EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 56 (2020) Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim., 56 (2020) 7 References
Free Access
Issue
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 56, 2020
Article Number 7
Number of page(s) 9
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/2020005
Published online 17 April 2020
  • Allan JD. 1976. Life history patterns in zooplankton. Am Natural 110: 165–180. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Alonso M, Kotov AA. 2017. A new species of Alonella Sars, 1862 (Crustacea: Cladocera: Chydoridae) from the Ecuadorian Andes. Zootaxa 4290: 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  • ANA. 2015. Conjuntura dos recursos hídricos no Brasil: regiões hidrográficas brasileiras − Edição Especial. − Brasília: Agência Nacional das Águas (ANA). Available at http://www.snirh.gov.br/portal/snirh/centrais-de-conteudos/conjuntura-dos-recursos-hidricos/regioeshidrograficas2014.pdf (accessed November, 2018). [Google Scholar]
  • Anderson MJ, Walsh DC. 2013. PERMANOVA, ANOSIM, and the Mantel test in the face of heterogeneous dispersions: what null hypothesis are you testing? Ecol Monogr 83: 557–574. [Google Scholar]
  • Battauz YS, de Paggi SBJ, Paggi JC. 2017. Macrophytes as dispersal vectors of zooplankton resting stages in a subtropical riverine floodplain. Aquat Ecol 51: 191–201. [Google Scholar]
  • Bottrell H, Duncan A, Gliwicz ZM, et al., 1976. Review of some problems in zooplankton production studies. Norweg J Zool 24: 419–456. [Google Scholar]
  • Branco CWC, Silveira RDML, Marinho MM. 2018. Flood pulse acting on a zooplankton community in a tropical river (Upper Paraguay River, Northern Pantanal, Brazil). Fund Appl Limnol/Arch Hydrobiol 192: 23–42. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brandorff GO, Pinto-Silva V, Morini AET. 2011. Zooplankton: species diversity, abundance and community development. In: Junk WJ, Silva C, Cunha CN, Wantzen KM (Eds.), The Pantanal: Ecology, biodiversity and sustainable management of a large Neotropical seasonal wetland. Pensoft Publishers: Sofia/Moscow, 355–391. [Google Scholar]
  • Castilho-Noll MSM, Câmara CF, Chicone MF, Shibata EH. 2010. Pelagic and littoral cladocerans (Crustacea, Anomopoda and Ctenopoda) from reservoirs of the Northwest of São Paulo State, Brazil. Biota Neotrop 10: 21–30. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Choi JY, Jeong KS, Kim SK, La GH, Chang KH, Joo GJ. 2014. Role of macrophytes as microhabitats for zooplankton community in lentic freshwater ecosystems of South Korea. Ecol Inf 24: 177–185. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Elmoor-Loureiro LMA. 1997. Manual de identificação de cladoceros límnicos do Brasil. Brasília. Ed. Universitária, 156 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Elmoor-Loureiro LMA. 2000. Brazilian cladoceran studies: where do we stand? Nauplius 8: 117–131. [Google Scholar]
  • Elmoor-Loureiro LMA. 2014. Ephemeroporus quasimodo sp. nov. (Crustacea: Cladocera: Chydoridae), a new species from the Brazilian Cerrado. Zootaxa 3821: 88–100. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Elmoor-Loureiro LMA, Soares CEA. 2010. Cladocerans from gut content of fishes from Guaporé River Basin, MT, Brazil. Acta Limnol Brasilien 22: 46–49. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Elmoor-Loureiro LMA, Sousa FDR, Rocha GM, et al., 2018. A new record of Kisakiellus aweti Sousa & Elmoor-Loureiro, 2018 (Cladocera, Chydoridae) from the Amazon region. Nauplius 26. [Google Scholar]
  • Forró L, Korovchinsky NM, Kotov AA, Petrusek A. 2008. Global diversity of cladocerans (Cladocera; Crustacea) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia 595: 177–184. [Google Scholar]
  • Green J. 1972. Freshwater ecology in the Mato Grosso, Central Brazil. J Nat History 6: 215–227. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Heckman CW. 1998. The seasonal succession of biotic communities in wetlands of the tropical wet‐and‐dry climatic zone: V. Aquatic invertebrate communities in the Pantanal of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Int Rev Hydrobiol 83: 31–63. [Google Scholar]
