Free Access
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 50, Number 2, 2014
Page(s) 143 - 153
Published online 28 March 2014
  • Agostinho A.A., Thomaz S.M. and Gomes L.C., 2005. Conservation of the biodiversity of Brazil's inlands waters. Conserv. Biol., 19, 646–652. [Google Scholar]
  • Alho C.J.R., 2011. Biodiversity of the Pantanal: its magnitude, human occupation, environmental threats and challenges for conservation. Braz. J. Biol., 71, 229–232. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Campbell J.M., Clark, W.J. and Kosinski, R., 1982. A technique for examination microspatial distribution of Cladocera associated with shallow water macrophytes. Hydrobiologia, 97, 225–232. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cardoso M.S., Henriques S.S., Gaspar C., Crespo L.C., Carvalho R., Schimdt J.B., Sousa P. and Szus T., 2009. Species richness and composition assessment of spiders in a Mediterranean scrubland. J. Insect Conserv., 13, 45–55. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Caterino M.S., 2007. Species and complementarity of beetle faunas in a mediterranean-type biodiversity hotspot. Biodivers. Conserv., 16, 3993–4007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Colwell R.K., 2009. EstimateS: Statistical Estimation of Species Richness and Shared Species from Samples. Version 8.2 User's Guide and application published at: [Google Scholar]
  • Colwell R.K. and Coddington, J.A., 1994. Estimate terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 345, 101–118. [Google Scholar]
  • Cruz I.C.S., Kikuchi R.K.P. and Leão Z.M.A.N., 2008. Use of the video transect method for characterizing the Itacolomis reefs, eastern Brazil. Braz. J. Oceanogr., 56, 271–280. [Google Scholar]
  • Elmoor-Loureiro L.M.A., 1997. Manual de identificação de cladóceros límnicos do Brasil, Universa, Brasília, 156 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Elmoor-Loureiro L.M.A., 2007. Phytophilous cladocerans (Crustacea, Anomopoda and Ctenopoda) from Paranã River valley, Goiás, Brazil. Zoologia, 24, 344–352. [Google Scholar]
  • Ferreira H.L.M., Souza M.B.G. and Lopez C.M., 2008. Evaluation of sampling methods for periphytic fauna in macrophytes at the Espinhaço mountain range biosphere reserve, Minas Gerais State, Brazil. Acta Sci. Biol. Sci., 30, 253–259. [Google Scholar]
  • Forró L., Korovichinsky N.M., Kotov A.A. and Petrusek A., 2008. Global diversity of cladocerans (Cladocera; Crustacea) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia, 595, 177–184. [Google Scholar]
  • Glowacki L., 2011. Accuracy of species richness estimator applied to fish in small and large temperate low land rivers. Biodivers. Conserv., 20, 1365–1384. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gonzáles-Oreja J.A., Garbisu C., Mendarte S., Ibarra A. and Albizu I., 2010. Assessing the performance of non-parametric estimators of species in meadows. Biodivers. Conserv., 19, 1417–1436. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gotelli N.J. and Colwell, R.K., 2001. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measuring and comparison of species richness. Ecol. Lett., 4, 379–391. [Google Scholar]
  • Gotelli N.J. and Colwell R.K., 2010. Estimating species richness. In: Magurran A.E. and McGill B.J. (eds.), Biological Diversity: Frontiers in Measurement and Assessment, Oxford, UK, 39–54. [Google Scholar]
  • Hammer Ø., Harper D.A.T. and Ryan P.D., 2001. Past: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol. Electron., 4, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  • Hansen J.P., Wikstrom S.A., Axemar H. and Kautsky L., 2011. Distribution differences and active habitat choices of invertebrates between macrophytes of different morphological complexity. Aquat. Ecol., 45, 11–22. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Heck K.L.J., van Belle G. and Simberloff D., 1975. Explicit calculation of the rarefaction diversity measurement and the determination of sufficient sample size. Ecology, 56, 1459–1461. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hollwedel W., Kotov A.A. and Brandorff G.O., 2003. Cladocera (Crustacea: Branchiopoda) from the Pantanal (Brazil). Arthropod. Sel., 12, 67–93. [Google Scholar]
