Free Access
Issue
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 52
Page(s) 75 - 89
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/2016005
Published online 21 March 2016
  • Abell R.A., Olson D.M., Dinerstein E., Hurley P.T., Diggs J.T., Eichbaum W., Walters S., Wettengel W., Allnutt T., Loucks C.J. and Hedao P., 2000. Freshwater Ecoregions of North America, A conservation assessment. Island Press, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
  • Allan J.D. and Castillo M.M., 2007. Stream Ecology (2nd ed.), Springer-Verlag, New York. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Álvarez-Cabria M., Barquín J. and Juanes J.A., 2011. Macroinvertebrate community dynamics in a temperate European Atlantic river. Do they conform to general ecological theory? Hydrobiologia, 658, 277–291. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Arthington A.H., Bunn S.E., Poff N.L. and Naiman R.J., 2006. The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems. Ecol. Appl., 16, 1311–1318. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bae, M.-J., Kwon Y., Hwang S.-J., Chon T.-S., Yang H.-J., Kwak I.-S., Park J.-H., Ham S.-A. and Park Y.-S., 2011. Relationships between three major stream assemblages and their environmental factors in multiple spatial scales. Ann. Limnol.-Int. J. Limnol., 47, S91–S105. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Bae M.-J., Li F., Kwon Y.-S., Chung N., Choi H., Hwang S.-J. and Park Y.-S., 2014. Concordance of diatom, macroinvertebrate and fish assemblages in streams as nested spatial scales: implications for ecological integrity. Ecol. Indic., 47, 89–101. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Barbour M.T., Gerritsen J., Snyder B.D. and Stribling J.B., 1999. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers, Washington, US EPA 841-B-99-002. [Google Scholar]
  • Boulton A.J., 1999. An overview of river health assessment: philosophies, practice, problems and prognosis. Freshwater Biol., 41, 469–479. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bunn S.E., Abal E.G., Smith M.J., Choy S.C., Fellows C.S., Harch B.D., Kennard M.J. and Sheldon F., 2010. Integration of science and monitoring of river ecosystem health to guide investments in catchment protection and rehabilitation. Freshwater Biol., 55, 223–240. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cairns J. Jr. and Pratt J.R., 1993. A history of biological monitoring using benthic macroinvertebrates. In: Rosenberg D.M. and Resh V.H. (eds) Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinvertebrates, Chapman & Hall, London. [Google Scholar]
  • Chessman B.C. and Royal M.J., 2004. Bioassessment without reference sites: use of environmental filters to predict natural assemblages of river macroinvertebrates. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 23, 599–615. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Clements W.H., Carlisle D.M., Lazorchak J.M. and Johnson P.C., 2000. Heavy metals structure benthic communities in Colorado Mountain streams. Ecol. Appl., 10, 626–638. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • De Lange H.J., De Jonge J., Den Besten P.J., Oosterbaan J. and Peeters E.T.H.M., 2004. Sediment pollution and predation affect structure and production of benthic macroinvertebrate communities in the Rhine-Meuse delta, the Netherlands. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 23, 557–579. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dolédec S. and Statzner B., 2010. Responses of freshwater biota to human disturbances: contribution of J-NABS to developments in ecological integrity assessments. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 29, 286–311. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Flinders C.A., Horwitz R.J. and Belton T., 2008. Relationship of fish and macroinvertebrate communities in the mid-Atlantic uplands: implications for integrated assessments. Ecol. Indic., 8, 588–598. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Geng S.W., Qu X.D., Zhang Y. and Lin K.D., 2012. Comparison and application of biological indices of macroinvertebrates in river health assessment. Environ. Sci., 33, 2281–2287 (in Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  • Hawkins C.P., 2006. Quantifying biological integrity by taxonomic completeness: its utility in regional and global assessments. Ecol. Appl., 16, 1277–1294. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hawkins C.P., Cao Y. and Roper B., 2010. Method of predicting reference condition biota affects the performance and interpretation of ecological indices. Freshwater Biol., 55, 1066–1085. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hellawell J.M., 1986. Biological Indicators of Freshwater Pollution and Environmental Management, Elsevier, London, England. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hering D., Meier C., Rawer-Jost C., Feld C.K., Biss R., Zenker A., Sundermann A., Lohse S. and Bohmer J., 2004. Assessing streams in Germany with benthic invertebrates: selection of candidate metrics. Limnologica, 34, 398–415. