EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 57 (2021) Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim., 57 (2021) 18 References
Free Access
Issue
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 57, 2021
Article Number 18
Number of page(s) 12
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/2021016
Published online 28 September 2021
  • Alvesdesouza C, González MT, Iriarte JL. 2008. Functional groups in marine phytoplankton assemblages dominated by diatoms in fjords of southern Chile. J Plankton Res 30: 1233–1243. [Google Scholar]
  • Albay M, Akçaalan R. 2003. Factors influencing the phytoplankton steady state assemblages in a drinking-water reservoir (Őmerli reservoir, Istanbul). Hydrobiologia 502: 85–95. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Alvesdesouza C, Menezes M, Huszar V. 2006. Phytoplankton composition and morphological functional groups in a tropical humic coastal lagoon, Brazil. Acta Bot Bras 20: 78–83. [Google Scholar]
  • Arauzo M, Cobelas MA. 1994. Phytoplankton strategied and time scales in a eutrophic reservoir. Hydrobiologia 291: 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  • Arrigo KR. 2005. Marine microorganisms and global nutrient cycles. Nature 437: 349–355. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Becker V, Caputo L, Ordóñez J, et al. 2010. Driving factors of the phytoplankton functional groups in a deep Mediterranean reservoir. Water Res 44: 3345–3354. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Borics G, Grigorszky I, Padisák J, Barbosa FAR, Doma ZZ. 2005. Dinoflagellates from tropical Brazilian lakes with description of Peridinium brasiliense sp. nova. Algol Stud 118: 47–61. [Google Scholar]
  • Bray JR, Curtis CT. 1957. An ordination of the upland forest communities of Southern Wisconsin. Ecol Monogr 27: 325–349. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Carney HJ, Goldman CR. 1988. Seasonal phytoplankton r- and K-selection in oligotrophic Lake Tahoe. Verh Internat Verein Limnol 23: 672–676. [Google Scholar]
  • Crossetti LO, Bicudo CEM. 2008. Adaptaions in phytoplankton life strategies to imposed change in a shallow urban tropical eutrophic reservoir, Garças Reservoir, over 8 years. Hydrobiology 614: 91–105. [Google Scholar]
  • Gasol JM, Garcíacantizano J, Massana R, Guerrero R, Pedrósalió C. 1993. physiological ecology of a metalimnetic Cryptomonas population: relationships to light, sulfide and nutrients. J Plankton Res 15: 255–275. [Google Scholar]
  • George DG, Talling JF, Rigg E. 2000. Factors influencing the temporal coherence of five lakes in the English Lake District. Freshw Biol 43: 449–461. [Google Scholar]
  • Giroldo D, Vieira AAH. 1999. Assimilation of 14C in a tropical strain of Criptomonas obovata (Cryptophyceae) exposed to several irradiances. J Plankton Res 21: 1911–1921. [Google Scholar]
  • Grime P. 1979. Plant strategies and vegetation processes. Chichester, England: Wiley-Intescience Press, pp.1–222. [Google Scholar]
  • Hambright KD, Zohary T. 2000. Phytoplankton species diversity control through competitive exclusion and physical disturbances. Limnol Oceanogr 45: 110–122. [Google Scholar]
  • Heaney SI, Eppley RW. 1981. Light, temperature and nitrogen as interacting factors affecting diel vertical migrations of dinoflagellates in culture. J Plankton Res. [Google Scholar]
  • Hillebrand H, Dürselen CD, Kirschtel U, Pollingher D, Zohary T. 1999. Biovolume calculation for pelagic and benthic microalgae. J Phycol 35: 403–424. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hu HJ, Wei YX. 2006. The Freshwater Algae of China Systematics, Taxonomy and Ecology. Beijing (CN): Science Press (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  • Hu R, Li Q, Han BP, Naselli-Flores L, Padisak J, Salmaso N. 2015. Tracking management-related water quality alterations by phytoplankton assemblages in a tropical reservoir. Hydrobiology 763: 109–124. [Google Scholar]
