Free Access
Issue
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 50, Number 4, 2014
Page(s) 325 - 334
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/2014026
Published online 14 November 2014
  • Allan J.D., 2004. Landscapes and riverscapes: the influence of land use on stream Ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol., 35, 257–284. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Allan J.D. and Castillo M.M., 2007. Stream Ecology: Structure e Function of Running Waters, Chapman–Hall, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
  • Axelsson E.P., Hajalten J., Leroy C.J., Whitham T.G., Julkunen-Tiitto R. and Wennstrom A., 2011. Leaf litter from insect-resistant transgenic trees causes changes in aquatic insect community composition. J. Appl. Ecol., 48, 1472–1479. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bacellar L.A.P., 2005. O papel das florestas no regime hidrológico de bacias Hidrográficas. Geo br, 1, 1–39. [Google Scholar]
  • Baptista D.F., Buss D.F., Dias L.G., Nessimian J.L., Da Silva E.R., De Moraes Neto A.H., Carvalho S.N., De-Oliveira M.A. and Andrade L.R., 2006. Functional feeding groups of Brazilian Ephemeroptera nymphs: ultrastructure of mouthparts. Ann. Limnol - Int. J. Lim., 42, 87–96. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Beketov M.A., Kefford B.J., Schäfer R.B. and Liess M., 2013. Pesticides reduce regional biodiversity of stream invertebrates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  • Bello L.C.C. and Cabrera I.M., 2001. Alimentación ninfal de Leptophlebiidae (Insecta: Ephemeroptera) en el Caño Paso del Diablo, Venezuela. Rev. Biol. Trop., 49, 999–1003. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bispo P.C., Oliveira L.G., Bini L.M. and Sousa K.G., 2006. Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera assemblages from riffles in mountain streams of Central Brazil: environmental factors influencing the distribution and abundance of immatures. Braz. J. Biol., 66, 611–622. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Brasil L.S., Shimano Y., Batista J.D. and Cabette H.S.R., 2013. Effects of environmental factors on community structure of Leptophlebiidae (Insecta: Ephemeroptera) in Cerrado streams, Brazil. Iheringia Sér Zool, 103, 260–265. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brasil L.S., Juen J., Batista J.D., Pavam M.G. and Cabette H.S.R., 2014. Longitudinal Distribution of the Functional Feeding Groups of Aquatic Insects in Streams of the Brazilian Cerrado Savan. Neotrop. Entomol., 43, 421–428. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Brenden T.O., Wang L. and SU Z., 2008. Quantitative identification of disturbance thresholds in support of aquatic resource management. Environ. Manage., 42, 821–832. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bunn S.E. and Davies P.M., 1990. Why is the stream fauna of south-western Australia so impoverished? Hydrobiologia, 194, 169–176. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Buss D.F., Baptista F., Silveira M.P., Nessimian J.L. and Dorvill F.M., 2002. Influence of water chemistry and environmental degradation on macroinvertebrate assemblages in a river basin in south-east Brazil. Hydrobiologia, 481, 125–136. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cabette H.S.R., Giehl N.F., Dias-Silva K., Juen L. and Batista J.D., 2010. Gerromorpha (Insecta: Heteroptera) da Bacia Hidrografica do Rio Suiá-Miçu, MT: riqueza relacionada a qualidade da água e hábitat. In: Santos J.E., Galbiati C. and Moschini L.E. (eds.), Gestão e educação ambiental – água, biomonitoramento e cultura, Editorial RiMa, São Carlos, 113–137. [Google Scholar]
