Free Access
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 46, Number 2, 2010
Page(s) 77 - 91
Published online 17 May 2010
  • Allan J.D. and Castillo M.M., 2007. Stream ecology – Structure and function of running waters, Springer, Dordrecht. [Google Scholar]
  • Ambers R.K.R., 2007. Effects of a small, century-old dam on a second order stream in the Virginia piedmont. Southeast. Geogr., 47, 181–201. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • American Rivers, Friends of the Earth and Trout Unlimited, 1999. Dam removal success stories: restoring rivers through selective removal of dams that don't make sense, American Rivers, Friends of the Earth and Trout Unlimited, Washington. [Google Scholar]
  • Armitage P.D. and Pardo I., 1995. Impact assessment of regulation at the reach level using macroinvertebrate information from mesohabitats. Regul. Rivers Res. Manag., 10, 147–158. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bain M.B. and Stevenson N.J., 1999. Aquatic habitat assessment: common methods, American Fisheries Society, Bethesda. [Google Scholar]
  • Baxter R.M., 1977. Environmental effects of dams and impoundments. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 8, 255–283. [Google Scholar]
  • Benstead J.P., March J.G., Pringle C. and Scatena F., 1999. Effects of a low-head dam and water abstraction on migratory tropical stream biota. Ecol. Appl., 9, 656–668. [Google Scholar]
  • Berg M.B., 1995. Larval food and feeding behaviour. In: Armitage P.D., Cranston P.S. and Pinder L.C.V. (eds.), The Chironomidae – The biology and ecology of non-biting midges, Chapman and Hall, London, 136–168. [Google Scholar]
  • Brandt S.A., 2000. Classification of geomorphological effects downstream of dams. Catena, 40, 375–401. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bredenhand E. and Samways M.J., 2009. Impact of a dam on benthic macroinvertebrates in a small river in a biodiversity hotspot: Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. J. Insect Conserv., 13, 297–307. [Google Scholar]
  • Brittain J.E. and L'Abee-Lund J.H., 1995. The environmental effects of dams and strategies for reducing their impact. In: Santbergen L. and Van Westen C. (eds.), Reservoirs in river basin development, Balkema, Rotterdam, 129–138. [Google Scholar]
  • Cabido D., Cabido M., Garre S.M., Gorgas J.A., Miatello R., Rambaldi S., Ravelo A. and Tassile J.L., 2003. Regiones Naturales de la Provincia de Córdoba, Serie C, Publicaciones Técnicas, Agencia Córdoba, Dirección de Ambiente, Córdoba. [Google Scholar]
  • Callisto M., Moreno P. and Barbosa F.A.R., 2001. Habitat diversity and benthic functional trophic groups at Serra do Cipó, Southeast Brazil. Rev. Bras. Biol., 61, 259–266. [Google Scholar]
  • Cantero G.A., Cantu M.P., Cisneros J.M., Cantero J.J., Blarasin M., Degioanni A., Gonzalez J., Becerra V., Gil H., De Prada J., Degiovanni S., Cholaky C., Villegas M., Cabrera A. and Eric C., 1998. Las tierras y aguas del sur de Córdoba: propuestas para un manejo sustentable, Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto, Córdoba. [Google Scholar]
  • Capitanelli R.G., 1979. Clima. In: Vázquez J.V., Miatello R.A. and Roqué M.E. (dirs.), Geografía Física de la Provincia de Córdoba, Editorial Boldt, Buenos Aires, 45–138. [Google Scholar]
  • Corigliano M.C., 1994. El efecto de los embalses sobre la fauna planctónica y bentónica del río Ctalamochita (Tercero), (Córdoba, Argentina). Rev. UNRC, 14, 23–38. [Google Scholar]
  • Di.P.A.S., 1994. Normas provinciales de calidad y control de aguas para bebida, Res. 608/93, Vol. 1, Sistema Provincial de Control de Calidad, Córdoba. [Google Scholar]
  • Domínguez E. and Fernández H.R., 2009. Macroinvertebrados bentónicos sudamericanos – Sistemática y biología, Fundación Miguel Lillo, Tucumán. [Google Scholar]
  • Dufrene M. and Legendre P., 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol. Monogr., 67, 345–366. [Google Scholar]
  • Englund G. and Malmqvist B., 1996. Effects of flow regulations, habitat area and isolation on the macroinvertebrates fauna of rapids in north Swedish Rivers. Regul. Rivers Res. Manag., 12, 433–445. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Evans J.E., Huxley J.M. and Vincent R.K., 2007. Upstream channel changes following dam construction and removal using a GIS/remote sensing approach. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 43, 683–697. [Google Scholar]
  • FISRWG, 1998. Stream Corridor Restoration: Principles, Processes, and Practices, Federal Interagency Stream Restoration Working Group, USA. [Google Scholar]
  • Fleituch T., 2003. Structure and functional organization of benthic invertebrates in a regulated stream. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol., 88, 332–344. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gordon N.D., Mcmahon T.A. and Finlayson B.L., 1994. Stream hydrology, an introduction for ecologists, Wiley and Sons, New York. [Google Scholar]
