Free Access
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 49, Number 3, 2013
Page(s) 169 - 177
Published online 14 August 2013
  • Acreman M.C. and Ferguson J.D., 2010. Environmental flows and European Water Framework Directive. Freshwat. Biol., 55, 32–48. [Google Scholar]
  • Allan J.D. and Russek E., 1985. The quantification of stream drift. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 42, 210–215. [Google Scholar]
  • American Public Health Association – APHA, 1992. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, American Public Health Association, Washington. [Google Scholar]
  • Armitage P.D., 1978. Downstream changes in the composition, numbers and biomass of bottom fauna in the Tees River, below Cow Green Reservoir and in an unregulated tributary Maize Beck, in the first five years after impoundment. Hydrobiologia, 58, 145–156. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brittain J.E. and Eikeland T.J., 1988. Invertebrate drift – a review. Hydrobiologia, 166, 77–93. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bruno M.C., Maiolini B., Carolli M. and Silveri L., 2009. Impact of hydropeaking on hyporheic invertebrates in an Alpine stream (Trentino, Italy). Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim., 45, 157–170. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Bruno M.C., Siviglia A., Carolli M. and Maiolini B., 2012. Multiple drift responses of benthic invertebrates to interacting hydropeaking and thermopeaking waves. Ecohydrol., in press. doi: 10.1002/eco.1275. [Google Scholar]
  • Bunn S.E. and Arthington A.H., 2002. Basis principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environ. Manage., 30, 492–507. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Callisto M. and Goulart M., 2005. Invertebrate drift along a longitudinal gradient in a Neotropical stream in Serra do Cipó National Park, Brazil. Hydrobiologia, 539, 47–56. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Céréghino R., Cugny P. and Lavandier P., 2002. Influence of intermittent hydropeaking on the longitudinal zonation patterns of benthic invertebrates in a mountain stream. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol., 87, 47–60. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Clarke K.R. and Warwick R.M., 2001. Change in Marine Communities an Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation (2nd edn), Primer-e Ltd., Plymouth Marine Laboratory, UK, 172 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Cowell B.C. and Carew W.C., 1976. Seasonal and diel periodicity in the drift of aquatic insects in a subtropical Florida stream. Freshwat. Biol., 6, 587–594. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Elliott J.M., 1968. The life histories and drifting of Trichoptera in a Dartmoor stream. J. Anim. Ecol., 37, 615–625. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Figueredo C.C. and Giani A., 2001. Seasonal variation in the diversity and species richness of phytoplankton in a tropical eutrophic reservoir. Hydrobiologia, 445, 165–174. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Flecker A.S., 1992. Fish predation and the evolution of invertebrate drift periodicity: evidence from Neotropical streams. Ecology, 73, 438–448. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hamada N., McCreadie J.W. and Adler P.H., 2002. Species richness and spatial distribution of blackflies (Diptera: Simuliidae) in streams of Central Amazonia, Brazil. Freshwat. Biol., 47, 31–40. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hansen E.A. and Closs G.P., 2007. Temporal consistency in the long-term spatial distribution of macroinvertebrate drift along a stream reach. Hydrobiologia, 575, 361–371. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hildebrand S.G., 1974. The relation of drift to benthos density and food level in an artificial stream. Limnol. Oceaonogr., 19, 951–957. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Huhta A., Muotka T. and Tikkanen P., 2000. Nocturnal drift of mayfly nymphs as a post-contact antipredator mechanism. Freshwat. Biol., 45, 33–42. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jacobsen D. and Bojsen B., 2002. Macroinvertebrate drift in Amazon streams in relation to riparian forest cover and fish fauna. Arch. Hidrobiol., 155, 177–197. [Google Scholar]
  • Jones N.E., 2013. The dual nature of hydropeaking rivers: is ecopeaking possible? River Res. Applic., in press. doi: 10.1002/rra.2653. [Google Scholar]
