Free Access
Issue
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 47, 2011
River ecosystem health assessment: the value in the management and restoration
Page(s) S3 - S14
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/2011016
Published online 08 July 2011
  • Allan J.D., 1995. Stream ecology: structure and function of running waters, Chapman and Hall, London.
  • Allan J.D., 2004. Landscapes and riverscapes: the influence of land use on stream ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst., 35, 257–284. [CrossRef]
  • Allan J.D., Erickson D.L. and Fay J., 1997. The influence of catchment land use on stream integrity across multiple spatial scales. Freshwater Biol., 37, 149–161. [CrossRef]
  • An K.-G., Jung S.H. and Choi S.S., 2001. An evaluation on health conditions of Pyongchang River using the index of biological integrity (IBI) and qualitative habitat evaluation index (QHEI). Korean J. Limnol., 34, 153–165 (in Korean).
  • An K.-G., Lee J.Y., Bae D.-Y., Kim J.-H., Hwang S.-J., Won D.-H., Lee J.-K. and Kim C.-S., 2006. Ecological assessments of aquatic environment using multi-metric model in major nationwide stream watershed. J. Korean Sco. Water Qual., 22, 796–804 (in Korean).
  • Angermier P.L. and Karr J.R., 1986. Applying an index of biotic integrity based on stream fish communities: considerations in sampling and interpretation. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage., 6, 418–429. [CrossRef]
  • Barbour M.T., Gerritsen J., Snyder B.D. and Stribling J.B., 1999. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Rivers: Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates, and Fish, 2nd edn., EPA 841/B-99/002, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
  • Beketov M.A., 2004. Different sensitivity of mayflies (Insecta, Ephemeroptera) to ammonia, nitrite and nitrate: linkage between experimental and observational data. Hydrobiologia, 528, 209–216. [CrossRef]
  • Berkman H.E. and Rabeni C.F., 1987. Effect of siltation on stream fish communities. Environ. Biol. Fish., 18, 285–294. [CrossRef]
  • Bolstad P.V. and Swank W.T., 1997. Cumulative impacts of land use on water quality in a southern Appalachian watershed. J. Am. Water Res. Assoc., 33, 519–533. [CrossRef]
  • Booth D.B., 2005. Challenges and prospects for restoring urban streams: a perspective from the Pacific Northwest of North America. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 24, 724–737.
  • Bourassa N. and Cattaneo A., 1998. Control of periphyton biomass in Laurentian streams. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 17, 420–429. [CrossRef]
  • Brierley G.J. and Fryirs K.A., 2005. Geomorphology and River Management-Application of the River Style Framework, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, 398 p.
  • Bryce S.A. and Hughes R.M., 2003. Variable assemblage responses to multiple disturbance gradients: case studies in Oregon and Appalachia, USA. In: Simon T.P. (ed.), Biological Response Signatures: Indicator Patterns Using Aquatic Communities, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 539–560.
  • Carlisle D.M., Falcone J. and Meador M.R., 2009. Predicting the biological condition of streams: use of geospatial indicators of natural and anthropogenic characteristics of watersheds. Environ. Monit. Assess., 151, 143–160. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Chambers P.A., Meissner R., Wrona F.J., Rupp H., Guhr H., Seeger J., Culp J.M. and Brua R.B., 2006. Changes in nutrient loading in an agricultural watershed and its effects on water quality and stream biota. Hydrobiologia, 556, 399–415. [CrossRef]
  • Chandler J.R., 1970. A biological approach to water quality management. Water Pollut. Control, 69, 415–422.
  • Cho Y.H., 1997. A study on evaluation method of stream naturalness for ecological restoration of stream corridors. J. Korean Inst. Landscape Arch., 25, 2073–2081 (in Korean).
  • Chung J., 1987. An assessment of water quality by epilithic diatoms of Hyungsan River water-system. Korean J. Phycol., 2, 139–146 (in Korean).
  • Chung Y.H., Shin J.H. and Lee M.J., 1965. A study on the microflora of the Han River. I. The phytoplankton and the effect of the marine water in the lower course of the Han River. Korean J. Bot., 8, 7–29 (in Korean).
  • Cuffney T.F., Zappia H., Giddings E.M.P. and Coles J.F., 2005. Effects of urbanization on benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages in contrasting environmental settings: Boston, Birmingham, and Salt Lake City. In: Brown L.R., Gray R.H., Hughes R.M. and Meador M.R. (eds.), Effects of Urbanization on Stream Ecosystems, Am. Fish. Soc., Symp., 47, Bethesda, Maryland, 361–408.
