Free Access
Issue
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 48, Number 4, 2012
Page(s) 371 - 381
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/2012025
Published online 30 October 2012
  • Allan J.D., 1997. Stream Ecology. Structure and Function of Running Waters, Chapman and Hall, London, 388 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Anderson M.J., 2001. A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Aust. Ecol., 26, 32–46. [Google Scholar]
  • Anderson M.J., Gorley R.N. and Clarke K.R., 2008. PERMANOVA+ for PRIMER: Guide to Software and Statistical Methods, Primer-E, Plymouth, 214 p. [Google Scholar]
  • APAT, 2007. IFF 2007 – Indice di Funzionalità Fluviale. Nuova versione del metodo revisionata e aggiornata, Manuale APAT, Trento, 325 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Bergey E.A. and Ward J.V., 1989. Upstream-downstream movements of aquatic invertebrates in a Rocky mountain stream. Hydrobiologia, 185, 71–82. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bilton D.T., Freeland J.R. and Okamura B., 2001. Dispersal in freshwater invertebrates. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 32, 159–181. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bird G.A. and Hynes H.B.N., 1981. Movement of immature aquatic insects in a lotic habitat. Hydrobiologia, 77, 103–112. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bo T., Cucco M., Fenoglio S. and Malacarne G., 2006. Colonisation patterns and vertical movements of stream invertebrates in the interstitial zone: a case study in the Apennines, NW Italy. Hydrobiologia, 568, 67–78. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Boulton A.J., 1989. Over-summering refuges of aquatic macroinvertebrates in two intermittent streams in central Victoria. Trans. R. Soc. South Aust., 113, 23–34. [Google Scholar]
  • Boulton A.J., 2000. The subsurface macrofauna. In: Jones J.B. and Mulholland P.J. (eds), Streams and Ground Waters, Academic Press, San Diego, 337–361. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Boulton A.J., 2007. Hyporheic rehabilitation in rivers: restoring vertical connectivity. Freshwater Biol., 52, 632–650. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Boulton A.J., Findlay S., Marmonier P., Stanley E.H. and Vallet H.M., 1998. The functional significance of the hyporheic zone in streams and rivers. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 29, 59–81. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Boulton A.J., Valett H.M. and Fisher S.G., 1992. Spatial distribution and taxonomic composition of the hyporheos of several Sonoran Desert streams. Arch. Hydrobiol., 125, 37–61. [Google Scholar]
  • Bretschko G., 1992. Differentiation between epigeic and hypogeic fauna in gravel streams. Regul. River, 7, 17–22. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brittain J.E. and Eikeland T.J., 1988. Invertebrate drift – a review. Hydrobiologia, 166, 77–93. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brunke M. and Gonser T., 1997. The ecological significance of exchange processes between rivers and groundwater. Freshwater Biol., 37, 1–33. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bruno M.C., Maiolini B., Carolli M. and Silveri L., 2009. Impact of hydropeaking on hyporheic invertebrates in an Alpine stream (Trentino, Italy). Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim., 45, 157–170. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Campaioli S., Ghetti P.F., Minelli A. and Ruffo S., 1994. Manuale per il riconoscimento dei macroinvertebrati delle acque dolci italiane, Vol. I. Provincia Autonoma di Trento, Trento, 357 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Campaioli S., Ghetti P.F., Minelli A. and Ruffo S., 1999. Manuale per il riconoscimento dei macroinvertebrati delle acque dolci italiane, Vol. II. Provincia Autonoma di Trento, Trento, 484 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Claret C., Marmonier P., Dole-Olivier M.-J., Creuzé des Châtelliers M., Boulton A.J. and Castella E., 1999. A functional classification of interstitial invertebrates: supplementing measures of biodiversity using species traits and habitat affinities. Arch. Hydrobiol., 145, 385–403. [Google Scholar]
