo. In Diario Oficial del Estado de Quintana Roo, Gobierno de Quintana Roo, Chetumal, p. 135. [Google Scholar]
  • Bautista F, Bautista D, Delgado-Carranza C. 2009. Calibration of the equations of Hargreaves and Thornthwaite to estimate the potential evapotranspiration in semi-arid and subhumid tropical climates for regional applications. Atmosfera 22: 331–348. [Google Scholar]
  • Bautista F, Palacio-Aponte G, Quintana P, Zinck JA. 2011. Spatial distribution and development of soils in tropical karst areas from the Peninsula of Yucatan, Mexico. Geomorphology 135: 308–321. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Becken S. 2014. Water equity − contrasting tourism water use with that of the local community. Water Resour Ind 7–8: 9–22. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cashman A. 2014. Water security and services in the Caribbean. Water 6: 1187–1203. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Castro-Borges, Mendoza-Rangel JM. 2010. Influence of climate change on concrete durability in Yucatan Peninsula. Corros Eng Sci Technol 45: 61–69. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • CEMDA, (Centro Mexicano de Derecho Ambiental A.C.). 2006. El agua en México: lo que todas y todos debemos saber, Centro Mexicano de Derecho Ambiental, Ciudad de México, p. 93. [Google Scholar]
  • Chen W, Chen C, Li L, Xing L, Huang G, Wu C. 2015. Spatiotemporal analysis of extreme hourly precipitation patterns in Hainan Island, South China. Water 7: 2239–2253. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • CONAGUA, (Comisión Nacional del Agua). 2015. Actualización de la disponibilidad media anual de agua en el acuífero Isla de Cozumel (2305), Diario Oficial de la Federación, Ciudad de México, p. 22. [Google Scholar]
  • Day M. 2010. Challenges to sustainability in the Caribbean karst. Geol Croat 63: 149–154. [Google Scholar]
  • De la Barreda B, Metcalfe SE, Boyd DS. 2020. Precipitation regionalization, anomalies and drought occurrence in the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Int J Climatol 40: 4541–4555. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Delgado CC, Bautista F, Orellana LR, Reyes HH. 2011. Classification and agroclimatic zoning using the relationship between precipitation and evapotranspiration in the state of Yucatán, Mexico. Investig Geogr 75: 51–60. [Google Scholar]
  • Deng Y, Young C, Fu X, Song J, Peng ZR. 2017. The integrated impacts of human activities and rising sea level on the saltwater intrusion in the east coast of the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Nat Hazards 85: 1063–1088. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dinpashoh Y, Jhajharia D, Fakheri-Fard A, Singh VP, Kahya E. 2011. Trends in reference crop evapotranspiration over Iran. J Hydrol 399: 422–433. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Doerr A, Hoy D. 1957. Karst landscapes of Cuba, Puerto Rico, and Jamaica. Sci Mon 85: 178–187. [Google Scholar]
  • DOF, (Diario Oficial de la Federación). 2020. ACUERDO por el que se actualiza la disponibilidad media anual de agua subterránea de los 653 acuíferos de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos, mismos que forman parte de las regiones hidrológico-administrativas que se indican, Diario Oficial de la Federación, Ciudad de México. [Google Scholar]
  • Ducci D, Sellerino M. 2013. Vulnerability mapping of groundwater contamination based on 3D lithostratigraphical models of porous aquifers. Sci Total Environ 447: 315–322. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ekwue EI. 2010. Management of water demand in the caribbean region: current practices and future needs. West Indian J Eng 32: 28–35. [Google Scholar]
  • Emeribe C, Butu A, Laka S. 2019. Trend analysis, cycles and periodicities in annual maximum daily rainfall distributions over Southern Nigeria. J Niger Assoc Math Phys 52: 299–312. [Google Scholar]
  • Ercan B, Yüce MI. 2017. Trend analysis of hydro-meteorological variables of Kızılırmak Basin. Nevşehir Bilim ve Teknol Derg Cilt 6: 333–340. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Escalante P. 1996. Tipos de vegetación de la Isla de Cozumel, Quintana Roo, scale 1:5. In: Proyecto B010 Avifauna de la Isla de Cozumel, Universidad Autónoma de México, Instituto de Biología and Departamento de Zoología, Ciudad de México. [Google Scholar]
  • Escolero O, Marín L, Steinich B, Pacheco J, Anzaldo J. 2005. Geochemistry of the hydrogeological reserve of Mérida, Yucatán, Mexico. Geofis Int 44: 301–314. [Google Scholar]
  • Falkland A. 1993. Hydrology and water management on small tropical islands. Hydrol warm humid Reg 126: 263–303. [Google Scholar]
