EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 54 (2018) Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim., 54 (2018) 29 Full HTML
Open Access
Issue
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 54, 2018
Article Number 29
Number of page(s) 5
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/2018019
Published online 14 September 2018

© N. Majdi et al., published by EDP Sciences, 2018

Licence Creative CommonsOpen Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1 Introduction

Nematodes are diverse and widely distributed and likely one of the most abundant groups of metazoans on Earth (Bongers and Ferris, 1999; Abebe et al., 2008), presumably being only restricted by the presence of amenable substrates, of water, of oxygen and of enough microscopic resources to sustain population growth. Hence, free-living nematodes are important key organisms in freshwater food webs as they contribute to transfer microbial production to macroscopic animals like macro-invertebrates and fishes (Majdi and Traunspurger, 2015).

A massive consumption of meiofauna, and of nematodes in peculiar, by larvae and juveniles of bottom-feeding fishes has been only recently acknowledged through field and laboratory studies (Schlechtriem et al., 2004, Spieth et al., 2011, Weber and Traunspurger, 2014a; 2015; 2016; Tillner et al., 2015). The fish-nematode trophic channel consists in a predator-prey body mass ratio over 5 orders of magnitude, which is in the upper bound of predator-prey body mass ratios commonly found in freshwater ecosystems for ectothermic vertebrates (Brose et al., 2006). This trophic channel should be biologically interesting in terms of energy conservation as (1) it overrides trophic intermediaries (like in the whales-zooplankton channel), and (2) as effective strategies allow bottom-feeding fishes to consume enough nematodes at relatively low energetic costs. It has been shown that juvenile bottom-feeding fishes were able to collect particles the size of nematodes out of bites of mud, sediment or biofilms. For example, in carp juveniles, Spieth et al. (2011) found a correspondence between the “mesh”-size of the branchial basket and the size-spectrum of the sediment-dwelling invertebrates that the carps were able to consume. However, it is becoming urgent to expand this field of research in order to better understand the ecological relevance of the fish-nematode trophic channel. Especially as nematodes are one of the few benthic organism groups (with chironomids and oligochaetes), which can reach high densities in polluted rivers (Heininger et al., 2007).

Corydoras aeneus (Gill, 1858) is a typical predator of benthic invertebrates in tropical streams (Aranha et al., 1993; Lopes et al., 2016). C. aeneus belongs to a fish family with species that were recorded to be tolerant to abrupt temperature changes, low-quality habitat and low dissolved oxygen concentrations in South America (Mol, 1993; De Araujo and Garutti, 2003). Thus, C. aeneus are commonly found in the most degraded urban streams (Casatti et al., 2010), in addition C. aeneus are also heavily traded as ornamental fishes all over the world, making them of general interest and easily available for experiments.

In continuation of this endeavor, we seek (1) to examine the predation pressure of C. aeneus on different species of free-living nematodes, and (2) to measure the amount of nematode biomass ingested daily.

2 Material and methods

2.1 Rearing conditions and acclimation of fishes

C. aeneus were obtained from a local aquarium dealer (Hameln, Germany), acclimated, and maintained following Nickum et al. (2004). Two groups of 50 juveniles were accommodated in two 250-L aquaria (100 cm × 50 cm × 50 cm) equipped with an aerating system (there were two groups in case a disease would break out, a reserve group would still be available for experiments; This was not the case, and individuals were randomly selected from the two stock tanks for the experiment). The 250-L tanks contained 5-cm of natural river sand (collected ∼500-m downstream the spring of the Ems river, Germany). Java moss (Vesicularia sp.) and water trumpet (Cryptocoryne sp.) were used as refuges. The fishes were acclimatized to the experimental conditions for 8 weeks at 18–19 °C under a light:dark cycle of 12:12 h (58 W Osram fluorescent tubes). Fishes were fed TetraWafer Mix (TETRA, Melle, Germany) and frozen chironomid larvae (Amtra Aquaristik, Rodgau, Germany). The fishes were starved for 24 h before the feeding experiment.

2.2 Cultivation of nematodes species

Caenorhabditis elegans (Maupas, 1900) and Panagrellus redivivus (Linnaeus, 1767) were cultivated at 20 °C on 8-cm Agar (NG) plates (0.85% Agar, 0.125% peptone, 0.15% NaCl, 500 μl CaCl2/L, 500 μl MgSO4/L, 12.5 ml KH2PO4/L and 500 μl cholesterol/L), seeded with Escherichia coli OP50 (a uracil-requiring mutant of E. coli) (Sulston and Hodgkin, 1988). Panagrolaimus cf. thienemanni (Hirschmann, 1952), and Poikilolaimus sp., were cultured at 20 °C on nematode growth gelrite plates following the protocol of Muschiol and Traunspurger (2007).

