EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 54 (2018) Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim., 54 (2018) 14 References
Free Access
Issue
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 54, 2018
Article Number 14
Number of page(s) 15
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/2018007
Published online 05 April 2018
  • Alonso M. 1990. Anostraca, Cladocera and Copepoda of Spanish saline lakes. Hydrobiologia 197: 221–231. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Alonso M. 1996. Crustacea Branchiopoda. In: Ramos Sánchez MA, ed. Fauna Iberica 7. Madrid: Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales CSIC. [Google Scholar]
  • Amoros C. 1984. Crustacés Cladocères. Lyon: Bulletin Mensuel de la Société Linnéenne. [Google Scholar]
  • Anh NTN, Van Hoa N, Van Stappen G, Sorgeloos P. 2009. Effect of different supplemental feeds on proximate composition and Artemia biomass production in salt ponds. Aquaculture 286: 217–225. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Anufriieva EV, Shadrin NV. 2014. Factors determining the average body size of geographically separated Arctodiaptomus salinus (Daday, 1885) populations. Zool Res 35: 132–141. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Arnér M, Koivisto S. 1993. Effects of salinity on metabolism and life history characteristics of Daphnia magna. Hydrobiologia 259: 69–77. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Azevedo FD, Dias JD, Braghin LDSM, Bonecker CC. 2012. Length-weight regressions of the microcrustacean species from a tropical floodplain. Acta Limnol Bras 24: 01–11. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bagella S, Gascón S, Caria MC, Sala J, Mariani MA, Boix D. 2010. Identifying key environmental factors related to plant and crustacean assemblages in Mediterranean temporary ponds. Biodivers Conserv 19: 1749–1768. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Balık S, Ustaoğlu MR, Mis DÖ, Aygen C, Taşdemir A, İlhan A. 2008. Kuzey Kıbrıs Türk Cumhuriyeti tatlı su göletlerinin sucul faunası üzerine ilk gözlemler. EÜ Su Ürünleri Derg 25: 347–351. [Google Scholar]
  • Benndorf J, Böing W, Koop J, Neubauer I. 2002. Top-down control of phytoplankton: the role of time scale, lake depth and trophic state. Freshwater Biol 48: 2282–2295. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Benvenuto C, Knott B, Weeks SC. 2015. Crustaceans of extreme environments. In: Thiel M, Watling L, eds. Lifestyles and feeding biology. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 379–417. [Google Scholar]
  • Benzie JAH. 2005. The Genus Daphnia (Including Daphniopsis). In: Dumont HJF, ed. Guides to the identification of the microinvertebrates of the continental waters of the world 21. Leiden (The Netherlands): Kenobi Productions, Ghent, Belgium and Backhuys Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  • Boix D, Gascón S, Sala J, Martinoy M, Gifre J, Quintana XD. 2005. A new index of water quality assessment in Mediterranean wetlands based on crustacean and insect assemblages: the case of Catalunya (NE Iberian peninsula). Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 15: 635–651. [Google Scholar]
  • Boronat L, Miracle MR, Armengol X. 2001. Cladoceran assemblages in a mineralization gradient. Hydrobiologia 442: 75–88. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bottrell HH, Duncan A, Gliwicz ZM, Grygierek E, Herzig A, Hillbright-Ilkowska Α, Kurasawa H, Larsson P, Weglenska T. 1976. A review of some problems in zooplankton production studies. Nor J Zool 24: 419–456. [Google Scholar]
  • Bray JR, Curtis JT. 1957. An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecol Monogr 27: 325–349. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brock MA, Nielsen DL, Shiel RJ, Green JD, Langley JD. 2003. Drought and aquatic community resilience: the role of eggs and seeds in sediments of temporary wetlands. Freshw Biol 48: 1207–1218. [Google Scholar]