  • Lauters F., Lavandier P., Lim P., Sabaton C. and Belaud A., 1996. Influence of hydropeaking on invertebrates and their relationship with fish feeding habits in a Pyrenean River. Regul. River., 12, 563–573. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lobón-Cerviá J., Rezende C.F. and Castellanos C., 2012. High species diversity and low density typify drift and benthos composition in Neotropical streams. Fund. Appl. Limnol., 181, 129–142. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • McIntosh A.R., Peckarsky B.L. and Taylor B.W., 2002. The influence of predatory fish on mayfly drift: extrapolating from experiments to nature. Freshwat. Biol., 47, 1497–1513. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Merritt R.W. and Cummins K.W., 1996. An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America. Kendall Hunt, Iowa, 862 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Mugnai R., Nessimian J.L. and Baptista D.F., 2010. Manual de identificação de macroinvertebrados aquáticos do estado do Rio de Janeiro, Technical Books, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 173 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Naliato D.A.O., Nogueira M.G. and Perbiche-Neves G., 2009. Discharge pulses of hydroelectric dams and their effects in the downstream limnological conditions: a case study in a large tropical river (SE Brazil). Lakes Reserv. Res. Manag., 14, 301–314. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pérez G.R., 1988. Guía para el estudio de los macroinvertebrados acuáticos del Departamento de Antioquia, Universidad de Antioquia, Bogotá, 217 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Poff N.L. and Ward J., 1991. Drift responses of benthic invertebrates to experimental streamflow variation in a hydrologically stable stream. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 48, 1926–1936. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Poff N.L. and Zimmerman J.K.H., 2010. Ecological responses to altered flow regimes: a literature review to inform the science and management of environmental flows. Freshwat. Biol., 55, 194–205. [Google Scholar]
  • Poff N.L., Allan J.D., Bain M.B., Karr J.R., Prestegaard K.L., Richter B.D., Sparks R.E. and Stromberg J.C., 1997. The Natural Flow Regime. A paradigm for river conservation and restoration. BioScience, 47, 769–784. [Google Scholar]
  • Pompeu P.S., Reis L.S., Gandini C.V., Souza R.C.R. and Favero J.M., 2009. The ichthyofauna of upper rio Capivari: defining conservation strategies based on the composition and distribution of fish species. Neotrop. Ichthyol., 7, 659–666. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ramírez A. and Pringle C.M., 1998. Invertebrate drift and benthic community dynamics in a lowland tropical stream,Costa Rica. Hydrobiologia, 386, 19–26. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ramírez A. and Pringle C.M., 2001. Spatial and temporal patterns of invertebrate drift in streams draining a Neotropical landscape. Freshwat. Biol., 46, 47–62. [Google Scholar]
  • Ríos-Touma B., Prat N. and Encalada A.C., 2012. Invertebrate drift and colonization processes in a tropical Andean stream. Aquat. Biol., 14, 233–246. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Schreiber E.S.G., 1995. Long-term patterns of invertebrate stream drift in an Australian temperate stream. Freshwat. Biol., 33, 13–25. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Smokorowski K.E., Metcalfe R.A., Finucan S.D., Jones N., Marty J., Power M., Pyrce R.S. and Steele R., 2011. Ecosystem level assessment of environmentally based flow restrictions for maintaining ecosystem integrity: a comparison of a modified peaking versus unaltered river. Ecohydrology, 4, 791–806. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Straskraba M., 1999. Retention time as a key variable of reservoir limnology. In: Tundisi J.G. and Straskraba M. (eds), Theoretical Reservoir Ecology and its Applications, Brazilian Academy of Sciences, São Carlos, 385–410. [Google Scholar]
  • Troelstrup N.H. and Hergenrader G.L., 1990. Effect of hydropower peaking flow fluctuations on community structure and feeding guilds of invertebrates colonizing artificial substrates in a large impounded river. Hydrobiologia, 199, 217–228. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Waters T.F., 1972. Drift of stream insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol., 17, 253–272. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zar J.H., 1996. Biostatistical Analysis, Prentice–Hall, New Jersey, 662 p. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.