  • Carvalho F.G., Silva-Pinto N., Oliveira-Júnior J.M.B. and Juen L., 2013. Effects of marginal vegetation removal on Odonata communities. Acta Limnol. Bras., 25, 10–18. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Castello L., 2008. Lateral migration of Arapaima gig's in floodplains of the Amazon. Ecol. Freshw. Fish, 17, 38–46. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chave J., 2004. Neutral theory and community ecology. Ecol. Lett., 7, 241–253. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Clarke K.R., 1993. Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Austr. Ecol., 18, 117–143. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Colwell R.K., 2004. Estimates: Statistical Estimation of Species Richness and Shared Species from Samples, Version 7.5., Available online at: Publishing Physics Web http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/estimates. Persistent URL http://purl.oclc.org/estimates. Accessed online 26 June 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • Colwell R.K. and Coddington J.A., 1994. Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Phil. Trans. R Soc. B, 345, 101–118. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Contador T.A., Kennedy J.H. and Rozzi R., 2012. The conservation status of southern South American aquatic insects in the literature. Biodivers. Conserv., 21, 2095–2107. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Corbi J.J., Kleineb P. and Trivinho-Strixino S., 2013. Are aquatic insect species sensitive to banana plant cultivation? Ecol. Indic., 25, 156–161. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cummins K.W., 1973. Tropidc relations of aquatic insects. Ann. Rev. Ent., 18, 183–206. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Da Silva E.R., Nessimian J.L. and Coelho L.B.N., 2010. Leptophlebiidae ocorrentes no Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil: hábitats, meso-hábitats e hábitos das ninfas (Insecta: Ephemeroptera). Biota Neotrop., 10, 87–94. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • De Marco P. and Siqueira M.F., 2009. Como determinar a distribuição potencial de espécies sob uma abordagem conservacionista? Megadiversidade, 5, 65–76. [Google Scholar]
  • Dias L.G., Molineri C. and Ferreira P.S.F. 2007. Ephemerelloidea (Insecta: Ephemeroptera) do Brasil. Pap Avulsos Zool., 47, 213–244. [Google Scholar]
  • Dias-Silva K., Cabette H.S.R., Juen L. and De Marco P. Jr. 2010. The influence of habitat integrity and physical-chemical water variables on the structure of aquatic and semi-aquatic Heteroptera. Rev. Bras. Zool., 27, 918–930. [Google Scholar]
  • Dolný A., Harabiš F., Bárta D. and Lhota S., 2012. Aquatic insects indicate terrestrial habitat degradation: changes in taxonomical structure and functional diversity of dragonflies in tropical rainforest of East Kalimantan. Trop. Zool., 25, 37–41. [Google Scholar]
  • Domínguez E., Molineri C., Pescador M.L., Hubbard M. and Nieto V., 2006. Ephemeroptera of South America, Pensoft, Moscow. [Google Scholar]
  • Dosskey M.G., Vidon P., Gurwick N.P., Allan C.J., Duval T.P., Lowrance R., Michael G., Vidon P., Gurwick N.P., Allan C.J., Duval T.P. and Lowrance R., 2010. The role of riparian vegetation in protecting and improving chemical water quality in streams 1. J. Am. Water Resour. As., 47, 261–277. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Heino J., 2013. Does dispersal ability affect the relative importance of environmental control and spatial structuring of littoral macroinvertebrate communities? Oecologia, 171, 971–980. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Holzman R., Collar D.C., Mehta R.S. and Wainwright P.C., 2011. Functional complexity can mitigate performance trade-offs. Amer. Nat., 177, 69–83. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • INMET, 2013. Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia, Brasil. Electronic database Publishing PhysicsWeb http://www.inmet.gov.br/portal/ accessed online 4 August 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • Jackson D.A., 1993. Stopping rules in principal components analysis: a comparison of heuristical and statistical approaches. Ecology, 74, 2204–2214. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Karr J.R., 1981. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fisheries, 6, 21–27. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Karr J.R., 1999. Defining and measuring river health. Freshw. Biol., 41, 221–234. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Klapproth J.C. and Johnson J.E., 2000. Understanding the Science Behind Riparian Forest Buffers: Effects on Water Quality, Virginia Cooperative Extension, Virginia. [Google Scholar]