  • Flores-Delgadillo L, Fedick S, Solleiro-Rebolledo E, Palacios-Mayorga S, Ortega-Larrocea P, Sedov S, Osuna-Ceja E. 2011. A sustainable system of a traditional precision agriculture in a Maya homegarden: soil quality aspects. Soil Tillage Res 113: 112–120. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Frausto-Martínez O, Gutiérrez-Aguirre MA, Cervantes-Martínez A, Mejía-Ortíz LM, Yañez G, Koch HC, Vázquez AB, Hernández-Flores G, Colín O, Salazar AS, Giese S. 2018. Estudio hidrológico de la isla de Cozumel, Universidad de Quintana Roo, Cozumel, p. 105. [Google Scholar]
  • Frausto-Martínez O, Zapi-Salazar N, Colin-Olivares O. 2019. Identification of Karst Forms Using LiDAR Technology: Cozumel Island, Mexico. In Abdalla R. (Ed.), Trends in Geomatics, An Earth Science Perspective, Intechopen. [Google Scholar]
  • Gamble D. 2004. Water resource development on small carbonate islands: solutions offered by the hydrologic landscape concept. In: Janelle D, Warf B, Hansen K, Sprague B, Zavala G, (Eds.), WorldMinds: Geographical Perspectives on 100 Problems. Norwell: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 503– 507. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • García-Gómez AG, Castaño-Meneses G, Vázquez-González MM, Palacios-Vargas JG. 2014. Mesofaunal arthropod diversity in shrub mangrove litter of Cozumel Island, Quintana Roo, México. Appl Soil Ecol 83: 44–50. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gocic M, Trajkovic S. 2013. Analysis of changes in meteorological variables using Mann-Kendall and Sen's slope estimator statistical tests in Serbia. Glob Planet Change 100: 172–182. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gompper ME, Petrites AE, Lyman RL. 2006. Cozumel Island fox (Urocyon sp.) dwarfism and possible divergence history based on subfossil bones. J Zool 270: 72–77. [Google Scholar]
  • González PD, Martín MJ, Guaita MJ, Sáez-Fernández J. 2020. An analysis of the cost of water supply linked to the tourism industry. An application to the case of the Island of Ibiza in Spain. Water 12. [Google Scholar]
  • Gutiérrez-Aguirre MA, Cervantes-Martínez A, Coronado-Álvarez L. 2008. Limnology of groundwater exposures with urban influence in Cozumel island, Mexico. Verh Internat Verein Limnol 30: 493–496. [Google Scholar]
  • GWP, (Global Water Partnership). 2014. Technical Focus Paper − Integrated water resources management in the Caribbean: The challenges facing Small Island Developing States, Global Water Partnership, Sweden, p. 52. [Google Scholar]
  • Hall T, Sealy AM, Stephenson TS, Kusunoki S, Taylor MA, Chen AA, Kitoh A. 2013. Future climate of the Caribbean from a super-high-resolution atmospheric general circulation model. Theor Appl Climatol 113: 271–287. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Helsel DR, Hirsch RM. 2002. Statistical methods in water resources. US Geological Service, Reston, p. 510. [Google Scholar]
  • Hernández-Flores G, Gutiérrez-Aguirre MA, Cervantes-Martínez A. 2020. Hacia un manejo integral del recurso hídrico en isla Cozumel, Quintana Roo. Impluvium 10: 34–40. [Google Scholar]
  • Hernández-Terrones L, Rebolledo-Vieyra M, Merino-Ibarra M, Soto M, Le-Cossec A, Monroy-Ríos E. 2011. Groundwater pollution in a karstic region (NE Yucatan): Baseline nutrient content and flux to coastal ecosystems. Water Air Soil Pollut 218: 517–528. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Herrera-Silveira JA, Medina-Gomez I, Aranda-Cirerol N, Zaldivar A, Ramirez J, Trejo J. 2002. Trophic status in coastal waters of the Yucatan Peninsula (SE, Mexico) using water quality indicators. Coast Environ Environ 8: 351–359. [Google Scholar]
  • Holden J, Grayson RP, Berdeni D, Bird S, Chapman PJ, Edmondson JL, Firbank LG, Helgason T, Hodson ME, Hunt SFP, Jones DT, Lappage MG, Marshall-Harries E, Nelson M, Prendergast-Miller M, Shaw H, Wade RN, Leake JR. 2019. The role of hedgerows in soil functioning within agricultural landscapes. Agric Ecosyst Environ 273: 1–12. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hussain F, Nabi G, Waseem M. 2015. Rainfall trend analysis by using the Mann-Kendall test & Sen's slope estimates: a case study of District Chakwal Rain Gauge, Barani Area, Northem Punjab Province, Pakistan. Sci Int 27: 3159–3165. [Google Scholar]
  • INEGI, (Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía). 2013. Conjunto de datos vectoriales edafológicos, escala 1:250 000 F16-11. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía, Aguascalientes. [Google Scholar]
