Free Access
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 54, 2018
Article Number 15
Number of page(s) 12
Published online 17 April 2018
  • Andersen CB, Žganec K. 2016. Impact of Zagreb wastewater treatment plant on the Sava River water quality. In: Annual Meeting of the American Association of Geographers. [Google Scholar]
  • Arbačiauskas K, Semenchenko V, Grabowski M, Leuven RSEW, Paunović M, Son MO, Csányi B, Gumuliauskaitė S, Konopacka A, Nehring S, Van der Velde G, Vezhnovetz V, Panov VE. 2008. Assessment of biocontamination of benthic macroinvertebrate communities in European inland waterways. Aquat Invasions 3: 211–30. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Argano R. 1979. Guide per il riconoscimento delle specie animali delle acque interne Italiane. 5. Isopodi (Crustacea, Isopoda). Consiglio nazionale delle ricerche. Verona: Impresso della stamperia Veldonega, 63 p. [Google Scholar]
  • AQEM Consortium. 2002. Manual for the application of the AQEM system. A comprehensive method to assess European streams using benthic macroinvertebrates, developed for the purpose of the Water Framework Directive. Version 1, 202 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Bacela-Spychalska K, Van der Velde G. 2013. There is more than one “killer shrimp”: trophic positions and predatory abilities of invasive amphipods of Ponto-Caspian origin. Freshw Biol 58: 730–741. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bernauer D, Jansen W. 2006. Recent invasions of alien macroinvertebrates and loss of native species in the upper Rhine River, Germany. Aquat Invasions 11: 55–71. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bij de Vaate A, Jazdzewski K, Ketelaars HA, Gollasch S, Van der Velde G. 2002. Geographical patterns in range extension of Ponto-Caspian macroinvertebrate species in Europe. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59: 1159–1174. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Boets P, Lock K, Messiaen M, Goethals PLM. 2010. Combining data-driven methods and lab studies to analyse the ecology of Dikerogammarus villosus. Ecol Inform 5: 133–9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bollache L, Devin S, Wattier R, Chovet M, Beisel J-N, Moreteau JC, Rigaud T. 2004. Rapid range extension of the Ponto-Caspian amphipod Dikerogammarus villosus in France: potential consequences. Arch für Hydrobiol 160: 57–66. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Borza P. 2011. Revision of invasion history, distributional patterns, and new records of Corophiidae (Crustacea: Amphipoda) in Hungary. Acta Zool Acad Sci Hung. 57: 75–84. [Google Scholar]
  • Borza P, Csányi B, Huber T, Leitner P, Paunović M, Remund N, Szekeres J, Graf W. 2015. Longitudinal distributional patterns of Peracarida (Crustacea, Malacostraca) in the River Danube. Fundam Appl Limnol 187: 113–26. [Google Scholar]
  • Cărăuşu S, Dobreanu E, Manolache C. 1955. Amphipoda forme salmastre şi de apă dulce. Fauna Republ pop Rom Crustac 4: 1–407. [Google Scholar]
  • Den Hartog C, Van den Brink FWB, Van der Velde G. 1992. Why was the invasion of the river Rhine by Corophium curvispinum and Corbicula species so successful ? J Nat Hist 26: 1121–1129. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Devin S, Beisel JN. 2006. Biological and ecological characteristics of invasive species: a gammarid study. Biol Invasions 9: 13–24. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Devin S, Piscart C, Beisel JN, Moreteau JC. 2003. Ecological traits of the amphipod invader Dikerogammarus villosus on a mesohabitat scale. Arch Fur Hydrobiol 158: 43–56. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dick JTA, Platvoet D. 2000. Invading predatory crustacean Dikerogammarus villosus eliminates both native and exotic species. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 267: 977–983. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dobson M. 2012. Identifying invasive freshwater shrimps and isopods. Ambleside: Freshwater Biological Association, 29 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Eggers TO, Martens A. 2001. Bestimmungsschlüssel der Süβwasser-Amphipoda (Crustacea) Deutschlands. Laurterbornia 42: 1–68. [Google Scholar]
  • Environment Agency. 2012. Invasive shrimp (D. haemobaphes) interim briefing note, Environment Agency UK, [Google Scholar]