  • Clarke K.R. and Gorley R.N., 2006. PRIMER-E® (v6). User Manual/Tutorial, PRIMER-E Ltd, Plymouth, 190 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Collier K.J. and Scarsbrook M.R., 2000. Use of riparian and hyporheic habitats. In: Collier K.J. and Winterbourn M.J. (eds.), New Zealand Stream Invertebrates: Ecology and Implications for Management, New Zealand Limnological Society, Christchurch, 179–206. [Google Scholar]
  • Del Rosario R.B. and Resh V.H., 2000. Invertebrates in intermittent and perennial streams: is the hyporheic zone a refuge from drying? J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 19, 680–696. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dole-Olivier M.-J. and Marmonier P., 1992. Patch distribution of interstitial communities: prevailing factors. Freshwater Biol., 27, 177–191. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dole-Olivier M.-J., Marmonier P. and Beffy J.L., 1997. Response of invertebrates to lotic disturbance: is the hyporheic zone a patchy refugium? Freshwater Biol., 37, 257–276. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Downes B.J. and Keough M.J., 1998. Scaling of colonization processes in streams: parallels and lessons from marine hard substrata. Aust. J. Ecol., 23, 8–26. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dussart B.H., 1967. Les Copépodes des eaux continentales d'Europe occidentale. Tome I: Calanoïdes et Harpacticoïdes, N. Boubée et Cie, Paris, 500 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Dussart B.H. 1969. Les Copépodes des Eaux Continentales d'Europe Occidentale. Tome II: Cyclopoïdes et Biologie, N. Boubée et Cie, Paris, 292 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Elliott J.M., 2003. A comparative study of the dispersal of 10 species of stream invertebrates. Freshwater Biol., 48, 1652–1668. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Elser P., 2001. Assessing small-scale directional movements of benthic invertebrates in streams by using a multidirectional cage trap. Limnologica, 31, 119–128. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fenoglio S., Agosta P., Bo T. and Cucco M., 2002. Field experiments on colonization and movements of stream invertebrates in an Apennine river (Visone, NW Italy). Hydrobiologia, 474, 125–130. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fenoglio S., Bo T., Gallina G. and Cucco M., 2004. Vertical distribution in the water column of drifting stream macroinvertebrates. J. Freshwater Ecol., 19, 485–492. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fenoglio S., Bo T. and Bosi G., 2006. Deep interstitial habitat as refuge for Agabus paludosus (Fabricius, 1801) (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) during summer droughts. Coleopts Bull., 60, 37–41. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fiers F. and Ghenne V., 2000. Cryptozoic copepods from Belgium: diversity and biogeographic implications. Belg. J. Zool., 130, 11–19. [Google Scholar]
  • Fochetti R. and Tierno De Figueroa J.M., 2009. Plecoptera, Vol. 43, Fauna d'Italia, Calderini, Bologna, 339 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Fowler R.T., 2002. Relative importance of surface and subsurface movement on benthic community recovery in the Makaretu River, North Island, New Zealand. N. Z. J. Mar. Fresh., 36, 459–469. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Franken R.J.M., Storey R.G. and Williams D.D., 2001. Biological, chemical and physical characteristics of downwelling and upwelling zones in the hyporheic zone of a north-temperate stream. Hydrobiologia, 444, 183–195. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gibert J., Stanford J., Dole-Olivier M.-J. and Ward J.V., 1994. Basic attributes of ground water ecosystems and prospects for research. In: Gibert J., Danielopol D.L. and Stanford J. (eds), Ground Water Ecology, Academic Press, San Diego, 7–40. [Google Scholar]
