Open Access
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 54, 2018
Article Number 29
Number of page(s) 5
Published online 14 September 2018
  • Abada AEA, Ghanim NF, Sherif AH, Salama NA. 2017. Benthic freshwater nematode community dynamics under conditions of Tilapia aquaculture in Egypt. Afr J Aquat Sci 42: 381–387. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Abebe E, Decraemer W, De Ley P. 2008. Global diversity of nematodes (Nematoda) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia 595: 67–78. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Andrássy I. 1956. Die Rauminhalts-und Gewichtsbestimmung der Fadenwurmer (Nematoden). Acta Zool Acad Sci Hung 2: 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  • Aranha JMR, Caramaschi EP, Caramaschi U. 1993. Spatial occupation, feeding and reproductive period of two species of Corydoras lacépède (Siluroidei, Callichthyidae) coexistents in the Alambari river (Botucatu, Sao Paulo). Rev Bras Zool 10: 453–466. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Biedenbach JM, Smith LL, Thomsen TK, Lawrence AL. 1989. Use of the nematode Panagrellus redivivus as an Artemia replacement in a larval penaeid diet. J World Aquac Soc 20: 61–71. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bongers T, Ferris H. 1999. Nematode community structure as a bioindicator in environmental monitoring. Trends Ecol Evol 14: 224–228. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Brose U, Jonsson T, Berlow EL, et al. 2006. Consumer-resource body-size relationships in natural food webs. Ecology 87: 2411–2417. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Brüggemann J. 2012. Nematodes as live food in larviculture-a review. J World Aquac Soc 43: 739–763. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Casatti L, Romero RM, Teresa FB, Sabino J, Langeani F. 2010. Fish community structure along a conservation gradient in Bodoquena Plateau streams, central West of Brazil. Acta Limnol Bras 22: 50–59. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cook Jr. SB. 1962. Feeding studies of the Aeneus catfish, Corydoras aeneus, on aquatic midges. J Econ Entomol 55: 155–157. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Coull, BC, Chandler GT. 1992. Pollution and meiofauna: field, laboratory and mesocosm studies. Oceanogr Mar Biol 30: 191–271. [Google Scholar]
  • De Araujo RB, Garutti V. 2003. Ecology of a stream from upper Paraná River basin inhabited by Aspidoras fuscoguttatus Nijssen and Isbrüker, 1976 (Siluriformes, Callichthyidae). Braz J Biol 63: 363–372. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Diatin I, Suprayudi MA, Budiardi T, Surawidjaja EH. 2015. Intensive culture of corydoras ornamental fish (Corydoras aeneus): evaluation of stocking density and water exchange. Aquac Aquar Conserv Legis 8: 975–987. [Google Scholar]
  • Dineen G, Robertson AL. 2010. Subtle top-down control of a freshwater meiofaunal assemblage by juvenile fish. Freshw Biol 55: 1818–1830. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Donkin SG, Williams PL. 1995. Influence of developmental stage, salts and food presence on various end points using Caenorhabditis elegans for aquatic toxicity testing. Environ Toxicol Chem 14: 2139–2147. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Haegerbaeumer A, Höss S, Ristau K, Claus E., Heininger P, Traunspurger W. 2017. The use of meiofauna in freshwater sediment assessments: structural and functional responses of meiobenthic communities to metal and organics contamination. Ecol Indic 78: 512–525. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Heininger P, Hoess S, Claus E, Pelzer J, Traunspurger W. 2007. Nematode communities in contaminated river sediments. Environ Pollut 146: 64–76. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Höss S, Claus E, Von der Ohe P, Brinke M, Güde H, Heininger P, Traunspurger W. 2011. Nematode species at risk − a metric to assess pollution in soft sediments of freshwaters. Environ Int 37: 940–949. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Honnens H, Ehlers R-U. 2013. Liquid culture of Panagrolaimus sp. for use as food for marine aquaculture shrimp and fish species. Nematology 15: 417–429. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lopes EN, Abelha MCF, Batista-Silva VF, Kashiwaqui EAL, Bailly D. 2016. Fish trophic structure in a first order stream of the Iguatemi River basin, upper Paraná River, Brazil. Acta Sci Biol 38: 429–437. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Majdi N, Traunspurger W. 2015. Free-living nematodes in the freshwater food web: a review. J Nematol 47: 28–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mol JHA. 1993. Structure and function of floating bubble nests of three armoured catfishes (Callichthyidae) in relation to the aquatic environment. In: Ouboter PE, ed., The freshwater ecosystems of Suriname, Berlin: Springer, pp. 167–197. [Google Scholar]