  • Brtek J, Mura G. 2000. Revised key to families and genera of the Anostraca with notes on their geographical distribution. Crustaceana 73: 1037–1088. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brucet S, Boix D, López-Flores R, Badosa, A, Moreno-Amich R, Quintana XD. 2005. Zooplankton structure and dynamics in permanent and temporary Mediterranean salt marshes: taxon-based and size-based approaches. Arch Hydrobiol 162: 535–555. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brucet S, Boix D, Gascón S, Sala J, Quintana XD, Badosa A, Søndergaard M, Lauridsen TL, Jeppesen E. 2009. Species richness of crustacean zooplankton and trophic structure of brackish lagoons in contrasting climate zones: north temperate Denmark and Mediterranean Catalonia (Spain). Ecography 32: 692–702. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brucet S, Boix D, Quintana XD, Jensen E, Nathansen LW, Trochine C, Meerhoff M, Gascón S, Jeppesen E. 2010. Factors influencing zooplankton size structure at contrasting temperatures in coastal shallow lakes: implications for effects of climate change. Limnol Oceanogr 55: 1697–1711. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Clarke KR, Gorley RN. 2006. PRIMER v6: user manual/tutorial. Plymouth: PRIMER-E, 115 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Council of the European Commission. 1992. Council directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora. Official Journal of the European Communities, Brussels, Series L 206, 7–49. [Google Scholar]
  • Davis JS. 2000. Structure, function, and management of the biological system for seasonal solar saltworks. Glob NEST J 2: 217–226. [Google Scholar]
  • Derry AM, Prepas EE, Hebert PDN. 2003. A comparison of zooplankton communities in saline lakewater with variable anion composition. Hydrobiologia 505: 199–215. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dumont HJ, Ali AJ. 2004. Stage-specific cannibalism and spontaneous cyst hatching in the freshwater fairy shrimp Streptocephalus proboscideus Frauenfeld. Hydrobiologia 524: 103–113. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dumont HJ, Van de Velde I, Dumont S. 1975. The dry weight estimate of biomass in a selection of Cladocera, Copepoda and Rotifera from the plankton, periphyton and benthos of continental waters. Oecologia 19: 75–97. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Dussart B. 1967. Les copépodes des eaux continentales d'Europe occidentale. In: Tome II: Cyclopoïdes et Biologie. Paris: Editions N. Boublée & Cie. [Google Scholar]
  • Dussart BH, Defaye D. 2001. Introduction to the Copepoda. In: Dumont HJF, ed. Guides to the identification of the macroinvertebrates of the continental waters of the world 16. Leiden (The Netherlands): Backhuys Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  • Einsle U. 1996. Copepoda: Cyclopoida Cyclops, Megacyclops, Acanthocyclops. In: Dumont HJF, ed. Guides to the Identification of the Microinvertebrates of the continental waters of the world 10. Amsterdam (The Netherlands): SPB Academic Publishing bv. [Google Scholar]
  • Eitam A, Blaustein L, Van Damme K, Dumont HJ, Martens K. 2004. Crustacean species richness in temporary pools: relationships with habitat traits. Hydrobiologia 525: 125–130. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Eugster HP, Hardie LA. 1978. Saline lakes. In: Lerman A, ed. Lakes. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 237–293. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • European Commission. 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council − establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Brussels: European Commission. [Google Scholar]
  • Fontaneto D, De Smet WH, Ricci C. 2006. Rotifers in saltwater environments, re-evaluation of an inconspicuous taxon. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 86: 623–656. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Geller W, Müller H. 1981. The filtration apparatus of Cladocera: filter mesh-sizes and their implications on food selectivity. Oecologia 49: 316–321. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gilbert JD, de Vicente I, Jiménez-Melero R, Parra G, Guerrero F. 2014. Selecting priority conservation areas based on zooplankton diversity: the case of Mediterranean wetlands. Mar Freshw Res 65: 857–871. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gliwicz ZM, Wursbaugh WA, Szymanska E. 2010. Absence of predation eliminates coexistence: experience from the fish-zooplankton interface. Hydrobiologia 653: 103–117. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • González EJ, Matsumura-Tundisi T, Tundisi JG. 2008. Size and dry weight of main zooplankton species in Bariri reservoir (SP, Brazil). Braz J Biol 68: 69–75. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gophen M. 1977. Feeding of Daphnia on Chlamydomonas and Chlorobium. Nature 265: 271–273. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gutiérrez-Yurrita PJ, Sancho G, Bravo MA, Baltanás A, Montes C. 1998. Diet of the red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkia in natural ecosystems of the Doñana National Park temporary fresh-water marsh (Spain). J Crustac Biol 18: 120–127. [Google Scholar]
