Free Access
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 56, 2020
Article Number 11
Number of page(s) 6
Published online 04 June 2020
  • Anderson MJ. 2001. A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol 26: 32–46. [Google Scholar]
  • Bellwood DR, Hughes TP, Folke C, Nyström M. 2004. Confronting the coral reef crisis. Nature 429: 827–833. [Google Scholar]
  • Cadotte MW, Carscadden K, Mirotchnick M. 2011. Beyond species: functional diversity and the maintenance of ecological processes and services. J Appl Ecol 48: 1079–1087. [Google Scholar]
  • Chalcraft DR, Resetarits Jr WJ. 2003. Predator identity and ecological impacts: functional redundancy or functional diversity? Ecology 84: 2407–2418. [Google Scholar]
  • Czerniawski R, Pilecka-Rapacz M. 2011. Summer zooplankton in small rivers in relation to selected conditions. Cent Eur J Biol 6: 659–674. [Google Scholar]
  • Debastiani VJ, Pillar VJ. 2018. SYNCSA–R tool for analysis of metacommunities based on functional traits and phylogeny of the community components. Bioinformatics 28: 2067–2068. [Google Scholar]
  • Dodson SI. 1974. Zooplankton competition and predation: an experimental test of the size‐efficiency hypothesis. Ecology 55: 605–613. [Google Scholar]
  • Gallardo B, Gascón S, Quintana X, Comín FA. 2011. How to choose a biodiversity indicator–Redundancy and complementarity of biodiversity metrics in a freshwater ecosystem. Ecol Indic 11: 1177–1184. [Google Scholar]
  • Gliwicz ZM. 1990. Food thresholds and body size in cladocerans. Nature 343: 638. [Google Scholar]
  • Hodkinson ID, Jackson JK. 2005. Terrestrial and aquatic invertebrates as bioindicators for environmental monitoring, with particular reference to mountain ecosystems. Environ Manag 35: 649–666. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hooper DU, Vitousek PM. 1997. The effects of plant composition and diversity on ecosystem processes. Science 277: 1302–1305. [Google Scholar]
  • Kharat S, Dahanukar N, Raut R, Mahabaleshwarkar M. 2003. Long-term changes in freshwater fish species composition in North Western Ghats, Pune District. Curr Sci 84: 816–820. [Google Scholar]
  • Laliberte E, Wells JA, DeClerck F, et al. 2010. Land‐use intensification reduces functional redundancy and response diversity in plant communities. Ecol Lett 13: 76–86. [Google Scholar]
  • Laliberté E, Legendre P, Shipley B, Laliberté ME. 2014. Package ‘FD’. Measuring functional diversity from multiple traits, and other tools for functional ecology. R package, version 1. 0-12. [Google Scholar]
  • Loreau M, Naeem S, Inchausti P, et al. 2001. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science 294: 804–808. [Google Scholar]
  • Malmqvist B, Rundle S. 2002. Threats to the running water ecosystems of the world. Environ Conserv 29: 134–153. [Google Scholar]
  • Mayfield MM, Bonser SP, Morgan JW, Aubin I, McNamara S, Vesk PA. 2010. What does species richness tell us about functional trait diversity? Predictions and evidence for responses of species and functional trait diversity to land-use change. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 19: 423–431. [Google Scholar]
  • MPCB website. (accessed Novemner 11, 2018). [Google Scholar]
  • Nevalainen L, Luoto TP. 2017. Relationship between cladoceran (Crustacea) functional diversity and lake trophic gradients. Funct Ecol 31: 488–498. [Google Scholar]
  • Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, et al. 2010. Package ‘vegan’. Community ecology package, 2013, version, 2(9). [Google Scholar]
  • Padhye SM, Dahanukar N. 2015. Determinants of ‘water fleas’ (Crustacea: Branchiopoda: Cladocera) diversity across seasonal and environmental gradients of a polluted river. Curr Sci 109: 1777–1780. [Google Scholar]
  • Padmavati G, Goswami SC. 1996. Zooplankton ecology in the Mandovi Zuary estuarine system of Goa, west coast of India. Indian J Mar Sci 25: 268–273. [Google Scholar]
  • Rajaram T, Das A. 2008. Water pollution by industrial effluents in India: discharge scenarios and case for participatory ecosystem specific local regulation. Futures 40: 56–69. [Google Scholar]
  • Rizo EZC, Gu Y, Papa RDS, Dumont HJ, Han BP. 2017. Identifying functional groups and ecological roles of tropical and subtropical freshwater Cladocera in Asia. Hydrobiologia 799: 83–99. [Google Scholar]
  • RStudio Team. RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, Inc., Boston, MA (2015) (accessed November 1, 2018). [Google Scholar]
  • Schindler DW. 2012. The dilemma of controlling cultural eutrophication of lakes. Proc R Soc B 279: 4322–4333. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Suárez-Morales E, Vázquez-Mazy A, Solís E. 1994. On the zooplankton community of a Mexican eutrophic reservoir, a seasonal survey. Hidrobiologica 3: 71–80. [Google Scholar]
  • Thorp JP, Covich PM. 2001. Ecology and Classification of North American Freshwater Invertebrates. Cambridge: Academic Press, 1073 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Thorp JH, Mantovani S. 2005. Zooplankton of turbid and hydrologically dynamic prairie rivers. Freshw Biol 50: 1474–1491. [Google Scholar]
  • Tilman D. 2001. Functional diversity. Encycl Biod 3: 109–120. [Google Scholar]
  • Vanjare AI, Padhye SM, Pai K. 2010. Zooplankton from a polluted river, Mula (India), with record of Brachionus rubens (Ehrenberg, 1838) epizoic on Moina macrocopa (Straus, 1820). Opusc Zool 41: 89–92. [Google Scholar]
  • Verberk WC, Van Noordwijk CGE, Hildrew AG. 2013. Delivering on a promise: integrating species traits to transform descriptive community ecology into a predictive science. Freshw Sci 32: 531–547. [Google Scholar]
  • Villéger S, Miranda JR, Hernández DF, Mouillot D. 2010. Contrasting changes in taxonomic vs. functional diversity of tropical fish communities after habitat degradation. Ecol Appl 20: 1512–1522. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Viroux L. 2002. Seasonal and longitudinal aspects of microcrustacean (Cladocera, Copepoda) dynamics in a lowland river. J Plankton Res 24: 281–292. [Google Scholar]
  • Weather Atlas. (accessed November 11, 2018). [Google Scholar]
  • Xu Z. 1992. The abundance of epizoic ciliate Epistylis daphniae related to their host Moina macropopa in an urban stream. J Invertebr Pathol 60: 197–200. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.