Free Access
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 48, Number 4, 2012
Page(s) 363 - 370
Published online 29 October 2012
  • Antoine S.E. and Benson-Evans K., 1983a. The effect of light intensity and quality on the growth of benthic algae. I. Phytopigment variations. Arch. Hydrobiol., 98, 299–306. [Google Scholar]
  • Antoine S.E. and Benson-Evans K., 1983b. The effect of light intensity and quality on the growth of benthic algae. II. Population dynamics. Arch. Hydrobiol., 99, 118–128. [Google Scholar]
  • Bechara J.A., Planas D. and Paquet S., 2007. Indirect effects of brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) on the structure of epilithic algal communities in an oligotrophic boreal forest stream. Fundam. Appl. Limnol., 169, 89–99. [Google Scholar]
  • Branco C.C.Z. and Necchi O. Jr, 1996. Survey of stream macroalgae of eastern Atlantic Rainforest of São Paulo State, southeastern Brazil. Arch. Hydrobiol., 80, 35–57. [Google Scholar]
  • Branco C.C.Z., Krupek R.A. and Peres C.K., 2009. Distribution of stream macroalgal communities from the mid-western region of Paraná State: importance of local scale variation. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol., 52, 379–386. [Google Scholar]
  • Branco C.C.Z., Necchi O. Jr and Peres K.P., 2010. Effects of artificial substratum types and exposure time on macroalgal colonization in a tropical stream. Fundam. Appl. Limnol., 178, 17–27. [Google Scholar]
  • Cole K.M. and Sheath R.G., 1990. Biology of the Red Algae, Cambridge University Press, New York, 517 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Demming-Adams B. and Adams W.W. III, 1992. Photoprotection and other responses of plants to high light stress. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol., 43, 599–626. [Google Scholar]
  • DeNicola D.M. and Hoagland K.D., 1992. Influences of canopy cover on spectral irradiance and periphyton assemblages in a prairie stream. J. North. Am. Benthol. Soc., 11, 391–404. [Google Scholar]
  • DeNicola D.M. and Hoagland K.D., 1996. Effects of solar spectral irradiance (Visible to UV) on a Prairie stream epilithic community. J. North. Am. Benthol. Soc., 15, 155–169. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Englund S.R., O'Brien J.J. and Clark D.B., 2000. Evaluation of digital and film hemispherical photography and spherical densiometry for measuring forest light environments. Can. J. Forest Res., 30, 1999–2005. [Google Scholar]
  • Falkowski P.G. and LaRoche J., 1991. Acclimation to spectral irradiance in algae. J. Phycol., 27, 8–14. [Google Scholar]
  • Flecker A.S. and Townsend C.R., 1994. Community-wide consequences of trout introduction in New Zealand streams. Ecol. Appl., 4, 798–807. [Google Scholar]
  • Flecker A.S., Taylor B.W., Bernhardt E.S., Hood J.M., Cornwell W.K., Cassatt S.R., Vanni M.J. and Altman N.S., 2002. Interactions between herbivorous fishes and limiting nutrients in a tropical stream ecosystem. Ecology, 83, 1831–1844. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Goteli N.J. and Ellison A.M., 2004. A primer of Ecological Statistics, Sinauer Associates Publishers, Massachusetts, 510 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Haury J.F. and Bogorad L., 1977. Action spectra for phycobiliprotein synthesis in a chromatically adapting cyanophyte. Plant Physiol., 60, 835–839. [Google Scholar]
  • Hill W.R., 1996. Effects of light. In: Stevenson R.J., Bothwell M.L. and Lowe R.L. (eds.), Algal Ecology: Freshwater Benthic Ecosystems, Academic Press, San Diego, 121–148. [Google Scholar]
  • Hill W.R., Mulholland P.J. and Marzolf E.R., 2001. Stream ecosystem responses to forest leaf emergence in spring. Ecology, 82, 2306–2319. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hill W.R., Ryon M.G. and Schilling E.M., 1995. Light limitation in a stream ecosystem: responses by primary producers and consumers. Ecology, 76, 1297–1309. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hynes H.B.N., 1970. The Ecology of Running Waters, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 555 p. [Google Scholar]
  • King D.K. and Cummins K.W., 1989. Autotrophic-heterotrophic community metabolism relationship of the woodland stream. J. Freshwater Ecol., 5, 205–218. [Google Scholar]
