Free Access
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 56, 2020
Article Number 16
Number of page(s) 14
Published online 03 July 2020
  • American Public Health Association (APHA) (1999) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. [Google Scholar]
  • Aristi I, Schiller DV, Arroita M, Barcelo D, Ponsati L, Garcia-Galan MJ, Sabater S, Elosegi A, Acuna V. 2015. Mixed effects of effluents from a wastewater treatment plant on river ecosystem metabolism: subsidy or stress? Freshw Biol 60: 1398–1410. [Google Scholar]
  • Bales JD, Nardi MR. 2007. Automated Routines for Calculating Whole-Stream Metabolism–Theoretical Background and User's Guide: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods 4–C2, 33, Reston, Virginia (online at [Google Scholar]
  • Bernot MJ, Sobota DJ, Hall RO, Mulholland PJ, Dodds WK, Webster JR, Tank JL, Ashkenas LR, Cooper LW, Dahm CN, Gregory SV, Grimm NB, Hamilton SK, Johnson SL, McDowell WH, Meyer JL, Peterson B, Poole GC, Valett HM, Arango C, Beaulieu JJ, Burgin AJ, Crenshaw C, Helton AM, Johnson L, Merriam J, Niederlehner BR, O'Brien JM, Potter JD, Sheibley RW, Thomas SM, Wilson K. 2010. Inter-regional comparison of land-use effects on stream metabolism. Freshw Biol 55: 1874–1890. [Google Scholar]
  • Bott TL. 2006. Primary productivity and community respiration, in Hauer FR, Lamberti GA (Eds.), Methods in Stream Ecology. San Diego: Academic Press Inc., pp. 533– 556. [Google Scholar]
  • Ciavatta S, Pastres R, Badetti C, Ferrari G, Beck MB. 2008. Estimation of phytoplanktonic production and system respiration from data collected by a real-time monitoring network in the lagoon of venice. Ecol Model 212: 28–36. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chen G. 2013. Ecosystem Oxygen Metabolism in an Impacted Temperate River Network: Application of the δ18O-DO Approach, PhD Thesis, Waterloo University, Waterloo. [Google Scholar]
  • Chesworth CT. 2016. Lagoon Wastewater Effluent Impacts Stream Metabolism in Red River Tributaries, MSc Thesis, Western Ontario University, London. [Google Scholar]
  • Elmore HL, West WF. 1961. Effect of water temperature on stream reaeration. J Sanitary Eng Div 87: 59–71. [Google Scholar]
  • Fellows CS, Valett HM, Dahm CN. 2001. Whole-stream metabolism in two montane streams: contribution of the hyporheic zone. Limnol Oceanogr 46: 523–531. [Google Scholar]
  • Ganning B, Wulff F. 1970. Measurements of community metabolism in some baltic brackish water rockpools by means of diel oxygen curves. Oikos 21: 292–298. [Google Scholar]
  • Grimm NB, Fisher SG. 1984. Exchange between ınterstitial and surface water: ımplications for stream metabolism and nutrient cycling. Hydrobiologia 111: 219–228. [Google Scholar]
  • Gücker B, Brauns M, Pusch MT. 2006. Effects of wastewater treatment plant discharge on ecosystem structure and function of lowland streams. J North Am Bentholog Soc 25: 313–329. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gücker B, Boechat IG, Giani A. 2009. Impacts of agricultural land use on ecosystem structure and whole-stream metabolism of tropical cerrado streams. Freshw Biol 54: 2069–2085. [Google Scholar]
  • Hall RO, Tank JL. 2005. Correcting whole-stream estimates of metabolism for groundwater input. Limnol Oceanogr 3: 222–229. [Google Scholar]
  • Hanson PC, Carpenter SR, Kimura N, Wu C, Cornelius SP, Kratz TK. 2008. Evaluation of metabolism models for free-water dissolved oxygen methods in lakes. Limnol Oceanogr Methods 6: 454–465. [Google Scholar]
  • Houser JN, Mulholland PJ, Maloney KO. 2005. Catchment disturbance and stream metabolism: patterns in ecosystem respiration and gross primary production along a gradient of upland soil and vegetation disturbance. J North Am Bentholog Soc 24: 538–552. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Houser JN, Bartsch LA, Richardson WB, Rogala JT, Sullivan JF. 2015. Ecosystem metabolism and nutrient dynamics in the main channel and backwaters of the upper mississippi river. Freshw Biol 60: 1863–1879. [Google Scholar]
  • Izagirre O, Agirre U, Bermejo M, Pozo J, Elosegi A. 2008. Environmental controls of whole-stream metabolism ıdentified from continuous monitoring of basque streams. J North Am Bentholog Soc 27: 252–268. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Karakaya N, Evrendilek F, Güngör K. 2011. Modeling and validating long-term dynamics of diel dissolved oxygen with particular reference to pH in a temperate shallow lake (Turkey). Clean–Soil Air Water 39: 966–971. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kicklighter DW. 1987. Effects of Kraft Mill Effluent on Riffle Community Metabolism in a Large River, MSc Thesis, Montana University, Missoula. [Google Scholar]
  • Kirchman DL. 1994. The uptake of ınorganic nutrients by heterotrophic bacteria. Microb Ecol 28: 255–271. [Google Scholar]