  • Hsieh TC, Ma KH, Anne C. 2019. iNEXT: iNterpolation and EXTrapolation for species diversity. R package version 2.0.19. Available at http://chao.stat.nthu.edu.tw/blog/software-download/ [Google Scholar]
  • Junk WJ, Da Cunha CN, Wantzen KM. et al., 2006. Biodiversity and its conservation in the Pantanal of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Aquat Sci 68: 278–309. [Google Scholar]
  • Korovchinsky NM. 1992. Sididae & Holopediidae. Guides to the identification of the microinvertebrates of the continental waters of the world, SPB, The Hague, 82 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Kotov AA, Garfias-Espejo T, Elías-Gutiérrez M. 2004. Separation of two Neotropical species: Macrothrix superaculeata (SMIRNOV, 1982) versus M. elegans SARS, 1901 (Macrothricidae, Anomopoda, Cladocera). Hydrobiologia 517: 61–88. [Google Scholar]
  • Kotov AA, Fuentes-Reines JM. 2014. A new species of Leydigia Kurz, 1875 (Cladocera: Chydoridae) from Colombia. Zootaxa 3814: 399–408. [Google Scholar]
  • Kotov A, Forró L, Korovchinsky NM, Petrusek A. 2013. World checklist of freshwater Cladocera species. World Wide Web electronic publication. Available in: http://fada.biodiversity.be/group/show/17 [Google Scholar]
  • Kotov AA, Elmoor-Loureiro LM. 2008. Revision of Ilyocryptus Sars, 1862 (Cladocera: Ilyocryptidae) of Brazil with description of two new subspecies. Zootaxa 1962: 49–64. [Google Scholar]
  • Lima PV, Oliveira SML, de Carvalho Silva M, Oliveira VA. 2012. Variação na riqueza das espécies zooplanctônicas em lagoas marginais do rio Cuiabá (Pantanal-MT). Biodiversidade 11. [Google Scholar]
  • Lomolino MV, Riddle BR, Whittaker RJ, Brown JH. 2010. Biogeography, 4th edn. Sinauer, Sunderland. [Google Scholar]
  • Maloufi S, Catherine A, Mouillot D, et al., 2016. Environmental heterogeneity among lakes promotes hyper β‐diversity across phytoplankton communities. Freshwater Biol. 61: 633–645. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Fonseca GAB, Kent J. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853–858. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Neretina AN, Kotov AA. 2017. Old World-New World differentiation of so-called “circumtropical” taxa: the case of rare genus Grimaldina Richard, 1892 (Branchiopoda: Cladocera: Macrothricidae). Zootaxa 4291: 295–323. [Google Scholar]
  • Neves IF, Rocha O, Roche KF, Pinto AA. 2003. Zooplankton community structure of two marginal lakes of the River Cuiaba (Mato Grosso, Brazil) with analysis of Rotifera and Cladocera diversity. Braz J Biol 63: 329–343. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, et al., 2018. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.5-3. Available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan [Google Scholar]
  • Padovesi-Fonseca C, Saraiva MF, Fernandes CLDS. 2016. First record of cladocerans from the headwaters of the Cerrado–Amazon boundary, central Brazil. Biodiversity 17: 90–92. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Panarelli EA, Kawamura HA, Elmoor-Loureiro LM, et al., 2019. Life history of Karualona Muelleri (Richard, 1897) (Chydoridae, Aloninae). jlimnol [Internet]. 26 Jul. 2019 [cited 30 Sep. 2019]. Available at https://www.jlimnol.it/index.php/jlimnol/article/view/jlimnol.2019.1848 [Google Scholar]
  • R Core Team. 2018. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at https://www.R-project.org/ [Google Scholar]
  • Rocha O, Santos-Wisniewski MJ, Matsumura-Tundisi T. 2011. Checklist de Cladocera de água doce do Estado de São Paulo. Biota Neotrop 11: 1–22. [Google Scholar]
  • Santangelo JM, Araújo LR, Esteves FA, Manca M, Bozelli RL. 2011. Method for hatching resting eggs from tropical zooplankton: effects of drying or exposing to low temperatures before incubation. Acta Limnol Bras 23: 42–47. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Santos-Wisniewski MJ, Matsumura-Tundisi T, Negreiros NF, et al., 2011. O estado atual do conhecimento da diversidade dos Cladocera (Crustacea, Branchiopoda) nas águas doces do estado de Minas Gerais. Biota Neotrop 11: 287–301. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sharma P, Kotov AA. 2014. Establishment of Chydorus sphaericus (O.F. Muller, 1785) (Crustacea: Cladocera) in Australia: consequences of mass fish stocking from Northern Europe? J Limnol 74: 225–233. [Google Scholar]
