EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 53 (2017) Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim., 53 (2017) 325-332 References
Free Access
Issue
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 53, 2017
Page(s) 325 - 332
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/2017016
Published online 04 September 2017
  • Agostinho AA, Thomaz SM, Minte-Vera CV, Winemiller KO. 2000. Biodiversity in the high Paraná River floodplain. In: Gopal B, Junk WJ, Davis JA, eds. Wetlands biodiversity: assessment, function and conservation. Leiden: Backhuys Publishers, pp. 89–118. [Google Scholar]
  • Agostinho AA, Pelicice FM, Gomes LC. 2008. Dams and the fish fauna of the Neotropical region: impacts and management related to diversity and fisheries. Braz J Biol 68: 1119–1132. [Google Scholar]
  • Ahearn D, Viers JH, Mount JF, Dahlgren RA. 2006. Priming the productivity pump: flood pulse driven trends in suspended algal biomass distribution across a restored floodplain. Freshw Biol 51: 1417–1433. [Google Scholar]
  • Anderson MJ, Ellingsen KE, McArdle BH. 2006. Multivariate dispersion as a measure of beta diversity. Ecol Lett 9: 683–693. [Google Scholar]
  • Anderson MJ, Crist TO, Chase JM, Vallend M, Inouye BD, Freestone AL, Sanders NJ, Cornell HV, Comita LS, Davies KF, Harrison SP, Kraft NJB, Stegen JC, Swenson NG. 2011. Navigating the multiple meanings of β diversity: a roadmap for the practicing ecologist. Ecol Lett 14: 19–28. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bonecker CC, Costa CL, Velho LFM, Lansac-Tôha FA. 2005. Diversity and abundance of the planktonic rotifers in different environments of the Upper Paraná River floodplain (Paraná State – Mato Grosso do Sul State, Brazil). Hydrobiologia 546: 405–414. [Google Scholar]
  • Bozelli RL, Thomaz SM, Padial AA, Lopes PM, Bini LM. 2015. Floods decrease zooplankton beta diversity and environmental heterogeneity in an Amazonian floodplain system. Hydrobiologia 753: 233–241. [Google Scholar]
  • Brochet AL, Gauthier-Clerc M, Guillemain M, Fritz H, Waterkeyn A, Baltanás Á, Green AJ. 2010. Field evidence of dispersal of branchiopods, ostracods and bryozoans by teal (Anas crecca) in the Camargue (southern France). Hydrobiologia 637: 255–261. [Google Scholar]
  • Campos R, Conceicão EO, Pinto MBO, Bertoncin APS, Higuti J, Martens K. 2017. Evaluation of quantitative sampling methods in pleuston: an example from ostracod communities. Limnologica 63: 36–41. [Google Scholar]
  • Clavero M, García-Berthou E. 2006. Homogenization dynamics and introduction routes of invasive freshwater fish in the Iberian Peninsula. Ecol Appl 16: 2313–2324. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Delorme LD. 1978. Distribution of freshwater ostracodes in Lake Erie. J Great Lakes Res 4: 216–220. [Google Scholar]
  • Gonzalez A. 2009. Metacommunities: spatial community ecology. In: Encyclopedia of Life Sciences (eLS). Chichester: John W. and Sons Ltd, pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • Higuti J, Lansac-Tôha FA, Velho LFM, Martens K. 2009. Biodiversity of non-marine ostracods (Crustacea, Ostracoda) in the alluvial valley of the upper Paraná River, Brazil. Braz J Biol 69: 661–668. [Google Scholar]
  • Higuti J, Declerck SAJ, Lansac-Tôha FA, Velho LFM, Martens K. 2010. Variation in ostracod (Crustacea, Ostracoda) communities in the alluvial valley of the upper Paraná River (Brazil) in relation to substrate. Hydrobiologia 644: 261–278. [Google Scholar]
  • Higuti J, Martens K. 2012a. On a new cypridopsine genus (Crustacea, Ostracoda, Cyprididae) from the Upper Paraná River Floodplain (Brazil). Zootaxa 3391: 22–38. [Google Scholar]
  • Higuti J, Martens K. 2012b. Description of new genus and species of Candonopsini (Crustacea, Ostracoda, Candoninae) from the alluvial valley of the Upper Paraná River (Brazil, South America). Eur J Taxon 33: 1–31. [Google Scholar]
  • Higuti J, Martens K. 2014. Five new species of Candoninae (Crustacea, Ostracoda) from the alluvial valley of the Upper Paraná River (Brazil, South America). Eur J Taxon 106: 1–36. [Google Scholar]
  • Higuti J, Schön I, Audenaert L, Martens K. 2013. On the Strandesia obtusata/elliptica lineage (Ostracoda, Cyprididae) in the alluvial valley of the upper Paraná River (Brazil), with the description of three new species. Crustaceana 86: 182–211. [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Junk WJ, Bayley PB, Sparks RE. 1989. The flood pulse concept in river floodplain systems. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 106: 110–127. [Google Scholar]
  • Jurasinski G, Retzer V, Beierkuhnlein C. 2009. Inventory, differentiation, and proportional diversity: a consistent terminology for quantifying species diversity. Oecologia 159: 15–26. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Legendre P, Bocard D, Peres-Neto PR. 2005. Analyzing beta diversity: partitioning the spatial variation of community composition data. Ecol Monogr 75: 435–450. [Google Scholar]
  • Liberto R, Mesquita-Joanes F, César I. 2012. Dynamics of pleustonic ostracod populations in small ponds on the Island of Martín García (Río de la Plata, Argentina). Hydrobiologia 688: 47–61. [Google Scholar]