  • Haberman J. 1976a. An ecological characterization of the rotifers dominating in the pelagic region of lakes Peipsi-Pihkva and Võrtsjärv. In: Haberman H, Haberman J, Elberg K, eds. Productivity of Estonian fresh waters, Estonian Contributions to the International Biological Programme. Vol. 10, Estonian Contributions to the International Biological Programme, Tartu, pp. 35–59. [Google Scholar]
  • Haberman J. 1976b. An ecological characterization of the crustaceans (Cladocera, Copepoda) and Dreissena polymorpha juv. dominating in the pelagic region of lakes Peipsi-Pihkva and Võrtsjärv. In: Haberman H, Haberman J, Elberg K, eds. Productivity of Estonian fresh waters, Estonian Contributions to the International Biological Programme, Vol. 10, Tartu, pp. 60–99. [Google Scholar]
  • Haberman J, Haldna M. 2014. Indices of zooplankton community as valuable tools in assessing the trophic state and water quality of eutrophic lakes: long term study of Lake Võrtsjärv. J Limnol 73: 263–273. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hairston NG. 1996. Zooplankton egg banks as biotic reservoirs in changing environments. Limnol Oceanogr 41: 1087–1092. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hammer UT. 1986. Saline lake ecosystems of the world. Dordrecht: Dr. W. Junk Publishers, 616 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Hillebrand H, Dürselen CD, Kirschtel D, Pollingher U, Zohary T. 1999. Biovolume calculation for pelagic and benthic microalgae. J Phycol 35: 403–424. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Huber-Pestalozzi G. 1938. Das Phytoplankton des Susswassers. Systematik und Biologie. In: Thienemann A, ed. Die Binnengewasser. Stuttgart: Schwezerbart. [Google Scholar]
  • Jarecki L, Walkey M. 2006. Variable hydrology and salinity of salt ponds in the British Virgin Islands. Saline Syst 2. DOI:10.1186/1746-1448-2-2. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Jeppesen E, Nõges P, Davidson TA, Haberman J, Nõges T, Blank K, Lauridsen TL, Søndergaard M, Sayer C, Laugaste R, Johansson LS, Bjerring R, Amsinck SL. 2011. Zooplankton as indicators in lakes: a scientific-based plea for including zooplankton in the ecological quality assessment of lakes according to the European Water Framework Directive (WFD). Hydrobiologia 676: 279–297. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jocque M, Vanschoenwinkel B, Brendonck L. 2010. Anostracan monopolisation of early successional phases in temporary waters. Fundam Appl Limnol 176: 127–132. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ketmaier V, Pirollo D, De Matthaeis E, Tiedemann R, Mura G. 2008. Large-scale mitochondrial phylogeography in the halophilic fairy shrimp Phallocryptus spinosa (Milne-Edwards, 1840) (Branchiopoda: Anostraca). Aquat Sci 70: 65–76. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Khemakhem H, Elloumi J, Moussa M, Aleya L, Ayadi H. 2010. The concept of ecological succession applied to phytoplankton over four consecutive years in five ponds featuring a salinity gradient. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 88: 33–44. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kiefer F. 1971. Revision der bacillifer − gruppe der gattung Arctodiaptomus Kiefer (Crustacea Copepoda: Calanoida). Mem Ist Ital Idrobiol 27: 113–267. [Google Scholar]
  • Kirono DG, Kent DM, Jones RN, Leahy PJ. 2012. Assessing climate change impacts and risks on three salt lakes in western Victoria, Australia. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 18: 152–167. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Koste W. 1978. Rotatoria, die Rãdertiere Mitteleuropas. Berlin, Stuggart: Gebrüder Borntraeger. [Google Scholar]
