EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 56 (2020) Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim., 56 (2020) 2 References
Free Access
Issue
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 56, 2020
Article Number 2
Number of page(s) 18
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/2019025
Published online 26 February 2020
  • Akdemir D, Külköylüoğlu O. 2014. Preliminary study on distribution, diversity, and ecological characteristics of nonmarine Ostracoda (Crustacea) from the Erzincan Region (Turkey). Turk J Zool 38: 421–431. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Akdemir D, Külköylüoğlu O, Yavuzatmaca M, Sarı N. 2016. Freshwater ostracods (Crustacea) of Gaziantep (Turkey) and their habitat preferences according to movement ability. Fund Appl Limnol 187/4: 307–314. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Atkinson D. 1994. Temperature and organism size- a biological law for ectotherms? Adv Ecol Res 25: 1–58. [Google Scholar]
  • Benson RH. 1972. Bradleya problem, with descriptions of two wew sychrospheric Ostracode Genera, Agrenocythere and Poseidonamicus (Ostracoda: Crustacea). Smithson Contrib Paleobiol 1–138. [Google Scholar]
  • Birks HJB, Line JM, Juggins S, Stevenson AC, ter Braak CJF. 1990. Diatoms and pH Reconstruction. ‎Philos Trans Royal Soc A 327: 263–278. [Google Scholar]
  • Boomer I, Frenzel P, Feike M. 2017. Salinity-driven size variability in Cyprideis torosa (Ostracoda, Crustacea). J Micropalaeontol 36: 63–69. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brandão SN, Yasuhara M. 2013. Challenging deep-sea cosmopolitanism: Taxonomic re-evaluation and biogeography of ‘Cythere dasyderma Brady, 1880’ (Ostracoda). J Micropalaeontol 32: 109–122. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brown J, Marquet PA, Taper ML. 1993. Evolution of Body Size: Consequences of an Energetic Definition of Fitness. Am Nat 142: 573–584. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cohen AC, Morin JG. 1990. Patterns of reproduction in ostracodes: a review. J Crust Biol 10: 184–211. [Google Scholar]
  • Danielopol DL, Cabral MC, Lord A, Carbonel P, Gross M, Stoica M, Humphreys WF, Namiotko T, Mohr E, Külköylüoğlu O, Piller WE, Nuñes T. 2018. Sieve-type pore canals in the Timiriaseviinae −A contribution to the comparative morphology and the systematics of Limnocytheridae (Ostracoda). Zootaxa 4495: 001–064. [Google Scholar]
  • Eweleit L, Reinhold K. 2014. Body size and elevation: do Bergmann's and Rensch's rule apply in the polytypic bushcricket Poecilimon veluchianus. Ecol Entomol 39: 133–136. [Google Scholar]
  • Fairbairn DJ, Blanckenhorn WU, Sźekely T. 2009. Sex, size and gender roles: Evolutionary studies of sexual size dimorphism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Forester RM. 1991. Ostracode assemblages from springs in the Western United States: Implications for palaeohydrology. Mem Entomol Soc Can 155: 181–201. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fricke H, Giere O, Stetter K, Alfredsson GA, Kristjansson JK, Stoffers P, Svavarsson J. 1989. Hydrothermal vent communities at the shallow subpolar Mid- Atlantic ridge. Mar Biol 102: 425–429. [Google Scholar]
  • Gilabert RO, Navia AF, De La Cruz-Agüero G, Molinero JC, Sommer U, Scotti M. 2019. Body size and mobility explain species centralities in the Gulf of California food web. Commun Ecol 20: 149–160. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Guo Y, Frenzel P, Börner N, Akita LG, Zhu L. 2013. Recent Ostracoda of Taro Co (WesternTibetan Plateau). Il Naturalista Siciliano. IV, XXXVII(1): 161–162 (Abstract). 17th Interna-tional Symposium on Ostracoda, Roma, Italy. [Google Scholar]
  • Gülen D. 1988. Contribution to the taxonomy of the freshwater ostracod fauna of Turkey. Su Ürünleri Dergisi 2: 199–203. [Google Scholar]
  • Hartmann G. 1964. Asiatische Ostracoden, Systematische und Zoogeographische Untersuchungen-Internationale, Revue der Gesamten Hydrobiologie. Systematische Beihefte 3: 1–155. [Google Scholar]
  • Holmes JA, Fothergill PA, Street-Perrott FA, Perrott RA. 1998. A high resolution Holocene ostracod record from the Sahel zone of Northeastern Nigeria. J Paleolimnol 20: 369–380. [Google Scholar]
  • Jeffery NW, Ellis EA, Oakley TH, Gregor TR. 2017. The genome sizes of ostracod Crustaceans correlate with body size and evolutionary history, but not environment. J Hered 701–706. [Google Scholar]
  • Jiang QF, Shen J, Liu XQ, Zhang EL. 2008. Holocene climate reconstruction of Ulungur Lake (Xinjiang, China) inferred from ostracod species assemblages and stable isotopes. Front Earth Sci Chin 2: 31–40. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Juggins S. 2003. Software for ecological and palaeoecological data analysis and visualization, C2 User Guide. Newcastle-Upon-Tyne: University of Newcastle. [Google Scholar]
  • Kamiya T. 1988. Contrasting population ecology of two species of Loxoconcha (Ostracoda, Crustacea) in recent Zostera (eelgrass) b eds adaptive differences between phytal and bottom-dwelling species. Micropaleontology V 34: 316–331. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Karanovic I. 2012. Recent Freshwater Ostracods of the World. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Keyser D. 2005. Histological peculiarities of the noding process in Cyprideis torosa (Jones) (Crustacea, Ostracoda). Hydrobiologia 53: 95–106. [Google Scholar]
