Editor's Choice
Free Access
Issue
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 50, Number 4, 2014
Page(s) 269 - 278
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/2014020
Published online 10 October 2014
  • Aguiar F.C.F. and Ferreira M.T., 2013. Plant invasions in the rivers of the Iberian Peninsula, south-western Europe: a review. Plant Biosyst., 147, 1107–1119. [CrossRef]
  • Akaike H., 1973. Information theory as an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov B.N. and Csaki F. (eds.), Second International Symposium on Information Theory, Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, 267–281.
  • Armitage P.D., Szoszkiewicz K., Blackburn J.H. and Nesbitt I., 2003. Ditch communities: a major contributor to floodplain biodiversity. Aquat. Conserv.: Mar. Freshwat. Ecosyst., 13, 165–185. [CrossRef]
  • Baattrup-Pedersen A., Szoszkiewicz K., Nijboer R., O´Hare M. and Ferreira T., 2006. Macrophyte communities in unimpacted European streams: variability in assemblage patterns, abundance and diversity. Hydrobiologia, 566, 179–196. [CrossRef]
  • Baláž D., Marhold K., Urban P., 2001. Červený zoznam rastlín a živočíchov Slovenska. Ochr. Prír., 20 (Suppl.), 1–160.
  • Baláži P., Tóthová L., Oťaheľová H., Hrivnák R. and Mišíková K., 2011. Zoznam zistených taxónov na monitorovaných lokalitách vodných útvarov povrchových vôd Slovenska. Časť 3 vodné makrofyty. Acta Environ. Univ. Comenianae, 19, 5–89.
  • Biggs J., Williams P., Whitfield M., Nicolet P. and Weatherby A., 2005. 15 years of ponds assessment in Britain: results and lessons learned from the work of Pond Conservation. Aquat. Conserv., 15, 693–714. [CrossRef]
  • Bornette G. and Puijalon S., 2011. Response of aquatic plants to abiotic factors: a review. Aquat. Sci., 73, 1–14. [CrossRef]
  • Ceschin S., Bisceglie S. and Aleffi M., 2012. Contribution to the knowledge of the bryoflora of running waters of Central Italy. Plant Biosyst., 146, 622–627.
  • Chambers P.A., Lacoul P., Murphy K.J. and Thomaz S.M., 2008. Global diversity of aquatic macrophytes in freshwater. Hydrobiologia, 595, 9–26. [CrossRef]
  • Chappuis E., Ballesteros E. and Gacia E., 2012. Distribution and richness of aquatic plants across Europe and Mediterranean countries: patterns, environmental driving factors and comparison with total plant richness. J. Veg. Sci., 23, 985–997. [CrossRef]
  • Chatterjee S., Hardi A.S. and Price B., 2000. Regression Analysis by Example, Willey, New York, 384 p.
  • Davies B., Biggs J., Williams P., Whitfield M., Nicolet P., Sear D., Bray S. and Maund S., 2008. Comparative biodiversity of aquatic habitats in the European agricultural landscapes. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 125, 1–8. [CrossRef]
  • Dorotovičová C., 2013. Man-made canals as a hotspot of aquatic macrophyte biodiversity in Slovakia. Limnologica, 43, 277–287. [CrossRef]
  • Dudgeon D., Arthington A.H., Gessner M.O., Kawabata Z-I., Knowler D.J., Lévêque C., Naiman R.J., Prieur-Richard -H., Soto D., Stiassny M.L.J. and Sullivan C.A., 2006. Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats status and conservation challenges. Biol. Rev., 81, 163–182. [CrossRef]
  • Futák J., 1972. Fytogeografický prehľad Slovenska. In: Lukniš M. (ed.), Slovensko 2, Príroda, Obzor, Bratislava, 431–482.
  • Guisan A. and Zimmermann N.E., 2000. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol. Model., 135, 147–186. [CrossRef]
  • Hejda M., Pyšek P. and Jarošík V., 2009. Impact of invasive plants on the species richness, diversity and composition of invaded communities. J. Ecol., 97, 393–403. [CrossRef]
  • Hrivnák R., Oťaheľová H. and Valachovič M., 2007. Vodná a močiarna vegetácia na Slovensku – súčasné výsledky výskumu a pohľad späť. Zpr. Čs. Bot. Společ., 42, Materiály 22, 29–38.
