EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 46 / No 2 (2010) Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim., 46 2 (2010) 101-110 References
Free Access
Issue
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 46, Number 2, 2010
Page(s) 101 - 110
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/2010008
Published online 17 May 2010
  • Arnott S.E., Magnuson J.J. and Yan N.D., 1998. Crustacean zooplankton species richness: single- and multipleyear estimates. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 55, 1573–1582. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Biggs J., Williams P., Whitfield M., Nicolet P. and Weatherby A., 2005. 15 years of pond assessment in Britain: results and lessons learned from the work of Pond Conservation. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst., 15, 693–714. [Google Scholar]
  • Bilton D.T., McAbendroth L.C., Nicolet P., Bedford A., Rundle S.D., Foggo A. and Ramsay P.M., 2009. Ecology and conservation status of temporary and fluctuating ponds in two areas of southern England. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst., 19, 134–146. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Borges P.A.V. and Brown V.K., 2003. Estimating species richness of arthropods in Azorean pastures: the adequacy of suction sampling and pitfall trapping. Graellsia, 59, 7–24. [Google Scholar]
  • Brose U., 2002. Estimating species richness of pitfall catches by non-parametric estimators. Pedobiologia, 46, 101–107. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brose U. and Martinez N.D., 2004. Estimating the richness of species with variable mobility. Oikos, 105, 292–300. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brose U., Martinez N.D. and Williams R.J., 2003. Estimating species richness: sensitivity to sample coverage and insensitivity to spatial patterns. Ecology, 84, 2364–2377. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bruno A.W. and Joslin L.M., 2005. The concepts of bias, precision and accuracy, and their use in testing the performance of species richness estimators, with a literature review of estimator performance. Ecography, 28, 815–829. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Burnham K.P. and Overton W.S., 1979. Robust estimation of population size when capture probabilities vary among animals. Ecology, 60, 927–936. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cam E., Nichols J.D., Sauer J.R. and Hines J.E., 2002. On the estimation of species richness based on the accumulation of previously unrecorded species. Ecography, 25, 102–108. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Carlton C.E. and Robison H.W., 1998. Diversity of litter-dwelling beetles in the Ouachita Highlands of Arkansas, USA (Insecta: Coleoptera). Biodivers. Conserv., 7, 1589–1605. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chao A., 1984. Non-parametric estimation of the number of classes in a population. Scand. J. Stat., 11, 265–270. [Google Scholar]
  • Chao A., 1987. Estimating the population size for capture-recapture data with unequal catchability. Biometrics, 43, 783–791. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chao A. and Lee S.-M., 1992. Estimating the number of classes via sample coverage. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc., 87, 210–217. [Google Scholar]
  • Chao A., Hwang W.-H., Chen Y.-C. and Kuo C.-Y., 2000. Estimating the number of shared species in two communities. Statist. Sinica, 10, 227–246. [Google Scholar]
  • Chao A., Chazdon R., Colwell R.K. and Shen T.-J., 2005. A new statistical approach for assessing similarity of species composition with incidence and abundance data. Ecol. Lett., 8, 148–159. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chapin F.S., Zavaleta E.S., Eviner V.T., Naylor R.L., Vitousek P.M., Reynolds H.L., Hooper D.U., Lavorel S., Sala E.O., Hobbie S.E., Mack M.C. and Díaz S., 2000. Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature, 405, 234–242. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chazdon R.L., Colwell R.K., Denslow J.S. and Guariguata M.R., 1998. Statistical methods for estimating species richness of woody regeneration in primary and secondary rain forests of NE Costa Rica. In: Dallmeier F. and Comiskey J.A. (eds.), Forest Biodiversity Research, Monitoring and Modeling: Conceptual Background and Old World Case Studies>, Parthenon Publishing, Paris, 285–309. [Google Scholar]
  • Chiarucci A., Maccherini S. and De Dominicis V., 2001. Evaluation and monitoring of the flora in a nature reserve by estimation methods. Biol. Conserv., 101, 305–314. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chiarucci A., Enright N.J., Perry G.L.W., Miller B.P. and Lamont B.B., 2003. Performance of nonparametric species richness estimators in a high diversity plant community. Divers. Distrib., 9, 283–295. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Clench H., 1979. How to make regional fists of butterflies: some thoughts. J. Lepid. Soc., 33, 216–231. [Google Scholar]