  • Junk W., Cunha C.N., Wantzen K.M., Peterman P., Strussmann C., Marques M.I. and Adis J., 2006. Biodiversity and its conservation in the Pantanal of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Aquat. Sci., 68, 278–309. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kaeser J.M. and Kirkman L.K., 2009. Estimating total plant species richness in depressional wetlands in the long leaf pine ecosystem. Wetlands, 29, 866–874. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Klink C.A. and Machado R.B., 2005. A conservação do Cerrado brasileiro. Megadiversidade, 1, 148–155. [Google Scholar]
  • Kotov A.A. and Štifter P., 2006. Cladocera: Family Ilyocryptidae (Branchiopoda: Cladocera: Anomopoda), Backhuys Publisher/Kenobi Productions, Leiden/Ghent, 172 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Kotov A.A., Garfias-Espejo T. and Elías-Gutiérrez M., 2004. Separation of two Neotropical species: Macrothrix superaculeata (Smirnov, 1982) versus M. elegans Sars, 1901 (Macrothricidae, Anomopoda, Cladocera). Hydrobiologia, 517, 61–88. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kruk C., Rodríguez-Galego L., Meerhoff M., Quintans F., Lacerot G., Mazeo N., Scasso F., Paggi J.C., Peeters E.T.H.M. and Marten S., 2009. Determinants of biodiversity in subtropical shallow lakes (Atlantic coast, Uruguay). Freshw. Biol., 54, 2628–2641. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ledru M.P., 2002. Late quaternary history and evolution of Cerrados as revealed by palynological records. In: Oliveira P.S. and Marquis R.J. (eds.), The Cerrados of Brazil, New York, NY, USA, 33–50. [Google Scholar]
  • Loutte G., Meester L.D. and Declerck, S., 2008. Assembly of zooplankton communities in newly created ponds. Freshw. Biol., 53, 2309–2320. [Google Scholar]
  • Lucena-Moya P. and Duggan I.C., 2011. Macrophyte architecture affects the abundance and diversity of littoral microfauna. Aquat. Ecol., 45, 279–287. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Magurran A.E. and Queiroz H., 2010. Evaluating tropical biodiversity: do we need a more refined approach? Biotropica, 42, 537–539. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Maia-Barbosa P., Peixoto R.S. and Guimarães A.S., 2008. Zooplankton in littoral waters of a tropical lake: a revisited biodiversity. Braz. J. Biol., 68, 1069–1078. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Melo A.S., 2004. A critique of the use of Jackknife and related non-parametric techniques to estimate species richness. Commun. Ecol., 5, 149–157. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Melo A.S. and Froehlich C.G., 2001. Evaluation of methods for estimating macroinvertebrate species richness using individual stones in tropical streams. Freshw. Biol., 46, 711–721. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Merlo M.J., Parietti M. and Etchegoin J.A., 2010. Evaluation of species richness estimators in studies of diversity involving two larval digenean communities parasitizing snail hosts. Parasitol. Res., 107, 1093–1102. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Middleton B., 2002. Succession and herbivory in monsoonal wetlands. Wetl. Ecol. Manage., 6, 189–202. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Moore P.D., 2007. Wetlands, Revised edn.,, Infobase Publishing, USA, 255 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Mormul R.P., Thomaz S.M., Takeda A.M. and Behrend R.D., 2011. Structural complexity and distance from source habitat determine invertebrate abundance and diversity. Biotropica, 43, 738–745. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Muirhead J.R., Ejmont-Karabin J. and MacIsaac H.J., 2006. Quantifying rotifer species richness in temperate lakes. Freshw. Biol., 51, 1696–1709. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Odland A. and del Moral R., 2002. Thirteen years of wetland vegetation succession following a permanent drawdown, Myrkdalen lake, Norway. Plant Ecol., 162, 185–198. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Padial A.A., Thomaz S.M. and Agostinho A.A., 2009. Effects of structural heterogeneity provided by the floating macrophyte Eichhornia azurea on the predation efficiency and habitat use of the small Neotropical fish Moenkhausia sanctaefilomenae. Hydrobiologia, 624, 161–170. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Petersen F.T., Meier R. and Larsen M.N., 2003. Testing richness species estimation methods using museum label data on the Danish Asilidae. Biodivers. Conserv., 12, 687–701. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ramsar information paper no. 1. What are wetlands? Accessed online 26 May 2011, available via DIALOG: [Google Scholar]
