Free Access
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 51, Number 3, 2015
Page(s) 249 - 259
Published online 05 October 2015
  • Abonyi A., Leitão M., Stanković I. et al., 2014. A large river (River Loire, France) survey to compare phytoplankton functional approaches: do they display river zones in similar ways? Ecol. Indic., 46, 11–22. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Alkawri A. and Gamoyo M., 2014. Remote sensing of phytoplankton distribution in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden. Acta Oceanol. Sin., 33(9), 93–99. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Améziane T., Dauta A. and Le Cohu R., 2003. Origin and transport of phytoplankton in a large river: the Garonne, France. Arch. Hydrobiol., 156(3), 385–404. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Barron R.K., Siegel D.A. and Guillocheau N., 2014. Evaluating the importance of phytoplankton community structure to the optical properties of the Santa Barbara Channel, California. Limnol. Oceanogr., 59(3), 927–946. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Battauz Y.S., de Paggi S.B.J. and Paggi J.C., 2014. Passive zooplankton community in dry littoral sediment: reservoir of diversity and potential source of dispersal in a subtropical floodplain lake of the Middle Parana River (Santa Fe, Argentina). Int. Rev. Hydrobiol., 99(3), 277–286. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bayer A.E. and Folger J., 1966. Some correlates of a citation measure of productivity in science. Sociol. Educ., 39(4), 381–390. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ben Mustapha Z., Alvain S., Jamet C. et al., 2014. Automatic classification of water-leaving radiance anomalies from global SeaWiFS imagery: application to the detection of phytoplankton groups in open ocean waters. Remote Sens. Environ., 146, 97–112. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Biddanda B.A., Coleman D.F., Johengen T.H. et al., 2006. Exploration of a submerged sinkhole ecosystem in Lake Huron. Ecosystems, 9(5), 828–842. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bolpagni R., Bresciani M., Laini A. et al., 2014. Remote sensing of phytoplankton–macrophyte coexistence in shallow hypereutrophic fluvial lakes. Hydrobiologia, 737(1), 67–76. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Boyce D.G., Lewis M.R. and Worm B., 2010. Global phytoplankton decline over the past century. Nature, 466, 591–596. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Callon M., Courtial J.P. and Laville F., 1991. Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research – the case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics, 22(1), 155–205. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Carneiro F.M., Nabout J.C. and Bini L.M., 2008. Trends in the scientific literature on phytoplankton. Limnology, 9, 153–158. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cheng B., Wang M.H., Morch A.I. et al., 2014. Research on e-learning in the workplace 2000–2012: a bibliometric analysis of the literature. Educ. Res. Rev., 11, 56–72. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Coale K.H., Johnson K.S., Fitzwater S.E. et al., 1996. A massive phytoplankton bloom induced by an ecosystem-scale iron fertilization experiment in the equatorial Pacific Ocean. Nature, 383, 495–501. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Costa L.S., Huszar V.L.M. and Ovalle A.R., 2009. Phytoplankton functional groups in a tropical estuary: hydrological control and nutrient limitation. Estuaries Coasts, 32(3), 508–521. [Google Scholar]
  • Davis J.R. and Koop K., 2006. Eutrophication in Australian rivers, reservoirs and estuaries ― a southern hemisphere perspective on the science and its implications. Hydrobiologia, 559(1), 23–76. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Elliott J.A., Irish A.E., Reynolds C.S. et al., 2000. Modelling freshwater phytoplankton communities: an exercise in validation. Ecol. Modell., 128(1), 19–26. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Elliott J.A., Persson I., Thackeray S.J. et al., 2007. Phytoplankton modeling of Lake Erken, Sweden by linking the models PROBE and PROTECH. Ecol. Modell., 202(3–4), 421–426. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gaston K.J., 2000. Global patterns in biodiversity. Nature, 405, 220–227. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Grelowski A., Pastuszak M., Sitek S. et al., 2000. Budget calculations of nitrogen, phosphorus and BOD5 passing through the Oder estuary. J. Mar. Syst., 25(3–4), 221–237. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ho Y.S., 2014. Classic articles on social work field in Social Science Citation Index: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 98, 137–155. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Irigoien X., Huisman J. and Harris R.P., 2004. Global biodiversity patterns of marine phytoplankton and zooplankton. Nature, 429, 863–867. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Keiser J. and Utzinger J., 2005. Trends in the core literature on tropical medicine: a bibliometric analysis from 1952–2002. Scientometrics, 62(3), 351–365. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Li L.L., Ding G.H., Feng N. et al., 2009. Global stem cell research trend: bibliometric analysis as a tool for mapping of trends from 1991 to 2006. Scientometrics, 80(1), 39–58. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Li Q.H., Chen L.L., Chen F.F. et al., 2013. Maixi River estuary to the Baihua Reservoir in the Maotiao River catchment: phytoplankton community and environmental factors. Chin. J. Oceanol. Limnol., 31(2), 290–299. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Liao J.Q. and Huang Y., 2014. Global trend in aquatic ecosystem research from 1992 to 2011. Scientometrics, 98, 1203–1219. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lunetta R.S., Shao Y., Ediriwickrema J. et al., 2010. Monitoring agricultural cropping patterns across the Laurentian Great Lakes Basin using MODIS-NDVI data. Int. J. Appl. Earth OBS, 12(2), 81–88. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Luo Y.Q., Melillo J., Niu S.L. et al., 2010. Coordinated approaches to quantify long-term ecosystem dynamics in response to global change. Glob. Change Biol., 17(2), 843–854. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ma F.C., Lyu P.H., Yao Q. et al., 2013. Publication trends and knowledge maps of global translational medicine research. Scientometrics, 98(1), 221–246. [Google Scholar]