  • Davies S.P. and Jackson S.K., 2006. The biological condition gradient: a descriptive model for interpreting change in aquatic ecosystems. Ecol. Appl., 16, 1251–1266. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Davis W.S. and Simon T.P. (eds.), 1995. Biological Assessment and Criteria. Tools for Resource Planning and Decision Making, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, 415 p.
  • Deshon J.E., 1995. Development and application of the invertebrate community index (ICI). In: Davis W.S. and Simon T.P. (eds.), Biological Assessment and Criteria: Tools for Water Resource Planning and Decision Making, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, 217–243.
  • DIN 38410, 1990. Biological-ecological analysis of water (group M): determination of the saprobic index (M2). German standard methods for the examination for water, Part 2, Wastewater and sludge, 10 p.
  • EEA, 1996. EEA Report. Surface water quality monitoring: 4.2. Biological assessments, Topic Report No. 2, http://reports.eea.eu.int/92-9167-001-4/page021.html.
  • Flinders C.A., Horwitz R.J. and Belton T., 2008. Relationship of fish and macroinvertebrate communities in the mid-Atlantic uplands: implications for integrated assessments. Ecol. Indic., 8, 588–598. [CrossRef]
  • Gammon J.R., 1976. The fish populations of the middle 340 km of the Wabash River, Purdue University Water Resources Research Center Technical Report 86, Lafayette, IN.
  • Gburek W.J. and Folmar G.J., 1999. Flow and chemical contributions to streamflow in an upland watershed: a baseflow survey. J. Hydrologia, 217, 1–18. [CrossRef]
  • Griffith M.B., Hill B., Mccormick H., Kaufmann R., Herlihy T. and Selle A.R., 2005. Comparative application of indices of biotic integrity based on periphyton, macroinvertebrates, and fish to southern Rocky Mountain streams. Ecol. Indic., 5, 117–36. [CrossRef]
  • Hering D., Johnson R.K., Kramm S., Schmutz S., Szoszkiewicz K. and Verdonschot P.F.M., 2006. Assessment of European streams with diatoms, macrophytes, macroinvertebrates, and fish: a comparative metric-based analysis of organism response to stress. Freshwater Biol., 51, 1757–1785. [CrossRef]
  • Hilsenhoff W.L., 1977. Use of arthropods to evaluate water quality of streams, Technical Bulletin of the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, 100, Madison, WI, 15 p.
  • Hilsenhoff W.L., 1982. Using a biotic index to evaluate water quality of streams, Technical Bulletin of the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, 132, Madison, WI.
  • Hwang S.-J., Kim N.-Y., Won D.H., An K.G., Lee J.K. and Kim C.S., 2006. Biological assessment of water quality by using epilithic diatoms in major river systems (Geum, Youngsan, Seomjin River), Korea. J. Korean Sco. Water Qual., 22, 784–795 (in Korean).
  • Jeong K.-S., Joo G.-J., Kim D.K., Lineman M., Kim S.-H., Jang I., Hwang S.-J., Kim J.-H., Lee J.-K. and Byeon M.S., 2008. Development of habitat–riparian quality indexing system as a tool of stream health assessment: case study in the Nakdong River basin. Korean J. Limnol., 41, 499–511 (in Korean).
  • Johnson R.K., Furse M.T., Hering D. and Sandin L., 2007. Ecological relationships between stream communities and spatial scale: implications for designing catchment-level monitoring programmes. Freshwater Biol., 52, 939–958. [CrossRef]
  • Karr J.R., 1981. Assessment of biological integrity using fish communities. Fisheries, 6, 21–27. [CrossRef]
  • Karr J.R. and Chu E.W., 1999. Restoring Life in Running Waters: Better Biological Monitoring, Island Press, Washington, DC.
  • Karr J.R. and Chu E.W., 2000. Sustaining living rivers. Hydrobiologia, 422/423, 1–14. [CrossRef]
  • Karr J.R., Fausch K.D., Angermeier P.L., Yant P.R. and Schlosser I.J., 1986. Assessing biological integrity in running waters: a method and its rationale, Special Publication 5, Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, IL.