  • Huszar V, Kruk C, Caraco N. 2003. Steady-state assemblages of phytoplankton in four temperate lakes (NE U.S.A.). Hydrobiology 502: 97–109. [Google Scholar]
  • Kruk C, Mazzeo N, Lacerot G, Reynolds CS. 2002. Classification schemes for phytoplankton: a local validation of a functional approach to the analysis of species temporal replacement. J Plankton Res 24: 901–912. [Google Scholar]
  • Kruk C, Segura AM. 2012. The habitat template of phytoplankton morphology-based functional groups. Hydrobiology 698: 191–202. [Google Scholar]
  • Kruskal JB. 1964. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: a numerical method. Psychometrika 29: 115–129. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Lauri H, Moel HD, Ward PJ, Räsänen TA, Keskinen M, Kummu M. 2012. Future changes in mekong river hydrology: impact of climate change and reservoir operation on discharge. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16: 4603–4619. [Google Scholar]
  • Lopes MRM, Bicudo CEM, Ferragut MC. 2005. Short term spatial and temporal variation of phytoplankton in a shallow tropical oligotrophic reservoir, southeast Brazil. Hydrobiology 542: 235–247. [Google Scholar]
  • Margalef R. 1978. Life-forms of phytoplankton as survival alternatives in an unstable environment. Oceanologia 1: 493–509. [Google Scholar]
  • Melack JM. 1979. Temporal variability of phytoplankton in tropical lakes. Oecologia 44: 1–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Moreno-Ostos E, Cruz-Pizarro L, Basanta A, George DG. 2008. The spatial distribution of different phytoplankton functional groups in a Mediterranean reservoir. Aquat Ecol 42: 115–128. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Naselli-Flores L, Padisák J, Albay M. 2007. Shape and size in phytoplankton ecology: do they matter? Hydrobiology 578: 157–161. [Google Scholar]
  • Padisák J, Borics G, Fehér G, et al. 2003. Dominant species, functional assemblages and frequency of equilibrium phases in late summer phytoplankton assemblages in Hungarian small shallow lakes. Hydrobiology 502: 157–168. [Google Scholar]
  • Padisák J, Crossetti LO, Naselli-Flores L. 2009. Use and misuse in the application of the phytoplankton functional classification: a critical review with updates. Hydrobiology 621: 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  • Pollingher U, Zemel E. 1981. In situ and experimental evidence of the influence of turbulence on cell division processes of Peridinium cinctum forma westii (Lemm.) Lefèvre. Eur J Phycol 16: 28–287. [Google Scholar]
  • Reynolds CS, Irish AE. 1997. Modelling phytoplankton dynamics in lakes and reservoirs: the problem of in-situ growth rates. Hydrobiology 349: 5–17. [Google Scholar]
  • Reynolds CS. 1987. The response of phytoplankton communities to changing lake environments. Swiss J Hydrol 49: 220–236. [Google Scholar]
  • Reynolds CS. 1988. Functional morphology and the adaptive strategies of freshwater phytoplankton. In Sandgren, Craig D, editors. Growth and Reproductive strategies of freshwater phytoplankton. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press, pp. 388– 433. [Google Scholar]
  • Reynolds CS. 1996. The plant life of the pelagic. Verh Internat Verein Limnol 26: 97–113. [Google Scholar]
  • Reynolds CS. 1997. Vegetation in the pelagic: a model for ecosystem theory. In: Kinne O, editors. Excellence in Ecology, Vol. 9. Germany: Ecology Institute. p. 371 [Google Scholar]
  • Reynolds CS. 1999. Phytoplankton assemblages in reservoirs. In: Tundisi JG, Straskraba M, editors. Theoretical reservoir ecology and its applications. São Carlos (BRA): International institute of ecology, Brazilian academy of sciences and Backhuys Publishers. p. 439– 456. [Google Scholar]
  • Reynolds CS. 2006. Ecology of phytoplankton. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press (UK), pp. 1–535. [Google Scholar]
  • Reynolds CS, Huszar V, Kruk C, Naselliflores L, Melo S. 2002. Towards a functional classification of the freshwater phytoplankton. J Plankton Res 24: 417–428. [Google Scholar]