  • Giller P.S. and Malmqvist B., 1998. The Biology of Streams and Rivers, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 296 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Golladay S.W. and Hax C.L., 1995. Effects of an engineered flow disturbance on meiofauna in a northTexas prairie stream. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 14, 404–413. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hakenkamp C.C. and Morin A., 2000. The importance of meiofauna to lotic ecosystem functionality. Freshwater Biol., 44, 165–175. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hakenkamp C.C. and Palmer M.A., 2000. The ecology of hyporheic meiofauna. In: Jones J.B. and Mulholland P.J. (eds.), Streams and Ground Waters, Academic Press, San Diego, 307–336. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hancock P.J., Boulton A.J. and Humphreys W.F., 2005. Aquifers and hyporheic zones: towards an ecological understanding of groundwater. Hydrogeol. J., 13, 98–111. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hildrew A.G., 1992. Food web and species interactions. In: Calow P. and Petts G.E. (eds.), The Rivers Handbook, Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, 309–330. [Google Scholar]
  • Hildrew A.G. and Giller P.S., 1994. Patchiness, species interactions and disturbance in the stream benthos. In: Giller P.S., Hildrew A.G. and Rafaelli D.G. (eds.), Aquatic Ecology: Scale, Pattern and Process, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 21–62. [Google Scholar]
  • Jacobi G.Z. and Cary S.J., 1996. Winter stoneflies (Plecoptera) in seasonal habitats in New Mexico, USA. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 15, 690–699. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Karaytug S., 1999. Copepoda: Cyclopoida. Genera Paracyclops, Ochridacyclops and key to the Eucyclopinae. Guides to the Identification of the Microinvertebrates of the Continental Waters of the World No. 14, Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, 224 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Lancaster J. and Belyea L.R., 1997. Nested hierarchies and scale-dependence of flow refugium use. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 16, 221–238. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lancaster J. and Hildrew A.G., 1993. Flow refugia and microdistribution of lotic macroinvertebrates. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 12, 385–393. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lancaster J., Hildrew A.G. and Gjerlov C., 1996. Invertebrate drift and the longitudinal transport processes in streams. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 53, 572–582. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lechthaler W. and Stockinger W., 2005. Trichoptera – Key to Larvae from Central Europe, CD-Rom-Edition, Vienna. [Google Scholar]
  • Lencioni V., Maiolini B. and Oss M., 2007. Continuità verticale e biodiversità dello zoobenthos in torrenti alpini. St. Trent. Sci. Nat., Acta Biol., 83, 15–20. [Google Scholar]
  • Lencioni V., Maiolini B., Fochetti R., Grasso M., Boscaini A. and Dumnicka E., 2006. Artificial substrate colonization by invertebrates in two high altitude alpine streams. Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol., 29, 1866–1870. [Google Scholar]
  • Mackay R.J., 1992. Colonization by lotic macroinvertebrates: a review of processes and patterns. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 49, 617–628. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Marmonier P., Vervier P., Gibert J. and Dole-Olivier M.-J., 1993. Biodiversity in ground waters. TREE, 8, 392–395. [Google Scholar]
  • Marmonier P., Archambaud G., Belaidi N., Bougon N., Breil P., Chauvet E., Claret C., Cornut J., Datry T., Dole-Olivier M.-J., Dumont B., Flipo N., Foulquier A., Gérino M., Guilpart A., Julien F., Maazouzi C., Martin D., Mermillod-Blondin F., Montuelle B., Namour P., Navel S., Ombredane D., Pelte T., Piscart C., Pusch M., Stroffek S., Robertson A., Sanchez-Pérez J.-M., Sauvage S., Taleb A., Wantzen M. and Vervier P., 2012. The role of organisms in hyporheic processes: gaps in current knowledge, needs for future research and applications. Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim., 48, 253–266. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • McIntyre A.D., 1969. Ecology of marine meiobenthos. Biol. Rev. Biol. P. Camb., 44, 245–290. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Meisch C., 2000. Freshwater Ostracoda of Western and Central Europe. Spektrum Academischer Verlag GmbH, Heidelberg, Berlin, 522 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Packman A.I. and Bencala K.E., 2000. Modeling methods in the study of surface-subsurface hydrologic interactions. In: Jones J.B. and Mulholland P.J. (eds.), Streams and Ground Waters, Academic Press, San Diego, California, 45–80. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Palmer M.A. and Strayer D.L., 1996. Meiofauna. In: Houer F.R. and Lamberti G.A. (eds.), Methods in Stream Ecology, Academic Press, New York, 315–337. [Google Scholar]