  • Kelly M.G. and Whitton B.A., 1995. The trophic diatom index: a new index for monitoring eutrophication in rivers. J. Appl. Phycol., 7, 433–444. [CrossRef]
  • Kelly M.G., Bennion H., Burgess A., Ellis J., Juggins S., Guthrie R., Jamieson J., Adriaenssens V. and Yallop M., 2009. Uncertainty in ecological status assessments of lakes and rivers using diatoms. Hydrobiologia, 633, 5–15. [CrossRef]
  • Kennen J.G., 1999. Relation of macroinvertebrate community impairment to catchment characteristics in New Jersey streams. J. Am. Water Res. Assoc., 35, 939–955. [CrossRef]
  • Kennen J.G., Chang M. and Tracy B.H., 2005. Effects of landscape change on fish assemblage. In: Brown L.R., Gray R.H., Hughes R.M. and Meador M.R. (eds.), Effects of Urbanization on Stream Ecosystems, Am. Fish. Soc., Symp., 47, Bethesda, Maryland, 39–52.
  • KMA (Korea Meteorological Administration), 2008. Climate change status and response plan, 2 p. (in Korean).
  • Kong D.S., Ryu H.I., Ryu J.K. and Yoon I.B., 1995. The development and application of higher taxa biotic index (HTBI) by benthic macroinvertebrates. P. Korean J. Environ. Toxicol., 11 (in Korean).
  • Kratzer E.B., Jackson J.K., Arscott D.B., Aufdenkampe A.K., Dow C.L., Kaplan L.A., Newbold J.D. and Sweeney B.W., 2006. Macroinvertebrate distribution in relation to land use and water chemistry in New York City drinking-water-supply watersheds. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 25, 954–976. [CrossRef]
  • Kutka F.J. and Richards C., 1996. Relating diatom assemblage structure to stream habitat quality. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 15, 469–480. [CrossRef]
  • Kwon Y.S. and An K.-G., 2006. Biological stream health and physico-chemical characteristics in the Keumho River watershed. Korean J. Limnol., 39, 145–156 (in Korean).
  • Lammert M. and Allan J.D., 1999. Assessing biotic integrity of streams: effects of scale in measuring the influence of land use/cover and habitat structure on fish and macroinvertebrates. Environ. Manage., 23, 257–270. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Lee H.D., 1977. A study of Saprobien system according to the water pollution in Han River. Korean J. Limnol., 10, 47–52 (in Korean).
  • Lee S.W., Hwang S.J., Lee S.B., Hwang H.S. and Sung H.C., 2009. Landscape ecological approach to the relationships of land use patterns in watersheds to water quality characteristics. Landscape Urban Plan., 92, 80–89. [CrossRef]
  • Lenat D.R. and Crawford J.K., 1994. Effects of land use on water quality and aquatic biota of three North Carolina Piedmont streams. Hydrobiologia, 294, 185–199. [CrossRef]
  • Levin S.A., 1992. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology, 73, 1943–1967. [CrossRef]
  • Li J., Herlihy A., Gerth W., Kaufmann P., Gregory S., Urquhart S. and Larsen D.P., 2001. Variability in stream macroinvertebrates at multiple spatial scales. Freshwater Biol., 46, 87–97.
  • Liu A.J., Tong S.T.Y. and Goodrich J.A., 2000. Land use as a mitigation strategy for the water-quality impacts of global warming: a scenario analysis on two watersheds in the Ohio River Basin. Environ. Eng. Policy, 2, 65–76.
  • McCarron E. and Frydenborg R., 1997. The Florida bioassessment program: an agent for change. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess., 3, 967–977. [CrossRef]
  • MOE/NIER, 2006. Study on development of methods for synthetic assessment of water environment, The Ministry of Environment/National Institute of Environmental Research, Korea (in Korean).
  • MOE/NIER, 2007. Establishment of monitoring network for survey and evaluation of aquatic ecosystem health, The Ministry of Environment/National Institute of Environmental Research, Korea (in Korean).
  • MOE/NIER, 2008. Survey and evaluation of aquatic ecosystem health in Korea, The Ministry of Environment/National Institute of Environmental Research, Korea (in Korean).
  • Moerke A.H. and Lamberti G.A., 2006. Scale-dependent influences on water quality, habitat, and fish communities in the streams of the Kalamazoo River Basin, Michigan (USA). Aquat. Sci., 68, 193–205. [CrossRef]
  • Moore A.A. and Palmer M.A., 2005. Invertebrate biodiversity in agricultural and urban headwater streams: implications for conservation and management. Ecol. Appl., 15, 1169–1177. [CrossRef]
  • Morgan R.P. and Cushman S.F., 2005. Urbanization effects on stream fish assemblages in Maryland, USA. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 24, 643–655.