  • Greenberg A.E., Clesceri L.S. and Eaton A.D., 1992. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, American Public Health Association, Washington. [Google Scholar]
  • Growns I.O. and Growns J.E., 2001. Ecological effects of flow regulation on macroinvertebrate and periphytic diatom assemblages in the Hawkesbury – Nepean River, Australia. Regul. Rivers Res. Manag., 17, 275–293. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Grubbs S.A. and Taylor J.M., 2004. The influence of flow impoundment and river regulation on the distribution of riverine macroinvertebrates at Mammoth Cave National Park, Kentucky, U.S.A. Hydrobiol., 520, 19–28. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gumiero B. and Salmoiraghi G., 1998. Influence of an impoundment on benthic macroinvertebrate habitat utilization. Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol., 26, 2063–2069. [Google Scholar]
  • Harper D.M., Smith C., Kemp J. and Crosa G., 1998. The use of ‘functional habitats’ in the conservation, management and rehabilitation of rivers. In: Bretschko G. and Helesic J. (eds.), Advances in river bottom ecology, Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, 315–326. [Google Scholar]
  • Hart D.D., Johnson T.E., Bushaw-Newton K.L., Horwitz R.J., Bednarek A.T., Charles D.F., Kreeger D.A. and Velinsky D.J., 2002. Dam removal: Challenges and opportunities for ecological research and river restoration. BioScience, 52, 669–681. [Google Scholar]
  • Lessard J.L. and Hayes D.B., 2003. Effects of elevated water temperature on fish and macroinvertebrate communities below small dams. River Res. Appl., 19, 721–732. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lopretto E.C. and Tell G., 1995. Ecosistemas de aguas continentales – Metodologías para su studio, Volumes II and III, Ediciones Sur, La Plata. [Google Scholar]
  • Lucas M.C., Bubb D.H., Jang M., Ha K. and Masters J.E.G., 2008. Availability of and access to critical habitats in regulated rivers: effects of low-head barriers on threatened lampreys. Freshw. Biol., 54, 621–634. [Google Scholar]
  • Luti R., Bertran M.A., Galera F.M., Müller N., Berzal M., Nores M., Herrera M.A. and Barrera J.C., 1979. Vegetación. In: Vázquez J.V., Miatello R.A. and Roqué M.E. (dirs.), Geografía Física de la Provincia de Córdoba, Editorial Boldt, Buenos Aires, 318–321. [Google Scholar]
  • Malmquist H.L., Antonsson T., Gudbergsson G., Skülason S. and Snorrason S.S., 2000. Biodiversity of macroinvertebrates on rocky substrate in the surf zone of iceland lakes. Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol., 27, 121–127. [Google Scholar]
  • Maloney K.O., Dodd H.R., Butler S.E. and Wahl D.H., 2008. Changes in macroinvertebrate and fish assemblages in a medium-sized river following a breach of a low head-dam. Freshw. Biol., 53, 1055–1068. [Google Scholar]
  • McCune B. and Grace J.B., 2002. Analysis of Ecological Communities, MjM Software, Oregon. [Google Scholar]
  • McCune B. and Mefford M.J., 1999. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data, Version 4.25, MjM Software, Gleneden Beach. [Google Scholar]
  • Meixler M. and Bain M., 2003. Habitat fragmentation mapping, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University, Available online at: [Google Scholar]
  • Merritt R.W. and Cummins K.W., 1996. An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America, Third edn., Kendall/Hunt, Dubuque. [Google Scholar]
  • Merritt R.W. and Cummins K.W., 2006. Trophic relationships of macroinvertebrates. In: Hauer F.R. and Lamberti G.A. (eds.), Methods in stream ecology, Second edn., Academic Press, San Diego, 585–601. [Google Scholar]
  • Palmer M.A. and Poff N.L., 1997. Heterogeneity in streams. The influence of environmental heterogeneity on patterns and processes in streams. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc., 16, 169–173. [Google Scholar]
  • Poff N.L. and Hart D.D., 2002. How dams vary and why it matters for the emerging science of dam removal. BioScience, 52, 659–668. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Power M.E., Dietrich W.E. and Finlay J.C., 1996. Dams and downstream biodiversity: potential food web consequences of hydrologic and geomorphic change. Environ. Manag., 20, 887–895. [Google Scholar]
  • Principe R.E., Raffaini G.B., Gualdoni C.M., Oberto A.M. and Corigliano M.C., 2007. Do hydraulic units define macroinvertebrate assemblages in mountain streams of central Argentina? Limnologica, 37, 323–336. [Google Scholar]
  • Protocolo HIDRI, 2006. Protocolo para la valoración de la calidad hidromorfológica de los rios, Agència Catalana de l'Aigua, Available online at: [Google Scholar]