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hering D., Johnson R.K., Kramm S., Schmutz S., Szoszkiewicz K. and Verdonschot P.F.M., 2006. Assessment of European streams with diatoms, macrophytes, macroinvertebrates and fish: a comparative metric-based analysis of organism response to stress. Freshwater Biol., 51, 1757–1785. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hering D., Borja A., Carstensen J., Carvalho L., Elliott M., Feld C.K., Heiskanen A.-S., Johnson R.K., Moe J., Pont D., Solheim A.L. and van de Bund W., 2010. The European Water Framework Directive at the age of 10: a critical review of the achievements with recommendations for the future. Sci. Total Environ., 408, 4007–4019. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hilsenhoff W.L., 1988. Rapid field assessment of organic pollution with a family-level biotic index. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 7, 65–68. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hu H.J., Li R.Y., Wei Y.X., Zhu H.Z., Chen J.Y. and Shi Z.X., 1980. Freshwater Algae in China, Shanghai Science and Technology Press, Shanghai, China (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  • Hynes H.B.N., 1960. The Biology of Polluted Waters, Liverpool University Press, Liverpool, UK. [Google Scholar]
  • Karr J.R., 1981. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fisheries, 6, 21–27. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Karr J.R., 1999. Defining and measuring river health. Freshwater Biol., 41, 221–234. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Karr J.R. and Chu E.W., 1999. Restoring life in running waters: better biological monitoring. Water Air Soil Poll., 116, 666–667. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kennard M.J., Pusey B.J., Arthington A.H., Harch B.D., Mackay S.J., 2006. Development and application of a predictive model of freshwater fish assemblage composition to evaluate river health in eastern Australia. Hydrobiologia, 572, 33–57. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kerans B.L. and Karr J.R., 1994. A Benthic index of biotic integrity (B-IBI) for rivers of the Tennessee Valley. Ecol. Appl., 4, 768–785. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kong W.J., Meng W., Zhang Y., Gipple C. and Qu X.D., 2013. A freshwater ecoregion delineation approach based on freshwater macroinvertebrate community features and spatial environmental data in Taizi River Basin, northeastern China. Ecol. Res., 28, 581–592. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lecointe C., Coste M. and Prygiel J., 2003. OMNIDIA 3.2. Diatom index software including diatom database with taxonomic names, references and codes of 11645 diatom taxa. [Google Scholar]
  • Leigh C., Qu X., Zhang Y., Kong W., Meng W., Hanington P., Speed R., Gippel C., Bond N., Catford J., Bunn S. and Close P., 2012. Assessment of River Health in the Liao River Basin (Taizi Subcatchment), International Water Centre, Brisbane, Australia. [Google Scholar]
  • Magurran A.E., 2004. Measuring Biological Diversity, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK. [Google Scholar]
  • Meng W., Zhang N., Zhang Y. and Zheng B.H., 2009. Integrated assessment of river health based on water quality, aquatic life and physical habitat. J. Environ. Sci., 21, 1017–1027. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Merritt R.W. and Cummins K.W., 1996. An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America, Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, USA. [Google Scholar]
  • Metcalfe J.L., 1989. Biological water quality assessment of running waters based on macroinvertebrate communities: history and present status in Europe. Environ. Poll., 60, 101–139. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis, Island Press, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
  • Ministry of Environmental Protection, 2009. Chinese Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater (4th ed.), Chinese Environmental Science Press, Beijing, China (In Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  • Morse J.C., Yang L.F. and Tian L.X., 1994. Aquatic Insects of China Useful for Monitoring Water Quality, Hohai University Press, China. [Google Scholar]
  • Norris R.H. and Hawkins C.P., 2000. Monitoring river health. Hydrobiologia, 435, 5–17. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Park Y.S., Song M.Y., Park Y.C., Oh K.H., Cho E. and Chon T.S., 2007. Community patterns of benthic macroinvertebrates collected on the national scale in Korea. Ecol. Model., 203, 26–33. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Plafkin J.L., Barbour M.T., Porter K.D., Gross S.K. and Hughes R.M., 1989. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Rivers: Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish. EPA 440-4-89-001, Office of Water Regulations and Standards, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