  • Kirk J.T.O. 1983. Light and Photosynthesis in Aquatic Environments, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. [Google Scholar]
  • Landeiro V.L., Hamada N. and Melo A.D., 2008. Responses of aquatic invertebrate assemblages and leaf breakdown to macroconsumer exclusion in Amazonian “terra firme” streams. Fundam. Appl. Limnol., 172, 49–58. [Google Scholar]
  • Lee R.E., 2008. Phycology (4th edn,), Cambridge University Press, New York, 547 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Lowe, R.L. and Laliberte G.D., 2006. Benthic stream algae: distribution and structure. In: Hauer F.R. and Lamberti G.A. (eds.), Methods in Stream Ecology (2nd edn,), Academic Press, San Diego, California, 327–356. [Google Scholar]
  • Marsac N.T., 1977. Ocurrence and nature of chromatic adaptation in Cyanobacteria. J. Bacteriol., 130, 82–91. [Google Scholar]
  • Mosisch T.D., Bunn S.E. and Davies P.M. 2001. The relative importance of shading and nutrients on algal production in subtropical streams. Freshwater Biol., 46, 1269–1278. [Google Scholar]
  • Necchi O. Jr, 2004. Light-related photosynthetic characteristics of lotic macroalgae. Hydrobiologia, 525, 139–155. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Necchi O. Jr, Branco C.C.Z. and Branco L.H.Z., 2000. Distribution of stream macroalgae in São Paulo state, Southeastern Brazil. Algol. Stud., 97, 43–57. [Google Scholar]
  • Necchi O. Jr, Branco L.H.Z. and Spezamiglio D.N., 2008. Distribuição ecológica das comunidades de macroalgas de ambientes lóticos do Parque Nacional de Itatiaia (RJ, MG), Brasil. Rev. Bras. Bot., 31, 135–145. [Google Scholar]
  • Necchi O. Jr and Zucchi M.R., 2001. Photosynthetic performance of freshwater Rhodophyta in response to temperature, irradiance, pH and diurnal rhythm. Phycol. Res., 49, 305–318. [Google Scholar]
  • Richardson K., Beardall J. and Raven J.A., 1983. Adaptation of unicellular algae to irradiance: an analysis of strategies. New Phytol., 93, 157–191. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rico-Garcia E., Hernández-Hernández F., Soto-Zarazúa G.M. and Herrera-Ruiz G., 2009. Two new Methods for the Estimation of Leaf Area using Digital Photography. Int. J. Agric. Biol., 11, 397–400. [Google Scholar]
  • Rier S.T., Stevenson J. and Laliberte G.D., 2006. Photo-acclimation response of benthic stream algae across experimentally manipulated light gradients: a comparison of growth rates and net primary productivity. J. Phycol., 42, 560–567. [Google Scholar]
  • Roberts S., Sabater S. and Beardall J., 2004. Benthic microalgal colonization in stream of differing riparian cover and light availability. J. Phycol., 40, 1004–1021. [Google Scholar]
  • Saffo M.B. 1987. New light on seaweeds. BioScience, 37, 654–664. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sheath R.G. and Burkholder J.M., 1985. Characteristics of softwater streams in Rhode Island II. Composition and seasonal dynamics of macroalgal communities. Hidrobiologia, 28, 109–118. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sheath R.G. and Cole K.M., 1992. Biogography of stream magroalgal in North America. J. Phycol., 28, 448–460. [Google Scholar]
  • Shortreed K.S. and Stockner J.G., 1983. Periphyton biomass and species composition in a coastal rainforest stream in British Columbia: effects of environmental changes caused by logging. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 40, 1887–1895. [Google Scholar]
  • Simão E., Nakamura A.T. and Takaki M., 2008. Use of Insulfim® like plastic filter to simulate canopy filtered light for germination tests. Naturalia, 31, 28–33. [Google Scholar]
  • Sokal R.R. and Rohlf F.J., 2000. Biometry, W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, 887 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Stevenson R.J., Bothwell M.L. and Lowe R.L., 1996. Algal ecology – Freshwater Benthic Ecosystems, Academic Press, San Diego, 753 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Usio N. and Townsend C., 2004. Roles of crayfish: consequences of predation and bioturbation for stream invertebrates. Ecology, 85, 807–822. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vogelman T.C. and Scheibe J., 1978. Action spectrum for chromatic adaptation in the blue-green alga Fremyella diplosiphon. Planta, 143, 233–239. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.