EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 47 (2011) Suppl. 1 Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim., 47 (2011) S15-S33 References
Free Access
Issue
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 47, 2011
River ecosystem health assessment: the value in the management and restoration
Page(s) S15 - S33
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/2011017
Published online 08 July 2011
  • Anderson E.L., Welch E.B., Jacoby J.M., Schimek G.M. and Horner R.R., 1999. Periphyton removal related to phosphorus and grazer biomass level. Freshwater Biol., 41, 633–651. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • APHA, 2001. Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water, American Public Health Association, New York. [Google Scholar]
  • Barbour M.Y., Gerritsen J., Snyder B.D. and Stribling J.B., 1999. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers: Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates, and Fish, 2nd edn., EPA 841-B-99-002, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
  • Biggs B.J.F. and Hickey C.W., 1994. Periphyton responses to a hydraulic gradient in a regulated river, New Zealand. Freshwater Biol., 32, 49–59. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Biggs B.J.F. and Smith R.A., 2002. Taxonomic richness of stream benthic algae: effects of flood disturbance and nutrients. Limnol. Oceanogr., 47, 1175–1186. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Biggs B.J.F., Duncan M.J., Jowett I.G., Quinn J.M., Hickey C.W., Davies-Colley R.J. and Close M.E., 1990. Ecological characterization, classification, and modeling of New Zealand rivers: an introduction and synthesis. N. Z. J. Mar. Freshwater Res., 24, 277–304. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bona F., Falasco E., Fassina S., Griselli B. and Badino G., 2007. Characterization of diatom assemblages in mid-altitude streams of NW Italy. Hydrobiologia, 538, 265–274. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Borja A., Josefson A.B., Miles A., Muxika I., Olsgard F., Philips G., German Rodriguea J. and Rygg B., 2007. An approach to the intercalibration of benthic ecological status assessment in the North Atlantic ecoregion, according to the European Water Framework Directive. Mar. Poll. Bull., 55, 42–52. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Butcher J.T., Stewart P.M. and Simon T.P., 2003. A benthic community index for streams in the Northern lakes and forests ecoregion. Ecol. Indic., 3, 181–193. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chessman B.C., Westhorpe D.P., Mitrovic S.M. and Hardwick L., 2009. Trophic linkage between periphyton and grazing macroinvertebrates in rivers with different levels of a catchment development. Hydrobiologia, 625, 135–150. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Choi J.K., Lee J.H. and Lee K., 1995. Taxonomic studies on diatoms in Korea. I. Classification system and Koreanization of classification level. Korean J. Pycol., 10, 1–11 (in Korean). [Google Scholar]
  • Clausen B. and Biggs B.J.F., 1997. Relationships between benthic biota and hydrological indices in New Zealand streams. Freshwater Biol., 38, 327–342. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dickman M.D., Peart M.R. and Yim W.W., 2005. Benthic diatoms as indicators of stream sediment concentration in Hong Kong. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol., 90, 412–421. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dufrene M. and Legendre P., 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol. Monogr., 67, 345–366. [Google Scholar]
  • Giller P.S. and Malmqvist B., 1998. The Biology of Streams and Rivers, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. [Google Scholar]
  • Hughes R.M. and Larsen D.P., 1988. Ecoregions: an approach to surface water protection. J. Water Poll. Cont. Fed., 60, 486–493. [Google Scholar]
  • Hwang S.J., Kim N.Y., Won D.H., An G.K., Lee J.K. and Kim C.S., 2006. Biological assessment of water quality by using epilithic diatoms in major river systems, Korea. J. Korean Soc. Wat. Qual., 22, 784–795 (in Korean). [Google Scholar]
  • Keister J.E. and Peterson W.T., 2003. Zonal and seasonal variations in zooplankton community structure off the central Oregon coast, 1998–2000. Prog. Oceanogr., 5, 341–361. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kelly M.G., 2002. Role of benthic diatoms in the implementation of the urban wastewater treatment directive in the River Wear, NE England. J. Appl. Phycol., 14, 9–18. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kelly M.G. and Whitton B.A., 1995. The trophic diatom index: a new index for monitoring eutrophication in rivers. J. Appl. Phycol., 7, 433–444. [Google Scholar]
