EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 58 (2022) Int. J. Lim., 58 (2022) 12 References
Free Access
Issue
Int. J. Lim.
Volume 58, 2022
Article Number 12
Number of page(s) 8
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/2022012
Published online 06 October 2022
  • Ågren GI, Fagerström T. 1984. Limiting dissimilarity in plants: Randomness prevents exclusion of species with similar competitive abilities. Oikos 43: 369–375. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Alanärä A, Burns MD, Metcalfe NB. 2001. Intraspecific resource partitioning in brown trout: The temporal distribution of foraging is determined by social rank. J Animal Ecol 70: 980–986. [Google Scholar]
  • Albaret JJ, Simier M, Darboe FS, Ecoutin JM, Raffray J, de Morais LT. 2004. Fish diversity and distribution in the Gambia Estuary, West Africa, in relation to environmental variables. Aquat Liv Resour 17: 35–46. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Amarasekare P. 2003. Competitive coexistence in spatially structured environments: a synthesis. Ecol Lett 6: 1109–1122. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Amundsen PA. 1995. Feeding strategy of Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus): general opportunist, but individual specialist. Nordic J Freshw Res 71: 150–156. [Google Scholar]
  • Amundsen PA, Gabler HM, Staldvik FJ. 1996. A new approach to graphical analysis of feeding strategy from stomach contents data— modification of the Costello (1990) method. J Fish Biol 48: 607–614. [Google Scholar]
  • Asha CV, Retina CI, Suson PS, Bijoy Nandan S. 2016. Ecosystem analysis of the degrading Vembanad wetland ecosystem, the largest Ramsar site on the South West Coast of India – measures for its sustainable management. Regl Stud Mar Sci 8: 408–421. [Google Scholar]
  • Bachok Z, Mansor MI, Noordin RM. 2004. Diet composition and food habits of demersal and macrobenthos in relation to some physical and pelagic marine fishes from Terengganu waters, east coast of Peninsular, Malaysia. Naga 27: 41–47. [Google Scholar]
  • Bekova R, Raikova-Petrova G, Gerdzhikov D, Petrova E, Vachkova V. 2013. Food spectrum of grey mullet (L) along the Bulgarian Black Sea coast. Agric Sci Technol 2: 173–178. [Google Scholar]
  • Blaber SJM. 1976. The food and feeding ecology of Mugilidae in the St. Lucia lake system. Biol J Linn Soc 8: 267–277. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Blaber SJM. 2002. “Fish in hot water”: the challenges facing fish and fisheries research in tropical estuaries. J Fish Biol 61: 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  • Boehlert GW, Mundy BC. 1988. Roles of behavioural and physical factors in larval and juvenile fish recruitment to estuarine nursery areas. Am Fish Soc Symp 3: 1–67. [Google Scholar]
  • Clavel J, Julliard R, Devictor V. 2011. Worldwide decline of specialist species: toward a global functional homogenization? Front Ecol Environ 9: 222–228. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Corrêa CE, Albrecht MP, Hahn NS. 2011. Patterns of niche breadth and feeding overlap of the fish fauna in the seasonal Brazilian Pantanal, Cuiabá River basin. Neotrop Ichthyol 9: 637–646. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Costello MJ. 1990. Predator feeding strategy and prey importance: a new graphical analysis. J Fish Biol 36: 261–263. [Google Scholar]
  • David BO, Closs GP, Crow SK, Hansen EA. 2007. Is diel activity determined by social rank in a drift-feeding stream fish dominance hierarchy? Anim Behav 74: 259–263. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dinh QM, Tran LT, Tran TMT, To DK, Nguyen TTK, Tran DD. 2020. Variation in diet composition of the mudskipper Periophthalmodon septemradiatus from Hau River, Vietnam. Bull Mar Sci 96: 487–500. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Eggold BT, Motta P. 1992. Ontogenetic dietary shifts and morphological correlates in striped mullet, Mugil cephalus . Environ Biol Fishes 34: 139–158. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • El-Marakby HI, Eid AM, Abdelghany AE, Abdel-Tawwab M. 2006. The Impact of Striped Mullet, Mugil cephalus on Natural Food and Phytoplankton Selectivity at Different Feeding Regimes in Earthen Fishponds. J Fisheries Aquatic Science 1: 87–96. [Google Scholar]
  • Encina L, Rodríguez-Ruiz A, Granado-Lorencio C. 2004. Trophic habits of the fish assemblage in an artificial freshwater ecosystem: The Joaquin Costa reservoir, Spain. Folia Zoolog 53: 437–449. [Google Scholar]
  • Fath BD, Asmus H, Asmus R, et al. 2019. Ecological network analysis metrics: the need for an entire ecosystem approach in management and policy. Ocean Coastal Manag 174: 1–14. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ferry LA, Cailliet GM. 1996. Sample size sufficiency and data analysis: Are we characterizing and comparing diet properly? In Feeding ecology and nutrition in fish: Proceedings of the symposium on the feeding ecology and nutrition in fish , edited by D. Mackinlay, K. Shearer. San Francisco, CA: International Congress on the Biology of Fishes, American Fisheries Society, pp. 71–80. [Google Scholar]
