Free Access
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 45, Number 3, 2009
Page(s) 171 - 180
Published online 28 July 2009
  • Appelberg M. (ed.), 2000. Swedish standard methods for sampling freshwater fish with multi-mesh gillnets. Fiskeriverket Information, 1, 32 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Appelberg M., Berger H.M., Hesthagen T., Kleiven E., Kurkilahti M., Raitaniemi J. and Rask M., 1995. Development and intercalibration of methods of Nordic freshwater fish monitoring. Water Air Soil Pollut., 85, 883–888. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bíró P., 1997. Temporal variation in Lake Balaton and its fish populations. Ecol. Freshw. Fish, 6, 196–216. [Google Scholar]
  • CEN (European Committee for Standardization), 2005. Water quality – Sampling of fish with multi-mesh gillnets (14757:2005), Brussels, 27 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Erős T., Specziár A. and Bíró P., 2009. Assessing fish assemblages in the littoral zone of a large shallow lake – a comparison between gillnetting and electric fishing. Fish. Res., 96, 70–76. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fjälling A. and Fürst M., 1991. Preliminary manual for test-fishing in Zambian reservoirs. Fish. Dev. Series, 53, 27–44. [Google Scholar]
  • Gassner H., Zick D., Bruschek G., Mayrhofer K. and Frey I., 2006. Metodik – Handbuch. In: Fischbestandsaufnahme und Bewertung des okologischen Zustandes der naturlichen und kunstlichen Seen Osterreichs (>50 ha) gemass EU-Wasserrahmenrichtlinie – Bundesamt fur Wasserwirtschaft, Institute fur Gewasserokologie, Fischereibiologie und Seenkunde, Mondsee, 27 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Gotelli N.J. and Colwell R.K., 2001. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol. Lett., 4, 379–391. [Google Scholar]
  • Gotelli N.J. and Entsminger G.L., 2008. EcoSim: Null Models Software for Ecology, Version 7, Acquired Intelligence Inc. & Kesey-Bear, Jericho, available at [Google Scholar]
  • Hamley J.M., 1975. Review of gillnet selectivity. J. Fish. Res. Board Can., 32, 1943–1969. [Google Scholar]
  • Hammar J. and Filipsson O., 1985. Ecological testfishing with the Lundgren gillnets of multiple mesh size: The Drottningholm technique modified for Newfoundland Artic char populations. Rep. Inst. Freshw. Res. Drottningholm, 62, 12–35. [Google Scholar]
  • Hansson S., 1988. A simple vertical gill net system for variable current conditions. Hydrobiologia, 160, 107–110. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Helland I.P., Freyhof J., Kasprzak P. and Mehner T., 2007. Temperature sensitivity of vertical distributions of zooplankton and planktivorous fish in stratified lake. Oecologia, 151, 322–330. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Herodek S., Laczkó L. and Virág Á., 1988. Lake Balaton: research and management, Nexus, Budapest, 110 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Holmgren K. and Appelberg M., 2000. Size structure of benthic freshwater fish communities in relation to environmental gradients. J. Fish Biol., 57, 1312–1330. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hubert W.A., 1996. Passive capture techniques. In: Murphy B.R., Willis D.W. (eds.), Fisheries techniques, 2nd edition, American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland, 157–181. [Google Scholar]
  • Istvánovics V., Clement A., Somlyódy L., Specziár A., Tóth L.G. and Padisák J., 2007. Updating water quality targets for shallow Lake Balaton (Hungary), recovering from eutrophication. Hydrobiologia, 581, 305–318. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jacobsen L., Berg S., Jepsen N. and Skov C., 2004. Does roach behaviour differ between shallow lakes of different environmental state? J. Fish Biol., 65, 135–147. [Google Scholar]
  • Jeppesen E., Pekcam-Hekim Z., Lauridsen T., Søndergaard M. and Jensen J.P., 2006. Habitat distribution of fish in late summer: changes along a nutrient gradient in Danish lakes. Ecol. Freshw. Fish, 15, 180–190. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Krebs C.J., 1989. Ecological Methodology, Harper and Row, New York, 654 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Kubečka J. and Prchalová M., 2006. Metodika odlovu a zpracování vzorků ryb stojatých vod, Výzkumný ústav vodohospodářský TGM, 22 p. (in Czech). [Google Scholar]