  • Coddington J.A., Young L.H. and Coyle F.A., 1996. Estimating spider species richness in a southern Appalachian cove hardwood forest. J. Arachnol., 24, 111–128. [Google Scholar]
  • Colwell R.K., 1997. Estimates: Statistical Estimation of Species Richness and Shared Species from Samples, Version 5. User's guide and application published at: http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/estimates. [Google Scholar]
  • Colwell R.K., 2004. Estimates: Statistical Estimation of Species Richness and Shared Species from Samples, Version 7. User's Guide and application published at: http://purl.oclc.org/estimates, University of Connecticut, Storrs. [Google Scholar]
  • Colwell R.K. and Coddington J.A., 1994. Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Series B, 345, 101–118. [Google Scholar]
  • Condit R., Hubbel S.P., Lafrankie J.V., Sukumar R., Manokaran N., Foster R.B. and Ashton P.S., 1996. Species–area and species–individual relationships for tropical trees: a comparison of three 50-ha plots. J. Ecol., 84, 549–562. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Conroy M. and Noon B.R., 1996. Mapping of species richness for conservation of biological diversity: conceptual and methodological issues. Ecol. Appl., 6, 763–773. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dumont H.J. and Segers H., 1996. Estimating lacustrine zooplankton species richness and complementarity. Hydrobiologia, 341, 125–132. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Flather C.H., 1996. Fitting species-accumulation functions and assessing regional land use impacts on avian diversity. J. Biogeogr., 23, 155–168. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Foggo A., Rundle S.D. and Bilton D.T., 2003. The net result: evaluating species richness extrapolation techniques for littoral pond invertebrates. Freshwater Biol., 48, 1756–1764. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gaston K.J., 1996. Species richness: measure and measurement. In: Gaston K.J. (ed.), Biodiversity: a biology by numbers and difference, Blackwell Science, Oxford, 77–113. [Google Scholar]
  • Gaston K.J., 2000. Global patterns in biodiversity. Nature, 405, 220–227. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gotelli N.J. and Colwell R.K., 2001. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol. Lett., 4, 379–391. [Google Scholar]
  • Hammond P.M., 1994. Practical approaches to the estimation of the extent of biodiversity in speciose groups. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Series B, 345, 119–136. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hellmann J.J. and Fowler G.W., 1999. Bias, precision, and accuracy of four measures of species richness. Ecol. Appl., 9, 824–834. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Heltshe J. and Forrester N.E., 1983. Estimating species richness using the jackknife procedure. Biometrics, 39, 1–11. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Holdridge L.R., Grenke W.C., Hatheway W.H., Liang T. and Tosi J.A., 1971. Forest environments in tropical life zones, Pergamon Press, Oxford. [Google Scholar]
  • Hortal J.,Garcia-Pereira P. and García-Barros E., 2004. Butterfly species richness in mainland Portugal: predictive models of geographic distribution patterns. Ecography, 27, 68–82. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hortal J., Borges P.A. and Gaspar C., 2006. Evaluating the performance of species richness estimators: sensitivity to sample grain size. J. Anim. Ecol., 75, 274–287. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Karakoç G., Erkoç F.U. and Katırcıoglu H., 2003. Water quality and impacts of pollution sources for Eymir and Mogan Lakes (Turkey). Environ. Int., 29, 21–27. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Keating K.A., Quinn J.F., Ivie M.A. and Ivie L., 1998. Estimating the effectiveness of further sampling in species inventories. Ecol. Appl., 8, 1239–1249. [Google Scholar]
  • Keddy P.A. and Drummond C.G., 1996. Ecological properties for the evaluation, management, and restoration of temperate deciduous forest ecosystems. Ecol. Appl., 6, 748–762. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kerr J.T., 1997. Species richness, endemism, and the choice of areas for conservation. Conserv. Biol., 11, 1094–1100. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lee S.-M. and Chao A., 1994. Estimating population size via sample coverage for closed capture-recapture models. Biometrics, 50, 88–97. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Longino J.T., Coddington J.A. and Colwell R.R., 2002. The ant fauna of a tropical rain forest: estimating species richness in three different ways. Ecology, 83, 689–702. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Magurran A.E., 1988. Ecological Diversity and its Measurement, Croom-Helm, London. [Google Scholar]
  • Martinez N.D., Hawkins B.A., Dawah H.A. and Feifarek B.P., 1999. Effects of sampling effort on characterization of food-web structure. Ecology, 80, 1044–1055. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Melo A.S. and Froehlich C.G., 2001. Evaluation of methods for estimating macroinvertebrate species richness using individual stones in tropical streams. Freshwat. Biol., 46, 711–721. [Google Scholar]