  • Froese R, Pauly D (Eds.). 2019. Fishbase. Version (02/2019) . World Wide Web electronic publication. Retrieved from www.Fishbase.org [Google Scholar]
  • Gabler H M, Amundsen PA. 2010. Feeding strategies, resource utilisation and potential mechanisms for competitive coexistence of Atlantic salmon and alpine bullhead in a sub-Arctic river. Aquatic Ecology 44: 325–336. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gotelli NJ, Entsminger GL. 2007. EcoSim: Null models software for ecology, version 7 . Jericho, VT: Acquired Intelligence Inc. & Kesey-Bear. [Google Scholar]
  • Gotelli NJ, Graves GR. 1996. Null models in ecology . Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Grossman GD. 1986. Food resource partitioning in a rocky intertidal fish assemblage. J Zool 1: 317–355. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hahn NS, Fugi R, Almeida VLL, Russo MR, Loureiro VE. 1997. Dieta e atividade alimentar de peixes do reservatório de Segredo. In Reservatório de Segredo - bases ecológicas para o manejo , edited by A.A. Agostinho and L.C. Gomes. Maringá: Eduem/Nupelia. 387 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Hesthagen T, Saksgård R, Hegge O, Dervo BK, Skurdal J. 2004. Niche overlap between young brown trout (Salmo trutta) and Siberiansculpin (Cottus poecilopus) in a subalpine Norwegian river, in The Atna River: Studies in an Alpine— Boreal Watershed , edited by O.T. Sandlund, K. Aagaard. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, pp. 117–125. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hossain MA, Hemraj DA, Ye Q, Leterme SC, Qin JG. 2017. Diet overlap and resource partitioning among three forage fish species in Coorong, the largest inverse estuary in Australia. Environ Biol Fishes 100: 639–654. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hurlbert SH. 1978. The measurement of niche overlap and some relatives. Ecology 59: 67–77. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jendyk J, Hemraj DA, Brown MH, Ellis AV, Leterme SC. 2014. Environmental variability and phytoplankton dynamics in a South Australian inverse estuary. Contin Shelf Res 91: 134–144. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Joseph S, Ouseph PP. 2010. Assessment of nutrients using multivariate statistical techniques in estuarine systems and its management implications: a case study from Cochin Estuary, India. Water Environ J 24: 126–132. [Google Scholar]
  • Keddy PA. 1989. Effects of competition from shrubs on herbaceous wetland plants: a 4-year field experiment. Can J Bot 67: 708–716. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kim JY, Atique U, An KG. 2021. Relative abundance and invasion dynamics of alien fish species linked to chemical conditions, ecosystem health, native fish assemblage, and stream order. Water 13: 158. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Krebs CJ. 1999. Ecological methodology . Addison Wesley Longman, INC: Menlo Park, CA. [Google Scholar]
  • Layman CA, Allgeier JE. 2012. Characterizing trophic ecology of generalist consumers: A case study of the invasive lionfish in The Bahamas. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 448: 131–141 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Leterme SC, Allais L, Jendyk J, et al. 2015. Drought conditions and recovery in the Coorong wetland, South Australia in 1997–2013. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 163: 175–184. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Levins R. 1968. Evolution in changing environments: Some theoretical explorations (No. 2) . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lopez peralta RH, Arcila CAT. 2002. Diet and composition of fish species from the southern continental shelf of Colombia. Naga 25: 23–29. [Google Scholar]
  • Luther G. 1962. The food habits of Liza macrolepis (Smith) and M cephalus L. (Mugilidae). Indian J. Fish. 9: 604–626. [Google Scholar]
  • Magalhaes MF. 1993. Feeding of an Iberian stream cyprinid assemblage: Seasonality of resource use in a highly variable environment. Oecologia 96: 253–260. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Maitra S, Harikrishnan M, Shibu AV, Sureshkumar S, Ranjeet K, Nandan SB. 2018. Studies on temporal variations of exploited fishery resources and their trophic levels in a tropical estuary. Regl Stud Mar Sci 22: 61–69. [Google Scholar]
  • McKinney ML, Lockwood JL. 1999. Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Trends Ecol Evolut 14: 450–453. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mequilla AT, Campos WL. 2007. Feeding relationships of dominant fish species in the Visayan Sea. Science Diliman 19: 35–46. [Google Scholar]
