Free Access
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 52
Page(s) 91 - 108
Published online 21 March 2016
  • Allan J.D. and Castillo M.M., 2007. Stream Ecology: Structure and Function of Running Waters, Chapman & Hall, New York, 400 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Armitage P.D., Moss D., Wright J.F. and Furse M.T., 1983. The performance of a new biological water quality score system based on macroinvertebrates over a wide range of unpolluted running-water sites. Water Res., 17, 333–347. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Barbour M.T., Gerritsen J., Snyder B. and Stribling J., 1999. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers, USEPA, Washington. [Google Scholar]
  • Bell G., 2000. The distribution of abundance in neutral communities. Am. Nat., 155, 606–617. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Blocksom K.A., 2003. A performance comparison of metric scoring methods for a multimetric index for Mid-Atlantic Highlands streams. Environ. Manage., 31, 670–682. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Brewin P.A., Buckton S.T. and Ormerod S.J., 2000. The seasonal dynamics and persistence of stream macroinvertebrates in Nepal: do monsoon floods represent disturbance? Freshwater Biol., 44, 581–694. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brigham A.R., Brigham W.U. and Gnilka A., 1982. Aquatic Insects and Oligochaetes of North and South Carolina, Midwest Aquatic Enterprises, USA, 837 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Brinkhurst R., 1986. Guide to the Freshwater Aquatic Microdrile Oligochaetes of North America, Dept. of Fisheries and Oceans, Ottawa, 259 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Bunn S.E. and Davies P.M., 2000. Biological processes in running waters and their implications for the assessment of ecological integrity. Hydrobiologia, 422/423, 61–70. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cao Y., Bark A.W. and Williams W.P., 1996. Measuring the responses of macroinvertebrate communities to water pollution: a comparison of multivariate approaches, biotic and diversity indices. Hydrobiologia, 341, 1–19. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chon T.-S., Kwak I.-S., Song M.-Y., Park Y.-S., Cho H.-D., Kim M.-J., Cha E.-Y. and Lek S., 2002. Characterizing the Effects of Water Quality on Benthic Stream Macroinvertebrates in South Korea Using a Self-Organizing Mapping Model, Bumwoo Publishing Company, Seoul, Korea. [Google Scholar]
  • Colwell R.K., Mao C.X. and Chang J., 2004. Interpolating, extrapolating, and comparing incidence-based species accumulation curves. Ecology, 85, 2717–2727. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Diaz R.J., Solan M. and Valente R.M., 2004. A review of approaches for classifying benthic habitats and evaluating habitat quality. J. Environ. Manage., 73, 165–181. [Google Scholar]
  • Ferreira V., Graça M.A.S., Feio M.J. and Mieiro C., 2004. Water quality in the Mondego river basin: pollution and habitat heterogeneity. Limnetica, 23, 295–306. [Google Scholar]
  • Fisher R.A., Corbet A.S. and Williams C., 1943. The relation between the number of species and the number of individuals in a random sample of an animal population. J. Anim. Ecol., 12, 42–58. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ford N.B. and Lancaster D.L., 2007. The species-abundance distribution of snakes in a bottomland hardwood forest of the southern United States. J. Herpetol., 41, 385–393. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Forster M.A. and Warton D.I., 2007. metacommunity scale comparison of species abundance distribution models for plant communities of eastern Australia. Ecography, 30, 449–458. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gray J.S. and Mirza F.B., 1979. A possible method for the detection of pollution-induced disturbance on marine benthic communities. Mar. Pollut. Bull., 10, 142–146. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gray J.S. and Pearson T.H., 1982. Objective selection of sensitive species indicative of pollution-induced change in benthic communities. I. Comparative methodology. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 9, 111–119. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hawkes H., 1998. Origin and development of the biological monitoring working party score system. Water Res., 32, 964–968. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Heino J., 2013. The importance of metacommunity ecology for environmental assessment research in the freshwater realm. Biol. Rev., 88, 166–178. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hellawell J.M., 1986. Biological Indicators of Freshwater Pollution and Environmental Management, Elsevier, London, UK, 546 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Hering D., Johnson R.K., Kramm S., Schmutz S., Szoszkiewicz K. and Verdonschot P.F., 2006. Assessment of European streams with diatoms, macrophytes, macroinvertebrates and fish: a comparative metric-based analysis of organism response to stress. Freshwater Biol., 51, 1757–1785. [Google Scholar]