  • National River Authority (NRA), 1992. River Corridor Surveys, NRA, Bristol.
  • Nerbonne B.A. and Vondracek B., 2001. Effects of local land use on physical habitat, benthic macroinvertebrates, and fish in the Whitewater River, Minnesota, USA. Environ. Manage., 28, 87–99. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Nielsen L.A. and Johnson D.L., 1983. Fisheries Techniques, American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD.
  • NIER, 2003. Comprehensive plan of survey and research on development of methods for synthetic assessment of water quality, The National Institute of Environmental Research, Korea (in Korean).
  • Nijboer R.C. and Verdonschot P.F.M., 2004. Variable selection for modelling effects of eutrophication on stream and river ecosystems. Ecol. Model., 177, 17–39. [CrossRef]
  • Nõges P., van de Bund W., Cardoso A.C., Solimini A. and Heiskanen A.-S., 2009. Assessments of the ecological status of European surface waters: a work in progress. Hydrobiologia, 633, 197–211. [CrossRef]
  • Nordin R.N., 1985. Water Quality Criteria for Nutrients and Algae (Technical Appendix), http://www.elp.gov.bc.ca/wat/wq/BCguidelines/nutrients.html.
  • Ode P.R., Hawkins C.P. and Mazor R.D., 2008. Comparability of biological assessments derived from predictive models and multimetric indices of increasing geographic scope. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 27, 967–985. [CrossRef]
  • Oh Y.N. and Chon T.S., 1991. A study on the benthic macroinvertebrates in the middle reaches of the Paenae stream, a tributary of the Naktong River, Korea. Korean J. Ecol., 14, 345–360 (in Korean).
  • Omernik J.M., Abernathy A.R. and Male L.M., 1981. Stream nutrient levels and proximity of agricultural and forest land to streams: some relationships. J. Soil Water, 36, 227–231.
  • Osborne L.L. and Wiley M.J., 1988. Empirical relationships between land use/cover and stream water quality in an agricultural watershed. J. Environ. Manage., 26, 9–27.
  • Osborne P.E. and Suárez-Seoane S., 2002. Should data be partitioned spatially before building large-scale distribution models? Ecol. Model., 157, 249–259. [CrossRef]
  • Otto A., 1995. Gewässerstrukturgütekartierung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Teil 1, Verfahrensentwurf für kleine und mittelgroβe Flieβ gewässer der freien Landschaft im Bereich der Mittelgebrige, des Hügellandes und des Flachlandes, Lanesamt für Wasserwirtschaft Rheinland-Pfalz.
  • Paller M.H., 2001. Comparison of fish and macroinvertebrate bioassessments from South Carolina coastal plain streams. Aquat. Ecosyst. Health Manage., 4, 175–186. [CrossRef]
  • Passy S.I., Rode R.W., Carlson D.M. and Novak M.A., 2004. Comparative environmental assessment in the studies of benthic diatom, macroinvertebrate, and fish communities. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol., 89, 121–138. [CrossRef]
  • Patrick R., 1977. Effects of trace metals in the aquatic ecosystem. Am. Sci., 66, 185–191.
  • Pearson T. and Rosenberg R., 1978. Macrobenthic succession in relation to organic enrichment and pollution of the marine environment. Annu. Rev. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol., 16, 229–311.
  • Pont D., Hugueny B., Beier U., Goffaux D., Melcher A., Noble R., Rogers C., Roset N. and Schmutz S., 2006. Assessing river biotic condition at a continental scale: a European approach using functional metrics and fish assemblages. J. Appl. Ecol., 43, 70–80. [CrossRef]
  • Prygiel J., Whitton B.A. and Bukowska L. (eds.), 1999. Use of algae for monitoring rivers III. In: Proceedings of an International Symposium, Agence de l'Eau Artois-Picardie, Douai Cedex, France, 271 p.