  • Jaiswal R, Lohani A, Tiwari H. 2015. Statistical analysis for change detection and trend assessment in climatological parameters. Environ Process 2: 729–749. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jaleel MI, Ibrahim SA, Hussain A, Mustafa M, Pathirana A. 2020. A screening approach for assessing groundwater quality for consumption in small Islands: case study of 45 Inhabited Islands in the Maldives. Water 12: 2209. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kačaroğlu F. 1999. Review of groundwater pollution and protection in karst areas. Water Air Soil Pollut 113: 337–356. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kammoun S, Trabelsi R, Re V, Zouari K. 2021. Coastal aquifer salinization in semi-arid regions: the case of grombalia (Tunisia). Water 13. [Google Scholar]
  • Koch K, Frausto O, Giese S, Schirmer M, Steenbeck T. 2016. Impact on groundwater of a karstic aquifer in the informal settlement ‘Las Fincas’ on Cozumel Island, Mexico. WIT Trans Ecol Environ 203: 147–158. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Len L, Parise M. 2009. Managing environmental problems in Cuban karstic aquifers. Environ Geol 58: 275–283. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lesser JH, Azpeitia RJ, Lesser JM. 1978. Geohidrología de la isla de Cozumel, Q. Roo. Recur Hidráulicos 7: 32–49. [Google Scholar]
  • Medici G, Baják P, West L, Chapman P, Banwart S. 2020. DOC and nitrate fluxes from farmland; impact on a dolostone aquifer KCZ. J Hydrol 125658. [Google Scholar]
  • Medici G, Engdahl NB, Langman JB. 2021. A basin-scale groundwater flow model of the Columbia plateau regional aquifer system in the Palouse (USA): insights for aquifer vulnerability assessment. Int J Environ Res 15: 299–312. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Medici G, West L, Banwart S. 2019. Groundwater flow velocities in a fractured carbonate aquifer-type: implications for contaminant transport. J Contam Hydrol 222: 1–16. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mendoza-Vizcaino J, Sumper A, Sudria-Andreu A, Ramirez JM. 2016. Renewable technologies for generation systems in islands and their application to Cozumel Island, Mexico. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 64: 348–361. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Modaresi. RA, Khalili D, Kamgar-Haghighi AA, Zand-Parsa S, Banimahd SA. 2016. Assessment of seasonal characteristics of streamflow droughts under semiarid conditions. Nat Hazards 82: 1541–1564. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Neeti N, Rogan J, Christman Z, Eastman JR, Millones M, Schneider L, Nickl E, Schmook B, Turner BL, Ghimire B. 2012. Mapping seasonal trends in vegetation using AVHRR-NDVI time series in the Yucatán Peninsula, Mexico. Remote Sens Lett 3: 433–442. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ng K-C, Jones B, Beswick R. 1992. Hydrogeology of Grand Cayman, British West Indies: a karstic dolostone aquifer. J Hydrol 134: 273–295. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nwogu EC, Iwueze IS, Nlebedim VU. 2016. Some tests for seasonality in time series data. J Mod Appl Stat Methods 15: 382–399. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Orellana R, Nava F, Espadas C. 2007. El clima de Cozumel y la Riviera Maya. In: Mejía-Ortíz LM. (Ed.) Biodiversidad acuática de la Isla de Cozumel, Universidad de Quintana Roo − Plaza y Valdéz, México, 23–32. [Google Scholar]
  • Phuong DND, Linh VT, Nhat TT, Dung HM, Loi NK. 2019. Spatiotemporal variability of annual and seasonal rainfall time series in Ho Chi Minh city, Vietnam. J Water Clim Chang 10: 658–670. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pulido-Velazquez D, Collados-Lara AJ, Alcalá FJ. 2018. Assessing impacts of future potential climate change scenarios on aquifer recharge in continental Spain. J Hydrol 567: 803–819. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Raei E, Shafiee ME, Nikoo MR, Berglund E. 2019. Placing an ensemble of pressure sensors for leak detection in water distribution networks under measurement uncertainty. J Hydroinformatics 21: 223–239. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Reguero B, Méndez F, Losada I. 2013. Variability of multivariate wave climate in Latin America and the Caribbean. Glob Planet Change 100: 70–84. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Richards HG. 1937. Land and freshwater Mollusks from the Island of Cozumel, Mexico, and their bearing on the geological history of the region. Proc Am Philos Soc 77: 249–262. [Google Scholar]