  • Hill J.K., Hamer K.C., Lace L.A. and Banham W.M.T., 1995. Effect of selective logging on trophical forest butterflies on Buru, Indonesia. J. Appl. Ecol., 32, 754–760. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hubbell S.P., 2001. The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA, 392 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Hynes H. and Coleman M.J., 1968. A simple method of assessing the annual production of stream benthos. Limnol. Oceanogr., 13, 569–573. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kim D.-H., Cho W.-S. and Chon T.-S., 2013. Self-organizing map and species abundance distribution of stream benthic macroinvertebrates in revealing community patterns in different seasons. Ecol. Inform., 17, 14–29. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kwon T.-S. and Chon T.-S., 1991. Ecological studies on benthic macroinvertebrates in the Suyong River II. Investigations on distribution and abundance in its main stream and four tributaries. Korean J. Limnol., 24, 179–198. [Google Scholar]
  • Lake P., 2000. Disturbance, patchiness, and diversity in streams. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 19, 573–592. [Google Scholar]
  • MacArthur R., 1960. On the relative abundance of species. Am. Nat., 94, 25–36. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Magurran A.E., 1988. Ecological Diversity and its Measurement. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 192 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Magurran A.E., 2004. Measuring Biological Diversity, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK, 264 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Magurran A.E. and Henderson P.A., 2012. How selection structures species abundance distributions. P. Roy. Soc. Lond. B. Bio., 279, 3722–3726. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Magurran A.E. and McGill B.J., 2011. Biological Diversity: Frontiers in Measurement and Assessment, Oxford University Press, Oxford. [Google Scholar]
  • May R.M., 1975. Patterns of species abundance and diversity. In: Cody M. and Diamond J.M. (eds.), Ecology and Evolution of Communities, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 81–120. [Google Scholar]
  • May R.M., 1981. Theoretical Ecology: Principles and Applications, Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, UK, 272 p. [Google Scholar]
  • McGill B.J., Etienne R.S., Gray J.S., Alonso D., Anderson M.J., Benecha H.K., Dornelas M., Enquist B.J., Green J.L., He F., Hurlbert A.H., Magurran A.E., Marquet P.A., Maurer B.A., Ostling A., Soykan C.U., Ugland K.I. and White E.P., 2007. Species abundance distributions: moving beyond single prediction theories to integration within an ecological framework. Ecol. Lett., 10, 995–1015. [Google Scholar]
  • McNaughton S.J., 1967. Relationship among functional properties of California grassland. Nature, 216, 168–169. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Merritt R.W. and Cummins K.W., 1996. An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America, Kendall Hunt, Iowa, 1214 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Motomura I., 1932. On the statistical treatment of communities. Zool. Mag., 44, 379–383. [Google Scholar]
  • Nummelin M., 1998. Log-normal distribution of species abundance is not a universal indicator of rainforest disturbance. J. Appl. Ecol., 35, 454–457. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Park Y.-S., Song M.-Y., Park Y.-C., Oh K.-H., Cho E. and Chon T.-S., 2007. Community patterns of benthic macroinvertebrates collected on the national scale in Korea. Ecol. Model., 203, 26–33. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Patrick R., 1963. The structure of diatom communities under varying ecological conditions. Ann. NY. Acad. Sci., 108, 359–365. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pennak R.W., 1978. Freshwater Invertebrates of the United States, Ronald Press, New York, 822 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Preston F., 1948. The commonness, and rarity, of species. Ecology, 29, 254–283. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Preston F., 1962. The canonical distribution of commonness and rarity: Part I. Ecology, 43, 185–215. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Qu X., Song M.-Y., Park Y.-S., Oh Y.-N. and Chon T.-S., 2008. Species abundance patterns of benthic macroinvertebrate communities in polluted streams. Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim., 44, 119–133. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Raunkiær C., 1909. Formationsundersogelse og formationsstatistik. Bot. Tidskr., 30, 20–132. [Google Scholar]