  • Palmer M.A., Arensburger P., Silver Botts P., Hakenkamp C. and Reid J.W., 1995. Disturbance and the community structure of stream invertebrates: patch-specific effects and the role of refugia. Freshwater Biol., 34, 343–356. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Palmer M.A., Bely A.E. and Berg K.E., 1992. Response of invertebrates to lotic disturbance: a test of the hyporheic refuge hypothesis. Oecologia, 89, 182–194. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Panek K.L.J., 1991. Migrations of the macrozoobenthos within the bed sediments of a gravel stream (Ritrodat-Lunz study area, Austria). Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol., 24, 1944–1947. [Google Scholar]
  • Pennak R.W., 1988. Ecology of freshwater meiofauna. In: Higgins R.P. and Thiel H. (eds.), Introduction to the Study of Meiofauna, Smithonian Institution Press, Washington, 39–60. [Google Scholar]
  • Piscart C., Moreteau J.-C. and Beisel J.-N., 2006. Monitoring changes in freshwater macroinvertebrate communities along a salinity gradient using artificial substrates. Environ. Monit. Assess., 116, 529–542. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Radwell A.J. and Brown A.V., 2008. Benthic meiofauna assemblage structure of headwater streams: density and distribution of taxa relative to substrate size. Aquat. Ecol., 42, 405–414. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Richards C. and Minshall G.W., 1988. The influence of periphyton abundance on Baetis bicaudatus distribution and colonization in a small stream. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 7, 77–86. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Robertson A.L., 2000. Lotic meiofaunal community dynamics: colonisation, resilience and persistence in a spatially and temporally heterogeneous environment. Freshwater Biol., 44, 135–147. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Robertson A.L., Lancaster J. and Hildrew A.G., 1995. Stream hydraulics and the distribution of microcrustacea – a role for refugia. Freshwater Biol., 33, 469–484. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Robertson A.L., Rundle S.D. and Schmid-Araya J.M., 2000. Putting the meio- into stream ecology: current findings and future directions for lotic meiofaunal research. Freshwater Biol., 44, 177–183. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rosenberg D.M. and Resh V.H., 1982. The use of artificial substrates in the study of freshwater benthic macroinvertebrates. In: Resh V.H. and Rosenberg D.M. (eds.), The Ecology of Aquatic Insects, Praeger, New York, 175–235. [Google Scholar]
  • Rouch R., 1991. Harpacticoid assemblages from a Pyrenean creek hyporheos. Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim., 27, 227–241. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Schmid P.E., Tokeshi M., and Schmid-Araya J.M., 2000. Relation between population density and body size in stream communities. Science, 289, 1557–1560. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Schmid-Araya J.M., 2000. Invertebrate recolonization patterns in the hyporheic zone of a gravel stream. Limnol. Oceanogr., 45, 1000–1005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Schmid-Araya J.M. and Schmid P.E., 1995. The invertebrate species of a gravel stream. Jber. Biol. Stn. Lunz, 15, 11–21. [Google Scholar]
  • Sharpe A.K. and Downes B.J., 2006. The effects of potential larval supply, settlement and post-settlement processes on the distribution of two species of filter-feeding caddisflies. Freshwater Biol., 51, 717–729. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Shaw D.W. and Minshall G.W., 1980. Colonization of an introduced substrate by stream invertebrates. Oikos, 34, 259–271. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Silver P., Palmer M.A., Swan C.M. and Wooster D., 2002. The small scale ecology of freshwater meiofauna. In: Rundle S.D., Robertson A.L. and Schmid-Araya J.M. (eds.), Freshwater Meiofauna: Biology and Ecology, Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, 217–239. [Google Scholar]