  • Rodríguez-Huerta E, Rosas-Casals M, Hernández-Terrones LM. 2019a. Water societal metabolism in the Yucatan Peninsula. The impact of climate change on the recharge of groundwater by 2030. J Clean Prod 235: 272–287. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rodríguez-Huerta E, Rosas-Casals M, Hernández-Terrones LM. 2019b. A water balance model to estimate climate change impact on groundwater recharge in Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Hydrol Sci J 65: 470–486. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rosmann T, Domínguez E, Chavarro J. 2016. Comparing trends in hydrometeorological average and extreme data sets around the world at different time scales. J Hydrol Reg Stud 5: 200–212. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Saadat S, Khalili D, Kamgar-Haghighi AA, Zand-Parsa S. 2013. Investigation of spatio-temporal patterns of seasonal streamflow droughts in a semi-arid region. Nat Hazards 69: 1697–1720. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sánchez y Pinto I, Cervantes-Martínez A, González HR, Vázquez CM, Gutiérrez-Aguirre M. 2015. Evidencia de flujo preferencial al mar, del cenote Caletita, en Cozumel, México. Ingeniería 19: 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  • SECTUR, (Secretaría de Turismo). 2018. Programa Marco para fomentar acciones para restablecer el balance del ciclo del agua en Cozumel, Secretaría de Turismo, Ciudad de México, p. 85. [Google Scholar]
  • SEDETUS, (Secretaría de Desarrollo Territorial Urbano Sustentable). 2019. Programa Estatal de Ordenamiento Territorial y Desarrollo Urbano Sustentable de Quintana Roo, Quintana Roo, p. 465. [Google Scholar]
  • Segrado PR, Arroyo AL, Amador SK, Farmer F. 2017. Motivational factors for tourists who choose Cozumel, Mexico, as a holiday destination in low seasons. El Periplo Sustentable 32. [Google Scholar]
  • Shewhart WA, Wilks S. 2016. Time series analysis: forecasting and control. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, p. 669. [Google Scholar]
  • Spaw RH. 1978. Late Pleistocene Carbonate Bank Deposition: Cozumel Island, Quintana Roo, Mexico. Gulf Coast Assoc Geol Soc Trans 28: 601–619. [Google Scholar]
  • Taylor MA, Stephenson TS, Chen AA, Stephenson KA. 2012. Climate change and the Caribbean: review and response. Caribb Stud 40: 169–200. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Téllez O, Cabrera E, Linares E, Bye R. 1989. Las plantas de Cozumel, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, p. 75. [Google Scholar]
  • Tercera Legislatura Constitucional del Estado de Quintana Roo. (Last reform on June 15, 2017). Decreto Ley 14, Ley de Agua Potable y Alcantarillado del Estado de Quintana Roo. Published in Diario Oficial del Estado de Quintana Roo, on Wednesday, October 6, 1981. [Google Scholar]
  • Thornthwaite CW. 1948. An approach toward a rational classification of climate. Geogr Rev 38: 55–94. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Toews MW, Whitfield PH, Allen DM. 2007. Seasonal statistics: the ‘seas’ package for R. Comput Geosci 33: 944–951. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vázquez-Domínguez E, Suárez-Atilano M, Booth W, González-Baca C, Cuarón AD. 2012. Genetic evidence of a recent successful colonization of introduced species on islands: Boa constrictor imperator on Cozumel Island. Biol Invasions 14: 2101–2116. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Villasuso PMJ, Sánchez y Pinto IA, Canul MC, Casares SR, Baldazo EG, Souza CJ, Poot EP, Pech AC. 2011. Hydrogeology and conceptual model of the karstic coastal aquifer in northern Yucatan state, Mexico. Trop Subtrop Agroecosystems 13: 243–260. [Google Scholar]
  • Vosper EL, Mitchell DM, Emanuel K. 2020. Extreme hurricane rainfall affecting the Caribbean mitigated by the Paris agreement goals. Environ Res Lett 15: 104053. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ward WC. 1997. Geology of coastal islands, northeastern Yucatan Peninsula. In: Vacher H. and Quinn T. (Eds.), Geology and Hydrogeology of Carbonate Islands. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 275–298. [Google Scholar]
  • Wurl J, Giese S, Frausto O, Chale G. 2003. Ground Water Quality Research on Cozumel Island, State of Quintana Roo, Mexico. In: Second International Conference on Saltwater Intrusion and Coastal Aquifers— Monitoring, Modeling, and Management, Merida, México, March 30 − April 2, 171–176. [Google Scholar]
  • Yadav R, Tripathi SK, Pranuthi G, Dubey SK. 2014. Trend analysis by Mann-Kendall test for precipitation and temperature for thirteen districts of Uttarakhand. J Agrometeorol 16: 164–171. [Google Scholar]
  • Zepeda QDS, Loeza RCM, Munguía VNE, Peralta JE, Velázquez CLE. 2018. Sustainability strategies for coastal aquifers: A case study of the Hermosillo Coast aquifer. J Clean Prod 195: 1170–1182. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.