  • Hrivnák R., Oťaheľová H., Valachovič M., Paľove-Balang P. and Kubinská A., 2010. Effect of environmental variables on the aquatic macrophyte composition pattern in streams: a case study from Slovakia. Fundam. Appl. Limnol., 177, 115–124. [CrossRef]
  • Hrivnák R., Oťaheľová H., Kochjarová J. and Paľove-Balang P., 2013. Effect of environmental conditions on species composition of macrophytes in two distinct biogeographical regions of Central Europe. Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst., 09, 1–15.
  • Janauer G.A., 2003. Methods. In: Janauer G.A., Hale P. and Sweeting R. (eds.), Macrophyte Inventory of the River Danube: A Pilot Study. Arch. Hydrobiol., 147 (Suppl.), Large Rivers, 14, 9–16.
  • Janauer G.A. and Dokulil M., 2006. Macrophytes and algae in running waters. In: Ziglio G., Siligardi M. and Flaim G. (eds.), Biological Monitoring of Rivers, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 89–109. [CrossRef]
  • Johnson J.B. and Omland K.S., 2004. Model selection in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol., 19, 101–108. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Lacoul P. and Freedman B., 2006. Environmental influences on aquatic plants in freshwater ecosystems. Environ. Rev., 14, 89–136. [CrossRef]
  • Lambdon P.W., Pyšek P., Basnou C., Hejda M., Arianoutsou M., Essl F., Jarošík V., Pergl J., Winter M., Anastasiu P., Andriopoulos P., Bazos I., Brundu G., Celesti-Grapow L., Chassot P., Delipetrou P., Josefsson M., Kark S., Klotz S., Kokkoris Y., Kühn I., Marchante H., Perglová I., Pino J., Vila M., Zikos A., Roy D. and Hulme P.E., 2008. Alien flora of Europe: species diversity, temporal trends, geographical patterns and research needs. Preslia, 80, 101–149.
  • Linton S. and Goulder R., 2000. Botanical conservation value related to origin and management of ponds. Aquat. Conserv.: Mar. Freshwat. Ecosyst., 10, 77–91. [CrossRef]
  • Marhold K. and Hindák F. (eds.), 1998. Checklist of Non-vascular and Vascular Plants of Slovakia, Veda, Bratislava, 688 p.
  • Mari E., Santi E., Piazzini S., Renzi M. and Maccherini S., 2010. Development of biological diversity in farmland ponds. J. Freshwat. Biol., 25, 95–105. [CrossRef]
  • Markwell K.A. and Fellows C.S., 2008. Habitat and biodiversity of on-farm water storages: a case study in Southeast Queensland, Australia. Environ. Manag., 41, 234–249. [CrossRef]
  • McCullagh P. and Nelder P., 1989. Generalized Linear Models, Chapman and Hall, London, 532 p.
  • O′Hare J.M., O′Hare M.T., Gurnell A.M., Dunbar M.J., Scarlett P.M. and Laize C., 2011. Physical constraints on the distribution of macrophytes linked with flow and sediment dynamics in British rivers. River Res. Appl., 27, 671–683. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Oťaheľová H., Valachovič M. and Hrivnák R., 2007. The impact of environmental factors on the distribution pattern of aquatic plants along the Danube River corridor (Slovakia). Limnologica, 37, 290–302. [CrossRef]
  • Polunin N.V.C. (ed.), 2008. Aquatic Ecosystems. Trend and Global Prospects. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 482 p.
  • R Development Core Team, 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, 3551 p.
  • Rodriguez J.B., Self J.R. and Soltanpour P.N., 1994. Optimal conditions for phosphorus analysis by the ascorbic acid-molybdenum blue method. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 58, 866–870. [CrossRef]
  • Sipos V.K., Kohler A., Köder M. and Janauer G.A., 2003. Macropyhte vegetation of Danube canals in Kiskunság (Hungary). Arch. Hydrobiol., 147 (Suppl. 1–2), Large Rivers 14(1–2), 143–166.
  • StatSoft, 2001. STATISTICA. System Reference, StatSoft Inc., Tulsa.
  • Willby N.J., Pygott J.R. and Eaton J.W., 2001. Inter-relationships between standing crop, biodiversity and trait attributes of hydrophytic vegetation in artificial waterways. Freshwat. Biol., 46, 883–902. [CrossRef]
  • Williams P., Whitfield M., Biggs J., Bray S., Fox G., Nicolet P. and Sear D., 2004. Comparative biodiversity of rivers, streams, ditches and ponds in an agricultural landscape in Southern England. Biol. Conserv., 115, 329–341. [CrossRef]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.