Free Access
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 49, Number 2, 2013
Page(s) 129 - 138
Published online 18 June 2013
  • Allen A.P., Whittier T.R., Kaufmann P.R., Larsen D.P., O'Connor R.J., Hughes R.M., Stemberger R.S., Dixit S.S., Brinkhurst R.O., Herlihy A.T. and Paulsen S.G., 1999. Concordance of taxonomic richness patterns across multiple assemblages in lakes of the northeastern United States. Can. J. Fish Aquat. Sci., 56, 739–747. [CrossRef]
  • Angrisano E.B. and Korob P.G., 2001. Trichoptera. In: Fernández H.R. and Domínguez E. (eds.), Guia para la identificacion de los artrópodos bentônicos sudamericanos, Editorial Universitaria de Tucumám, Tucamám, 55–92.
  • Bini L.M., Vieira L.C.G., Machado J. and Velho L.F.M., 2007. Concordance of species composition patterns among microcrustaceans, rotifers and testate amoebae in a shallow pond. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol., 92, 9–22. [CrossRef]
  • Bini L.M., Silva L.C.F., Velho L.F.M., Bonecker C.C. and Lansac-Toha F.A., 2008. Zooplankton assemblage concordance patterns in Brazilian reservoirs. Hydrobiologia, 598, 247–255. [CrossRef]
  • Bispo P.C., Oliveira L.G., Crisci-Bispo V.L. and Silva M.M., 2001. A pluviosidade como fator de alteração da entomofauna bentônica (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera e Trichoptera) em córregos do Planalto Central do Brasil. Acta Limnol. Bras., 13, 1–9.
  • Bowman M.F., Ingram R., Reid R.A., Somers K.M., Yan N.D., Paterson A.M., Morgan G.E. and Gunn J.M., 2008. Temporal and spacial concordance in community composition of phytoplakton, zooplakton, macroinvertebrate, crayfish, and fish on Precambrian Shield. Can. J. Fish Aquat. Sci., 65, 919–932. [CrossRef]
  • Brittain J.E., 1982. Biology of mayflies. Annu. Rev. Entomol., 27, 119–147. [CrossRef]
  • Cameron S.E., Williams K.J. and Mitchell D.K., 2008. Efficiency and concordance of alternative methods for minimizing opportunity costs in conservation planning. Conserv. Biol., 22, 886–896. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Carvalho N.D.O., Cafe F.A., Mota G.D.O., Franco H.C.D.B. and Braga A., 2004. Assessment of the sedimentation in the reservoirs of the Belo Monte hydroelectric complex, Xingu River, Brazil. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on River Sedimentation, Vols 1–4, 233–242.
  • Colwell R.K., 2005. EstimateS: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 7.5.
  • Couceiro S.R.M., Hamada N., Forsberg B.R. and Padovesi-Fonseca C., 2010. Effects of anthropogenic silt on aquatic macroinvertebrates and abiotic variables in streams in the Brazilian Amazon. J. Soils Sediments, 10, 89–103. [CrossRef]
  • DeChaine E.G. and Martin A.P., 2005. Historical biogeography of two alpine butterflies in the Rocky Mountains: broad-scale concordance and local-scale discordance. J. Biogeogr., 32, 1943–1956. [CrossRef]
  • Domínguez E., Molineri C., Pescador M.L., Hubbard M. and Nieto C., 2006. Ephemeroptera of South America, Pensoft Publ., Moscow, 646 p.
  • Faith D.P., 2003. Environmental diversity (ED) as surrogate information for species-level biodiversity. Ecography, 26, 374–379. [CrossRef]
  • Gauch H.G., 1982. Multivariate Analysis in Community Ecology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 312 p.
  • Grenouillet G., Brosse S., Tudesque L., Lek S., Baraillé Y. and Loot G., 2008. Concordance among stream assemblages and spatial autocorrelation along a fragmented gradient. Divers Distrib., 14, 592–603. [CrossRef]
  • Heino J., 2002. Concordance of species richness patterns among multiple freshwater taxa: a regional perspective. Biodivers. Conserv., 11, 137–147. [CrossRef]
  • Heino J., 2010. Are indicator groups and cross-taxon congruence useful for predicting biodiversity in aquatic ecosystems?Ecol. Indic., 10, 112–117. [CrossRef]
  • Heino J. and Mykrä H., 2006. Assessing physical surrogates for biodiversity: Do tributary and stream type classifications reflect macroinvertebrate assemblage diversity in running waters?Biodivers. Conserv., 129, 418–426.
  • Heino J., Muotka T. and Paavola R., 2003. Determinants of macroinvertebrate diversity in headwater streams: regional and local influences. J. Animal Ecol., 72, 425–434. [CrossRef]
  • Heino J., Paavola R., Virtanen R. and Muotka T., 2005. Searching for biodiversity indicators in running waters: do bryophytes, macroinvertebrates, and fish show congruent diversity patterns? Biodivers. Conserv., 14, 415–428. [CrossRef]
  • Hynes H.B.N., 1970. The ecology of stream insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol., 15, 25–42. [CrossRef]
  • Jackson D.A., 1995. Protest – a Procrustean randomization test of community environment concordance. Ecoscience, 2, 297–303.
  • Jackson D.A. and Harvey H.H., 1993. Fish and benthic invertebrates: community concordance and community-environment relationships. Can. J. Fish Aquat. Sci., 50, 2641–2651. [CrossRef]
  • Juen L. and De Marco P., 2011. Odonata biodiversity in terra-firme forest streamlets in Central Amazonia: on the relative effects of neutral and niche drivers at small geographical extents. Insect. Conserv. Diver., 4, 265–274. [CrossRef]
  • Junk W.J., Bayley P.B. and Sparks R.E., 1989. The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems. In: Dodge D.P. (ed.), Proceedings of the International Large River Symposium, 110–127.