  • Macias D., Navarro G., Echevarria F. et al., 2007. Phytoplankton pigment distribution in the northwestern Alboran Sea and meteorological forcing: a remote sensing study. J. Mar. Res., 65(4), 523–543. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mieleitner J. and Reichert P., 2008. Modelling functional groups of phytoplankton in three lakes of different trophic state. Ecol. Modell., 211(3–4), 279–291. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mihaljevic M., Stevic F., Spoljaric D. et al., 2014. Application of morpho-functional classifications in the evaluation of phytoplankton changes in the Danube River. Acta Zool. Bulg. (Suppl. 7), 153–158. [Google Scholar]
  • Niu B.B., Hong S., Yuan J.F. et al., 2014. Global trends in sediment-related research in earth science during 1992–2011: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 98(1), 511–529. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Odermatt D., Pomati F., Pitarch J. et al., 2012. MERIS observations of phytoplankton blooms in a stratified eutrophic lake. Remote Sens. Environ., 126, 232–239. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ohniwa R.L., Hibino A. and Takeyasu K., 2010. Trends in research foci in life science fields over the last 30 years monitored by emerging topics. Scientometrics, 85(1), 111–127. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ozhan K. and Bargu S., 2014. Distinct responses of Gulf of Mexico phytoplankton communities to crude oil and the dispersant corexit(A (R)) Ec9500A under different nutrient regimes. Ecotoxicology, 23(3), 370–384. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Perkins M., Effler S.W. and Strait C.M., 2014. Phytoplankton absorption and the chlorophyll a-specific absorption coefficient in dynamic Onondaga Lake. Inland Waters, 4(2), 133–146. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Reynolds C.S., 2006. The Ecology of Phytoplankton. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. [Google Scholar]
  • Serizawa H., Amemiya T. and Itoh K., 2009. Patchiness and bistability in the comprehensive cyanobacterial model (CCM). Ecol. Modell., 220(6), 764–773. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sin Y., Hyun B., Jeong B. et al., 2013. Impacts of eutrophic freshwater inputs on water quality and phytoplankton size structure in a temperate estuary altered by a sea dike. Mar. Environ. Res., 85, 54–63. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Smetacek V., Klaas C., Strass V.H. et al., 2012. Deep carbon export from a Southern Ocean iron-fertilized diatom bloom. Nature, 487, 313–319. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Smith V.H., 2003. Eutrophication of freshwater and coastal marine ecosystems a global problem. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 10(2), 126–139. [Google Scholar]
  • Sugimoto R., Sato T., Yoshida T. et al., 2014. Using stable nitrogen isotopes to evaluate the relative importance of external and internal nitrogen loadings on phytoplankton production in a shallow eutrophic lake (Lake Mikata, Japan). Limnol. Oceanogr., 59(1), 37–47. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Talling J.F. and Prowse G.A., 2010. Selective recruitment and resurgence of tropical river phytoplankton: evidence from the Nile system of lakes, rivers, reservoirs and ponds. Hydrobiologia, 637(1), 187–195. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tekwani N., Majdi N., Mialet B. et al., 2013. Contribution of epilithic diatoms to benthic–pelagic coupling in a temperate river. Aquat. Microb. Ecol., 69, 47–57. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Treusch A.H., Demir-Hilton E., Vergin K.L. et al., 2012. Phytoplankton distribution patterns in the northwestern Sargasso Sea revealed by small subunit rRNA genes from plastids. ISME J., 6, 481–492. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Van de Waal D.B., Smith V.H., Declerck S.A.J. et al., 2014. Stoichiometric regulation of phytoplankton toxins. Ecol. Lett., 17(6), 736–742. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Vannote R.L., Minshall G.W., Cummins K.W. et al., 1980. The river continuum concept. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 37(1), 130–137. [Google Scholar]
  • Van Raan A.F.J., 2005. For your citations only? Hot topics in bibliometric analysis measurement. Interdisc. Res. Perspect., 3, 50–62. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wen H. and Huang Y., 2012. Trends and performance of oxidative stress research from 1991 to 2010. Scientometrics, 91(1), 51–63. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Willig M.R., Kaufman D.M. and Stevens R.D., 2003. Latitudinal gradients of biodiversity: pattern, process, scale, and synthesis. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst., 34, 273–309. [Google Scholar]
  • Yu S.P., Yang J.S. and Liu G.M., 2014. Impact assessment of Three Gorges Dam's impoundment on river dynamics in the north branch of Yangtze River estuary, China. Environ. Earth Sci., 72(2), 499–509. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang Y.H., Liu X.J., Nguyen T. et al., 2013. Global remote sensing research trends during 1991–2010: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 96, 203–219. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhao J., Peter H.U., Zhang H.S. et al., 2014. Short- and long-term response of phytoplankton to ENSO in Prydz Bay, Antarctica: evidences from field measurements, remote sensing data and stratigraphic biomarker records. J. Ocean Univ. China, 13(3), 437–444. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhu K.X., Bi Y.H. and Hu Z.Y., 2013. Responses of phytoplankton functional groups to the hydrologic regime in the Daning River, a tributary of Three Gorges Reservoir, China. Sci. Total Environ., 450–451, 169–177. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.