  • European Environment Agency. 2012. European waters − assessment of status and pressures, Copenhagen: European Environment Agency, 96 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Gergs R, Rothhaupt K-O. 2015. Invasive species as driving factors for the structure of benthic communities in Lake Constance, Germany. Hydrobiologia 746: 245–254. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Grabowski M, Bacela K, Konopacka A. 2007. How to be an invasive gammarid (Amphipoda: Gammaroidea) − comparison of life history traits. Hydrobiologia 590: 75–84. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Grabowski M, Bacela K, Konopacka A, Jazdzewski K. 2009. Salinity-related distribution of alien amphipods in rivers provides refugia for native species. Biol Invasions 11: 2107–2117. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hellmann C, Schöll F, Worischka S, Becker J, Winkelmann C. 2017. River-specific effects of the invasive amphipod Dikerogammarus villosus (Crustacea: Amphipoda) on benthic communities. Biol Invasions 19: 381–398. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Holdich DM, Pöckl M. 2007. Invasive crustaceans in European inland waters. In: Gherardi F, ed. Biological invaders in inland waters: profiles, distribution, and threats. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 29–75. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • ICPDR. 2005. The Danube River Basin District. River basin characteristics, impact of human activities and economic analysis. Part A − Basin-wide overview. International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River (ICPDR), Vienna, Austria. [Google Scholar]
  • Jazdzewski K. 1980. Range extensions of some gammaridean species in European inland waters caused by human activity. Crustaceana 6: 84–107. [Google Scholar]
  • Jazdzewski K, Konopacka A, Grabowski M. 2002. Four Ponto-Caspian and one American gammarid species (Crustacea, Amphipoda) recently invading Polish waters. Contrib Zool 71: 115–122. [Google Scholar]
  • Josens G, De Vaate AB, Usseglio-Polatera P, Cammaerts R, Chérot F, Grisez F, Verboonen P, Vanden Bossche JP. 2005. Native and exotic Amphipoda and other Peracarida in the River Meuse: new assemblages emerge from a fast changing fauna. Hydrobiologia 542: 203–220. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Karaman GS, Pinkster S. 1977a. Freshwater Gammarus species from Europe, North Africa and adjacent regions of Asia (Crustacea − Amphipoda) Part I. Gammarus pulex − group and related species. Bijdr Dierkd 47: 1–97. [Google Scholar]
  • Karaman GS, Pinkster S. 1977b. Freshwater Gammarus species from Europe, North Africa and adjacent regions of Asia (Crustacea − Amphipoda) Part II. Gammarus roeseli − group and related species. Bijdr Dierkd 47: 165–96. [Google Scholar]
  • Karatayev AY, Burlakova LE, Padilla DK, Mastitsky SE, Olenin S. 2009. Invaders are not a random selection of species. Biol Invasions 11: 2009–2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kelleher B, Bij de Vaate A, Swarte M, Klink AG, Van der Velde G. 2000. Identification, invasion and population development of the Ponto-Caspian isopod Jaera istri Veuille (Janiridae) in the Lower Rhine, the Netherlands. Beaufortia Bull Zool Mus Univ Amst 50: 89–94. [Google Scholar]
  • Kinzler W, Kley A, Mayer G, Waloszek D, Maier G. 2009. Mutual predation between and cannibalism within several freshwater gammarids: Dikerogammarus villosus versus one native and three invasives. Aquat Ecol 43: 457–464. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kobak J, Rachalewski M, Bacela-Spychalska K. 2016. Conquerors or exiles? Impact of interference competition among invasive Ponto-Caspian gammarideans on their dispersal rates. Biol Invasions 18: 1953–1965. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Komatina D, Grošelj S. 2015. Transboundary water cooperation for sustainable development of the Sava River Basin. In: Milačič R, Ščančar J, Paunović M, eds. The Sava River. The handbook. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 1–28. [Google Scholar]
  • Labat F, Piscart C, Fontan B. 2011. First records, pathways and distributions of four new Ponto-Caspian amphipods in France. Limnologica 41: 290–295. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Leuven RSEW, Van der Velde G, Baijens I, Snijders J, van der Zwart C, Lenders HJR, Bij de Vaate A. 2009. The river Rhine: a global highway for dispersal of aquatic invasive species. Biol Invasions 11: 1989–2008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lodge DM. 1993. Biological invasions: lessons for ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 8: 133–137. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lucić A, Paunović M, Tomović J, Kovačević S, Zorić K, Simić V, Atanacković A, Marković V, Kračun-Kolarević M, Hudina S, Lajtner J, Gottstein S, Milošević Đ, Anđus S, Žganec K, Jaklič M, Simčič T, Vilenica M. 2015. Aquatic macroinvertebrates of the Sava River. In: Milačič R, Ščančar J, Paunović M, eds. The Sava River. The handbook. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 335–359. [Google Scholar]
