EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 48 / No 1 (2012) Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim., 48 1 (2012) 81-93 References
Editor's Choice
Free Access
Issue
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 48, Number 1, 2012
Page(s) 81 - 93
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/2011059
Published online 14 March 2012
  • Álvarez J. and Salvador A., 1984. Cría de anuros en la laguna de Chozas de Arriba (León). Mediterranea, 7, 27–48. [Google Scholar]
  • Álvarez-Cobelas M.A., Rojo C. and Angeler D.G., 2005. Mediterranean limnology: current status, gaps and the future. J. Limnol., 64, 13–29. [Google Scholar]
  • Arak A., 1988. Female mate selection in the natterjack toad: active choice or passive atraction?Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 22, 317–327. [Google Scholar]
  • Baker J.M.R. and Halliday T.R., 1999. Amphibian colonization of new ponds in an agricultural landscape. Herpetolog. J., 9, 55–63. [Google Scholar]
  • Balcombe C.K., Anderson J.T., Fortney R.H. and Kordek W.S., 2005. Wildlife use of mitigation and reference wetlands in West Virginia. Ecol. Eng., 25, 85–99. [Google Scholar]
  • Banks B. and Beebee T.J.C., 1986. Climatic effects on calling and spawning of the Natterjack toad Bufo calamita: discriminant analyses and applications for conservation monitoring. Biol. Conserv., 36, 339–350. [Google Scholar]
  • Barry D.S., Pauley T.K. and Maerz J.C., 2008. Amphibian use of man-made pools on clear-cuts in the Allegheny Mountains of West Virginia, USA. Appl. Herpetol., 5, 121–128. [Google Scholar]
  • Beebee T.J.C., 1997. Changes in dewpond numbers and amphibian diversity over 20 years on chalk downland in Sussex, England. Biol. Conserv., 81, 215–219. [Google Scholar]
  • Beebee T.J.C. and Griffiths R.A., 2005. The amphibian decline crisis: a watershed for conservation biology?Biol. Conserv., 125, 271–285. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Beja P. and Alcazar R., 2003. Conservation of Mediterranean temporary ponds under agricultural intensification: an evaluation using amphibians. Biol. Conserv., 114, 317–326. [Google Scholar]
  • Beja P., Kuzmin S., Beebee T., Denoël M., Schmidt B., Tarkhnishvili D., Ananjeva N., Orlov N., Nyström P., Ogrodowczyk A., Ogielska M., Bosch J., Miaud C., Tejedo M., Lizana M. and Martínez-Solano I., 2009. Epidalea calamita. In: IUCN 2011. Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2011.2. <www.iucnredlist.org>. Downloaded on 24 January 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • Boix D., Franch M. and Mascort R., 2004a. Els amfibis i rèptils del Baix Ter. In: Quintana X.D. and Marí M. (eds.), Els Aiguamolls del Baix Ter, Monografia dels Papers del Montgrí, Vol. 23: Papers del Montgrí, Torroella de Montgrí, Spain, 86–110. [Google Scholar]
  • Boix D., Sala J., Quintana X.D. and Moreno-Amich R., 2004b. Succession of the animal community in a Mediterranean temporary pond. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 23, 29–49. [Google Scholar]
  • Boix D., Sala J. and Moreno-Amich R., 2001. The faunal composition of Espolla pond (NE Iberian peninsula): the neglected biodiversity of temporary waters. Wetlands, 21, 577–592. [Google Scholar]
  • Boomsma J.J. and Arntzen J.W., 1985. Abundance, growth and feeding of natterjack toads (Bufo calamita) in a 4-year-old artificial habitat. J. Appl. Ecol., 22, 395–405. [Google Scholar]
  • Bragg A.N., 1960. Population fluctuation in the amphibian fauna of Cleveland County, Oklahoma during the past twenty-five years. Southwest Nat., 5, 165–169. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brand A.B. and Snodgrass J.W., 2010. Value of artificial habitats for amphibian reproduction in altered landscapes. Conserv. Biol., 24, 295–301. [Google Scholar]
  • Brooke P.N., Alford R.A. and Schwarzkopf L., 2000. Environmental and social factors influence chorusing behaviour in a tropical frog: examining various temporal and spatial scales. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 49, 79–87. [Google Scholar]
  • Brown P.H. and Lant C.L., 1999. The effect of wetland mitigation banking on the achievement of no-net-loss. Environ. Manage., 23, 333–345. [Google Scholar]
  • Clarke K.R., 1993. Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust. J. Ecol., 18, 117–143. [Google Scholar]
  • Comín F.A. (ed.), 2010. Ecological Restoration. A Global Challenge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 318 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Cox N.A., Chanson J.S. and Stuart S.N. (eds.), 2006. The Status and Distribution of Reptiles and Amphibians of the Mediterranean Basin, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, 42 p. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Crawley M., 2002. Statistical Computing: An Introduction to Data Analysis Using S-Plus, Chichester, 772 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Cushman S.A., 2006. Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians: a review and prospectus. Biol. Conserv., 128, 231–240. [Google Scholar]