  • Reiser D.W. and Peacock R.T., 1985. A technique for assessing upstream fish passage problems at small-scale hydropower developments. In: Olson F.W., White R.G. and Hamre R.H. (eds.), Symposium on small hydropower and fisheries, American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, 423–432. [Google Scholar]
  • Rempel L.L., Richardson J.S. and Healey M.C., 2000. Macroinvertebrate community structure along gradients of hydraulic and sedimentary conditions in a large, gravel-bed river. Freshw. Biol., 45, 57–63. [Google Scholar]
  • Rosgen D.L., 1996. Applied River Morphology – Wildland Hydrology Books, Pagosa Springs, Ft. Collins. [Google Scholar]
  • Rosgen D.L., 1997. A geomorphological approach to restoration of incised rivers. In: Wang S.S.Y., Langendoen E.J. and Shields Jr F.D. (eds.), Proceedings of the Conference on Management of Landscapes Disturbed by Channel Incision. [Google Scholar]
  • Rosgen D.L., 2006. The Cross-Vane, W-Weir and J-Hook Vane structures and their description, design and application for stream stabilization and river restoration, Wildland Hydrology, Inc. Ft. Collins, Colorado, Available online at: [Google Scholar]
  • Saila S.B., Poyer D. and Aube D., 2005. Small dams and habitat quality in low order streams, Wood-Pawcatuck Watershed Association, Hope Valley. [Google Scholar]
  • Sharma C.M., Sharma S., Borgstrom R. and Bryceson I., 2005. Impacts of a small dam on macroinvertebrates: A case study in the Tinau River, Nepal. Aquat. Ecosyst. Health Manag., 8, 267–275. [Google Scholar]
  • Skalak K., Pizzuto J. and Hart D.D., 2009. Influence of small dams on downstream channel characteristics in Pennsylvania and Maryland: implications for the long-term geomorphic effects of dam removal. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 45, 97–109. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ter Braak C.J.F., 1986. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology, 67, 1167–1179. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ter Braak C.J.F. and Smilauer P., 1998. CANOCO Reference Manual and User's Guide to Canoco for Windows: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4), Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, New York. [Google Scholar]
  • Thomson J.R., Taylor M.P., Fryirs K.A. and Brierley G.J., 2001. A geomorphological framework for river characterization and habitat assessment. Aquat. Conserv., 11, 373–389. [Google Scholar]
  • Thomson J.R., Taylor M.P. and Brierley G.J., 2003. Are River Styles ecologically meaningful? A test of the ecological significance of a geomorphic river characterization scheme. Aquat. Conserv., 14, 25–48. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tickner D., Armitage P.D., Bickerton M.A. and Hall K.A., 2000. Assessing stream quality using information on mesohabitat distribution and character. Aquat. Conserv., 10, 170–196. [Google Scholar]
  • Tomanova S., Goitia E. and Helešic J., 2006. Trophic levels and functional feeding groups of macroinvertebrates in neotropical streams. Hydrobiol., 556, 251–264. [Google Scholar]
  • Townsend C.R., 1989. The patch dynamics concepts of stream community ecology. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc., 8, 36–50. [Google Scholar]
  • Underwood A.J., 1994. Spatial and temporal problems with monitoring. In: Calow P. and Petts E. (eds.), The Handbook of River, Blackwell, Oxford, 182–204. [Google Scholar]
  • Vallania A.E., Medina A.I. and Sosa M.E., 1998. Estructura de la comunidad de Trichoptera en un arroyo regulado de la provincia de San Luis, Argentina. Rev. Soc. Entomol. Argent., 57, 7–11. [Google Scholar]
  • Vallania A.E. and Corigliano M.C., 2007. The effect of regulation caused by a dam on the distribution of the functional feeding groups of the benthos in the sub basin of the Grande River (San Luis, Argentina). Environ. Monit. Assess., 124, 201–209. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ward J.V., 1982. Ecological aspects of stream regulation: responses in downstream lotic reaches. Water Pollut. Manag. Rev. (New Delhi), 2, 1–26. [Google Scholar]
  • Ward J.V., 1992. Aquatic insect ecology – Biology and habitat, Willey and Sons, New York. [Google Scholar]
  • Ward J.V. and Stanford J.A., 1979. Ecological factors controlling stream zoobenthos with emphasis on thermal modification of regulated streams. In: Ward J.V. and Stanford J.A. (eds.), The ecology of regulated streams, Plenum Publishing Corporation, New York, 35–55. [Google Scholar]
  • Ward J.V. and Stanford J.A., 1995. The serial discontinuity concept: Extending the model to floodplain rivers. Regul. Rivers: Res. Manag., 11, 105–119. [Google Scholar]
  • Zeilhofera P. and de Moura R.M., 2009. Hydrological changes in the northern Pantanal caused by the Manso dam: Impact analysis and suggestions for mitigation. Ecol. Eng., 35, 105–117. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.