  • Lampert W, Sommer U. 2007. Limnoecology: the ecology of lakes and streams, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press Inc., 324 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Lapesa S, Snell TW, Fields DM, Serra M. 2004. Selective feeding of Arctodiaptomus salinus (Copepoda, Calanoida) on co-occurring sibling rotifer species. Freshw Biol 49: 1053–1061. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • LAWA. 2003. German Guidance document for the implementation of the EC Water Framework Directive. Länderarbeitsgemeinschaft Wasser, Mainz, Germany. http://www.lawa.de/Publikationen.html. [Google Scholar]
  • Maier G. 1992. Development, reproduction and growth pattern of two coexisting, pond dwelling cladocerans. Int Rev Hydrobiol 77: 621–632. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Maier G. 1994. Patterns of life history among cyclopoid copepods of central Europe. Freshw Biol 31: 77–86. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Marques SC, Pardal MÂ, Mendes S, Azeiteiro UM. 2011. Using multitable techniques for assessing the temporal variability of species-environment relationship in a copepod community from a temperate estuarine ecosystem. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 405: 59–67. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Marrone F, Barone R, Naselli-Flores L. 2006. Ecological characterization and cladocerans, calanoid copepods and large branchiopods of temporary ponds in a Mediterranean island (Sicily, Southern Italy). Chem Ecol 22: 181–190. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Michaloudi E. 2005. Dry weights of the zooplankton of Lake Mikri Prespa (Macedonia, Greece). Belg J Zool 135: 223–227. [Google Scholar]
  • Moss B. 1994. Brackish and freshwater shallow lakes − different systems or variations on the same theme. Hydrobiologia 275: 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  • Moss B, Stephen D, Álvarez C, Bécares E, van de Bund W, Collings SE, van Donk E, de Eyto E, Feldmann T, Fernández-Aláez C, Fernández-Aláez M, Franken RJM, García-Criado F, Gross EM, Gyllström M, Hansson L-A, Irvine K, Järvalt A, Jensen J-P, Jeppesen E, Kairesalo T, Kornijów R, Krause T, Künnap H, Laas A, Lill E, Lorens B, Luup H, Miracle MR, Nõges P, Nõges T, Nykänen M, Ott I, Peczula W, Peeters ETHM, Phillips G, Romo S, Russell V, Salujõe J, Scheffer M, Siewertsen K, Smal H, Tesch C, Timm H, Tuvikene L, Tonno I, Virro T, Vicente E, Wilson D. 2003. The determination of ecological status in shallow lakes − a tested system (ECOFRAME) for implementation of the European Water Framework Directive. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 13: 507–549. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Munoz J, Gomez A, Green AJ, Figuerola J, Amat F, Rico C. 2008. Phylogeography and local endemism of the native Mediterranean brine shrimp Artemia salina (Branchiopoda: Anostraca). Mol Ecol 17: 3160–3177. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mura G, Hadjstephanou N. 1987. First records of Branchinella spinosa Milne-Edwards (Crustacea, Anostraca) in Cyprus. Riv Idrobiol 26: 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  • Nédli J, De Meester L, Major Á, Schwenk K, Szivák I, Forró L. 2014. Salinity and depth as structuring factors of cryptic divergence in Moina brachiata (Crustacea: Cladocera). Fundam Appl Limnol 184: 69–85. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nogrady T, Segers H. 2002. Rotifera 6. The Asplanchnidae, Gastropodidae, Lindiidae, Microcodinidae, Synchaetidae, Trochosphaeridae and Filinia. In: Dumont HJF, ed. Guides to the Identification of the Microinvertebrates of the Continental Waters of the World 18. Leiden (The Netherlands): Backhuys Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  • Nogrady T, Pourriot R, Segers H. 1995. Rotifera 3. The notommatidae and the scaridiidae. In: Dumont HJF, ed. Guides to the identification of the microinvertebrates of the continental waters of the world 8. Amsterdam (The Netherlands): SPB Academic Publishing BV. [Google Scholar]
  • O'Connell M, Young J, Kingwell R. 2006. The economic value of saltland pastures in a mixed farming system in Western Australia. Agric Syst 89: 371–389. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pielou EC. 1969. An introduction to mathematical ecology. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 294 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Reddy RY. 1994. Copepoda: Calanoida: Diaptomidae. In: Dumont HJF, ed. Guides to the identification of the microinvertebrates of the continental waters of the world 5. The Hague (The Netherlands): SPB Academic Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  • Rott E. 1981. Some results from phytoplankton counting intercalibrations. Schweiz Z Hydrol 43: 34–62 [Google Scholar]