  • Denton J.S. and Beebee T.C.J., 1993. Density-related features of Natterjack toad (Bufo calamita) populations in Britain. J. Zool., 229, 105–119. [Google Scholar]
  • Denton J.S., Hitchings S.P., Beebee T.J.C. and Gent A., 1997. A recovery program for the Natterjack toad (Bufo calamita) in Britain. Conserv. Biol., 11, 1329–1338. [Google Scholar]
  • Díaz-Paniagua C., Fernández-Zamudio R., Florencio M., García-Murillo P., Gómez-Rodríguez C., Portheault A., Serrano L. and Siljeström P., 2010. Temporay ponds from Doñana National Park: a system of natural habitats for the preservation of aquatic flora and fauna. Limnetica, 29, 41–58. [Google Scholar]
  • Dodd C.K., 1992. Biological diversity of a temporary pond herpetofauna in north Florida sandhills. Biodivers. Conserv., 1, 125–142. [Google Scholar]
  • Donnelly M.A., Guyer C., Juterbock J.E. and Alford R., 1994. Techniques for marking amphibians. In: Heyer W.R., Donnelly M.A., McDiarmid R.W., Hayek L.-A.C. and Foster M.S. (eds.), Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity. Standard Methods for Amphibians, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, 277–284. [Google Scholar]
  • Fischer J. and Lindenmayer D.B., 2007. Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis. Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 16, 265–280. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • García-Muñoz E., Gilbert J., Parra G. and Guerrero F., 2010. Wetlands classification for amphibian conservation in Mediterranean landscapes. Biodivers. Conserv., 19, 901–911. [Google Scholar]
  • García-París M., Montori A. and Herrero P. (eds.), 2004. Amphibia, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales and Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid, 639 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Gascón S., Boix D., Sala J. and Quintana X.D., 2007. Changes on macrobenthic fauna of a mediterranean salt marsh (Empordà wetlands, NE iberian peninsula) after a severe drought, with special emphasis on the Corophium orientale population. Vie Milieu, 57, 10. [Google Scholar]
  • Gibbons J.W., Winne C.T., Scott D.E., Willson J.D., Glaudas X., Andrews K.M., Todd B.D., Fedewa L.A., Wilkinson L., Tsaliagos R.N., Harper S.J., Greene J.L., Tuberville T.D., Metts B.S., Dorcas M.E., Nestor J.P., Young C.A., Akre T., Reed R.N., Buhlmann K.A., Norman J., Croshaw D.A., Hagen C. and Rothermel B.B., 2006. Remarkable amphibian biomass and abundance in an isolated wetland: implications for wetland conservation. Conserv. Biol., 20, 1457–1465. [Google Scholar]
  • Grasshoff K., Kremling K. and Ehrhardt M., 1983. Methods of Seawater Analysis, Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, 419 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Grillas P., Gauthier P., Yavercovski N. and Perennou C. (eds.), 2004. Mediterranean Temporary Pools, Station Biologique de la Tour du Valat, Arles, 118 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Hildebrandt A., Guillamón M., Lacorte S., Tauler R. and Barceló D., 2008. Impact of pesticides used in agriculture and vineyards to surface and groundwater quality (North Spain). Water Res., 42, 3315–3326. [Google Scholar]
  • Houlahan J.E., Findlay C.S., Schmidt B.R., Meyer A.H. and Kuzmin S.L., 2000. Quantitative evidence for global amphibian population declines. Nature, 404, 752–755. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Jakob C., Poizat G., Veith M., Seitz A. and Crivelli A.J., 2003. Breeding phenology and larval distribution of amphibians in a Mediterranean pond network with unpredictable hydrology. Hydrobiologia, 499, 51–61. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jeffries M., 1991. The ecology and conservation value of forestry ponds in Scotland, United Kingdom. Biol. Conserv., 58, 191–211. [Google Scholar]
  • Joly P. and Grolet O., 1996. Colonization dynamics of new ponds, and the age structure of colonizing Alpine newts, Triturus alpestris. Acta Oecol., 17, 599–608. [Google Scholar]
  • Laan R. and Verboom B., 1990. Effects of pool size and isolation on amphibian communities. Biol. Conserv., 54, 251–262. [Google Scholar]
  • Lacki M., Hummer J. and Webster H., 1992. Mine-drainage treatment wetland as habitat for herptofaunal wildlife. Environ. Manage., 16, 513–520. [Google Scholar]
  • Lehtinen R.M. and Galatowitsch S.M., 2001. Colonization of restored wetlands by amphibians in Minnesota. Am. Midl. Nat., 145, 388–396. [Google Scholar]
  • Lehtinen R.M., Galatowitsch S.M. and Tester J., 1999. Consequences of habitat loss and fragmentation for wetland amphibian assemblages. Wetlands, 19, 1–12. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lesbarrères D., Fowler M.S., Pagano A. and Lodé T., 2010. Recovery of anuran community diversity following habitat replacement. J. Appl. Ecol., 47, 148–156. [Google Scholar]