  • Landeiro V.L., Hamada N., Godoy B.S. and Melo A.S., 2010. Effects of litter patch area on macroinvertebrate assemblage structure and leaf breakdown in Central Amazonian streams. Hydrobiologia, 649, 355–363. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Legendre P. and Legendre L., 2012. Numerical Ecology, Elsevier, Amsterdam. [Google Scholar]
  • Ligeiro R., Hughes R.M., Kaufmann P.R., Macedo D.R., Firmiano K.R., Ferreira W.R., Oliveira D., Melo A.S. and Callisto M., 2013. Defining quantitative stream disturbance gradients and the additive role of habitat variation to explain macroinvertebrate taxa richness. Ecol. Indic., 25, 45–57. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Monteiro-Júnior C.S., Couceiro S.R.M., Hamada N. and Juen L., 2013. Effect of vegetation removal for road building on richness and composition of Odonata communities in Amazonia, Brazil. Int. J. Odonatol., 16, 764–798. [Google Scholar]
  • Nessimian J.L., Venticinque E.M., Zuanon J., De Marco P., Gordo M., Fidelis L., Batista J.D. and Juen J., 2008. Land use, habitat integrity, and aquatic insect assemblages in Central Amazonian streams. Hydrobiologia, 614, 117–131. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nessimian J.L., Venticinque E.M., Zuanon J., De Marco P., Gordo M., Fidelis L., Batista J.D. and Juen J., 2013. Uso do solo, integridade de hábitat e agrupamentos de insetos aquáticos em igarapés na Amazônia Central. In: Castro G. (ed.), Conservação da Biodiversidade em paisagens antropizadas do Brasil, UFPR, Curitiba, 343–371. [Google Scholar]
  • Peel M.C., Finlayson B.L. and Mcmahon T.A., 2007. Updated world map of the Koppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11, 1633–1644. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pereira L.R., Cabette H.S.R. and Juen L., 2012. Trichoptera as bioindicators of habitat integrity in the Pindaíba river basin, Mato Grosso (Central Brazil). Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim., 48, 295–302. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Peres-Neto P.R., Jackson D.A. and Somers K.M., 2003. Giving meaningful interpretation to ordination axes: assessing loading significance in principal component analysis. Ecology, 84, 2347–2363. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Polegatto C. and Froehlich C.G., 2003. Feeding strategies in Atalophlebiinae (Ephemeroptera: Leptophlebiidae), with considerations on scraping and filtering. Behaviour, 1, 55–61. [Google Scholar]
  • Poole G.C., 2002. Fluvial landscape ecology: addressing uniqueness within the river discontinuum. Freshw. Biol, 47, 641–660. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Popielarz P.A. and Neal Z.P., 2007. The niche as a theoretical tool. Ann. Rev. Soc., 33, 65–84. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Primack R.B. and Rodrigues E., 2001. Biologia da conservação, Planta, Lodrina. [Google Scholar]
  • Salles F.F., 2006. A Ordem Ephemeroptera no Brasil (Insecta): taxonomia e diversidade. PhD thesis, Federal University of Viçosa. [Google Scholar]
  • Salles F.F., Nascimento J.M.C., Massariol F.C., Angeli K.B. and Barcelos P.R.B., 2010. Primeiro levantamento da fauna de Ephemeroptera (Insecta) do Espírito Santo, Sudeste do Brasil. Biota. Neotrop., 10, 293–306. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Savage H.M., 1987. Biogeographic classification of the Neotropical Leptophlebiidae (Ephemeroptera) based upon geological centers of ancestral origin and ecology. Stud. Neotrop. Fauna E, 22, 37–41. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Scrimgeour G.J., 1991. Life history and production of Deleatidium (Ephemeroptera: Leptophlebiidae) in an unstable New Zealand river Life history and production of Deleatidium (Ephemeroptera: Leptophlebiidae) in an unst. New Zeal. J. Mar. Fresh, 25, 93–99. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Selvakumar C., Sivaramakrishnan K.G., Janarthanan S., Arumugam M. and Arunachalam M., 2014. Impact of riparian land-use patterns on Ephemeroptera community structure in river basins of the southern Western Ghats, India. Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst., 412, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  • Shimano Y., Cabette H.S.R., Salles F.F. and Juen L., 2010. Composição e distribuição da fauna de Ephemeroptera (Insecta) em área de transição Cerrado-Amazônia, Brasil. Iheringia, Sér. Zool., 100, 301–308. