Free Access
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 47, 2011
River ecosystem health assessment: the value in the management and restoration
Page(s) S15 - S33
Published online 08 July 2011
  • Anderson E.L., Welch E.B., Jacoby J.M., Schimek G.M. and Horner R.R., 1999. Periphyton removal related to phosphorus and grazer biomass level. Freshwater Biol., 41, 633–651. [CrossRef]
  • APHA, 2001. Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water, American Public Health Association, New York.
  • Barbour M.Y., Gerritsen J., Snyder B.D. and Stribling J.B., 1999. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers: Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates, and Fish, 2nd edn., EPA 841-B-99-002, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, DC.
  • Biggs B.J.F. and Hickey C.W., 1994. Periphyton responses to a hydraulic gradient in a regulated river, New Zealand. Freshwater Biol., 32, 49–59. [CrossRef]
  • Biggs B.J.F. and Smith R.A., 2002. Taxonomic richness of stream benthic algae: effects of flood disturbance and nutrients. Limnol. Oceanogr., 47, 1175–1186. [CrossRef]
  • Biggs B.J.F., Duncan M.J., Jowett I.G., Quinn J.M., Hickey C.W., Davies-Colley R.J. and Close M.E., 1990. Ecological characterization, classification, and modeling of New Zealand rivers: an introduction and synthesis. N. Z. J. Mar. Freshwater Res., 24, 277–304. [CrossRef]
  • Bona F., Falasco E., Fassina S., Griselli B. and Badino G., 2007. Characterization of diatom assemblages in mid-altitude streams of NW Italy. Hydrobiologia, 538, 265–274. [CrossRef]
  • Borja A., Josefson A.B., Miles A., Muxika I., Olsgard F., Philips G., German Rodriguea J. and Rygg B., 2007. An approach to the intercalibration of benthic ecological status assessment in the North Atlantic ecoregion, according to the European Water Framework Directive. Mar. Poll. Bull., 55, 42–52. [CrossRef]
  • Butcher J.T., Stewart P.M. and Simon T.P., 2003. A benthic community index for streams in the Northern lakes and forests ecoregion. Ecol. Indic., 3, 181–193. [CrossRef]
  • Chessman B.C., Westhorpe D.P., Mitrovic S.M. and Hardwick L., 2009. Trophic linkage between periphyton and grazing macroinvertebrates in rivers with different levels of a catchment development. Hydrobiologia, 625, 135–150. [CrossRef]
  • Choi J.K., Lee J.H. and Lee K., 1995. Taxonomic studies on diatoms in Korea. I. Classification system and Koreanization of classification level. Korean J. Pycol., 10, 1–11 (in Korean).
  • Clausen B. and Biggs B.J.F., 1997. Relationships between benthic biota and hydrological indices in New Zealand streams. Freshwater Biol., 38, 327–342. [CrossRef]
  • Dickman M.D., Peart M.R. and Yim W.W., 2005. Benthic diatoms as indicators of stream sediment concentration in Hong Kong. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol., 90, 412–421. [CrossRef]
  • Dufrene M. and Legendre P., 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol. Monogr., 67, 345–366.
  • Giller P.S. and Malmqvist B., 1998. The Biology of Streams and Rivers, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
  • Hughes R.M. and Larsen D.P., 1988. Ecoregions: an approach to surface water protection. J. Water Poll. Cont. Fed., 60, 486–493.
  • Hwang S.J., Kim N.Y., Won D.H., An G.K., Lee J.K. and Kim C.S., 2006. Biological assessment of water quality by using epilithic diatoms in major river systems, Korea. J. Korean Soc. Wat. Qual., 22, 784–795 (in Korean).
  • Keister J.E. and Peterson W.T., 2003. Zonal and seasonal variations in zooplankton community structure off the central Oregon coast, 1998–2000. Prog. Oceanogr., 5, 341–361. [CrossRef]
  • Kelly M.G., 2002. Role of benthic diatoms in the implementation of the urban wastewater treatment directive in the River Wear, NE England. J. Appl. Phycol., 14, 9–18. [CrossRef]
  • Kelly M.G. and Whitton B.A., 1995. The trophic diatom index: a new index for monitoring eutrophication in rivers. J. Appl. Phycol., 7, 433–444. [CrossRef]
  • Kelly M.G., Bennion H., Burgess A., Ellis J., Juggins S., Guthrie R., Jamieson J., Adriaenssens V. and Yallop M., 2009. Uncertainty in ecological status assessments of lakes and rivers using diatoms. Hydrobiologia, 633, 5–15. [CrossRef]
  • Kim Y.J., 2007. Changes of epilithic diatom communities according to urbanization influence in the Pocheon and Youngpyeong Streams. Korean J. Limnol., 40, 468–480 (in Korean).