2.3 Experimental set-up

Fine-grained sand (3–5 mm diameter) was obtained from the uppermost 5-cm of sediment collected from a local stream (Ems spring), washed several times to remove fine-grained particles and organisms, and then sterilized by two rounds of autoclaving (121 °C, 20 min) followed by drying for 48 h at 200 °C. No bacteria were added to the sediment, because nematodes can survive over 24 h without a food source (Donkin and Williams, 1995). The sediment was distributed to a depth of 2-cm in sixty four 12-L aquaria (30 cm × 20 cm × 20 cm, bottom: 600 cm2) equipped with an aeration system and under 12:12 light cycle (58W Osram fluorescent tubes). Six hours before fishes were placed in the aquaria, a homogeneous suspension of each of the four nematode species was spread out grid-like using a pipette near the sediment surface.

Starting densities of 300 000 nematodes per aquarium (500 nematodes cm−2) were estimated by counting (under a dissection microscope, 40 × magnification) the aliquots of a homogeneous nematode suspension, which was used for inoculation of aquaria. The density achieved in sediment simulated a high, but realistic nematode abundance in the environment (see Traunspurger et al., 2012). Every starting suspension consisted only of adult nematodes. Adult nematodes were sorted out from juvenile stages in cultures by washing culture dishes through a cascade of mesh-sizes (500, 250, 100, 63 μm). The body length of nematodes inoculated in control (no fish) and fish aquaria was inferred by counting the first 400 individuals in sub-samples from the starting nematode suspensions. For Poikilolaimus sp. and Panagrolaimus cf. thienemanni, individual biomass was estimated directly from length-wet mass regression after Muschiol and Traunspurger (2007). For C. elegans and P. redivivus, we first derived body-width from body-length after Muschiol and Traunspurger (2007), before using the regression of Andrássy (1956) to estimate individual wet weight (WW).

Two juvenile C. aeneus individuals with a total length of 25–30 mm, were added to 32 aquaria (8 replicate aquaria per nematode species) and 32 aquaria without fish served as controls (8 aquaria per nematode species). After 24 h of presence in aquaria, fishes were removed and released in the 250-L tank.

2.4 Sample processing

After removing the fishes, 20 sediment subsamples were collected randomly from each aquarium using an acrylic tube (0.71-cm intern. diam. × 2-cm-deep column of sediment). The 20 subsamples were pooled, and considered as one sample. Each sample was preserved immediately in formaldehyde (4% final concentration) and stained with rose Bengal (300 μg mL−1). Nematodes were further extracted from sediment by density centrifugation (LUDOX TM 50® colloidal silica, adjusted to 1.14 g L−1, using 10-μm mesh size to retain nematodes) according to the method of Pfannkuche and Thiel (1988). All nematodes present in samples were counted, and densities were further expressed as number of individuals per aquarium (i.e. per 600 cm2), or in terms of biomass as mg WW per aquarium.

2.5 Statistical analysis

For each nematode species, we used Student's t-test to compare mean nematode densities remaining in the aquaria after exposure to fish predation. Homoscedasticity of data was checked using Levene's test: data were not transformed. We used the mean individual biomass values measured from inoculums to infer the corresponding biomass of nematodes consumed by fishes during the experiment (24 h), assuming that no juveniles were produced and adult's individual biomass did presumably not vary much during the course of the experiment.

3 Results

After 24 h, the two C. aeneus individuals were able to dampen significantly the number of all nematode species dwelling the sediment (t-test, Poikilolaimus, t = –9.14, p < 0.001; C. elegans, t = –14.8, p < 0.001; Panagrolaimus, t = –11.5 p < 0.001; Panagrellus, t = –11.5 p < 0.001). The two C. aeneus removed, on a daily basis, on average 81 162 Poikilolaimus, 103 285 C. elegans, 151 697 Panagrolaimus, and 136 200 Panagrellus, in comparison to controls (Fig. 1). Which represented for each C. aeneus individual, an average daily ingestion of 75, 137, 197, and 238 mg WW of adult nematodes of the species Poikilolaimus sp., C. elegans, Panagrolaimus cf. thienemanni, and P. redivivus, respectively (see Tab. 1 for nematode species individual body-mass).

thumbnail Fig. 1

Nematode densities after 24 h exposition in control aquaria without fishes (grey bars) or in aquaria with two Corydoras aeneus (25–30 mm) catfishes (black bars). Values are means ± SD. Aquaria contained 1.2 L of sandy sediment spread on a surface of 600 cm2. Nematode species offered: Poikilolaimus sp. (Poikilo), Caenorhabditis elegans (Celegans), Panagrolaimus cf. thienemanni (Panagro), and Panagrellus redivivus (Panagre).
Table 1

Individual body mass of nematode species inoculated in aquariums (n = 400 individuals measured).