  • Landeiro V.L., Bini L.M., Melo A.S., Pes A.M.O. and Magnusson W.E., 2012. The roles of dispersal limitation and environmental conditions in controlling caddisfly (Trichoptera) assemblages. Freshwater Biology, 57, 1554–1564. [CrossRef]
  • Melo A.S. and Froehlich C.G., 2001. Macroinvertebrates in neotropical streams: richness patterns along a catchment and assemblage structure between 2 seasons. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 20, 1–16. [CrossRef]
  • Melo A.S., Niyogi D.K., Matthaei C.D. and Townsend C.R., 2003. Resistance, resilience, and patchiness of invertebrate assemblages in native tussock and pasture streams in New Zealand after a hydrological disturbance. Can. J. Fish Aquat. Sci., 60, 731–739. [CrossRef]
  • Monaghan K.A. and Soares A.M.V.M., 2010. The bioassessment of fish and macroinvertebrates in a Mediterranean–Atlantic climate: habitat assessment and concordance between contrasting ecological samples. Ecol. Indic., 10, 184–191. [CrossRef]
  • Nessimian J.L., Venticinque E.M., Zuanon J., De Marco P. Jr., Gordo M., Fidelis L., Batista J.D. and Juen L., 2008. Land use, habitat integrity, and aquatic insect assemblages in Central Amazonian streams. Hydrobiologia, 614, 117–131. [CrossRef]
  • Nogueira D.S., Cabette H.S.R. and Juen L., 2011. Estrutura e composição da comunidade de Trichoptera (Insecta) de rios e áreas alagadas da Bacia do rio Suiá-Missu, Mato Grosso, Brasil, Iheringia. Sér. Zool., 101, 173–180.
  • Oksanen J., Blanchet F.G., Kindt R., Legendre P., Minchin P.R., O'Hara R.B., Simpson G.L., Solymos P., Stevens M.H.H. and Wagner H., 2011. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.0-2.
  • Olden J.D., Jackson D.A. and Peres-Neto P.R., 2001. Spatial isolation and fish communities in drainage lakes. Oecologia, 127, 572–585. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Paavola R., Muotka T., Virtanen R., Heino J. and Kreivi P., 2003. Are biological classifications of headwater streams concordant across multiple taxonomic groups?Freshwater Biol., 48, 1912–1923. [CrossRef]
  • Paszkowski C.A. and Tonn W.M., 2000. Community concordance between the fish and aquatic birds of lakes in northern Alberta, Canada: the relative importance of environmental and biotic factors. Freswater Biol., 43, 421–437. [CrossRef]
  • Pes A.M.O., Hamada N. and Nessimian J.L., 2005. Chaves de identificação de larvas para famílias e gêneros de Trichoptera (Insecta) da Amazônia Central, Brasil. Revta Bras. Ent., 49, 181–204. [CrossRef]
  • Ratter J.A., Askew G.P., Montgomery R.F. and Gifford D.R., 1978. Observations on the vegetation of northeastern Mato Grosso II. Forest and Soils of the Rio Suiá-Missu area. R. Soc. Lond., 293, 191–208. [CrossRef]
  • R Development Core Team, 2011. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
  • Riva A.L.M., Fonseca L.F.L. and Hasenclever L., 2007. Instrumentos econômicos e financeiros para a conservação ambiental no Brasil: Uma análise do estado da arte no Brasil e no Mato Grosso, desafios e perspectivas, Instituto Socioambiental – ISA, São Paulo, 138 p.
  • Roque F.O., Lima D.V.M., Siqueira T., Vieira L.J.S., Stefanes M. and Trivino-Strixino S., 2012. Concordance between macroinvertebrates communities and the typological classification of White and clear-water streams in western Brazilian Amazonia. Biota Neotropical, 12, 83–92. [CrossRef]
  • Rosenberg D.M. and Resh V.H., 1993. Introduction to freshwater biomonitoring and benthic macroinvertebrates. In: Rosenberg D.M. and Resh V.H. (eds.), Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinvertebrates, Chapman and Hall, New York, 1–9.
  • Shimano Y., Cabette H.S.R., Salles F.F. and Juen L., 2010. Composição e distribuição da fauna de Ephemeroptera (Insecta) em área de transição Cerrado-Amazônia, Brasil. Iheringia, 100, 301–308. [CrossRef]
  • Siqueira T., Bini L.M., Roque F.O. and Correnie K., 2012. A metacommunity framework for enhancing the effectiveness of biological monitoring strategies. Plos One, 7, 1–12. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Strahler H.N., 1957. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Am. Geophys. Union Trans., 38, 913–920. [CrossRef]
  • Tolonen K.T., Holopainen I.J., Hamalainen H., Rahkola-Sorsa M., Ylostalo P., Mikkonen K. and Karjalainen J., 2005. Littoral species diversity and biomass: concordance among organism groups and the effects of environmental variables. Biodivers. Conserv., 14, 961–980. [CrossRef]
  • Vannote R.L., Minshall G.W., Cummins K.W., Sedell J.R. and Cushing C.E., 1980. The river continuum concept. Can. J. Fish Aquat. Sci., 37, 130–137. [CrossRef]
  • Wiggins G.B., 1996. Larvae of the North American Caddisfly Genera (Trichoptera), University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 457 p.
  • Wiggins G.B. and Mackay R.J., 1978. Some relationships between systematics and trophic ecology in Neartic aquatic insects, with special references to Trichoptera. Ecology, 59, 1211–1220. [CrossRef]
  • Zar J.H., 1999. Biostatistical Analysis, Prentice–Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 960 p.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.