  • Macneil C, Platvoet D. 2013. Could artificial structures such as fish passes facilitate the establishment and spread of the “killer shrimp” Dikerogammarus villosus (Crustacea: Amphipoda) in river systems? Aquat Conserv 23: 667–77. [Google Scholar]
  • MacNeil C, Platvoet D, Dick JT. 2008. Potential roles for differential body size and microhabitat complexity in mediating biotic interactions within invasive freshwater amphipod assemblages. Fundam Appl Limnol 172: 175–182. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Maguire I, Jelić M, Klobučar G. 2011. Update on the distribution of freshwater crayfish in Croatia. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 401: 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  • Marković V, Tomović J, Atanacković A, Kračun M, Ilić M, Nikolić V, Paunović M. 2015. Macroinvertebrate communities along the Velika Morava River. Turkish J Zool 39: 210–224. [Google Scholar]
  • Matoničkin I, Pavletić Z, Habdija I, Stilinović B. 1975. A contribution to the valorisation of waters of the ecosystem of river Sava. Sveučilišna naklada Liber, Zagreb, 96 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Meštrov M, Dešković I, Tavčar V. 1978. Pollution of the river Sava − according to several years of ecological research. Ekologija 13: 61–79. [Google Scholar]
  • Meštrov M, Habdija I, Stilinović B, Maloseja Ž, Tavčar V, Kerovec M, Primc B, Futač N. 1989. Biološko-ekološka valorizacija kvalitete vode rijeke Save. In: Meštrov M, ed. Rijeka Sava-zaštita i korištenje voda. Vol. 14, Zagreb: JAZU, 290–308. [Google Scholar]
  • Mineur F, Davies AJ, Maggs CA, Verlaque M, Johnson MP. 2010. Fronts, jumps and secondary introductions suggested as different invasion patterns in marine species, with an increase in spread rates over time. Proc R Soc Lond B 277: 2693–2701. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nunes AL, Tricarico E, Panov VE, Cardoso AC, Katsanevakis S. 2015. Pathways and gateways of freshwater invasions in Europe. Aquat Invasions 10: 359–370. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ogrinc N, Kanduč T, Kocman D. 2015. Integrated approach to the evaluation of chemical dynamics and anthropogenic pollution sources in the Sava River Basin. In: Milačič R, Ščančar J, Paunović M, eds. The Sava River. The hanbook. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 75–94. [Google Scholar]
  • Paunović M, Miljanović B, Simić V, Cakić P, Djikanović V, Jakovčev-Todorović D, Stojanović B, Veljković A. 2005. Distribution of non-indigenous tubificid worm Branchiura sowerbyi (Beddard, 1892) in Serbia. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip 19: 91–97. [Google Scholar]
  • Paunović M, Tomović J, Kovačević S, Zorić K, Žganec K, Simić V, Atanacković A, Marković V, Kračun M, Hudina S, Lajtner J, Gottstein S, Lucić A. 2012. Macroinvertebrates of the natural substrate of the Sava River − preliminary results. Water Res Manag 2: 33–39. [Google Scholar]
  • Petts GE, Möller H, Roux AL. 1993. Historical change in large alluvial rivers: Western Europe, Chichester: Wiley, 355 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Pinkster S. 1993. A revision of the genus Echinogammarus Stebbing, 1899 with some notes on related genera (Crustacea, Amphipoda). Mem del Mus Civ Stor Nat 10: 1–185. [Google Scholar]
  • R Development Core Team. 2017. A language and environment for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, [Google Scholar]
  • Rewicz T, Grabowski M, MacNeil C, Bącela-Spychalska K. 2014. The profile of a “perfect” invader − the case of killer shrimp, Dikerogammarus villosus. Aquat Invasions 9: 267–288. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rice SP, Greenwood MT, Joyce CB. 2001. Tributaries, sediment sources, and the longitudinal organisation of macroinvertebrate fauna along river systems. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58: 824–840. [Google Scholar]
  • Schneider-Jacoby M. 2005. The Sava and Drava floodplains. Threatened ecosystems of international importance. Arch für Hydrobiol Supp. 158: 249–288. [Google Scholar]