  • Kobayashi T, Miller J, Bayly IAE, Tang C, Hunter SJ, Ralph TJ, Stone L. 2018. Latitude and elevation as factors controlling occurrence of calanoid copepods in marginal lotic waters in New South Wales, Australia. Ecol Res 33: 1103–1111. [Google Scholar]
  • Külköylüoğlu O. 1998. Freshwater Ostracoda and their Quarterly Occurance in Şamlar Lake (Istanbul, Turkey). Limnologica 28: 229–235. [Google Scholar]
  • Külköylüoğlu O. 2003. Ecology of freshwater Ostracoda (Crustacea) from lakes and reservoirs in Bolu, Turkey. J Freshwater Ecol 18: 343–347. [Google Scholar]
  • Külköylüoğlu O. 2005. Ecology and phenology of freshwater ostracods in Lake Gölköy (Bolu, Turkey). Aquat Ecol 39: 295–304. [Google Scholar]
  • Külköylüoğlu O, Sarı N, Akdemir D, Yavuzatmaca M, Altınbağ C. 2012a. Distribution of sexual and asexual Ostracoda (Crustacea) from different altitudinal ranges in the Ordu Region of Turkey: Testing the Rapoport Rule. High Alt Med Biol 13: 126–136. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Külköylüoğlu O, Yavuzatmaca M, Akdemir D, Sarı N. 2012b. Distribution and local species diversity of freshwater Ostracoda in relation to habitat in the Kahramanmaraş Province of Turkey. Int Rev Hydrobiol 97: 247–261. [Google Scholar]
  • Külköylüoğlu O, Yavuzatmaca M, Akdemir D, Yılmaz O, Çelen E, Dere Ş, Dalkıran N. 2019. Correlational patterns of species diversity, swimming ability and ecological tolerance of non-marine Ostracoda (Crustacea) with different reproductive modes in shallow water bodies of Ağrı region (Turkey). J Freshwater Ecol 34: 151–165. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Laprida C, Díaz A, Ratto N. 2006. Ostracods (Crustacea) from thermal Waters, southern Altiplano, Argentina. Micropaleontology 52: 177–188. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Martins MJF, Hunt G, Lockwood R, Swaddle JP, Horne DJ. 2017. Correlation between investment in sexual traits and valve sexual dimorphism in Cyprideis species (Ostracoda). PLoS ONE 12: e0177791. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Meisch C. 2000. Freshwater Ostracoda of Western and Central Europe (Süswasserfauna von Mitteleuropa), Heidelberg: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Vol. 8, I-xii, 522 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Meisch C, Smith RJ, Martens K. 2019. A subjective global checklist of the extant non-marine Ostracoda (Crustacea). Eur J Taxon 492: 1–135. [Google Scholar]
  • Mersin Governor. 2019. Mersin Valiliği. http://www.mersin.gov.tr. [Google Scholar]
  • Mezquita F, Griffiths HI, Sanz SJ, Soria M, Pinon A. 1999. Ecology and distribution of ostracods associated with flowing waters in the Eastern Iberian Peninsula. J Crustac Biol 19: 344–354. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mischke S, Herzschuh U, Zhang C, Bloemendal J, Riedel F. 2005. A Late Quaternary lake record from the Qilian Mountains (NW China): Lake level and salinity changes inferred from sediment properties and ostracod assemblages. Glob Planet Change 46: 337–359. [Google Scholar]
  • Mischke S, Herzschuh U, Massmann G, Zhang C. 2007. An ostracod-conductivity transfer function for Tibetan lakes. J Paleolimnol 38: 509–524. [Google Scholar]
  • Panov VE, McQueen DJ. 1998. Effects of temperature on individual growth rate and body size of a freshwater amphipod. Can J Zool 76: 1107–1116. [Google Scholar]
  • Pieri V, Martens K, Stoch F, Rossetti G. 2009. Distribution and ecology of nonmarine ostracods (Crustacea, Ostracoda) from Friuli Venezia Giulia (Ne Italy). J Limnol 68: 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  • Ter Braak CJF. 1987. The analysis of vegetation-environment relationships by Canonical Correspondence Analysis. Vegetatio 69: 69–77. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Węsławski JM, Hessen DO. 2017. Size; why are some animals small and other large? In: DWARF declining size − a general response to climate warming in Arctic fauna? Instytut Oceanologii Polskiej Akademii Nauk, Sopot 3–24. [Google Scholar]
  • Williams M, Siveter DJ, Salas MJ, Vannier J, Popov LE, Pour LE. 2008. The earliest ostracods: the geological evidence. Senckenberg Leth 88: 11–21. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Yavuzatmaca M, Külköylüoğlu O, Yılmaz O. 2015. Distributional patterns of non-marine Ostracoda (Crustacea) in Adıyaman province (Turkey). Ann Limnol − Int J Lim 51: 101–113. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Yavuzatmaca M, Külköylüoğlu O, Yılmaz O, Akdemir D. 2017. On the relationship of ostracod species (Crustacea) to shallow water ion and sediment phosphate concentration across different elevational range (Sinop, Turkey). Turk J Fish Aquat Sci 17: 1333–1346. [Google Scholar]
  • Yavuzatmaca M, Külköylüoğlu O, Akdemir D, Çelen E. 2018. On the relationship between the occurrence of ostracod species and elevation in Sakarya province, Turkey. Acta Zool Acad Sci H 64: 329–354. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.