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Shimano Y., Salles F.F., Faria L.R.R., Cabette H.S.R. and Nogueira D.S., 2012. Distribuição espacial das guildas tróficas e estruturação da comunidade de Ephemeroptera (Insecta) em córregos do Cerrado de Mato Grosso, Brasil. Iheringia, Sér. Zool., 102, 187–196. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Shimano Y., Juen L., Salles F.F., Nogueira D.S. and Cabette H.S.R., 2013a. Environmental and spatial processes determining Ephemeroptera (Insecta) structures in tropical streams. Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim., 49, 31–41. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Shimano Y., Salles F.F. and Juen L., 2013b. Study of the mayfly order Ephemeroptera (Insecta) in Brazil: a scienciometric review. Rev. Bras. Entomol., 57, 359–364. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Silva D.P., De Marco P. and Resende D.C., 2010. Adult odonate abundance and community assemblage measures as indicators of stream ecological integrity: a case study. Ecol. Indic., 10, 744–752. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Silva-Pinto N., Juen L., Cabette H.S.R. and De Marco P. Jr. 2012. Fluctuating asymmetry and wing size of argia tinctipennis Selys (Zygoptera: Coenagrionidae) in relation to riparian forest preservation status. Neotrop. Entomol., 41, 178–185. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Souza H.M.S., Cabette H.S.R. and Juen L., 2011. Baetidae (Insecta, Ephemeroptera) em córregos do cerrado matogrossense sob diferentes níveis de preservação ambiental. Iheringia, Sér. Zool., 101, 181–190. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Strahler H.N., 1957. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 38, 913–920. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Suga C.M. and Tanaka M.O., 2013. Influence of a forest remnant on macroinvertebrate communities in a degraded tropical stream. Hydrobiologia, 703, 203–213. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tate C.M. and Heiny J.S., 1995. The ordination of benthic invertebrate communities in the South Platte River Basin in relation to environmental factors. Freshwater Biol., 33, 439–154. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Thorp J.H., Thoms M.C. and Delong M.D., 2006. The riverine ecosystem synthesis: biocomplexity in river networks across space and time. River. Res. Appl., 147, 123–147. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Thorp J.H., Martin C. and Thoms M.D.D., 2008. The Riverine Ecosystem Synthesis: Cohesiveness. Toward Conceptual, Elsevier, Amsterdam. [Google Scholar]
  • Vannote R.L., Minshall G.W., Cummins K.W., Sedell J.R. and Cushing C.E., 1980. The River Continuum Concept. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 37, 130–137. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wahl C.M., Neils A. and Hooper D., 2013. Impacts of land use at the catchment scale constrain the habitat benefits of stream riparian buffers. Freshw. Biol., 58, 2310–2324. [Google Scholar]
  • Warfe D.M., Barmuta L.A. and Wotherspoon S., 2008. Quantifying habitat structure: surface convolution and living space for species in complex environments. Oikos, 117, 1764–1773. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Whittaker R.J., Araújo M.B., Jepson P., Ladle R.J. and Watson J.E.M.W., 2005. Conservation Biogeography: assessment and prospect. Divers. Distrib., 11, 3–23. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Xu M., Wang Z., Duan X. and Pan B., 2014. Effects of pollution on macroinvertebrates and water quality bio-assessment. Hydrobiol., 729, 247–259. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Yoshimura M., 2012. Effects of forest disturbances on aquatic insect assemblages. Entomol. Sci., 15, 145–154. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zar J.H., 2010. Biostatistical Analysis, Pearson, London. [Google Scholar]
  • Zweig L.D. and Rabeni C.F., 2001. Biomonitoring for deposited sediment using benthic invertebrates: a test on 4 Missouri streams. J. N Am. Benthol. Soc., 20, 643–657. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.