4 Discussion

In the present study we showed that C. aeneus massively consumed adults of different free-living nematode species dwelling sandy sediment. Since Diatin et al. (2015) reported a wet weight of 440–510 mg for C. aeneus individuals measuring 22–23 mm, the predator-prey ratio in our study could be estimated at ca. 5 orders of magnitude, and the daily consumption of nematodes could be roughly estimated to represent between ca. 14 and 54% of C. aeneus individual biomass. We are aware that this estimation is probably overestimating the strength of the Corydoras-nematode trophic transfer occurring in the field, because it is based on optimal laboratory conditions (e.g. absence of alternative prey, relatively high density of size-calibrated nematodes, homogeneous structure of the substrate). However, our results clearly show that C. aeneus is able to feed massively on nematodes; in case those are the only prey available, strengthening growing evidence that this trophic channel can be commonly used by many benthivorous fishes (Weber and Traunspurger 2014b, 2015; 2016; Abada et al., 2017). Feeding on nematodes and other small-sized invertebrates by means of substrate ingestion/filtration reduces food chain length, presumably allowing field fish populations to sustain higher productivity rates than if preying on larger animals occupying higher trophic levels. Also as nematodes are abundant in nearly all benthic habitats, using them means less risk of food shortage, which might represent a considerable advantage, especially for the fitness of juvenile cohorts.

Indeed, this experiment does not reflect the true diet of C. aeneus, which might be much more diverse in the field as this species is opportunistic. For example, C. aeneus has long been considered as an efficient biological control of gnat due to its voracious feeding on mud-dwelling chironomid larvae, but they are also able to dampen populations of oligochaetes, chaoborids, and of small ostracods and cladocers swimming above the mud (Cook Jr., 1962). We recommend further laboratory investigations proposing mixtures of different categories (or sizes) of prey to better understand under which conditions nematodes might be used over other benthic invertebrate prey (see e.g. Dineen and Robertson, 2010; Weber and Traunspurger, 2014a).

Nematodes usually dominate in heavily polluted bottoms (e.g. Coull and Chandler, 1992; Heininger et al., 2007), and contrary to chironomids, their life-cycle is fully benthic, which implies that the structure of nematode species assemblages can be a relevant indication of both short- and long-term contaminations (Höss et al., 2011; Semprucci et al., 2015; Haegerbaeumer et al., 2017). Fish-nematode feeding studies can be performed under various specific abiotic and biotic conditions and provide coherent measures of feeding rates (see e.g. Weber and Traunspurger, 2014a). Thus, we believe that a better consideration of the fish-nematode trophic channel could bring valuable insights into the response of aquatic food webs to various environmental stressors, including realistic measures of trophic dynamics under heavy pollution scenarios.

C. aeneus is a popular ornamental fish, so conditions for its culture are of commercial interest (e.g. Diatin et al., 2015). Among the four species of nematodes offered, Panagrolaimus cf. thienemanni and Panagrolaimus redivivus were especially preyed upon. Panagrolaimus sp. has been proposed as a relevant substitute to rotifers as live food in fish larvae aquaculture, because it is easy to culture and yields better dry weight per individual than rotifers (Honnens and Ehlers, 2013). Also, P. redivivus alone or in mixture with other food items (e.g. algae), are known to represent a relevant live food for fish larvae (e.g. Biedenbach et al., 1989; Schlechtriem et al., 2004; Brüggemann, 2012). Knowing that methods exist to cheaply produce massive number of P. redivivus nematodes (e.g. Ricci et al., 2003), and knowing that the fatty acid content of P. redivivus can be improved by simple improvements of culture media (Rouse et al., 1992), we argue that P. redivivus could be a relevant live prey for stock cultures of fish juveniles and even for rearing adults of small bottom-feeding fish species like C. aeneus.