  • Prygiel J., Rosso-Darmet A., Lafont M., Lesniak C., Durbec A. and Ouddane B., 1999. Use of Oligochaete communities for assessment of ecotoxicological risk in fine sediment of rivers and canals of the Artois-Picardie water basin (France). Hydrobiologia, 410, 25–37. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Qu X.D., Wu N.C., Tang T., Cai Q.H. and Park Y.S., 2010. Effects of heavy metals on benthic macroinvertebrate communities in high mountain streams. Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Limnol., 46, 291–302. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Qu X.D., Liu Z.G. and Zhang Y., 2012. Discussion on the standardized method of reference sites selection for establishing the Benthic-Index of Biotic Integrity. Acta Ecol. Sin., 15, 4661–4672. [Google Scholar]
  • Qu X.D., Zhang Y., Ma S.Q., Zhao R. and Meng W., 2013. Spatial distribution characteristics of macroinvertebrate communities in Taizi River basin. Res. Environ. Sci., 26, 509–515 (in Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  • Qu X.D., Zhou Y., Zhao R., Bentsen C., Yin X.W. and Zhang Y., 2014. Are Diatom-based indices from Europe suitable for river health assessment in China? A case study from Taizi River, Northeastern China. Br. J. Environ. Climate Change, 4, 95–114. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rabeni C.F., Doisy K.E. and Zweig L.D., 2005. Stream invertebrate community functional responses to deposited sediment. Aquat. Sci., 67, 395–402. [Google Scholar]
  • Resh V.H., 2008. Which group is best? Attributes of different biological assemblages used in freshwater biomonitoring programs. Environ. Monit. Assess., 138, 131–138. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Reynoldson T.B., Norris R.H., Resh V.H., Day K.E. and Rosenberg D.M., 1997. The reference condition: a comparison of multimetric and multivariate approaches to assess water-quality impairment using benthic macroinvertebrates. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 16, 833–852. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rosenberg D.M. and Resh V.H., 1993. Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinvertebrates, Chapman & Hall, London. [Google Scholar]
  • Stevenson R.J. and Pan T.D., 1999. Assessing environmental conditions in rivers and streams with diatoms. In: Stoermer E.F. and Smol J.P. (eds) The Diatoms: Applications for the Environmental and Earth Sciences, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 11–40. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Stoddard J.L., Larsen D.P., Hawkins C.P., Johnson R.K. and Norris R.H., 2006. Setting expectations for the ecological condition of streams: the concept of reference condition. Ecol. Appl., 16, 1267–1276. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Stribling J.B., Jessup B.K. and Gerritsen J., 1999. Development of biological and habitat criteria for Wyoming streams and their use in the TMDL process, prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc., Owings Mills, MD, for U.S. EPA, Region 8, Denver, CO. [Google Scholar]
  • Vannote R.L., Minshall G.W., Cummins K.W., Sedell J.R. and Cushing C.E., 1980. The river continuum concept. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 37, 130–137. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang W., Wang B., He X.Y., Qu X.D. and Zhang Y., 2013. Study of zoning and distribution characteristics of fish in Taizi River. Res. Environ. Sci., 26, 494–501 (in Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  • Wu N.C., Tang T., Zhou S.C., Jia X.H., Li D.F., Liu R.Q. and Cai Q.H., 2009. Changes in benthic algae communities following construction of a run-of-river dam. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 28, 69–79. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Xie Y., 2007. Freshwater Fishes in Northwest Region of China, Liaoning Science and Technology Press, Shenyang, China (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  • Yin X.W., Zhang Y., Qu X.D. and Meng W., 2013. Spatial community structure of periphyton assemblages in the Taizihe River basin. Res. Environ. Sci., 26, 502–508. (in Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang J.M., 1995. The Ichthyography of Heilongjiang River, Heilongjiang Science and Technology Press, Haierbin, China (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang N., Meng W., Zhang Y. and Zheng B.H., 2009. Multi-variable assessment of river ecosystem health in Liao River basin. Res. Environ. Sci., 22, 162–170 (in Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang Y., Zhao R., Qu X.D. and Meng W., 2013. The researches of integrated river health assessment of Liaohe River basin. Eng. Sci., 15, 11–18 (in Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  • Zheng W.H., Qu X.D., Zhang Y. and Meng W., 2011. Habitat suitability of macroinvertebrates in the Taizi River basin, northeast China. Res. Environ. Sci., 24, 1355–1363. (in Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  • Zhu H.Z. and Chen J.Y., 2000. Bacillariophyta of the Xizang Plateau, Science Press, Beijing, China (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.