  • Richards C., Host G.E. and Arthur J.W., 1993. Identification of predominant environmental factors structuring stream macroinvertebrate communities within a large agricultural catchment. Freshwater Biol., 29, 285–294. [CrossRef]
  • Richards C., Johnson L.B. and Host G.E., 1996. Landscape scale influences on stream habitats and biota. Can. J. Fish Aquat. Sci., 53 (Suppl. I), 295–311. [CrossRef]
  • Richards C., Haro R.J., Johnson L.B. and Host G.E., 1997. Catchment and reach-scale properties as indicators of macroinvertebrate species traits. Freshwater Biol., s37, 219–230. [CrossRef]
  • Roth N.E., Allan J.D. and Erickson D.L., 1996. Landscape influences on stream biotic integrity assessed at multiple spatial scales. Landscape Ecol., 11, 141–156. [CrossRef]
  • Roy A.H., Rosemond A.D., Paul M.J., Leigh D.S. and Wallace J.B., 2003. Stream macroinvertebrate response to catchment urbanisation (Georgia, U.S.A.). Freshwater Biol., 48, 329–346. [CrossRef]
  • Roy A.H., Freeman M.C., Freeman B.J., Wenger S.J., Ensign W.E. and Meyer J.L., 2005. Investigating hydrologic alteration as a mechanism of fish assemblage shifts in urbanizing streams. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 24, 656–678.
  • Sawyer J.A., Stewart P.M., Mullen M.M., Simon T.P. and Bennett H.H., 2003. Influence of habitat, water quality, and land use on macro-invertebrate and fish assemblages of a southeastern coastal plain watershed, USA. Aquat. Ecosyst. Health Manag., 7, 85–99. [CrossRef]
  • Schuler T.R., 1994. The importance of imperviousness. Watershed Protect. Tech., 1, 100–111.
  • Simon T.P. (ed.), 1999. Assessing the Sustainability and Biological Integrity of Water Resources Using Fish Communities, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 652 p.
  • Simon T.P., 2000. The use of biological criteria as a tool for water resource management. Environ. Sci. Policy, 3, S43–S49. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [PubMed]
  • Skvortzow B.W., 1929. Fresh-water diatoms from Korea, Japan. Phillippines J. Sci., 38, 283–291.
  • Smith A.J., Bode R.W. and Kleppel G.S., 2007. A nutrient biotic index (NBI) for use with benthic macroinvertebrate communities. Ecol. Indic., 7, 371–386. [CrossRef]
  • Smith R.W., Bergen M., Weisberg S.B., Cadien D., Dankey A., Montagne D., Stull J.K. and Velarde R.G., 2001. Benthic response index for assessing infaunal communities on the mainland shelf of Southern California. Ecol. Appl., 11, 1073–1087. [CrossRef]
  • Sponseller R.A., Benfield E.F. and Valett H.M., 2001. Relationships between land use, spatial scale and stream macroinvertebrate communities. Freshwater Biol., 46, 1409–1424. [CrossRef]
  • Šrámek-Hušek R., 1956. Zur biologischen charakteristik der höheren saprobitätsstufen. Arch. Hydrobiol., 51, 376–390.
  • Stewart P.M., Scribiallo R. and Simon T.P., 1999. The use of aquatic macrophytes in monitoring and in assessment of biological integrity. In: Gerhardt A. (ed.), Biomonitoring of Polluted Waters – Reviews on Actual Topics, Environmental Science Forum, 96, Trans Tech Publications, Ltd., Uetikon-Zuerich, Switzerland, 275–302.
  • Stoddard J.L., Herlihy A.T., Peck D.V., Hughes R.M., Whittier T.R. and Tarquinio E., 2008. A process for creating multimetric indices for large-scale aquatic surveys. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 27, 878–891. [CrossRef]
  • Swink W.R. and Wilhelm G., 1994. Plants of the Chicago region, 4th edn., Indiana Academy of Science, Indianapolis, IN.
  • Thompson J., Taylor M.P., Fryirs K.A. and Brierley G.J., 2001. A geomorphological framework for river characterization and habitat assessment. Mar. Freshwater Ecosyst., 11, 373–389. [CrossRef]
  • Tong S.T.Y. and Chen W., 2002. Modeling the relationship between land use and surface water quality. J. Environ. Manage., 66, 377–393. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Townsend C.R., Dole´dec S., Norris R., Peacock K. and Arbuckle C., 2003. The influence of scale and geography on relationships between stream community composition and landscape variables: description and prediction. Freshwater Biol., 48, 768–785. [CrossRef]
  • Tsuda M., 1964. Biology of Polluted Waters, Hokuryu-kan, Tokyo.
  • UNESCO, 2004. Integrated watershed management – Ecohydrology and phytotechnology – Manual, UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science in Europe, Venice, Italy.
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 1990. Biological Criteria: National Program Guidance for Surface Waters, US EPA, Office of Water Regulations and Standards, Washington, DC, EP-440/5-90-004, April.
