Free Access
Issue
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 53, 2017
Page(s) 333 - 343
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/2017012
Published online 19 September 2017
  • Ács É., Szabó K., Tóth B. and Kiss K.T., 2004. Investigation of benthic algal communities, especially diatoms of some Hungarian streams in connection with reference conditions of the Water Framework Directives. Acta Bot. Hung., 46, 255–277. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • APHA, 2012. American Public Health Association. American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (22nd edn,), 1496 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Bellinger B.J., Christine C. and Catherine M.O., 2006. Benthic diatoms as indicators of eutrophication in tropical streams. Hydrobiologia, 573, 75–87. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Beltrami M.E., Ciutti F., Cappelletti C., Losch B., Alber R. and Ector L., 2012. Diatoms from Alto Adige/Sudtirol (Northern Italy): characterization of assemblages and their application for biological quality assessment in the context of the Water Framework Directive. Hydrobiologia, 695, 153–170. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bere T. and Tundisi J.G., 2011. Diatom-based water quality assessment in streams influence by urban pollution: effects of natural and Two selected artificial substrates, São Carlos-SP, Brazil. Braz. J. Aquat. Sci. Technol., 15(1), 54–63. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Billen G., Garnier J., Ficht A. and Cun C., 2001. Modelling response of water quality in the Seine river estuary to human activity in its watershed over the last 50 years. Estuaries, 24, 977–993. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bona F., Falasco E., Fassina S., Griselli B. and Badino G., 2007. Characterization of diatom assemblages in mid-altitude streams of NW Italy. Hydrobiologia, 583, 265–274. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Çelekli A., Toudjani A.A., Kayhan S., Lekesiz H.Ö. and Gümüş E.Y., 2017. Ülkemize Özgü Su Kalitesi Ekolojik Değerlendirme Sisteminin Kurulmasi Projesi (project no: 20011K050400). T.C. Orman ve Su İşleri Bakanliği Su Yönetimi Genel Müdürlüğü. [Google Scholar]
  • CEMAGREF, 1982. Etude de Méthodes Biologiques Quantitatives d'Appréciation de la Qualité des Eaux. Rapport Q.E.Lyon- A.F.B.Rhône-Mediterrannee-Corse. [Google Scholar]
  • Delgado C. and Pardo I., 2014. Comparison of benthic diatoms from Mediterranean and AtlanticSpanish streams: community changes in relation to environmentalfactors. Aquat. Bot., 120, 304–314. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Della Bella V., Pace G., Barile M., Zedde A., Puccinelli C., Ciadamidaro S., Danieli P.P., Andreani P., Aulicino F.A., Belfiore C. and Mancini L., 2012. Benthic diatom assemblages and their response to human stress in small-sized volcanic-siliceous streams of central Italy (Mediterranean eco-region). Hydrobiologia, 695, 207–222. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dell'uomo A., 1999. Use of algae for monitoring rivers in Italy: current situation and perspectives. In: Prygiel J., Whitton B.A. and Bukowska J. (eds.), Use of algae for monitoring rivers III, Agence de l'Eau Artois-Picardie, Douai, 17–25. [Google Scholar]
  • Dell'uomo A., 2004. L'indice diatomico di eutrofizzazione/polluzione (EPI-D) nel monitoraggio delle azque correnti, line guida. Dipartimento di Botanica ed Ecologia, Universita di Camerino. [Google Scholar]
  • Directive, 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. O.J.E.C., 327, 1–72. [Google Scholar]
  • Ducharne A., Baubion C., Beaudoin N., Benoit M., Billen G., Brisson N., Garnier J., Kieken H., Lebonvallet S., Ledoux E., Mary B., Mignolet C., Poux X., Sauboua E., Schott C., Théry S. and Viennot P., 2007. Long term prospective of the Seine River system: confronting climatic and direct anthropogenic changes. Sci. Total Environ., 375, 292–311. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • European Committee for Standardization, 2003. Water quality – Guidance standard for the routine sampling and pretreatment of benthic diatoms from rivers. European Standard EN, 14407, 14 p. Brussels. [Google Scholar]
