EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 58 (2022) Int. J. Lim., 58 (2022) 7 References
Free Access
Issue
Int. J. Lim.
Volume 58, 2022
Article Number 7
Number of page(s) 13
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/2022005
Published online 28 June 2022
  • American Public Health Association. 1992. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th ed. Washington, DC: APHA. [Google Scholar]
  • Askew RR. 2004. The dragonflies of Europe. Second Edition, Harley Books, Essex: 308 p. [Google Scholar]
  • AQEM consortium. 2002. Manual for the application of the AQEM method. A comprehensive method to assess European streams using benthic macroinvertebrates, developed for the purpose of the Water Framework Directive. Version 1.0, February 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • Belančić A, Bogdanović T, Franković M, Ljuština M, Mihoković N, Vitas B. 2008. Crvena knjiga vretenaca Hrvatske, Ministarstvo kulture Republike Hrvatske, Ministarstvo zaštite okoliša i prirode, Državni zavod za zaštitu prirode, Zagreb, 132 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Benke AC, Wallace JB. 2003. Influence of wood on invertebrate communities in streams and rivers. In: Gregory SV, Boyer KL and Gurnell AM (eds.), The ecology and management of wood in world rivers. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 37: Bethesda, Maryland. 149–177 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Boudot JP, Kalkman VJ. 2015. Atlas of the Dragonflies and Damselflies of Europe. KNNV, Utrecht, 381 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Bowler DE, Eichenberg D, Conze K-J, et al. 2021. Winners and losers over 35 years of dragonfly and damselfly distributional change in Germany. Divers Distrib 27: 1353–1366. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bried JT, Herman BD, Ervin GN. 2007. Umbrella potential of plants and dragonflies for wetland conservation: a quantitative case study using the umbrella index. J Appl Ecol 44: 833–842. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brochard C, Groendijk D, van der Ploeg E, Termaat T. 2012. Fotogids Larvenhuidjes van Libellen. Zeist: KNNV Publishers, 320 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Buchwald R. 1992. Vegetation and dragonfly fauna – characteristics and examples of biocenological field studies. Vegetatio 101: 99–107. [Google Scholar]
  • Carvalho FG, de Pinto NS, Oliveira Junior JMB, de Juen L. 2013. Effects of marginal vegetation removal on Odonata communities. Acta Limnol Bras 25: 10–18. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Céréghino R, Cugny P, Lavandier P. 2002. Influence of intermittent hydropeaking on the longitudinal zonation patterns of benthic invertebrates in a mountain stream. Int Rev Hydrobiol 87: 47–60. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chovanec A, Waringer J, Raab R, Laister G. 2004. Lateral connectivity of a fragmented large river system: assessment on a macroscale by dragonfly surveys (Insecta: Odonata). Aquatic Conserv: Mar Freshw Ecosyst 14: 163–178. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chovanec A, Schindler M, Waringer J, Wimmer R. 2015. The dragonfly association index (Insecta: Odonata) – a tool for the type-specific assessment of lowland river. River Res Appl 3: 627–638. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Clarke KR, Gorley RN. 2006. PRIMER V6: User Manual/Tutorial. Plymouth: Primer-E. [Google Scholar]
  • Clausnitzer V. 2003. Dragonfly communities in coastal habitats in Kenya: indication of biotope quality and the need of conservation measures. Biodivers Conserv 412: 333–356. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Corbet PS. 1999. Dragonflies: Behaviour and Ecology of Odonata. Colchester: Harley Books. [Google Scholar]
  • Corbet PS, Brooks S. 2008. Dragonflies, Collins New Naturalist Library series, Book 106. London: Harper Collins, 480 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Corbet PS, Suhling F, Soendgerath D. 2006. Voltinism of Odonata: a review. Int J Odonatol 9: 1–44. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Čanjevac I. 2013. Typology of Discharge Regimes of Rivers in Croatia. Hrvat Geogr Glas 75: 23–42. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dijkstra K-DB, Lewington, R. 2006. Field guide to the dragonflies of Britain and Europe. Gillingham: British Wildlife Publishing, 320 p. [Google Scholar]
  • DIN EN. 2010. Water Quality – Guidance standard on determining the degree of modification of river hydromorphology, European standard CEN/TC 230 [Google Scholar]
  • Dudgeon D. 2013. Anthropocene extinctions: global threats to riverine biodiversity and the tragedy of the freshwater commons. In: Sabater, S and Elosegi, A (eds.), River conservation: challenges and opportunities. Bilbao: Fundación BBVA, pp. 129–167. [Google Scholar]
  • Elosegi A, Díez J, Mutz M. 2019. Effects of hydromorphological integrity on biodiversity and functioning of river ecosystems. Hydrobiology 657: 199–215. [Google Scholar]
  • ESRI. 2010. ArcMap Version 10.0. ArcInfo license. Redlands, C.A. [Google Scholar]