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 2002. Biological assessments and criteria: crucial components of water quality programs, EPA 822-F-02-006, Washington, DC.
  • U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), 2002. Revised protocols for sampling algal, invertebrate, and fish communities as part of the national water-quality assessment program, Open-file Report 02-150, Virginia.
  • van Dam H., Mertens A. and Sinkeldam J., 1994. A coded checklist and ecological indicator values of freshwater diatoms from The Netherlands. Netherlands J. Aquat. Ecol., 28, 117–133. [CrossRef]
  • Waite I.R., Brown L.R., Kennen J.G., May J.T., Cuffney T.F., Orlando J.L. and Jones K.A., 2008. Comparison of watershed disturbance predictive models for stream benthic macroinvertebrates for three distinct ecoregions in western US. Ecol. Indic., 10, 1125–1136. [CrossRef]
  • Wallace J.B., Eggert S.L., Meyer J.L. and Webster J.R., 1997. Multiple trophic levels of a forest stream linked to terrestrial litter inputs. Science, 277, 102–104. [CrossRef]
  • Wang L., Lyons J., Kanehl P. and Bannerman R., 2001. Impacts of urbanization on stream habitat and fish across multiple spatial scales. Environ. Manage., 28, 255–266. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Washington H.G., 1984. Diversity, biotic and similarity indices: a review with special relevance to aquatic ecosystems. Water Res., 18, 653–694. [CrossRef]
  • Watanabe T., Asai K. and Houki A., 1990. Numerical simulation of organic pollution in flowing waters. Enc. Env. Control Tech., 4, 251–281.
  • Weisberg S.B., Ranasinghe J.A., Dauer D.M., Schaffner L.C., Diaz R.J. and Frithsen J.B., 1997. An estuarine benthic index of biotic integrity (B-IBI) for Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries, 20, 149–158. [CrossRef]
  • Won D.H., Jun Y.-C., Kwon S.-J., Hwang S.-J., Ahn K.-G. and Lee J.-W., 2006. Development of Korean saprobic index using benthic macroinvertebrates and its application to biological stream environment assessment. J. Korean Sco. Water Qual., 22, 768–783 (in Korean).
  • Woodiwiss F.S., 1978. Comparative study of biological-ecological water quality assessment methods. Second practical demonstration, Nottingham (20 Sept. to 1 Oct. 1976), Summary Report, Commission of the European Communities, Environment and Consumer Protection Service.
  • Word J.Q., 1978. The infaunal trophic index. Coastal Water Research Project Annual Report, Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, El Segundo, CA, 19–39.
  • Word J.Q., 1980. Classification of benthic invertebrates into infaunal trophic index feeding groups, Biennial Report, 1979–1980, Coastal Water Research Project, Los Angeles, CA, 103–121.
  • Word J.Q., 1990. The infaunal trophic index, a functional approach to benthic community analyses, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
  • Wui I.S., 1974. The biological estimation of water pollution levels on the benthos fauna of the Yeong-san River. Korean J. Limnol., 7, 29–35 (in Korean).
  • Wui I.S., Ra C.H., Choi C.G. and Baik S.K., 1983. Studies on the aquatic insects of the Tamjin River. Korean J. Limnol., 16, 33–52 (in Korean).
  • Yeom D.H., An K.-W., Hong Y.P. and Lee S.K., 2000. Assessment of an index of biological integrity (IBI) using fish assemblages in Keumho River, Korea. Korean J. Environ. Biol., 18, 215–226 (in Korean).
  • Yoon I.B., Kong D.S. and Ryu J.K., 1992a. Studies on the biological evaluation of water quality by benthic macroinvertebrates (I) – saprobic valency and indicative value. Korean J. Environ. Biol., 10, 24–39 (in Korean).
  • Yoon I.B., Kong D.S. and Ryu J.K., 1992b. Studies on the biological evaluation of water quality by benthic macroinvertebrates (II) – effects of environmental factors to community. Korean J. Environ. Biol., 10, 40–55 (in Korean).
  • Yoon I.B., Kong D.S. and Ryu J.K., 1992c. Studies on the biological evaluation of water quality by benthic macroinvertebrates (III) – macroscopic simple water quality evaluation. Korean J. Environ. Biol., 10, 77–84 (in Korean).
  • Zelinka M. and Marvan P., 1961. Zur Präzisierung der biologischen klassifikation der Reinheid fliessender Gewässer. Arch. Hydrobiol., 57, 389–407.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.