  • Reid J.W., 1984. Semiterrestrial meiofauna inhabiting a wet campo in central Brazil, with special reference to the Copepoda (Crustacea). Hydrobiologia, 118, 95–111. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Reid J.W., 1987. The cyclopoid copepods of a wet campo marsh in central Brazil. Hydrobiologia, 153, 121–138. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Reid J.W., 1993. The Harpacticoid and cyclopoid copepod fauna in the cerrado region of central Brazil. 1. Species composition, habitats, and zoogeography. Acta Limnol. Bras., 6, 56–68. [Google Scholar]
  • Reid J.W., 1994. Murunducaris juneae, new genus, new species (Copepoda: Harpacticoida: Parastenocarididae) from a wet campo in central Brazil. J. Crustacean Biol., 14, 771–781. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Roberto M.C., Santana F.C. and Thomaz S.M., 2009. Limnology in the Upper Paraná River floodplain: large-scale spatial and temporal patterns, and the influence of reservoirs. Braz. J. Biol., 69, 717–725. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sakuma M., Hanazato T., Nakazato R. and Haga H., 2002. Method for quantitative sampling of epiphytic microinvertebrates in lake vegetation. Lymnology, 13, 115–119. [Google Scholar]
  • Serafim-Júnior M., Lansac-Tôah F.A., Paggi J.C., Velho L.F.M. and Robertson B., 2003. Cladocera fauna composition in a river-lagoon system of the Upper Paraná River floodplain, with a new record for Brazil. Braz. J. Biol., 63, 349–356. [Google Scholar]
  • Sinev A.Y. and Elmoor-Loureiro L.M.A., 2010. Three new species of chydorid cladocerans of subfamily Aloninae (Branchipoda: Anomopoda: Chydoridae) from Brazil. Zootaxa, 2390, 1–25. [Google Scholar]
  • Smirnov N.N., 1992. The Macrothricidae of the World, SPB Academic Publishing, Amsterdam, 143 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Smirnov N.N., 1996. Cladocera: The Chydorinae and Sayciinae (Chydoridae) of the World, SPB Academic Publishing, Amsterdam, 197 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Sousa F.D.R., 2012. Diversidade da fauna de Cladocera (Crustacea, Branchiopoda) associada à macrófitas em áreas úmidas naturais do Cerrado do Brasil Central. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Brasília. [Google Scholar]
  • Sousa F.D.R. and Elmoor-Loureiro L.M.A., 2008. Phytopilous cladocerans (Crustacea, Branchiopoda) of the Parque Nacional das Emas, State of Goiás. Biota Neotrop., 8, 159–166. [Google Scholar]
  • Thomaz S.M. and Cunha E.R., 2010. The role of macrophytes in habitat structuring in aquatic ecosystems: methods of measurement, causes and consequences on animal assemblages’ composition and biodiversity. Acta Limnol. Bras., 22, 218–236. [Google Scholar]
  • Thomaz S.M., Dibble E.D., Evangelista L.R., Higuti J. and Bini L.M., 2008. Influence of aquatic macrophyte habitat complexity on invertebrate abundance and richness in tropical lagoons. Freshw. Biol., 53, 358–367. [Google Scholar]
  • Turki S. and Turki B., 2010. Copepoda and Branchiopoda from Tunisian temporary waters. Int. J. Biodivers. Conserv., 2, 86–97. [Google Scholar]
  • Van Damme K., Kotov A.A. and Dumont H.J., 2010. A checklist of names in Alona Baird 1843 (Crustacea: Cladocera: Chydoridae) and their current status: an analysis of the taxonomy of a lump genus. Zootaxa, 2330, 1–63. [Google Scholar]
  • Van Damme K., Sinev A.Y. and Dumont H.J., 2011. Separation of Anthalona gen.n. from Alona Baird, 1843 (Branchiopoda: Cladocera: Anomopoda): morphology and evolution of scraping stenothermic alonines. Zootaxa, 2875, 1–64. [Google Scholar]
  • van der Valk A.G., 2006. The Biology of Freshwater Wetlands, Oxford University Press, New York, 173 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Vieira L.C.G., Bini L.M., Velho L.F.M. and Mazão G.R., 2007. Influence of spatial complexity on the density and diversity of periphytic rotifers, microcrustaceans and testate amoebae. Fund. Appl. Limnol., 170/1, 77–85. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Williams V.L., Witkowski E.T.F. and Balkwill K., 2007. The use of incidence-based species richness estimators, species accumulation curves and similarity measures to appraise ethnobotanical inventories from South Africa. Biodivers. Conserv., 16, 2495–2513. [Google Scholar]
  • Zagmajster M., Culver D.C., Cristiman M.C. and Sket B., 2010. Evaluating the sampling bias in pattern of subterranean species richness: combining approaches. Biodivers. Conserv., 19, 3035–3048. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.