Free Access
Issue
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 48, Number 4, 2012
Page(s) 425 - 436
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/2012030
Published online 04 March 2013
  • Amoros C. and Bornette G., 2002. Connectivity and biocomplexity in waterbodies of riverine floodplains. Freshwater Biol., 47, 761–776. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Amoros C., Roux A.L., Reygrobellet J.L., Bravard J.P. and Pautou G., 1987. A method for applied ecological studies of fluvial hydrosystems. Regul. Rivers, 1, 17–36. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • APHA 1992. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (18th edn,), American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, USA. [Google Scholar]
  • Arscott D.B., Tockner K. and Ward J.V., 2005. Lateral organization of aquatic invertebrates along the corridor of a braided floodplain river. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 24, 934–954. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Behrend R.D.L., Fernandes S.E.P., Fujita D.S.A. and Takeda A.M., 2009. Eight years of monitoring aquatic Oligochaeta from the Baía and Ivinhema Rivers. Braz. J. Biol., 69, 559–571. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bogatov V., Sirotsky S. and Yuriev D., 1995. The ecosystem of the Amur river. In: Cushing C.E., Cummins K.W. and Minshall, G.W. (eds.), River and Stream Ecosystems, Elsevier, New York, USA, 601–613. [Google Scholar]
  • Brinkhurst R.O. and Marchese M. 1992. Guía para la identificación de Oligoquetos acuáticos continentales de Sud y Centroamérica. Asociación de Ciencias Naturales del Litoral Colección Climax No. 6, Segunda Edición, Asociación de Ciencias Naturales del Litoral, Santa Fe, Argentina, 207 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Bunn S.E. and Arthington A.H., 2002. Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environ. Manage., 30, 492–507. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Domínguez E. and Fernández H.R. 2009. Macroinvertebrados bentónicos Sudamericanos, Fundación Miguel Lillo, Tucumán, Argentina, 654 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Drago E.C., 1990. Hydrological and geomorphological characteristics of flood-plain ponds in the middle Paraná River. Acta Limnol. Bras., 3, 907–930. [Google Scholar]
  • Drago E.C., 2007. The physical dynamics of the river–lake floodplain system. In: Iriondo H., Paggi J.C. and Parma M.J. (eds.), The Middle Paraná River Limnology of a Subtropical Wetland, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, USA, 82–122. [Google Scholar]
  • Dudgeon D., 1995. The ecology of rivers and streams in tropical Asia. In: Cushing C.E., Cummins K.W. and Minshall G.W. (eds.), River and Stream Ecosystems, Elsevier, New York, USA, 615–657. [Google Scholar]
  • Ezcurra de Drago I., Marchese M. and Wantzen K.M., 2004. Benthos of a large neotropical river: spatial patterns and species assemblages in the Lower Paraguay and its floodplains. Arch. Hydrobiol., 160, 347–374. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ezcurra de Drago I., Marchese M. and Montalto L., 2007. Benthic invertebrates. In: Iriondo H., Paggi J.C. and Parma M.J. (eds.), The Middle Paraná River Limnology of a Subtropical Wetland, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 251–275. [Google Scholar]
  • Feld C.K. and Hering D., 2007. Community structure or function: effects of environmental stress on benthic macroinvertebrates at different spatial scales. Freshwater Biol. 52, 1380–1399. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Forbes A.E. and Chase J.M., 2002. The role of habitat connectivity and landscape geometry in experimental zooplankton metacommunities. Oikos, 96, 433–440. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gallardo B., García M., Cabezas A., González E., González M., Ciancarelli C. and Comín F.A., 2008. Macroinvertebrate patterns along environmental gradients and hydrological connectivity within a regulated river-floodplain. Aquat. Sci., 70, 248–258. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Garcia X.F. and Laville H., 2001. Importance of floodplain waters for the conservation of chironomid (Diptera) biodiversity in a 6th order section of the Garonne river (France). Ann. Limnol., 37, 35–47. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Hieber M., Robinson C.T., Uehlinger U. and Ward J.V., 2005. A comparison of macroinvertebrate assemblages among different types of alpine streams. Freshwater Biol., 50, 2087–2100. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • InfoStat. Software estadístico. 2010. Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina. [Google Scholar]
  • Junk W.J., 1999. The flood pulse concept of large rivers: learning from tropics. Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl., 115, 261–280. [Google Scholar]
  • Junk W.J., Bayley P.B. and Sparks R.E., 1989. The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems. Special Publ. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 106, 110–127. [Google Scholar]
  • Koleff P., Gaston K.J. and Lennon J.J., 2003. Measuring beta diversity for presence–absence data. J. Anim. Ecol., s72, 367–382. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Krebs C.J. 1989. Ecological Methodology, Harper Collins Publishers, New York. [Google Scholar]
  • Legendre P. and Gallagher E.D., 2001. Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia, 129, 271–280. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Legendre P. and Legendre L. 1998. Numerical Ecology (Second English edition,), Elsevier Science BV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
  • Lopretto E.C. and Tell G., 1995. Ecosistemas de aguas continentales. Ediciones Sur, La Plata, Argentina, 1401 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Marchese M. and Ezcurra de Drago I.E., 1992. Benthos of the lotic environments in the middle Paraná River system: transverse zonation. Hydrobiologia, 237, 1–13. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Marchese, M. and Ezcurra de Drago I., 2006. Bentos como indicador de condiciones tróficas del sistema del río Paraná Medio. In: Tundisi J., Matsumura Tundisi T. and Sidagis Galli C. (eds.), Eutrofização na América do Sul: Causas, Consequências e Tecnologias de Gerenciamento e Controle, San Paulo, Brazil, 297–316. [Google Scholar]