  • Sinev AY, Elmoor-Loureiro LM. 2010. Three new species of chydorid cladocerans of subfamily Aloninae (Branchipoda: Anomopoda: Chydoridae) from Brazil. Zootaxa 2390: 1–25. [Google Scholar]
  • Smirnov NN. 1996. Cladocera: The Chydorinae and Sayciinae (Chydoridae) of the world. Amsterdam: SPB Academic Publishing, 197 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Soares CEA, Elmoor-Loureiro LMA. 2011. Uma atualização da lista de Cladocera Cladocera (Crustacea, Branchiopoda) do Estado de Pernambuco, Brasil. Biota Neotrop 11: 409–414. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sousa FDR, Elmoor-Loureiro LMA. 2008. Cladóceros fitófilos (Crustacea, Branchiopoda) do Parque Nacional das Emas, estado de Goiás. Biota neotropica 8: 159–166. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sousa FDR, Elmoor-Loureiro LMA. 2017. Zip Code matters: Nicsmirnovius paggii, a new species from fitzpatricki-complex (Cladocera: Chydoridae) does not co-occur with Nicsmirnovius incredibilis . Ann Limnol 51: 2247–2270. [Google Scholar]
  • Sousa FDR, Elmoor-Loureiro LMA, Santos S. 2015a. Alona kaingang (Crustacea, Cladocera, aloninae): a new species of the pulchella group, with identification key to neotropical species. Zoolog Stud 54: 48. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sousa FDR, Elmoor-Loureiro LMA, Santos S. 2015b. Redescription of Coronatella poppei (Richard, 1897) (Crustacea, Branchiopoda, Chydoridae) and a revision of the genus in Brazil, with descriptions of new taxa. Zootaxa 3955: 211–244. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sousa FDR, Elmoor-Loureiro LM, Debastiani-Júnior JR, Mugnai R, Senna A. 2015c. New records of Anthalona acuta Van Damme, Sinev & Dumont 2011 and Anthalona brandorffi (Sinev & Hollwedel, 2002) in Brazil, with description of a new species of the simplex-branch (Crustacea: Cladocera: Chydoridae). Zootaxa 4044: 224–240. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sousa FDR, Elmoor-Loureiro LMA, Santos S. 2016. Position of the dentifera-group in the Coronatella-branch and its relocation to a new genus: Magnospina gen. n. (Crustacea, Chydoridae, Aloninae). ZooKeys 586: 95–119. [Google Scholar]
  • Sousa FDR, Elmoor-Loureiro LM, Panarelli EA. 2017. The Amazing diversity of the genus Monospilus Sars, 1862 (Crustacea: Branchiopoda: Aloninae) in South America. Zootaxa 4242: 467–492. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sousa FDR, Elmoor-Loureiro LMA. 2018. Cladocera from the Upper Xingu River Basin with the description of a new genus of the Chydoridae (Crustacea: Branchiopoda: Anomopoda). Zootaxa 4418: 545–561. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sousa FDR, Elmoor-Loureiro LMA, Mendonça-Galvão L, Panarelli EA, Arruda TF, Fagundes BG. 2018. Cladoceran (Crustacea: Branchiopoda) biodiversity of protected areas in a Brazilian hotspot. Inverteb Zool 15: 309–322. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sousa FDR, Elmoor-Loureiro LMA. 2019a. Identification key for the Brazilian species and subspecies of the family Ilyocryptidae (Crustacea, Branchiopoda, Anomopoda). Pap Avulsos Zool 59. [Google Scholar]
  • Sousa FDR, Elmoor-Loureiro LMA. 2019b. Identification key for the Brazilian genera and species of Aloninae (Crustacea, Branchiopoda, Anomopoda, Chydoridae). Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia 59. [Google Scholar]
  • Van Damme K, Kotov AA, Dumont HJ. 2010. A checklist of names in Alona Baird 1843 (Crustacea: Cladocera: Chydoridae) and their current status: an analysis of the taxonomy of a lump genus. Zootaxa 2330: 1–63. [Google Scholar]
  • Williams VL, Witkowski ETF, Balkwill K. 2007. The use of incidence-based species richness estimators, species accumulation curves and similarity measures to appraise ethnobotanical inventories from South Africa. Biodiv Conserv 16: 2495–2513. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zanata LH, Güntzel AM, Rodrigues TAR, et al., 2017. Checklist de Cladocera (Crustacea, Branchiopoda) do Estado de Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil. Iheringia Sér Zool 107: e2017113. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.