Acknowledgments

We thank two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on a previous version of this manuscript. Authors ensure that all applicable international, national, and institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

References

  • Abada AEA, Ghanim NF, Sherif AH, Salama NA. 2017. Benthic freshwater nematode community dynamics under conditions of Tilapia aquaculture in Egypt. Afr J Aquat Sci 42: 381–387. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Abebe E, Decraemer W, De Ley P. 2008. Global diversity of nematodes (Nematoda) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia 595: 67–78. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Andrássy I. 1956. Die Rauminhalts-und Gewichtsbestimmung der Fadenwurmer (Nematoden). Acta Zool Acad Sci Hung 2: 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  • Aranha JMR, Caramaschi EP, Caramaschi U. 1993. Spatial occupation, feeding and reproductive period of two species of Corydoras lacépède (Siluroidei, Callichthyidae) coexistents in the Alambari river (Botucatu, Sao Paulo). Rev Bras Zool 10: 453–466. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Biedenbach JM, Smith LL, Thomsen TK, Lawrence AL. 1989. Use of the nematode Panagrellus redivivus as an Artemia replacement in a larval penaeid diet. J World Aquac Soc 20: 61–71. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bongers T, Ferris H. 1999. Nematode community structure as a bioindicator in environmental monitoring. Trends Ecol Evol 14: 224–228. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Brose U, Jonsson T, Berlow EL, et al. 2006. Consumer-resource body-size relationships in natural food webs. Ecology 87: 2411–2417. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Brüggemann J. 2012. Nematodes as live food in larviculture-a review. J World Aquac Soc 43: 739–763. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Casatti L, Romero RM, Teresa FB, Sabino J, Langeani F. 2010. Fish community structure along a conservation gradient in Bodoquena Plateau streams, central West of Brazil. Acta Limnol Bras 22: 50–59. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cook Jr. SB. 1962. Feeding studies of the Aeneus catfish, Corydoras aeneus, on aquatic midges. J Econ Entomol 55: 155–157. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Coull, BC, Chandler GT. 1992. Pollution and meiofauna: field, laboratory and mesocosm studies. Oceanogr Mar Biol 30: 191–271. [Google Scholar]
  • De Araujo RB, Garutti V. 2003. Ecology of a stream from upper Paraná River basin inhabited by Aspidoras fuscoguttatus Nijssen and Isbrüker, 1976 (Siluriformes, Callichthyidae). Braz J Biol 63: 363–372. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Diatin I, Suprayudi MA, Budiardi T, Surawidjaja EH. 2015. Intensive culture of corydoras ornamental fish (Corydoras aeneus): evaluation of stocking density and water exchange. Aquac Aquar Conserv Legis 8: 975–987. [Google Scholar]
  • Dineen G, Robertson AL. 2010. Subtle top-down control of a freshwater meiofaunal assemblage by juvenile fish. Freshw Biol 55: 1818–1830. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Donkin SG, Williams PL. 1995. Influence of developmental stage, salts and food presence on various end points using Caenorhabditis elegans for aquatic toxicity testing. Environ Toxicol Chem 14: 2139–2147. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Haegerbaeumer A, Höss S, Ristau K, Claus E., Heininger P, Traunspurger W. 2017. The use of meiofauna in freshwater sediment assessments: structural and functional responses of meiobenthic communities to metal and organics contamination. Ecol Indic 78: 512–525. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Heininger P, Hoess S, Claus E, Pelzer J, Traunspurger W. 2007. Nematode communities in contaminated river sediments. Environ Pollut 146: 64–76. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Höss S, Claus E, Von der Ohe P, Brinke M, Güde H, Heininger P, Traunspurger W. 2011. Nematode species at risk − a metric to assess pollution in soft sediments of freshwaters. Environ Int 37: 940–949. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Honnens H, Ehlers R-U. 2013. Liquid culture of Panagrolaimus sp. for use as food for marine aquaculture shrimp and fish species. Nematology 15: 417–429. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lopes EN, Abelha MCF, Batista-Silva VF, Kashiwaqui EAL, Bailly D. 2016. Fish trophic structure in a first order stream of the Iguatemi River basin, upper Paraná River, Brazil. Acta Sci Biol 38: 429–437. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Majdi N, Traunspurger W. 2015. Free-living nematodes in the freshwater food web: a review. J Nematol 47: 28–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mol JHA. 1993. Structure and function of floating bubble nests of three armoured catfishes (Callichthyidae) in relation to the aquatic environment. In: Ouboter PE, ed., The freshwater ecosystems of Suriname, Berlin: Springer, pp. 167–197. [Google Scholar]