  • Kociolek J.P. and Spaulding S.A., 2000. Freshwater diatom biogeography. Nova Hedwigia, 71, 223–241.
  • Koetsier P., 2005. Response of a stream diatom community to top predator manipulation. Aquat. Sci., 67, 517–527.
  • Krammer K. and Lange-Bertalot H., 1986. Bacillariophyceae 1. Teil: Naviculaceae. In: Ettl H., Gerloff H., Heying J.H. and Mollenhauer D. (eds.), Süβwasserflora von Mittleuropa, Band 2/1, Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart/New York, 876 p.
  • Krammer K. and Lange-Bertalot H., 1988. Bacillariophyceae 2. Teil: Bacillariaceae, Epithemiaceae, Surirellaceae. In: Ettl H., Gerloff H., Heying J.H. and Mollenhauer D. (eds.), Süβwasserflora von Mittleuropa, Band 2/2, Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart/New York, 596 p.
  • Krammer K. and Lange-Bertalot H. 1991a. Bacillariophyceae 3. Teil: Cenrales, Fragilariaceae, Eunotiaceae. In: Ettl H., Gerloff J., Heying H. and Mollenhauer D. (eds.), Süβwasserflora von Mittleuropa, Band 2/3, Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart/Jena, 576 p.
  • Krammer K. and Lange-Bertalot H., 1991b. Bacillariophyceae 4. Teil: Achnanthaceae Kritische Eragänzungen zu Navicula (Lineolatae) und Gomphonema. In: Ettl H., Gerloff J., Heying H. and Mollenhauer D. (eds.), Süβwasserflora von Mittleuropa, Band 2/4, Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart/New York, 437 p.
  • Kwon T.H. and Lee J.H., 2007. Assessment of ecological condition improvement by eco-technological restoration in a small stream. Korean J. Env. Ecol., 21, 442–448 (in Korean).
  • Lee J.H. and Chung J., 1992. Station variation of epilithic diatoms according to pollution degree from the Kumho River. Korean J. Limnol., 25, 31–41 (in Korean).
  • Lee K., 1988. A checklist of the freshwater diatoms in Korea. Korean J. Phycol., 3, 29–88 (in Korean).
  • Leira M. and Sabater S., 2005. Diatom assemblages distribution in catalan rivers, NE Spain, in relation to chemical and physiographical factors. Water Res., 39, 73–82. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Leland H.V. and Porter S.D., 2000. Distribution of benthic algae in the upper Illinois River basin in relation to geology and land use. Freshwater Biol., 44, 279–301. [CrossRef]
  • McCune B. and Grace J.B., 2002. Analysis of Ecological Communities, MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, OR.
  • McCune B. and Mefford M.J., 1999. PC-ORD, Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data version 4.41 MjM Software, Gleneden Beach, OR.
  • Mielke E.W., Berry K.J. and Johnson E.S., 1976. Multiresponse permutation procedures for a priori classifications. Commun. Stat. Theory Methods, 5, 1409–1424. [CrossRef]
  • MOE/NIER, 2008. Survey and Evaluation of Aquatic Ecosystem Health in Korea, The Ministry of Environment/National Institute of Environmental Research, Korea (in Korean).
  • Omernik J.M., 1987. Ecoregions: a spatial framework for environmental management. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr., 77, 118–125. [CrossRef]
  • Pan Y.D., Stevenson R.J., Hill B.H., Kaufmann P.R. and Herlihy A.T., 1999. Spatial patterns and ecological determinants of benthic algal assemblages in Mid-Atlantic streams, USA. J. Phycol., 35, 460–468. [CrossRef]
  • Pan Y.D., Hill B.H., Husby P., Hall. R.K. and Kaufmann P.R., 2006. Relationships between environmental variables and benthic diatom assemblages in California Central valley stream (USA). Hydrobiologia, 561, 119–130. [CrossRef]
  • Passy S.I., Bode R.W., Carlson D.M. and Novak M.A., 2004. Comparative environmental assessment in the studies of benthic diatoms, macroinvertebrates, and fish communities. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol., 89, 121–138. [CrossRef]
  • Petersen C.G., 1996. Response of benthic algal communities to natural physical disturbance. In: Stevensen R.J., Bothwell M.L. and Lowe R.J. (eds.), Algal Ecology: Freshwater Benthic Ecosystems, Academic Press, New York, 375–402.