  • Lauridsen T.L., Søndergaard M., Jensen J.P. and Jeppesen E., 2005. Undersøgelser i søer – NOVANA. Danmarks Miljøundersøgelser, Teknisk anvisning fra DMU, 22, 234 p. (in Danish). [Google Scholar]
  • Lauridsen T.L., Landkildehus F., Jeppesen E., Jørgensen T.B. and Søndergaard M., 2008. A comparison of methods for calculating Catch Per Unit Effort (CPUE) of gill net catches in lakes. Fish. Res., 93, 204–211. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mehner T., Diekmann M., Brämic U. and Lemcke R., 2005. Comparison of fish communities in German lakes as related to lake morphology, trophic state, shore structure and human use intensity. Freshw. Biol., 50, 70–85. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mortensen E., Jerl Jensen H., Müller J.-P. and Timmermann M., 1990. Fiskeundersøgelser i søer – Undersøgelsesprogram, fiskeredskaber og metoder. Danmarks Miljøundersøgelser, 1990, Teknisk anvisning fra DMU, 3, 57 p. (in Danish). [Google Scholar]
  • Olin M. and Malinen T., 2003. Comparison of gillnet and trawl in diurnal fish community sampling. Hydrobiologia, 506–509, 443–449. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Olin M., Rask M., Ruuhijärvi J., Kurkilahti M., Ala-Opas P. and Ylönen O., 2002. Fish community structure in mesotrophic and eutrophic lakes of southern Finland: the relative abundance of percids and cyprinids along a trophic gradient. J. Fish Biol., 60, 593–612. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Olin M., Kurkilahti M., Peitola P. and Ruuhijärvi J., 2004. The effects of fish accumulation on the catchability of multimesh gillnet. Fish. Res., 68, 135–147. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Olin M., Malinen T. and Ruuhijärvi J., 2009. Gillnet catch in estimating the density and structure of fish community – Comparison of gillnet and trawl samples in a eutrophic lake. Fish. Res., 96, 88–94. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Peltonen H., Ruuhijärvi J., Malinen T. and Horppila J., 1999. Estimation of roach (Rutilus rutilus (L.)) and smelt (Osmerus eperlanus (L.)) stocks with virtual population analysis, hydroacustics and gillnet CPUE. Fish. Res., 44, 25–36. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Prchalová M., Kubečka J., Říha M., Litvín R., Čech M., Frouzová J., Hladík M., Hohausová E., Peterka J. and Vašek M., 2008. Overestimation of percid fishes (Percidae) in gillnet sampling. Fish. Res., 91, 79–87. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Prchalová M., Kubečka J., Říha M., Mrkvička T., Vašek M., Jůza T., Kratochvíl M., Peterka J., Draštík V. and Křížek J., 2009. Size selectivity of standardized multimesh gillnets in sampling coarse European species. Fish. Res., 96, 51–57. [Google Scholar]
  • Rask M., Olin M., Keskitalo J., Lehtovaara A., Ruuhijärvi J. and Vesala S., 2003. Responses of plankton and fish communities to mass removal of planktivorous fish in a two-basin lake in southern Finland. Hydrobiologia, 506–509, 451–457. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Specziár A., 2001. Impacts of the activity of fish on the results of gillnet samplings: diurnal and seasonal changes of the CPUE in Lake Balaton. Hidrol. Közl., 81, 5/6, 459–461 (in Hungarian). [Google Scholar]
  • Specziár A., Tölg L. and Bíró P., 2000, Investigation of Lake Balaton's fish fauna. Halászatfejlesztés, 24, 115–125 (in Hungarian). [Google Scholar]
  • Sutela T., Rask M., Vehanen T. and Westermark A., 2008. Comparison of electrofishing and NORDIC gillnets for sampling littoral fish in boreal lakes. Lakes Reserv.: Res. Manage., 13, 215–220. [Google Scholar]
  • Tátrai I., Specziár A., György Á.I. and Bíró P., 2008. Comparison of fish size distribution and fish abundance estimates obtained with hydroacoustics and gill netting in the open water of a large shallow lake. Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim., 44, 231–240. [Google Scholar]
  • Vašek M., Kubečka J., Čech M., Draštík V., Matěna J., Mrkvička T., Peterka J. and Prchalová M., 2009. Diel variation in gillnet catches and vertical distribution of pelagic fishes in a stratified European reservoir. Fish. Res., 96, 64–69. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.