  • Muschiol D, Traunspurger W. 2007. Life cycle and calculation of the intrinsic rate of natural increase of two bacterivorous nematodes, Panagrolaimus sp and Poikilolaimus sp from chemoautotrophic Movile Cave, Romania. Nematology 9: 271–284. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nickum J, Bart Jr HL, Bowser PR, Greer IE, Hubbs C, Jenkins JA, MacMillan JR, Rachlin JW, Rose JD, Sorensen PW. 2004. Guidelines for the use of fishes in research. Bethesda (USA): American Fisheries Society. [Google Scholar]
  • Pfannkuche O, Thiel H. 1988. Sample processing. In Higgins RP, Thiel H, eds. Introduction to the study of meiofauna. Washington (USA): Smithsonian Institution Press, pp. 134–145. [Google Scholar]
  • Ricci M, Fifi A, Ragni A, Schlechtriem C, Focken U. 2003. Development of a low-cost technology for mass production of the free-living nematode Panagrellus redivivus as an alternative live food for first feeding fish larvae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 60: 556–559. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rouse DB, Webster CD, Radwin IA. 1992. Enhancement of the fatty acid composition of the nematode Panagrellus redivivus using three different media. J World Aquac Soc 23: 89–95. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Schlechtriem C., Ricci M., Focken U., Becker K., 2004. The suitability of the free-living nematode Panagrellus redivivus as live food for first-feeding fish larvae. J Appl Ichthyol, 20: 161–168. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Semprucci F., Frontalini F., Sbrocca C., Armynot du Châtelet E., Bout-Roumazeilles V., Coccioni R., Balsamo M. 2015. Meiobenthos and free-living nematodes as tools for biomonitoring environments affected by riverine impact. Environ Monit Assess 187: 251. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Spieth HR, Möller T, Ptatschek C, Kazemi-Dinan A, Traunspurger W. 2011. Meiobenthos provides a food resource for young cyprinids. J Fish Biol 78: 138–149. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sulston J, Hodgkin J. 1988. Methods. In: Wood WB, ed. The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Plainview (USA): Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, pp. 587–606. [Google Scholar]
  • Tillner R, Assheuer T, Rennert B, Trubiroha A, Clemmesen C, Wuertz S. 2015. Evaluation of an improved RNA/DNA quantification method in a common carp (Cyprinus carpio Linnaeus 1758) larval feeding trial with Artemia, two nematodes (Panagrellus redivivus Linnaeus 1758, Panagrolaimus sp. Fuchs 1930) and dry feed. J Appl Ichthyol 31: 466–473. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Traunspurger W, Höss S, Witthöft-Mühlmann A, Wessel M, Güde H. 2012. Meiobenthic community patterns of Lake Constance: relationships to nutrients and abiotic parameters in an oligotrophic deep lake. Fund Appl Limnol 180: 233–248. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Weber S, Traunspurger W. 2014a. Consumption and prey size selection of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans by different juvenile stages of freshwater fish. Nematology 16: 631–641. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Weber S, Traunspurger W. 2014b. Top-down control of a meiobenthic community by two juvenile freshwater fish species. Aquat Ecol 465–480. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Weber S, Traunspurger W. 2015. The effects of predation by juvenile fish on the meiobenthic community structure in a natural pond. Freshw Biol 60: 2392–2409. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Weber S, Traunspurger W. 2016. Effects of juvenile fish predation (Cyprinus carpio L.) on the composition and diversity of free-living freshwater nematode assemblages. Nematology 18: 39–52. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.