  • European Committee for Standardization, 2004a. Water quality – Guidance standard for the identification, enumeration and interpretation of benthic diatoms from running waters. European Standard EN, 13946, 12 p. Brussels. [Google Scholar]
  • European Committee for Standardization, 2004b. Water quality – Guidance standard for the surveying, sampling and laboratory analyses of phytobenthos in shallow running water. European Standard EN, 15708, 22 p. Brussels. [Google Scholar]
  • European Communities (EC), 2009. Water Framework Directive intercalibration technical report. Part 2. In: Poikane S. (ed.), Lakes. European Commission, Ispra, Italy. Joint Research Centre. [Google Scholar]
  • Gómez N. and Licursi M., 2001. The Pampean Diatome Index (PDI) for assessment of rivers and streams in Argentina. Aquat. Ecol., 35, 173–181. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Hering D., Johnson R.K., Kramm S., Schmutz S., Szoszkiewicz K. and Verdonschot P.F.M., 2006. Assessment of European streams with diatoms. Macrophytes, macroinvertebrates and fish: a comparative metric-based analysis of organismresponse to stress. Freshw. Biol., 51, 1757–1785. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hlúbiková D., Hindáková A., Matúš H. and Miettinen J., 2007. Application of diatom water quality indices in influenced and non-influenced sites of Slovak rivers (Central Europe). Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl., 161(3–4), 444–460. [Google Scholar]
  • John D.M., Whitton B.A. and Brook J.A., 2002. The Freshwater Algal Flora of the British Isles (1st edn), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. [Google Scholar]
  • Kelly M., Juggins S., Guthrie R., Pritchard S., Jamieson J., Rippey B., Hirst H. and Yallop M., 2008. Assessment of ecological status in U.K. rivers using diatoms. Freshw. Biol., 53, 403–422. [Google Scholar]
  • Kelly M.G. and Whitton B.A., 1995. The trophic diatom index: a new diatom index for monitoring eutrophication in rivers. J. Appl. Phycol., 7, 433–444. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kelly M.G., Cazaubon A., Coring E., Dell'Uomo A., Ector L., Goldsmith B., Guasch H., Laugaste R., Hürlimann J., Jarlman A., Kawecka B., Kwandrans J., Lindstrøm E.A., Leitao M., Marvan P., Padisák J., Pipp E., Prygiel J., Rott E., Sabater S., VanDam H. and Vizinet J., 1998. Recommendations for the routine sampling of diatoms for water quality assessments in Europe. J. Appl. Phycol., 10(2), 215–224. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kobayasi H. and Mayama S., 1989. Evaluation of riverwater quality by diatoms. Korean J. Phycol., 4, 121–133. [Google Scholar]
  • Krammer K, 2000. The Genus Pinnularia. In: Lange-Bertalot H. (ed.), Diatoms of Europe-Diatoms of the European Inland Waters and Comparable Habitats. Gantner Verlag, Ruggel, 1, 1–703. [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Krammer K., 2002. The Genus Cymbella. In: Lange-Bertalot H. (ed.), Diatoms of Europe – Diatoms of the European Inland Waters and Comparable Habitats. Gantner Verlag, Ruggel, 3, 1–584. [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Krammer K. and Lange-Bertalot H., 1991a. Bacillariophyceae. 3 Teil: Centrales. Fragilariaceae. Eunotiaceae. In: Ettl H., Gerloff J., Heynig H. and Mollenhauer D. (eds.), Süß-wasser-flora von Mitteleuropa. Band 2. Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart. [Google Scholar]
  • Krammer K. and Lange-Bertalot H., 1991b. Bacillariophyceae. 4 Teil: Achnanthaceae. Kritische Erganzungen zu Navicula (Lineolatae) und Gomphonema. In: Ettl H., Gartner G., Gerloff J., Heynig H. and Mollenhauer D. (eds.), Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Band 2. Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart. [Google Scholar]