  • Melo A.S., Pereira R.A.S., Santos A.J., Shepherd G.J., Machado G., Medeiros H.F. and Sawaya R.J., 2003. Comparing species richness among assemblages using sample units: why not use extrapolation methods to standardize different sample sizes? Oikos, 101, 398–410. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Michaelis M. and Menten M.L., 1913. Der kinetik der invertinwirkung. Biochem. Z., 49, 333–369. [Google Scholar]
  • Miller R.I. and Wiegert R.G., 1989. Documenting completeness, species-area relations, and the species-abundance distribution of a regional flora. Ecology, 70, 16–22. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Oertli B., Auderset J.D., Castella E., Juge R., Cambin D. and Lachavanne J.B., 2002. Does size matter? The relationship between pond area and biodiversity. Biol. Conserv., 104, 59–70. [Google Scholar]
  • Oertli B., Biggs J., Céréghino R., Grillas P., Joly P. and Lachavanne J.-L., 2005. Conservation and monitoring of pond biodiversity: introduction. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst., 15, 535–540. [Google Scholar]
  • Palmer M.W., 1990. The estimation of species richness by extrapolation. Ecology, 71, 1195–1198. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Petersen F.T. and Meier R., 2003. Testing species-richness estimation methods on single-sample collection data using the Danish Diptera. Biodiv. Conserv., 12, 667–686. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Peterson A.T. and Slade N.A., 1998. Extrapolating inventory results into biodiversity estimates and the importance of stopping rules. Divers. Distrib., 4, 95–105. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Prendergast J.R., Quinn R.M., Lawton J.H., Eversham B.C. and Gibbons D.W., 1993. Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies. Nature, 365, 335–337. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pressey R.L., Humphries C.J., Margules C.R., Vane-Wright R.I. and Williams P.H., 1993. Beyond opportunism: key principles for systematic reserve selection. Tr. Ecol. Evol., 8, 124–128. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Raaijmakers J.G.W., 1987. Statistical analysis of the Michaelis-Menten equation. Biometrics, 43, 793–803. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Schindler D.E., Knapp R.A. and Leavitt P.R., 2001. Alteration of nutrient cycles and algal production resulting from fish introductions into Mountain lakes. Ecosystems, 4, 308–321. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Schippers P.,van de Weerd H., Klein J., Jong B. and Scheffer M., 2006. Impacts of agricultural phosphorus use in catchments on shallow lake water quality: About buffers, time delays and equilibria. Sci. Total Environ., 369, 280–294. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Smith E.P. and van Belle G., 1984. Nonparametric estimation of species richness. Biometrics, 40, 119–129. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Soberón J. and Llorente J., 1993. The use of species accumulation functions for the prediction of species richness. Conserv. Biol., 7, 480–488. [Google Scholar]
  • Søndergaard M. and Jeppesen E., 2007. Anthropogenic impacts on lake and stream ecosystems, and approaches to restoration. J. Appl. Ecol., 44, 1089–1094. [Google Scholar]
  • Toro M., Granados I., Robles S. and Montes C., 2006. High mountain lakes of the Central Range (Iberian Peninsula): Regional limnology & environmental changes. Limnetica, 25, 1-2, 217–252. [Google Scholar]
  • Walther B.A. and Martin J.L., 2001. Species richness estimation of bird communities: how to control for sampling effort? Ibis, 143, 413–419. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Walther B.A. and Morand S., 1998. Comparative performance of species richness estimation methods. Parasitology, 116, 395–405. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Walther B.A. and Moore J.L., 2005. The definitions of bias, precision, and accuracy, and their use in testing the performance of species richness estimators, with a literature review of estimator performance. Ecography, 28, 815–829. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Walther B.A., Cotgreave P., Gregory R.D., Price R.D. and Clayton D.H., 1995. Sampling effort and parasite species richness. Parasitol. Today, 11, 306–310. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Whittaker R.J., Willis K.J. and Field R., 2001. Scale and species richness: towards a general, hierarchical theory of species richness. J. Biogeogr., 28, 453–470. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Williams R.J. and Martinez N.D., 2000. Simple rules yield complex food web dynamics. Nature, 404, 180–183. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Williams P., Whitfield M., Biggs J., Bray S., Fox G., Nicolet P. and Sear D., 2004. Comparative biodiversity of rivers, streams, ditches and ponds in an agricultural landscape in Southern England. Biol. Conserv., 115, 329–341. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.