  • Marchese M., Ezcurra de Drago I. and Drago E., 2002. Benthic macroinvertebrates and physical habitat relationships in the Paraná River flood-plain system. In: McClain M.E. (ed.), The Ecohydrology of South American Rivers and Wetlands, Special Publication No. 6, IAHS, 111–130. [Google Scholar]
  • Marchese M., Wantzen K.M. and Ezcurra de Drago I., 2005. Benthic invertebrate assemblages and species diversity patterns of the Upper Paraguay. Riv. Res. Appl., 21, 131–144. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mormul R.P., Thomaz S.M., Takeda A.M. and Behrend R.D., 2011. Structural complexity and distance from source habitat determine invertebrate abundance and diversity. Biotropica, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • Neiff J.J., 2001. Diversity in some tropical wetland systems of South America. In: Gopal B., Junk W.J. and Davis J.A. (eds.), Biodiversity in Wetlands: Assessment, Function and Conservation, Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, 157–186. [Google Scholar]
  • Oksanen J., Kindt R., Legendre P. and O'Hara R.B., 2006. Vegan: Community Ecology Package version 1.17-4, http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan/index.html [Google Scholar]
  • Paoli C. and Schreider M. 2000. El río Paraná en su tramo medio. Tomo I, Universidad Nacional del Litoral, Santa Fe, Argentina, 307 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Poff N.L., 1997. Landscape filters and species traits: towards mechanistic understanding and prediction in stream ecology. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 16, 391–409. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ramonell C.G., Amsler M.L. and Toniolo H., 2000. Geomorfología del cauce principal. In: Paoli C. and Schreider M. (eds.), El río Paraná en su tramo medio, Tomo I, Centro de Publicaciones, Secretaría de Extensión UNL, Santa Fe, Argentina, 175–232. [Google Scholar]
  • Reese E.G. and Batzer D.P., 2007. Do invertebrate communities in floodplains change predictably along a rivers length? Freshwater Biol., 52, 226–239. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Takeda A.M. and Fujita D.S., 2004. Benthic invertebrates. In: Thomaz S.M., Agostinho A.A. and Hanh N.S. (eds.), The Upper Parana River and its Floodplain: Physical Aspect, Ecology and Conservation, Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands, 191–208. [Google Scholar]
  • Takeda A.M., Callisto M. and Barbosa F., 2000. Zoobenthos survey of the Pantanal, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil. In: Willink P.W., Chernoff B., Alonso L.E., Montambault J.R. and Lourival R. (eds.), A Biological Assessment of the Aquatic Ecosystems of the Pantanal, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil. RAP Bulletin of Biological Assessment 18. Conservation International, 168–174. [Google Scholar]
  • Takeda A.M., Stevaux J.C. and Fujita D.S., 2001. Effect of hydraulics, bed load grain size and water factor on habitat and abundance of Narapa bonettoi Righi and Varela, 1983 of the Upper Paraná River, Brazil. Hydrobiologia, 463, 241–248. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Thomaz S.M., Bini L.M. and Bozelli R.L., 2007. Floods increase similarity among aquatic habitats in river-floodplain systems. Hydrobiologia, 1, 1–13. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Thorp J.H., Thoms M.C. and DeLong M.D., 2006. The riverine ecosystem synthesis: biocomplexity in river networks across space and time. Riv. Res. Appl., 22, 123–147. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tockner K., Schiemer F. and Ward J.V., 1998. Conservation by restoration: the management concept for a riverfloodplain system on the Danube River in Austria. Aquat. Conserv., 8, 71–86. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tockner K., Malard F. and Ward J.V., 2000. An extension of the flood pulse concept. Hydrol. Process., 14, 2861–2863. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tockner K., Pusch M., Gessner J., and Wolter C., 2011. Domesticated ecosystems and novel communities: challenges for the management of large rivers. Ecohydrol. Hydrobiol., 11, 167–174. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Trivinho Strixino S. 2011. Larvas de Chironomidae. Guía de identificação, Dpto. De Hidrobiologia, Lab. De Entomologia Aquática, UFSCar, São Carlos, Brazil. 371 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Wantzen K.M. and Junk W.J., 2000. The importance of stream-wetland-systems for biodiversity: a tropicalperspective. In: Gopal B., Junk W.J. and Davis J.A. (eds.), Biodiversity in Wetlands: Assessment, Function and Conservation, Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, 11–34. [Google Scholar]
  • Ward J.V. and Stanford J.A., 1995. Ecological connectivity in alluvial river ecosystems and its disruption by flow regulation. Reg. Riv., 11, 105–19. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ward J.V. and Tockner K., 2001. Biodiversity: towards a unifying theme for river ecology. Freshwater Biol., 46, 807–19. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ward J.V., Tockner K. and Schiemer F., 1999. Biodiversity of floodplain river ecosystem. Ecotones and connectivity. Reg. Riv. Res. Manag., 15, 125–139. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wentworth C., 1932. A scale of grade and class terms for clastic sediments. J. Geol., 30, 377–392. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Whittaker R.H., 1973. Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon, 21, 213–251. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zilli F.L. and Marchese M.R., 2011. Patterns in macroinvertebrate assemblages at different spatial scales. Implications of hydrological connectivity in a large floodplain river. Hydrobiologia, 663, 245–257. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zilli F.L. and Montalto L., 2011. Benthic invertebrates in the middle Paraná River floodplain (Argentina). In: Álvarez M. (ed.), Floodplains: Physical Geography, Ecology and Societal Interactions, Nova Science Publishers Inc., Hauppauge, NY, 99–126. [Google Scholar]
  • Zilli F.L., Montalto L. and Marchese M.R., 2008. Benthic invertebrate assemblages and functional feeding groups in the Paraná River floodplain (Argentina). Limnologica, 38, 159–171. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.