  • Salmaso N, Naselli-Flores L, Padisák J. 2014. Functional classifications and their application in phytoplankton ecology. Freshw Biol 60: 603–619. [Google Scholar]
  • Salmaso N, Padisák J. 2007. Morpho-Functional Groups and phytoplankton development in two deep lakes (Lake Garda, Italy and Lake Stechlin, Germany). Hydrobiology 578: 97–112. [Google Scholar]
  • Salmaso N, Zignin A. 2010. At the extreme of physical gradients: phytoplankton in highly flushed, large rivers. Hydrobiology 639: 21–36. [Google Scholar]
  • Salmaso N. 1996. Seasonal variation in the composition and rate of change of the phytoplankton community in a deep subalpine lake (Lake Garda, Northern Italy). An application of nonmetric multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis. Hydrobiology 337: 49–68. [Google Scholar]
  • Sandgren SD. 1988. The ecology of chrysophyte flagellates: their growth and perenation strategies, as freshwater phytoplankton. In Sandren CD eds, Growth and Reproductive Strategies of Freshwater Phytoplankton. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press, pp. 9– 104. [Google Scholar]
  • Santos ACAD, Calijuri MC. 1998. Survival strategies of some species of the phytoplankton community in the Barra Bonita Reservoir (São Paulo, Brazil). Hydrobiology 367: 139–151. [Google Scholar]
  • Scheffer M, Rinaldi S, Gragnani A, Mur L, Nes EHV. 1997. On the dominance of filamentous Cyanobacteria in shallow, turbid lakes. Ecology 78: 272–282. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Scheffer M, Rinaldi S, Huisman J, Weissing FJ. 2003. Why plankton communities have no equilibrium: solutions to the paradox. Hydrobiology 491: 9–18. [Google Scholar]
  • Silva CAD, Train S, Rodrigues LC. 2005. Phytoplankton assemblages in a Brazilian subtropical cascading reservoir system. Hydrobiology 537: 99–109. [Google Scholar]
  • Smayda TJ, Reynolds CS. 2001. Community assembly in marine phytoplankton: application of recent models to harmful dinoflagellate blooms. J Plankton Res 23: 447–461. [Google Scholar]
  • Smayda TJ, Reynolds CS. 2003. Strategies of marine dinoflagellate survival and some rules of assembly. J Sea Res 49: 95–106. [Google Scholar]
  • Sommer U, Adrian R, Domis LDS, et al. 2015. Beyond the plankton ecology group (PEG) model: mechanisms driving plankton succession. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Soc 43: 429–448. [Google Scholar]
  • Sommer U. 1981. The role of r- and K-selection in the succession of phytoplankton in Lake Constance. Acta Oecol Oecol Gen 2: 327–342. [Google Scholar]
  • Stević F, Mihaljević M, Špoljarić D. 2013. Changes of phytoplankton functional groups in a floodplain lake associated with hydrological perturbations. Hydrobiology 709: 143–158. [Google Scholar]
  • Sun J, Liu DY, Qian SB. 1999. Study on phytoplankton biomass I, phytoplankton measurement biomass from cell volume or plasma volume. Acta Oceanol Sin 21: 75–85. [Google Scholar]
  • Tolotti M, Corradini F, Boscaini A, Calliari D. 2007. Weather-driven ecology of planktonic diatoms in Lake Tovel (Trentino, Italy). Hydrobiology 578: 147–156. [Google Scholar]
  • Wang L, Cai Q, Xu YY, Kong L, Tan L, Zhang M. 2011. Weekly dynamics of phytoplankton functional groups under high water level fluctuations in a subtropical reservoir-bay. Aquat Ecol 45: 197–212. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wilk-Wozniak E. Żurek R. 2006. Phytoplankton and its relationships with chemical parameters and zooplankton in meromictic Piaseczno reservoir, Southern Poland. Aquat Ecol 40: 165–176. [Google Scholar]
  • Xiao LJ, Wang T, Hu R, Han BP, Wang S. 2011. Succession of phytoplankton functional groups regulated by monsoonal hydrology in a large canyon-shaped reservoir. Water Res 45: 5099–5109. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yang XL. 2008. Study on the community characteristics of zooplankton in Zhushuqiao reservoir and biological evaluation of water quality [master's thesis]. Hunan (CN): Central south university of forestry and technology. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.