  • Lopes OM, Bini LM, Declerck SAJ, Farjalla VF, Vieira LCG, Bonecker CC, Lansac-Tôha FA, Esteves FA, Bozelli RL. 2014. Correlates of zooplankton beta diversity in tropical lake systems. PLOS ONE 9: 1–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Martens K, Behen F. 1994. A checklist of the non-marine ostracods (Crustacea, Ostracoda) from the inland waters of South America and adjacent islands. Trav Sci Mus Nat Hist Nat Luxemb 22: 1–81. [Google Scholar]
  • McCarthy JM, Hein CL, Olden JD, Vander Zanden MJ. 2006. Coupling long-term studies with meta-analysis to investigate impacts of non-native crayfish on zoobenthic communities. Freshw Biol 51: 224–235. [Google Scholar]
  • Melo AS, Schneck F, Hepp LU, Simões NR, Siqueira T, Bini LM. 2011. Focusing on variation: methods and applications of the concept of beta diversity in aquatic ecosystems. Acta Limnol Bras 3: 318–331. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nabout JC, Nogueira IS, Oliveira LG, Morais RR. 2007. Phytoplankton diversity (alpha, beta, and gamma) from the Araguaia River tropical floodplain lakes (central Brazil). Hydrobiologia 557: 455–461. [Google Scholar]
  • Ohtaka A, Narita T, Kamiya T, Katakura H, Araki Y, Im S, Chhay R, Tsukawaki S. 2011. Composition of aquatic invertebrates associated with macrophytes in Lake Tonle Sap, Cambodia. Limnology 12: 137–144. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Oksanen J, Blanchet GF, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR, O'Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Szoecs E, Wagner H. 2016. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.4-0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan. [Google Scholar]
  • Olden JD, Poff NL, Douglas MR, Douglas ME, Faush KD. 2004. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of biotic homogenization. Trends Ecol Evol 19: 18–24. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Poi de Neiff A, Carignan R. 1997. Macroinvertebrates on Eichhornia crassipes roots in two lakes of the Parana River floodplain. Hydrobiologia 345: 185–196. [Google Scholar]
  • Por FD, Rocha EF. 1998. The Pleustal, a third limnic biochore and its neotropical centre. Verh Int Ver Limnol 26: 1876–1881. [Google Scholar]
  • R Core Team. 2012. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, http://www.R-project.org/. [Google Scholar]
  • Rocha CEF, Por FD. 1998. Preliminary comparative data on the fauna of the pleuston in the southern Pantanal, Brazil, with emphasis on the microcrustaceans. Verh Int Ver Limnol 26: 2137–2140. [Google Scholar]
  • Rossetti G, Martens K. 1998. Taxonomic revision of the Recent and Holocene representatives of the Family Darwinulidae (Crustacea, Ostracoda), with a description of three new genera. Bull Inst R Sci Nat Belg Biol 68: 55–110. [Google Scholar]
  • Sampaio EV, López CM. 2000. Zooplankton community composition and some limnological aspects of an oxbow lake of the Paraopeba River, São Francisco River Basin, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Braz Arch Biol Technol 43: 285–293. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Simpson GL. 2016. Permute: functions for generating restricted permutations of data. R Package, version 0.9-0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=permute. [Google Scholar]
  • Souza-Filho EE. 2009. Evaluation of the Upper Paraná River discharge controlled by reservoirs. Braz J Biol 69: 707–719. [Google Scholar]
  • Souza-Filho EE, Stevaux JC. 2004. Geology and geomorphology of the Baía-Curutuba-Ivinhema River Complex. In: Thomaz SM, Agostinho AA, Hahn NS, eds. The Upper Paraná River and its floodplain: physical aspects, ecology and conservation. Leiden: Backhuys Publishers, pp. 1–29. [Google Scholar]
  • Thomaz SM, Pagioro TA, Bini LM, Roberto MC, Rocha RRA. 2004. Limnological characterization of the aquatic environments and the influence of hydrometric levels. In: Thomaz SM, Agostinho AA, Hahn NS, eds. The Upper Paraná River and its floodplain: physical aspects, ecology and conservation. Leiden: Backhuys Publishers, pp. 75–102. [Google Scholar]
  • Thomaz SM, Bini LM, Bozelli RL. 2007. Floods increase similarity among aquatic habitats in river-floodplain systems. Hydrobiologia 579: 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  • Tockner K, Malard F, Ward JV. 2000. An extension of the flood pulse concept. Hydrol Process 14: 2861–2883. [Google Scholar]
  • Vanschoenwinkel B, Gielen S, Seaman M, Brendock L. 2008. Any way the wind blows – frequent wind dispersal drives species sorting in ephemeral aquatic communities. Oikos 117: 125–134. [Google Scholar]
  • Waterkeyn A, Vanschoenwinkel B, Elsen S, Anton-Pardo M, Grillas P, Brendonck L. 2010. Unintentional dispersal of aquatic invertebrates via footwear and motor vehicles in a Mediterranean wetland area. Aquat Conserv 20: 580–587. [Google Scholar]
  • Ward JV, Tockner K. 2001. Biodiversity: towards a unifying theme for river ecology. Freshw Biol 46: 807–819. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.