  • Kelly M.G., Bennion H., Burgess A., Ellis J., Juggins S., Guthrie R., Jamieson J., Adriaenssens V. and Yallop M., 2009. Uncertainty in ecological status assessments of lakes and rivers using diatoms. Hydrobiologia, 633, 5–15. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kim Y.J., 2007. Changes of epilithic diatom communities according to urbanization influence in the Pocheon and Youngpyeong Streams. Korean J. Limnol., 40, 468–480 (in Korean). [Google Scholar]
  • Kociolek J.P. and Spaulding S.A., 2000. Freshwater diatom biogeography. Nova Hedwigia, 71, 223–241. [Google Scholar]
  • Koetsier P., 2005. Response of a stream diatom community to top predator manipulation. Aquat. Sci., 67, 517–527. [Google Scholar]
  • Krammer K. and Lange-Bertalot H., 1986. Bacillariophyceae 1. Teil: Naviculaceae. In: Ettl H., Gerloff H., Heying J.H. and Mollenhauer D. (eds.), Süβwasserflora von Mittleuropa, Band 2/1, Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart/New York, 876 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Krammer K. and Lange-Bertalot H., 1988. Bacillariophyceae 2. Teil: Bacillariaceae, Epithemiaceae, Surirellaceae. In: Ettl H., Gerloff H., Heying J.H. and Mollenhauer D. (eds.), Süβwasserflora von Mittleuropa, Band 2/2, Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart/New York, 596 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Krammer K. and Lange-Bertalot H. 1991a. Bacillariophyceae 3. Teil: Cenrales, Fragilariaceae, Eunotiaceae. In: Ettl H., Gerloff J., Heying H. and Mollenhauer D. (eds.), Süβwasserflora von Mittleuropa, Band 2/3, Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart/Jena, 576 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Krammer K. and Lange-Bertalot H., 1991b. Bacillariophyceae 4. Teil: Achnanthaceae Kritische Eragänzungen zu Navicula (Lineolatae) und Gomphonema. In: Ettl H., Gerloff J., Heying H. and Mollenhauer D. (eds.), Süβwasserflora von Mittleuropa, Band 2/4, Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart/New York, 437 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Kwon T.H. and Lee J.H., 2007. Assessment of ecological condition improvement by eco-technological restoration in a small stream. Korean J. Env. Ecol., 21, 442–448 (in Korean). [Google Scholar]
  • Lee J.H. and Chung J., 1992. Station variation of epilithic diatoms according to pollution degree from the Kumho River. Korean J. Limnol., 25, 31–41 (in Korean). [Google Scholar]
  • Lee K., 1988. A checklist of the freshwater diatoms in Korea. Korean J. Phycol., 3, 29–88 (in Korean). [Google Scholar]
  • Leira M. and Sabater S., 2005. Diatom assemblages distribution in catalan rivers, NE Spain, in relation to chemical and physiographical factors. Water Res., 39, 73–82. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Leland H.V. and Porter S.D., 2000. Distribution of benthic algae in the upper Illinois River basin in relation to geology and land use. Freshwater Biol., 44, 279–301. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • McCune B. and Grace J.B., 2002. Analysis of Ecological Communities, MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, OR. [Google Scholar]
  • McCune B. and Mefford M.J., 1999. PC-ORD, Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data version 4.41 MjM Software, Gleneden Beach, OR. [Google Scholar]
  • Mielke E.W., Berry K.J. and Johnson E.S., 1976. Multiresponse permutation procedures for a priori classifications. Commun. Stat. Theory Methods, 5, 1409–1424. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • MOE/NIER, 2008. Survey and Evaluation of Aquatic Ecosystem Health in Korea, The Ministry of Environment/National Institute of Environmental Research, Korea (in Korean). [Google Scholar]
  • Omernik J.M., 1987. Ecoregions: a spatial framework for environmental management. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr., 77, 118–125. [Google Scholar]
  • Pan Y.D., Stevenson R.J., Hill B.H., Kaufmann P.R. and Herlihy A.T., 1999. Spatial patterns and ecological determinants of benthic algal assemblages in Mid-Atlantic streams, USA. J. Phycol., 35, 460–468. [Google Scholar]
  • Pan Y.D., Hill B.H., Husby P., Hall. R.K. and Kaufmann P.R., 2006. Relationships between environmental variables and benthic diatom assemblages in California Central valley stream (USA). Hydrobiologia, 561, 119–130. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Passy S.I., Bode R.W., Carlson D.M. and Novak M.A., 2004. Comparative environmental assessment in the studies of benthic diatoms, macroinvertebrates, and fish communities. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol., 89, 121–138. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Petersen C.G., 1996. Response of benthic algal communities to natural physical disturbance. In: Stevensen R.J., Bothwell M.L. and Lowe R.J. (eds.), Algal Ecology: Freshwater Benthic Ecosystems, Academic Press, New York, 375–402. [Google Scholar]
