Free Access
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 48, Number 3, 2012
Page(s) 289 - 294
Published online 23 July 2012
  • Bain M.B. and Stevenson N.J., 1999. Aquatic Habitat Assessment: Common Methods, American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD. [Google Scholar]
  • Bonnington C., Weaver D. and Fanning E., 2008. The habitat preference of four kingfisher species along a branch of the Kilombero River, southern Tanzania. Afr. J. Ecol., 46, 424–427. [Google Scholar]
  • Burfield I. and van Bommell F., 2004. Birds in Europe: Population Estimates, Trends, and Conservation Status. BirdLife Conservation Series No. 12, BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK. [Google Scholar]
  • Campos F., Fernández A., Gutiérrez-Corchero F., Martín-Santos F. and Santos P., 2000. Diet of the Eurasian kingfisher (Alcedo atthis) in northern Spain. Folia Zool., 49, 115–121. [Google Scholar]
  • Cramp S., 1985. Handbook of the Birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa, Vol. 4, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. [Google Scholar]
  • Grossman G.D., Nickerson D.M. and Freeman M.C., 1991. Principal component analyses of assemblage structure data: utility of tests based on eigenvalues. Ecology, 72, 341–347. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kasahara S. and Katoh K., 2008. Food-niche differentiation in sympatric species of kingfishers, the Common Kingfisher Alcedo atthis and the Greater Pied Kingfisher Ceryle lugubris. Ornithol. Sci., 7, 123–134. [Google Scholar]
  • King J.R. and Jackson D.A., 1999. Variable selection in large environmental data sets using principal components analysis. Environmetrics, 10, 67–77. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Leunda P.M., Oscoz J. and Miranda R., 2006. Length–weight relationships of fishes from tributaries of the Ebro River, Spain. J. Appl. Ichthyol., 22, 299–300. [Google Scholar]
  • Leunda P.M., Sistiaga M., Oscoz J. and Miranda R., in press. Ichthyofauna of a near-natural Pyrenean river: spatio-temporal variability and reach-scale habitat. Environ. Eng. Manage. J. [Google Scholar]
  • Meadows B.S., 1972. Kingfisher numbers and stream pollution. Ibis, 114, 443. [Google Scholar]
  • Moreno-Opo R., 2003. Martín Pescador Común, Alcedo atthis. In: Martí R. and Del Moral J.C. (eds.), Atlas de las aves reproductoras de España, Dirección General de la Conservación de la Naturaleza – Sociedad Española de Ornitología, Madrid, pp. 342–343. [Google Scholar]
  • Munne A., Prat N., Sola C., Bonada N. and Rieradevall N., 2003. A simple field method for assessing the ecological quality of riparian habitat in rivers and streams: QBR index. Aquat. Conserv., 13, 147–163. [Google Scholar]
  • Peris S.J. and Rodríguez R., 1996. Some factors related to distribution by breeding Kingfisher (Alcedo atthis L.). Ekol. Polska, 44, 31–38. [Google Scholar]
  • Reid S.M., Yunker G. and Jones N.E., 2009. Evaluation of single-pass backpack electric fishing for stream fish community monitoring. Fish. Manage. Ecol., 16, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  • Wechsler S., 2007. Nutzung künstlicher Brutwände durch den Eisvogel Alcedo atthis: Welche Konsequenzen ergeben sich für deren Konstruktion? Ornithol. Beob., 104, 225–223. [Google Scholar]
  • Whitfield A.K. and Blaber S.J.M., 1978. Feeding ecology of piscivorous birds at Lake St Lucia, part 1: diving birds. Ostrich, 49, 185–198. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Woodwall P.F., 1991. Morphometry, diet and habitat in the kingfishers (Aves: Alcedinidae). J. Zool., 223, 9–90. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.