  • Schwarz U. 2016. Sava White Book. The River Sava: threats and restoration Potential. Radolfzell/Wien: EuroNatur/Riverwatch, 144 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Sommerwerk N, Hein T, Schneider-Jacoby M, Baumgartner C, Ostojić A, Siber R, Bloesch J, Paunović M, Tockner K. 2009. The Danube River Basin. In: Tockner K, Uehlinger U, Robinson CT, eds. Rivers of Europe. London: Academic Press, pp. 59–112. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Statzner B, Peltret O, Tomanova S. 2003. Crayfish as geomorphic agents and ecosystem engineers: effect of a biomass gradient on baseflow and flood-induced transport of gravel and sand in experimental streams. Freshw Biol 48: 147–163. [Google Scholar]
  • Statzner B, Bonada N, Dolédec S. 2008. Biological attributes discriminating invasive from native European stream macroinvertebrates. Biol Invasions 10: 517–530. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Strayer DL, Cole JJ, Findlay SEG, Fischer DT, Gephart JA, Malcom HM, Pace ML, Rosi-Marshall EJ. 2014. Decadal-scale change in a large-river ecosystem. Bioscience 64: 496–510. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Suarez AV, Holway DA, Case TJ. 2001. Patterns of spread in biological invasions dominated by long-distance jump dispersal: Insights from Argentine ants. PNAS 98: 1095–1100. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tierno de Figueroa JM, López-Rodríguez MJ, Fenoglio S, Sánchez-Castillo P, Fochetti R. 2013. Freshwater biodiversity in the rivers of the Mediterranean Basin. Hydrobiologia 719: 137–186. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tockner K, Uehlinger U, Robinson CT. (eds.) 2009. Rivers of Europe. London: Academic Press, 728 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Urbanič G. 2008. Redelineation of European inland water ecoregions in Slovenia. Rev Hydrobiol 1: 17–25. [Google Scholar]
  • Van den Brink FWB, Van der Velde G, Bij de Vaate A. 1993. Ecological aspects, explosive range extension and impact of a mass invader, Corophium curvispinum Sars, 1895 (Crustacea: Amphipoda), in the Lower Rhine (The Netherlands). Oecologia 93: 224–232. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Van der Velde G, Rajagopal S, Kelleher B, Muskó IB, Bij de Vaate A. 2000. Ecological impact of crustacean invaders: general considerations and examples from the River Rhine. In: The biodiversity crisis and Crustacea: Proc 4th Int Crustacean Congress. Vol. 2, Brill, Leiden, Amsterdam, pp. 3–33. [Google Scholar]
  • Van Overdijk CDA, Grigorovich IA, Mabee T, Ray WJ, Ciborowski JJH, Macisaac HJ. 2003. Microhabitat selection by the invasive amphipod Echinogammarus ischnus and native Gammarus fasciatus in laboratory experiments and in Lake Erie. Freshw Biol 48: 567–578. [Google Scholar]
  • Van Riel MC, Van der Velde G, Rajagopal S, Marguillier S, Dehairs F, Bij de Vaate A. 2006. Trophic relationships in the Rhine food web during invasion and after establishment of the Ponto-Caspian invader Dikerogammarus villosus. Hydrobiologia 565: 39–58. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Veuille M. 1979. Ĺévolution du genre Jaera Leach (Isopodes; Asellotes) et ses rapports avec ĺhistoire de la Méditerranée. Sci Ser 49: 195–217. [Google Scholar]
  • Whitton BA. (ed.) 1984. Ecology of European Rivers, London: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 584 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Wittmann KJ, Ariani AP, Daneliya M. 2016. The Mysidae (Crustacea: Peracarida: Mysida) in fresh and oligohaline waters of the Mediterranean. Taxonomy, biogeography, and bioinvasion. Zootaxa 4142: 1–70. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zorić K, Jakovčev-Todorović D, Dikanović V, Vasiljević B, Tomović J, Atanacković A, Simić V, Paunović M. 2011. Distribution of the Ponto-Caspian polychaeta Hypania invalida (Grube, 1860) in inland waters of Serbia. Aquat Invasions 6: 33–38. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Žganec K, Gottstein S, Hudina S. 2009. Ponto-Caspian amphipods in Croatian large rivers. Aquat Invasions 4: 327–335. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Žganec K, Ćuk R, Dekić S, Miliša M. 2016. Biocontamination of benthic macroinvertebrate communities of four major large rivers in Croatia. In: Móra A, Csabai Z, eds. Book of abstracts and programme. 2nd Central European Symposium for Aquatic Macroinvertebrate Research (CESAMIR). Mohács, Pécs: Carpathes Nature Foundation, p. 123. [Google Scholar]
  • Žganec K, Lunko P, Stroj A, Mamos T, Grabowski M. 2016. Distribution, ecology and conservation status of two endemic amphipods, Echinogammarus acarinatus and Fontogammarus dalmatinus, from the Dinaric karst rivers, Balkan Peninsula. Ann Limnol 52: 13–26. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.