  • Moon WK, Atique U, An KG. 2020. Ecological risk assessments and eco-toxicity analyses using chemical, biological, physiological responses, DNA damages and gene-level biomarkers in Zebrafish (Danio rerio) in an urban stream. Chemosphere 239: 124754. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Moyle PB, Cech J. 2004. An introduction to ichthyology . Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar]
  • Muchlisin ZA, Rinaldi F, Fadli N, Adlim M, Siti-Azizah MN. 2015. Food preference and diet overlap of two endemic and threatened freshwater fishes, depik (Rasbora tawarensis) and kawan (Poropuntius tawarensis) in Lake Laut Tawar, Indonesia. AACL Bioflux 8: 40–49. [Google Scholar]
  • Nandan B, Renjini PK. 2011. Length-weight relationship, condition factor & morphometry of gold spot mullet Liza parsia from Cochin estuary. Indian J Geo Mar Sci 40: 567–571. [Google Scholar]
  • Paravicini V, Casey J, Schiettekatte M, et al. 2020. Delineating reef fish trophic guilds with global gut content data synthesis and phylogeny. PLOS Biol 18: e3000702. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pauly D, Christensen V. 2000. Trophic levels of fishes, in Fishbase 2000: Concepts, design and data sources , edited by R. Froese, D. Pauly. Los Banos, Philippines: ICLARM. 181 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Pauly D, Froese R, Saa PS, Palomares ML, Christensen V, Rius J. 2000. TrophLab manual . Manila, Philippines: ICLARM. [Google Scholar]
  • Pianka ER. 1971. Ecology of the agamid lizard Amphibolurus isolepis in Western Australia. Copeia 1971: 527–536. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pollard DA. 1981. Estuaries are valuable contributors to fisheries production. Aust Fish. 40: 7–9. [Google Scholar]
  • Potter, IC, Claridge PN, Hyndes GA, Clarke, KR. 1997. Seasonal, annual and regional variations in ichthyofaunal composition in the inner Severn Estuary and inner Bristol Channel. J Marine Biological Association United Kingdom 77: 507–525. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Priyadarshini S, Manoharan J, Varadharjan D, Subramaniyan A. 2012. Interpretation of the food and feeding habits of Dascyllus trimaculatus (Ruppell, 1829) from Gulf of Mannar, South East coast of India. Arch Appl Sci Res 4: 1758–1762. [Google Scholar]
  • Rao RK, Babu KR. 2013. Studies on food and feeding habits of Mugil cephalus (Linnaeus 1758) east coast of Andhra Pradesh India. Can J Basic Appl Sci 3: 2499–2504. [Google Scholar]
  • Ricklefs RE, Lau M. 1980. Bias and dispersion of overlap indices:?Results of some Monte Carlo simulations. Ecology 61: 1019–1024. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Saeed F, Iqbal KJ, Atique U, et al. 2020. Toxic trace metals assessment in selected organs of edible fish species, sediment and water in Head Punjab, Punjab, Pakistan. Punjab Univ. J Zool 35: 43–50. [Google Scholar]
  • Sandlund OT Museth J, Naesje TF, Rognerud S, Saksgård R, Hesthagen T, Borgstrøm R. 2010. Habitat use and diet of sympatric Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus) and whitefish (Coregonus lavaretus) in five lakes in southern Norway: Not only interspecific population dominance? Hydrobiologia 650: 27–41. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Schoener TW. 1974. Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science 185: 27–39. [Google Scholar]
  • Segurado P, Santos JM, Pont D, et al. 2011. Estimating species tolerance to human perturbation: expert judgment versus empirical approaches. Ecol Indic 11: 1623–1635. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Shivaprasad A, Vinita J, Revichandran C, Manoj NT, Jayalakshmy KV, Muraleedharan KR. 2013. Ambiguities in the classification of Cochin Estuary, West coast of India. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 10: 3595–3628. [Google Scholar]
  • Smith EP, Zaret TM. 1982. Bias in estimating niche overlap. Ecology 63: 1248–1253. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Van Niekerk L, Turpie JK. 2012. National Biodiversity Assessment 2011: Technical Report. Volume 3: Estuary Component. CSIR Report Number CSIR/NRE/ECOS/ER/2011/0045/B. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Stellenbosch. [Google Scholar]
  • Vasconcelos RP, Henriques S, França S, Pasquaud S, Cardoso I, Laborde M, Cabral HN. 2015. Global patterns and predictors of fish species richness in estuaries. J Anim Ecol 84: 1331–1341. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ward AJ, Webster MM, Hart PJ. 2006. Intraspecific food competition in fishes. Fish Fish 7: 231–261. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wotton RJ. 1998. Ecology of teleost fishes . Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher. [Google Scholar]
  • Introdução aos estudos sobre alimentação natural em peixes. Maringá: EDUEM. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.