  • Krammer K. and Lange-Bertalot H., 1999a. Bacillariophyceae. 1 Teil: Naviculaceae. In: Ettl H., Gerloff J., Heynig H. and Mollenhauer D. (eds.), Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Band 2. Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg, Berlin. [Google Scholar]
  • Krammer K. and Lange-Bertalot H., 1999b. Bacillariophyceae. 2 Teil: Bacillariaceae. Epithemiaceae. Surirellaceae. In: Ettl H., Gerloff J., Heynig H. and Mollenhauer D. (eds.), Süß-wasser-flora von Mitteleuropa. Band 2. Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg, Berlin. [Google Scholar]
  • Lange-Bertalot H., 2001. Navicula sensu stricto 10 Genera Separated from Navicula sensu lato Frustulia. In: Lange-Bertalot H. (ed.), Diatoms of Europe -Diatoms of the European Inland Waters and Comparable Habitats. Gantner Verlag, Ruggel, 2, 1–526. [Google Scholar]
  • Leelahakriengkrai P. and Peerapornpisal Y., 2014. Evaluation of the Trophic Benthic Diatom Index in some Main Rivers of Thailand. Adv. Environ. Biol., 8(1), 248–254. [Google Scholar]
  • Leira M., Chen G., Dalton C., Irvine K. and Taylor D., 2009. Patterns in freshwater diatom taxonomic distinctness along an eutrophication gradient. Freshw. Biol., 54, 1–4. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Leps J. and Smilauer P., 2003. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data using CANOCO. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lobo E.A., Callegaro V.L.M., Oliveira M.A., Salomoni S.E., Schuler S. and Asai K., 1996. Pollution Tolerant Diatoms from lotic Systems in the Jacuí Basin, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Iheringia. Sér. Bot. Porto Alegre, 47, 45–72. [Google Scholar]
  • Lobo E.A., Callegaro V.L.M. and Bender P., 2002. Utilizaçaȏ de algas diatomáceas epilíticas como indicadoras da qualidade da água em rios e arroios da Regiaõ Hidrográfica do Guaíba, RS, Brasil. EDUNISC, Santa Cruz do Sul, 127 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Mancini L. and Arcá G., 2000. Carta della Qualità Biologica dei Corsi d'Acqua della Regione Lazio. Regione Lazio. Assessorato Ambiente. Dipartimento Ambiente e Protezione Civile, 156 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Marcel R., Berthon V., Castets V., Rimet F., Thiers A., Labat F. and Fontan B., 2017. Modelling diatom life forms and ecological guilds for river biomonitoring. Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst., 418, 1. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Mustapha M.K., 2008. Assessment of the Water Quality of Oyun Reservoir., Offa., Nigeria. Using selected physico-chemical parameters. Turk. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 8, 309–319. [Google Scholar]
  • O'Driscoll C., de Eyto E., Rodgers M., O'Connor M., Asam Z.Z. and Xiao L., 2012. Diatom assemblages and their associated environmental factors in upland peat forest rivers. Ecol. Indic., 18, 443–451. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Padisák J., Borics G., Grigorszky I. and Soróczki-Pintér E., 2006. Use of phytoplankton assemblages for monitoring ecological status of lakes within the Water Framework Directive: the assemblage index. Hydrobiologia, 553, 1–14. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Padisák J., Crossetti L. and Naselli-Flores L., 2009. Use and misuse in the application of the phytoplankton functional classification: a critical review with updates. Hydrobiologia, 621, 1–19. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pan Y. and Stevenson R.J., 1996. Gradient analysis of diatom assemblages in western Kentucky wetlands. J. Phycol., 32, 222–232. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Potapova M. and Charles D.F., 2003. Distrivution of benthic diatoms in US rivers in relation to conductivity and ionic composition. Fresw. Biol., 48, 1311–1328. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Potapova M., Charles D.F., Ponade K.C. and Winter D.M., 2004. Quantifying speciesindicator values for trophic diatom indices: comparison of approaches. Hydrobiologia, 517, 25–41. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Reynolds C.S., Huszar V., Kruk C., Naselli-Flores L. and Melo S., 2002. Towards a functional classification of the freshwater phytoplankton, review. J. Plankton Res., 24(5), 417–428. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rimet F., 2012. Recent views on river pollution and diatoms. Hydrobiologia, 683, 1–24. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rimet F., Bouchez A. and Tapolczai K., 2016. Spatial heterogeneity of littoral benthic diatoms in a large lake: monitoring implications. Hydrobiologia, 771, 179–193. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rott E., Pipp E., Pfister P., Van Dam H., Ortler K.,Binder N. and Pall K., 1999. Indikationslisten für Aufwuchsalgen in österreichischen Fliessgewässern. Teil 2: Trophieindikation (sowie geochemische Präferenzen, taxonomische und toxikologische Anmerkungen). Wasserwirtschaftskataster, Bundesministerium f.Land-u. Forstwirtschaft, Wien, 248 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Rott E., Pipp E. and Pfister P., 2003. Diatom methods developed for river quality assessment in Austria and a cross-chech against numerical trophic indication methods used in Europe. Algol. Stud., 110, 91–115. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Round F.E., 1991. Diatoms in river water-monitoring studies. J. Appl. Phycol., 3, 129–145. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Salomoni S.E., Rocha O., Callegaro V.L. and Lobo E.A., 2006. Epilithic diatoms as indicators of water quality in the Gravataí river, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Hydrobiologia, 559, 233–246. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Schindler D.W., 2006. Recent advances in the understanding and management of eutrophication. Limnol. Oceanogr., 51(1), 356–363. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sladeček V., 1973. System of water quality from the biological point of view. Archiv für Hydrobiologie Beiheft, 7, 1–218. [Google Scholar]
  • Smol J.P., 2008. Pollution of Lakes and Rivers: A Paleoenvironmental Perspective. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford. [Google Scholar]
  • ter Braak C.J.F. and Šmilauer P., 2002. CANOCO Reference Manual and CanoDraw for Windows User's Guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer Power Press, Ithaca. [Google Scholar]
  • Vadeboncoeur Y. and Steinman A.D., 2002. Periphyton function in lake ecosystems. Sci. World J., 2, 1449–1468. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Van Dam H., Mertens A. and Sinkeldam J., 1994. A coded checklist and ecological indicator values of freshwater diatoms from The Netherlands. Neth. J. Aquat. Ecol., 28, 117–184. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Venkatachalapathy R. and Karthikeyan P., 2013. Benthic Diatoms in River Influenced By Urban Pollution, Bhavani Region, Cauvery River, South India. I.J.I.T.E.E., 2(3), 206–210. [Google Scholar]
  • Wallis C., Seon-Massin N., Martini F. and Schouppe M., 2011. Implementation of the Water Framework Directive: When Ecosystem Services Come into Play. Brussels. [Google Scholar]
  • Wang X., Zheng B., Liu L. and Li L., 2014. Use of Diatoms in River Health Assessment. Annu. Res. Rev. Biol., 4(24), 4054–4074. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wunsan S., Cattaneo A. and Bourassa N., 2002. Comparing diatom species. genera andsize in biomonitoring: a case study form streams in the Laurentians (Québec.Canada). Freshw. Biol., 47, 325–340. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zelinka M. and Marvan P., 1961. Zur Präzisierung der biologischen Klassifikation der Reinheit fliessender Gewässer. Archiv. Hydrobiol., 57, 389–407. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.