  • Muschiol D, Traunspurger W. 2007. Life cycle and calculation of the intrinsic rate of natural increase of two bacterivorous nematodes, Panagrolaimus sp and Poikilolaimus sp from chemoautotrophic Movile Cave, Romania. Nematology 9: 271–284. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nickum J, Bart Jr HL, Bowser PR, Greer IE, Hubbs C, Jenkins JA, MacMillan JR, Rachlin JW, Rose JD, Sorensen PW. 2004. Guidelines for the use of fishes in research. Bethesda (USA): American Fisheries Society. [Google Scholar]
  • Pfannkuche O, Thiel H. 1988. Sample processing. In Higgins RP, Thiel H, eds. Introduction to the study of meiofauna. Washington (USA): Smithsonian Institution Press, pp. 134–145. [Google Scholar]
  • Ricci M, Fifi A, Ragni A, Schlechtriem C, Focken U. 2003. Development of a low-cost technology for mass production of the free-living nematode Panagrellus redivivus as an alternative live food for first feeding fish larvae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 60: 556–559. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rouse DB, Webster CD, Radwin IA. 1992. Enhancement of the fatty acid composition of the nematode Panagrellus redivivus using three different media. J World Aquac Soc 23: 89–95. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Schlechtriem C., Ricci M., Focken U., Becker K., 2004. The suitability of the free-living nematode Panagrellus redivivus as live food for first-feeding fish larvae. J Appl Ichthyol, 20: 161–168. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Semprucci F., Frontalini F., Sbrocca C., Armynot du Châtelet E., Bout-Roumazeilles V., Coccioni R., Balsamo M. 2015. Meiobenthos and free-living nematodes as tools for biomonitoring environments affected by riverine impact. Environ Monit Assess 187: 251. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Spieth HR, Möller T, Ptatschek C, Kazemi-Dinan A, Traunspurger W. 2011. Meiobenthos provides a food resource for young cyprinids. J Fish Biol 78: 138–149. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sulston J, Hodgkin J. 1988. Methods. In: Wood WB, ed. The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Plainview (USA): Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, pp. 587–606. [Google Scholar]
  • Tillner R, Assheuer T, Rennert B, Trubiroha A, Clemmesen C, Wuertz S. 2015. Evaluation of an improved RNA/DNA quantification method in a common carp (Cyprinus carpio Linnaeus 1758) larval feeding trial with Artemia, two nematodes (Panagrellus redivivus Linnaeus 1758, Panagrolaimus sp. Fuchs 1930) and dry feed. J Appl Ichthyol 31: 466–473. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Traunspurger W, Höss S, Witthöft-Mühlmann A, Wessel M, Güde H. 2012. Meiobenthic community patterns of Lake Constance: relationships to nutrients and abiotic parameters in an oligotrophic deep lake. Fund Appl Limnol 180: 233–248. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Weber S, Traunspurger W. 2014a. Consumption and prey size selection of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans by different juvenile stages of freshwater fish. Nematology 16: 631–641. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Weber S, Traunspurger W. 2014b. Top-down control of a meiobenthic community by two juvenile freshwater fish species. Aquat Ecol 465–480. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Weber S, Traunspurger W. 2015. The effects of predation by juvenile fish on the meiobenthic community structure in a natural pond. Freshw Biol 60: 2392–2409. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Weber S, Traunspurger W. 2016. Effects of juvenile fish predation (Cyprinus carpio L.) on the composition and diversity of free-living freshwater nematode assemblages. Nematology 18: 39–52. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Cite this article as: Majdi N, Weber S, Traunspurger W. 2018. The early catfish catches the worm: predation of Corydoras aeneus (Siluriformes, Callichthyidae) on freshwater nematodes. Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim. 54: 29

All Tables

Table 1

Individual body mass of nematode species inoculated in aquariums (n = 400 individuals measured).

In the text

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1

Nematode densities after 24 h exposition in control aquaria without fishes (grey bars) or in aquaria with two Corydoras aeneus (25–30 mm) catfishes (black bars). Values are means ± SD. Aquaria contained 1.2 L of sandy sediment spread on a surface of 600 cm2. Nematode species offered: Poikilolaimus sp. (Poikilo), Caenorhabditis elegans (Celegans), Panagrolaimus cf. thienemanni (Panagro), and Panagrellus redivivus (Panagre).
In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.