  • Petersen C.G. and Stevenson R.J., 1990. Post-state development of epilithic algal communities in different current environments. Can. J. Bot., 68, 2092–2102. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Petersen W.T. and Keister J.E., 2003. Interannual variability in copepod community composition at a coastal station in the northern California Current: a multivariate approach. Deep Sea Res., 50, 2499–2517. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Potapova M.G. and Charles D.F., 2002. Benthic diatom in USA rivers: distributions along spatial and environmental gradients. J. Biogeogr., 29, 167–187. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Potapova M.G. and Charles D.F., 2003. Distribution of benthic diatoms in U.S. rivers in relation to conductivity and ionic composition. Freshwater Biol., 48, 1311–1328. [Google Scholar]
  • Roth N.J., Allan J.D. and Erickson D.L., 1996. Landscape influences on stream biotic integrity assessed at multiple spatial scales. Landscape Ecol., 11, 141–156. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Shin J.H. and Lee D.K., 2004. Strategies for restoration of forest ecosystems degraded by forest fire in Kangwon ecoregion of Korea. Forest Ecol. Manag., 201, 43–56. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Simboura N., Panayotidis P. and Papathanassiou E., 2005. A synthesis of the biological quality elements for the implementation of the European Water Framework Directive in the Mediterraneam ecoregion: The case of Saronikos. Gulf Ecol. Indic., 5, 253–266. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Skvortzow B.W., 1929. Freshwater diatoms from Korea. Philippines J. Sci., 38, 283–291. [Google Scholar]
  • Soininen J., Paavola R. and Muotka T., 2004. Benthic diatom communities in boreal streams: community structure in relation to environmental and spatial gradients. Ecography, 27, 330–342. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • StatSoft Inc., 2004. STATISTICA (data analysis software system), Version 7, http://www.statsoft.com. [Google Scholar]
  • Stevenson R., 1997. Scale-dependent causal frameworks and the consequences of benthic algal heterogeneity. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc., 16, 248–262. [Google Scholar]
  • Stevenson R.J., Bothwell M.X. and Lowe R.L. (eds.), 1996. Algal Ecology: Freshwater Benthic Ecosystems, Academic Press, New York, 753 p. [Google Scholar]
  • ter Braak C.J.F., 1987. Ordination. In: Jongnam R.H.G., Ter Braak C.J.F. and van Tongeren O.F.R. (eds.), Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology, Pudoc, Wageningen, 91–173. [Google Scholar]
  • Watanabe T., 2005. Picture Book and Ecology of the Freshwater Diatoms, Uchida Rokakuho Publishing Co., Tokyo, Japan. [Google Scholar]
  • Watanabe T., Asai K. and Houki A., 1986. Numerical estimation of organic pollution of flowing water by using the epilithic diatom assemblage – Diatom assemblage index (DAIpo). Sci. Tot. Environ., 55, 209–218. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Watanabe T., Asai K. and Houki A., 1990. Numerical simulation of organic pollution in flowing waters. Encyclopedia Environ. Control Technol., 4, 251–281. [Google Scholar]
  • Weckström J. and Korhola A., 2001. Patterns in the distribution, composition and diversity of diatom assemblages in relation to ecoclimatic factors in Arctic Lapland. J. Biogeogr., 28, 31–45. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Werner P. and Köhler J., 2005. Seasonal dynamics of benthic and planktonic algae in a nutrient-rich lowland river (Spree, Germany). Int. Rev. Hydrobiol., 90, 1–20. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Whittier T.R., Hughes R.M. and Larsen D.O., 1988. Correspondence between ecoregions and spatial patterns in stream ecosystems in Oregon. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 45, 1264–1278. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Whitton B.A. and Rott E. (eds.), 1996. Use of algae for monitoring rivers. II. In: Proceedings of an International Symposium, Innsbruck, Austria. [Google Scholar]
  • Wu N., Tang T., Qu X. and Cai Q., 2009. Spatial distribution of benthic algae in the Gangqu River, Shangrila, China. Aquat. Ecol., 43, 37–49. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.