  • Marzolf ER, Mulholland PJ, Steinman AD. 1994. Improvements to the diurnal upstream-downstream dissolved oxygen change technique for determining whole-stream metabolism in small streams. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 51: 1591–1599. [Google Scholar]
  • Mulholland PJ, Fellows CS, Tank JL, Grimm NB, Webster JR, Hamilton SK, Marti E, Ashkenas L, Bowden WB, Dodds WK, McDowell WH, Paul MJ, Peterson BJ. 2001. Inter-biome comparison of factors controlling stream metabolism. Freshw Biol 46: 1503–1517. [Google Scholar]
  • Mulholland PJ, Houser JN, Maloney KO. 2005. Stream diurnal dissolved oxygen profiles as ındicators of in stream metabolism and disturbance effects: fort benning as a case study. Ecol Indic 5: 243–252. [Google Scholar]
  • Odum HT. 1956. Primary production in flowing waters. Limnol Oceanogr 1: 102–117. [Google Scholar]
  • Owens M, Edwards RW, Gibbs JW. 1964. Some reaeration studies in streams. Int J Air Water Pollution 8: 469–486. [Google Scholar]
  • Reardon J, Foreman JA, Searcy RL. 1966. New reactants for the colorimetric determination of ammonia. Clin Chim Acta 14: 403–405. [Google Scholar]
  • Riley AJ, Dodds WK. 2013. Whole-stream metabolism: strategies for measuring and modeling diel trends of dissolved oxygen. Freshw Sci 32: 56–69. [Google Scholar]
  • Roberts BJ, Mulholland PJ, Hill WR. 2007. Multiple scales of temporal variability in ecosystem metabolism rates: results from 2 years of continuous monitoring in a forested headwater stream. Ecosystems 10: 588–606. [Google Scholar]
  • Roley SS, Tank JL, Griffiths NA, Hall RO, Davis RT. 2014. The influence of floodplain restoration on whole-stream metabolism in an agricultural stream: insights from a 5-year continuous data set. Freshw Sci 33: 1043–1059. [Google Scholar]
  • Ruggiero A, Solimini AG, Carchini G. 2006. Effects of a waste water treatment plant on organic matter dynamics and ecosystem functioning in a mediterranean stream. Ann Limnolog Int J Limnol 42: 97–107. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sanchez-Perez JM, Gerino M, Sauvage S, Dumas P, Maneux E, Julien F, Winterton P, Vervier P. 2009. Effects of wastewater treatment plant pollution on ın-stream ecosystems functions in an agricultural watershed. Ann Limnolog Int J Limnol 45: 79–92. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Seeley CM. 1969. The diurnal curve in estimates of primary production. Chesap Sci 10: 322–326. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Staehr PA, Sand-Jensen K. 2007. Temporal dynamics and regulation of lake metabolism. Limnol Oceanogr 52: 108–120. [Google Scholar]
  • Staehr PA, Bade D, Van de Bogert MC, Koch GR, Williamson C, Hanson P, Cole JJ, Kratz T. 2010. Lake metabolism and the diel oxygen technique: state of the science. Limnol Oceanogr Methods 8: 628–644. [Google Scholar]
  • Turkish State Meteorological Service, Official Statistics,, 20th September 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • Vallino JJ, Hopkinson CS, Garritt RH. 2005. Estimating estuarine gross production, community respiration and net ecosystem production: a nonlinear ınverse technique. Ecol Model 187: 281–296. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Van de Bogert MC, Carpenter SR, Cole JJ, Pace ML. 2007. Assessing pelagic and benthic metabolism using free water measurements. Limnol Oceanogr Methods 5: 145–155. [Google Scholar]
  • Wagner RJ, Boulger RW Jr, Oblinger CJ, Smith BA. 2006. Guidelines and Standard Procedures for Continuous Water-Quality Monitors: Station Operation, Record Computation, and Data Reporting: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods Report 1-D3, U.S. Geological Survey Enterprise Publising Network, Reston, Virginia. [Google Scholar]
  • Wang H, Hondzo M, Xu C, Poole V, Spacie A. 2003. Dissolved oxygen dynamics of streams draining an urbanized and an agricultural catchment. Ecol Model 160: 145–161. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wassenaar LI, Venkiteswaran JJ, Schiff SL, Koehler G. 2010. Aquatic community metabolism response to municipal effluent ınputs in rivers quantified using diel δ18O values of dissolved oxygen. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 67: 1232–1246. [Google Scholar]
  • Williamson CE, Dodds W, Kratz TK, Palmer M. 2008. Lakes and streams as sentinels of environmental change in terrestrial and atmospheric processes. Front Ecol Environ 6: 247–254. [Google Scholar]
  • Yates AG, Brua RB, Culp JM, Chambers PA. 2013. Multi-scaled drivers of rural prairie stream metabolism along human activity gradients. Freshw Biol 58: 675–689. [Google Scholar]
  • Young RG, Huryn AD. 1998. Effects of land use on stream metabolism and organic matter turnover. Ecol Appl 9: 1359–1376. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.