  • Petersen C.G. and Stevenson R.J., 1990. Post-state development of epilithic algal communities in different current environments. Can. J. Bot., 68, 2092–2102. [CrossRef]
  • Petersen W.T. and Keister J.E., 2003. Interannual variability in copepod community composition at a coastal station in the northern California Current: a multivariate approach. Deep Sea Res., 50, 2499–2517. [CrossRef]
  • Potapova M.G. and Charles D.F., 2002. Benthic diatom in USA rivers: distributions along spatial and environmental gradients. J. Biogeogr., 29, 167–187. [CrossRef]
  • Potapova M.G. and Charles D.F., 2003. Distribution of benthic diatoms in U.S. rivers in relation to conductivity and ionic composition. Freshwater Biol., 48, 1311–1328. [CrossRef]
  • Roth N.J., Allan J.D. and Erickson D.L., 1996. Landscape influences on stream biotic integrity assessed at multiple spatial scales. Landscape Ecol., 11, 141–156. [CrossRef]
  • Shin J.H. and Lee D.K., 2004. Strategies for restoration of forest ecosystems degraded by forest fire in Kangwon ecoregion of Korea. Forest Ecol. Manag., 201, 43–56. [CrossRef]
  • Simboura N., Panayotidis P. and Papathanassiou E., 2005. A synthesis of the biological quality elements for the implementation of the European Water Framework Directive in the Mediterraneam ecoregion: The case of Saronikos. Gulf Ecol. Indic., 5, 253–266. [CrossRef]
  • Skvortzow B.W., 1929. Freshwater diatoms from Korea. Philippines J. Sci., 38, 283–291.
  • Soininen J., Paavola R. and Muotka T., 2004. Benthic diatom communities in boreal streams: community structure in relation to environmental and spatial gradients. Ecography, 27, 330–342. [CrossRef]
  • StatSoft Inc., 2004. STATISTICA (data analysis software system), Version 7,
  • Stevenson R., 1997. Scale-dependent causal frameworks and the consequences of benthic algal heterogeneity. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc., 16, 248–262. [CrossRef]
  • Stevenson R.J., Bothwell M.X. and Lowe R.L. (eds.), 1996. Algal Ecology: Freshwater Benthic Ecosystems, Academic Press, New York, 753 p.
  • ter Braak C.J.F., 1987. Ordination. In: Jongnam R.H.G., Ter Braak C.J.F. and van Tongeren O.F.R. (eds.), Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology, Pudoc, Wageningen, 91–173.
  • Watanabe T., 2005. Picture Book and Ecology of the Freshwater Diatoms, Uchida Rokakuho Publishing Co., Tokyo, Japan.
  • Watanabe T., Asai K. and Houki A., 1986. Numerical estimation of organic pollution of flowing water by using the epilithic diatom assemblage – Diatom assemblage index (DAIpo). Sci. Tot. Environ., 55, 209–218. [CrossRef]
  • Watanabe T., Asai K. and Houki A., 1990. Numerical simulation of organic pollution in flowing waters. Encyclopedia Environ. Control Technol., 4, 251–281.
  • Weckström J. and Korhola A., 2001. Patterns in the distribution, composition and diversity of diatom assemblages in relation to ecoclimatic factors in Arctic Lapland. J. Biogeogr., 28, 31–45. [CrossRef]
  • Werner P. and Köhler J., 2005. Seasonal dynamics of benthic and planktonic algae in a nutrient-rich lowland river (Spree, Germany). Int. Rev. Hydrobiol., 90, 1–20. [CrossRef]
  • Whittier T.R., Hughes R.M. and Larsen D.O., 1988. Correspondence between ecoregions and spatial patterns in stream ecosystems in Oregon. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 45, 1264–1278. [CrossRef]
  • Whitton B.A. and Rott E. (eds.), 1996. Use of algae for monitoring rivers. II. In: Proceedings of an International Symposium, Innsbruck, Austria.
  • Wu N., Tang T., Qu X. and Cai Q., 2009. Spatial distribution of benthic algae in the Gangqu River, Shangrila, China. Aquat. Ecol., 43, 37–49. [CrossRef]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.