  • Ruttner-Kolisko A. 1971. Rotatorien als indikatoren für den chemismus von binnensalzgewässern. sitzungsberichte der österreichische akademie der wissenschaften in wien. Mathematisch Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse. Abteilung 1: 179: 283–298. [Google Scholar]
  • Segers H. 1995. Rotifera 2: the lecanidae (monogononta). In: Dumond HJF, ed. Guides to the identification of the microinvertebrates of the continental waters of the world 6. The Hague (The Netherlands): SPB Academic Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  • Shannon CE. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication, Part I, Part II. Bell Syst Tech J 27: 623–656. [Google Scholar]
  • Smith VH. 2003. Eutrophication of freshwater and coastal ecosystems. A global problem. Environ Sci Pollut Res 10: 126–139. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Stenger-Kovács C, Lengye E, Buczkó K, Tóth FM, Crossetti LO, Pellinger A, Zámbóné ZD, Padisák J. 2014. Vanishing world: alkaline, saline lakes in Central Europe and their diatom assemblages. Inland Waters 4: 383–396. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Svetlichny L, Hubareva E, Khanaychenko A. 2012. Calanipeda aquaedulcis and Arctodiaptomus salinus are exceptionally euryhaline osmoconformers: evidence from mortality, oxygen consumption, and mass density patterns. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 470: 15–29. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tikkanen T. 1986. Kasviplanktonopas. Suomen Luonnonsuojelun Tuki Oy, Helsinki. pp. 104–113, [in Finnish]. [Google Scholar]
  • Ter Braak CJ, Smilauer P. 2002. CANOCO Reference Manual and CanoDraw for Windows user's Guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, NY, 500 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Ter Braak CJ, Verdonschot PF. 1995. Canonical correspondence analysis and related multivariate methods in aquatic ecology. Aquat Sci 57: 255–289. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tolomeyev AP. 2002. Phytoplankton diet of Arctodiaptomus salinus (Copepoda, Calanoida) in Lake Shira (Khakasia). Aquat Ecol 36: 229–234. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Torrentera L, Dodson SI. 2004. Ecology of the brine shrimp Artemia in the Yucatan, Mexico, salterns. J Plankton Res 26: 617–624. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tziortzis I, Zogaris S, Papatheodoulou A, Marrone F. 2014. First record of the Tadpole Shrimp Triops cancriformis (Branchiopoda, Notostraca) in Cyprus. Limnetica 33, 341–348. [Google Scholar]
  • Utermöhl H. 1958. Vervollkommung der quantitativen Phytoplankton-methodik. Mitt Int Ver Theor Angewan Limnol 9: 1–38. [Google Scholar]
  • Vieira N, Bio A. 2011. Spatial and temporal variability of water quality and zooplankton in an artisanal salina. J Sea Res 65: 293–303. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Waterkeyn A, Grillas P, Vanschoenwinkel B, Brendonck L. 2008. Invertebrate community patterns in Mediterranean temporary wetlands along hydroperiod and salinity gradients. Freshw Biol 53: 1808–1822. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Williams WD. 1985. Biotic adaptations in temporary lentic waters, with special reference to those in semi-arid and arid regions. Hydrobiologia 125: 85–110. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Williams WD. 1993. Conservation of salt lakes. Hydrobiologia 267: 291–306. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Williams WD. 1998. Salinity as a determinant of the structure of biological communities in salt lakes. Hydrobiologia 381: 191–201. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Williams WD. 2002. Environmental threats to salt lakes and the likely status of inland saline ecosystems in 2025. Environ Conserv 29: 154–167. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zacharias I, Zamparas M. 2010. Mediterranean temporary ponds. A disappearing ecosystem. Biodivers Conserv 19: 3827–3834. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zacharias I, Dimitriou E, Dekker A, Dorsman E. 2007. Overview of temporary ponds in the Mediterranean region: threats, management and conservation issues. J Environ Biol 28: 1–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.