  • European Environment Agency. 2018. European waters – assessment of status and pressures. EEA Report 7/2018. Denmark, Copenhagen. [Google Scholar]
  • Feld CK, Pusch M. 1998. Die Bedeutung von Totholzstrukturen für die Makroinvertebraten –Taxocoenosen in einem Flachlandfluß des Norddeutschen Tieflandes. Verh Westd Entom 1998: 165–172. [Google Scholar]
  • Garner G, Malcolm IA, Sadler JP, Hannah DM. 2014. What causes cooling water temperature gradients in a forested stream reach? Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 18: 5361–5376. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gerken B, Sternberg K. 1999. Die Exuvien Europaïscher Libellen, Arnika & Eisvogel, Hökster & Jena, 354 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Giller PS, Malmqvist B. 1998. The Biology of Streams and Rivers. Biology of Habitats. New York: Oxford University Press, 304 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Graf W. 1997. A new record of the perlid stonefly Agnetina elegantula (Klapalek, 1905) in Europe. In: Landolt, P and Sartori, M (eds.): Ephemeroptera and Plecoptera: Biology-Ecology-Systematics. Fribourg. 205–208 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Harabiš F, Dolný A. 2010. Ecological factors determining the density-distribution of Central European dragonflies (Odonata). Eur J Entomol 107: 571–577. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Harabiš F, Dolný A. 2012. Human altered ecosystems: Suitable habitats as well as ecological traps for dragonflies (Odonata): the matter of scale. J Insect Conserv 16: 121–130. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Harris GP. 2001. Biogeochemistry of nitrogen and phosphorus in Australian catchments, rivers and estuaries: effects of land use and flow regulation and comparisons with global patterns. Mar Freshw Res 52: 139–149. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hawking JH, New TR. 1999. The distribution patterns of dragonflies (Insecta: Odonata) along the Kiewa River, Australia, and their relevance in conservation assessment. Hydrobiology 392: 249–260. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hoffman A, Hering D. 2000. Wood-associated macroinvertebrate fauna in central European streams. Int Rev Hydrobiol 85: 25–48. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hykel M, Harabiš F, Dolný A. 2016. Assessment of the quality of the terrestrial habitat of the threatened dragonfl y, Sympetrum depressiusculum (Odonata: Libellulidae). Eur J Entomol 113: 476–481. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jonsen I, Taylor PD. 2000. Calopteryx damselfly dispersions arising from multiscale responses to landscape structure. Conserv Ecol 4: 4. [Google Scholar]
  • Kadoya T, Suda SI, Tsubaki Y, Washitani I. 2008. The sensitivity of dragonflies to landscape structure differs between life-history groups. Landsc Ecol 23: 149–158. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kalkman VJ, Clausnitzer V, Dijkstra K-DB, Orr AG, Paulson DR, van Tol J. 2008. Global diversity of dragonflies (Odonata) in freshwater. In: Balian E, Martens K, Lévêque C and Segers H (eds.), A global assessment of animal diversity in freshwater. Hydrobiology 595: 351–363. [Google Scholar]
  • Kalkman VJ, Boudot J-P, Bernard R, et al. 2010. European Red List of Dragonflies. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. [Google Scholar]
  • Kalkman VJ, Boudot JP, Bernard R, De Knjif G, Suhling F, Termaat T. 2018. Diversity and conservation of European dragonflies and damselflies (Odonata). Hydrobiology 811: 269–282. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Laini A, Viaroli P, Bolpagni R, Cancellario T, Racchetti E, Guareschi S. 2019. Taxonomic and functional responses of benthic macroinvertebrate communities to hydrological and water quality variations in a heavily regulated river. Water 11: 1478. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lang C, Müller H, Waringer JA. 2001. Larval habitats and longitudinal distribution patterns of Cordulegaster heros Theischinger and C. bidentata Sélys in an Austrian forest stream (Anisoptera: Cordulegastridae). Odonatologica 30: 395–409. [Google Scholar]
  • Mackay RJ. 1992. Colonization by lotic macroinvertebrates: a review of processes and patterns. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 49: 617–628. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Minshall GW. 1984. Aquatic insect–substratum relationship. In: Resh VH and Rosenberg DM (eds.), The ecology of aquatic insects. New York: Praeger Scientific, 358–400 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Moore NW. 1997. Status survey and conservation action plan. Dragonflies. IUCN/SSC Odonata Specialist Group. IUCN, Gland and Cambridge, 28 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Nagy HB, László Z, Szabó F, Szöcs L, Dévai G, Tóthmérész B. 2019. Landscape-scale terrestrial factors are also vital in shaping Odonata assemblages of watercourses. Sci Rep 9: 18196. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Oertli B, Joye DA, Castella E, Juge R, Cambin D, Lachavanne JB. 2002. Does size matter? The relationship between pond area and biodiversity. Biol Conserv 104: 59–70. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ott J. 2010. Dragonflies and climatic changes – recent trends in Germany and Europe. BioRisk 5: 253–286. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Poff NL, Zimmermann JKH. 2010. Ecological responses to altered flow regimes: a literature review to inform the science and management of environmental flows. Freshw Biol 55: 194–205. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Raebel EM, Merckx T, Riordan P, Macdonald DW, Thompson DJ. 2010. The dragonfly delusion: why it is essential to sample exuviae to avoid biased surveys. J Insect Conserv 14: 523–534. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rouquette JR, Thompson DJ. 2005. Habitat associations of the endangered damselfly, Coenagrion mercuriale, in a water meadow ditch system in southern England. Biol Conserv 123: 225–235. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Samways MJ, McGeoch MA, New TR. 2009. Insect conservation: handbook of approaches and methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 432 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Samways MJ, Steytler NS. 1996. Dragonfly (Odonata) distribution patterns in urban and forest landscapes, and recommendations for riparian management. Biol Conserv 78: 279–288. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Schinegger R, Trautwein C, Melcher A, Schmutz S. 2012. Multiple human pressures and their spatial patterns in European running waters. Water Environ J 26: 261–273. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Simaika JP, Samways MJ. 2008. Valuing dragonflies as service providers. In: Cordoba-Aguilar, A (eds.), Dragonflies: Model Organisms for Ecological and Evolutionary Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 109–123. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Smith J, Samways ML, Taylor S. 2007. Assessing riparian quality using two complementary sets of bioindicators. Biodivers Conserv 16: 2695–2713. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Strayer DL. 2006. Challenges for freshwater invertebrate conservation. J N Am Benthol Soc 25: 271–287. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Suh AN, Samways AJ. 2005. Significance and temporal changes when designing a reservoir for conservation of dragonfly diversity. Biodivers Conserv 14: 165–178. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Suhling F, Müller O. 1996. Die Flussjungfern Europas. Gomphidae. Westarp Wissenschaften / Die Neue Brehm-Bücherei (Bd. 628), Magdeburg. [Google Scholar]
  • Suhling F, Sàhlen G, Martens A, Marais E, Schütte C. 2006. Dragonfly assemblages in arid tropical environments: a case study from western Namibia. Biodivers Conserv 15: 311–332. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Šegota T, Filipčić A. 2003. Köppenova podjela klima i hrvatsko nazivlje, Geoadria 8: 17–37. [Google Scholar]
  • Ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P. 2012. Canoco reference manual and user’s guide: software for ordination, version 5.0, Ithaca USA: Microcomputer Power, 496 [Google Scholar]
  • Termaat T, van Strien AJ, van Grunsven RHA, et al. 2019. Distribution trends of European dragonflies under climate change. Divers Distrib 25: 936–950. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • TIBCO Software Inc. 2017. Statistica (data analysis software system), version 13. Retrieved from: http://statistica.io. [Google Scholar]
  • Vilenica M, Mičetić Stanković V, Franković M. 2011. Dragonfly fauna (Insecta, Odonata) in the Turopolje region (Croatia). Nat Croat 20: 141–158. [Google Scholar]
  • Vilenica M. 2017. Ecological traits of dragonfly (Odonata) assemblages along an oligotrophic Dinaric karst hydrosystem. Ann Limnol - Int J Lim 53: 377–389. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Vilenica M, Kerovec M, Pozojević I, Mihaljević Z. 2020a. Odonata assemblages in anthropogenically impacted lotic habitats. J Limnol 80: 1968. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vilenica M, Pozojević I, Vučković N, Mihaljević Z. 2020b. How suitable are man-made water bodies as habitats for Odonata? Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 421: 13. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Vilenica M, Rebrina F, Matoničkin Kepčija R, et al. 2022. Aquatic macrophyte vegetation promotes taxonomic and functional diversity of Odonata assemblages in intermittent Karst rivers in the Mediterranean. Diversity 14: 31. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Villalobos-Jiménez G, Dunn AM, Hassall C. 2016. Dragonflies and damselflies (odonata) in urban ecosystems: a review. Eur J Entomol 113: 217–232. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ward JV, Stanford JA. 1979. Ecology of regulated streams. New York: Plenum Press. 398 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Zwick P. 1992. Stream habitat fragmentation - a threat to biodiversity. Biodivers Conserv 1: 80–97. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.