  • Raup D.M., 1975. Taxonomic diversity estimation using rarefaction. Paleobiology, 1, 333–342. [Google Scholar]
  • Resh V.H. and Rosenberg D.M., 1984. The Ecology of Aquatic Insects. Prager, New York, 625 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Reynoldson T., Norris R., Resh V., Day K. and Rosenberg D., 1997. The reference condition: a comparison of multimetric and multivariate approaches to assess water-quality impairment using benthic macroinvertebrates. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 16, 833–852. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rocha F.C., Andrade E.M. and Lopes F.B., 2015. Water quality index calculated from biological, physical and chemical attributes. Environ. Monit. Assess., 187, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  • Roesch L.F., Fulthorpe R.R., Riva A., Casella G., Hadwin A.K., Kent A.D., Daroub S.H., Camargo F.A., Farmerie W.G. and Triplett E.W., 2007. Pyrosequencing enumerates and contrasts soil microbial diversity. ISME J., 1, 283–290. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rosenberg D.M. and Resh V.H., 1993. Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinvertebrates, Chapman &Hall, New York, 488 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Rosenberg R., Blomqvist M., Nilsson H.C., Cederwall H. and Dimming A., 2004. Marine quality assessment by use of benthic species-abundance distributions: a proposed new protocol within the European Union Water Framework Directive. Mar. Pollut. Bull., 49, 728–739. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Shannon C.E. and Weaver W., 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Information, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, 144 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Sokal R.R. and Rohlf F.J., 1995. Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, Freeman W.H., New York, 880 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Stevenson R.J., 1997. Scale-dependent determinants and consequences of benthic algal heterogeneity. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 16, 248–262. [Google Scholar]
  • Tang H., Song M.-Y., Cho W.-S., Park Y.-S. and Chon T.-S., 2010. Species abundance distribution of benthic chironomids and other macroinvertebrates across different levels of pollution in streams. Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim., 44, 53–66. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Tokeshi M., 1990a. Niche apportionment or random assortment: species abundance patterns revisited. J. Anim. Ecol., 59, 1129–1146. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tokeshi M., 1993. Species abundance patterns and community structure. Adv. Ecol. Res., 24, 111–186. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tokeshi M., 1999. Species Coexistence: Ecological and Evolutionary Perspectives, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK, 468 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Townsend C.R., Scarsbrook M.R. and Sylvain D., 1997. Quantifying disturbance in streams: alternative measures of disturbance in relation to macroinvertebrate species traits and species richness. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 16, 531–544. [Google Scholar]
  • Warwick R., 1986. A new method for detecting pollution effects on marine macrobenthic communities. Mar. Biol., 92, 557–562. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wiggins G.B., 1996. Larvae of the North American Caddisfly Genera (Trichoptera), University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 414 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Williams C.B., 1964. Patterns in the Balance of Nature, Academic Press, London, 324 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Williams E.D., 1978. Botanical Composition of the Park Grass Plots at Rothamsted 1856–1976, Rothamsted Experimental Station Harpenden, UK. [Google Scholar]
  • Wright J.F., Sutcliffe D.W. and Furse M.T., 2000. Assessing the Biological Quality of Fresh Waters: RIVPACS and other Techniques, Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside, England, 373 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Yoon B.J. and Chon T.S., 1996. Effects of environmental disturbances on community dynamics of chironomids in the Soktae Stream, a tuributary of the Suyong River. Korean J. Appl. Entomol., 11, 44–44. [Google Scholar]
  • Yoon I., 1995. Aquatic Insects of Korea, Jeonghaengsa, Seoul, Korea. [Google Scholar]
  • Zar J.H., 1984. Biostatistical Analysis, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 960 p. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.