  • Sliva L. and Williams D.D., 2005. Responses of hyporheic meiofauna to habitat manipulation. Hydrobiologia, 548, 217–232. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Smock L.A., 1994. Movements of invertebrates between stream channels and forested floodplains. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 13, 524–531. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Söderström O., 1987. Upstream movements of invertebrates in running water – a review. Arch. Hydrobiol., 111, 197–208. [Google Scholar]
  • StatSoft Inc., 2008. STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 8.1. www.stasoft.com. [Google Scholar]
  • Stead T.K., Schmid-Araya J.M. and Hildrew A.G., 2003. All creatures great and small: patterns in the stream benthos across a wide range of metazoan body size. Freshwater Biol., 48, 532–547. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Stead T.K., Schmid-Araya J.M. and Hildrew A.G., 2005. Secondary production of a stream metazoan community: does the meiofauna make a difference? Limnol. Oceanogr., 50, 398–403. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Stoch F., 1998. Moraria alpina n. sp. and redescription of Moraria radovnae Brancelj 1988, new rank, from Italian and Slovenian Alps (Crustacea, Copepoda, Harpacticoida). St. Trent. Sci. Nat., Acta Biol., 73, 135–145. [Google Scholar]
  • Stoch F., 2000–2006. CKmap for Windows. Version 5.3. Ministry for Environment, Territory and Sea, Nature Protection Directorate. Available online at: http://ckmap. faunaitalia.it [Google Scholar]
  • Stoch F. and Bruno M.C., 2011. Acanthocyclops magistridussarti sp. nov. from ground waters of peninsular Italy, with comments on the intraspecific variability of the antennary basis ornamentation (Copepoda, Cyclopoida, Cyclopidae). In: Defaye D., Suarez Morales E. and von Vaupel Klein J.C. (eds), Studies on Freshwater Copepoda, Brill, Leiden, 489–506. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Swan C.M. and Palmer M.A., 2000. What drives small scale spatial patterns in lotic meiofauna communities. Freshwater Biol., 44, 109–121. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Townsend C.R., 1989. The patch dynamics concept of stream community ecology. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 8, 36–50. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Townsend C.R. and Hildrew A.G., 1976. Field experiments on the drifting, colonization and continuous redistribution of stream benthos. J. Anim. Ecol., 45, 759–772. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ward J.V., Bretschko G., Brunke M., Danielopol D., Gibert J., Gonser T. and Hildrew A.J., 1998. The boundaries of river systems: the metazoan perspective. Freshwater Biol., 40, 531–569. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ward J.V., Malard F., Stanford J.S. and Gonser T., 2000. Interstitial aquatic fauna of shallow unconsolidated sediments, particularly hyporheic biotopes. In: Wilkens H., Culver D.C. and Humphreys W.F. (eds.), Subterranean Ecosystems, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 41–58. [Google Scholar]
  • Ward J.V. and Palmer M.A., 1994. Distribution patterns of interstitial freshwater meiofauna over a range of spatial scales, with emphasis on alluvial river-aquifer systems. Hydrobiologia, 287, 147–156. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Williams D.D., 1984. The hyporheic zone as a habitat for aquatic insects and associated arthropods. In: Resh V.H. and Rosenberg D.M. (eds.), The Ecology of Aquatic Insects, Praeger, New York, 430–455. [Google Scholar]
  • Williams D.D. and Hynes H.B.N., 1974. The occurrence of benthos deep in the substratum of a stream. Freshwater Biol., 4, 233–256. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Williams D.D. and Hynes H.B.N., 1976. The recolonisation mechanisms of the stream benthos. Oikos, 27, 265–272. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Williams D.D. and Williams N.E., 1993. The upstream/downstream movement paradox of lotic invertebrates: quantitative evidence from a Welsh mountain stream. Freshwater Biol., 30, 199–218. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Winterbottom J.H., Orton S.E. and Hildrew A.G., 1997. Field experiments on the mobility of benthic invertebrates in a southern English stream. Freshwater Biol., 38, 37–47. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.