  • López-Flores R.O., Quintana X.D., Salvadó V., Hidalgo M., Sala L. and Moreno-Amich R., 2003. Comparison of nutrient and contaminant fluxes in two areas with different hydrological regimes (Empordà Wetlands, NE Spain). Water Res., 37, 3034–3046. [Google Scholar]
  • Miaud C., Sanuy D. and Avrillier J.-N., 2000. Terrestrial movements of the natterjack toad Bufo calamita (Amphibia, Anura) in a semi-arid, agricultural landscape. Amphib. Reptil., 21, 357–369. [Google Scholar]
  • Mierzwa K.S., 2000. Wetland mitigation and amphibians: preliminary observations at a Southwestern Illinois bottomland hardwood forest restoration site. J. Iowa Acad. Sci., 107, 191–194. [Google Scholar]
  • Mitsch W.J. and Wilson R.F., 1996. Improving the success of wetland creation and restoration with know-how, time, and self-design. Ecol. Appl., 6, 77–83. [Google Scholar]
  • Montori A., Llorente G.A., Richter-Boix A., Villero D., Franch M. and Garriga N., 2007. Colonización y efectos potenciales de la especie invasora Discoglossus pictus sobre las especies nativas. Munibe, 25, 14–27. [Google Scholar]
  • Newman R.A., 1998. Ecological constraints on amphibian metamorphosis: interactions of temperature and larval density with responses to changing food level. Oecologia, 115, 9–16. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Oertli B., Auderset Joye D., Castella E., Juge R., Cambin D. and Lachavanne J.-B., 2002. Does size matter? The relationship between pond area and biodiversity. Biol. Conserv., 104, 59–70. [Google Scholar]
  • Oertli B., Biggs J., Céréghino R., Grillas P., Joly P. and Lachavanne J.-B., 2005. Conservation and monitoring of pond biodiversity: introduction. Aquat. Conserv.: Mar. Freshwat. Ecosyst., 15, 535–540. [Google Scholar]
  • Pearman P.B., Velasco A.M. and López A., 1995. Tropical amphibian monitoring: a comparison of methods for detecting inter-site variation in species’ composition. Herpetologica, 51, 325–337. [Google Scholar]
  • Pechmann J., Estes R., Scott D. and Gibbons J., 2001. Amphibian colonization and use of ponds created for trial mitigation of wetland loss. Wetlands, 21, 93–111. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Peltzer P., Lajmanovich R., Attademo A. and Beltzer A., 2006. Diversity of anurans across agricultural ponds in argentina. Biodivers. Conserv., 15, 3499–3513. [Google Scholar]
  • Perry M.C., Sibrel C.B. and Gough G.A., 1996. Wetlands mitigation: partnership between an electric power company and a federal wildlife refuge. Environ. Manage., 20, 933–939. [Google Scholar]
  • Petranka J., Kennedy C. and Murray S., 2003. Response of amphibians to restoration of a southern Appalachian wetland: a long-term analysis of community dynamics. Wetlands, 23, 1030–1042. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Petranka J.W., Harp E.M., Holbrook C.T. and Hamel J.A., 2007. Long-term persistence of amphibian populations in a restored wetland complex. Biol. Conserv., 138, 371–380. [Google Scholar]
  • Pleguezuelos J.M., Márquez R. and Lizana M., 2002. Atlas y libro rojo de los anfibios y reptiles de España, Dirección General de la Conservación de la Naturaleza, Asociación Herpetológica Española, Madrid, 588 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Pough F.H., Magnusson W.E., Ryan M.J., Wells K.D. and Taigent T.L., 1992. Energetics and locomotion: behavioral energetics. In: Feder M.E. and Burggren W.W. (eds.), Environmental Physiology of the Amphibians, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 395–436. [Google Scholar]
  • Rannap R., Lõhmus A. and Briggs L., 2009. Restoring ponds for amphibians: a success story. Hydrobiologia, 634, 87–95. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rohr J.R. and Crumrine P.W., 2005. Effects of an herbicide and an insecticide on pond community structure and processes. Ecol. Appl., 15, 1135–1147. [Google Scholar]
  • Ruhí A., Boix D., Sala J., Gascon S. and Quintana X.D., 2009. Spatial and temporal patterns of pioneer macrofauna in recently created ponds: taxonomic and functional approaches. Hydrobiologia, 634, 137–151. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sala J., Gascón S., Boix D., Gesti J. and Quintana X.D., 2004. Proposal of a rapid methodology to assess the conservation status of Mediterranean wetlands and its application in Catalunya. Arch. Sci., 57, 141–152. [Google Scholar]
  • Salvadó V., Quintana X. and Hidalgo M., 2006. Monitoring of nutrients, pesticides, and metals in waters, sediments, and fish of a wetland. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 51, 377–386. [Google Scholar]
  • Shulse C., Semlitsch R., Trauth K. and Williams A., 2010. Influences of design and landscape placement parameters on amphibian abundance in constructed wetlands. Wetlands, 30, 915–928. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sinsch U., 1988. Temporal spacing of breeding activity in the natterjack toad, Bufo calamita. Oecologia, 76, 399–407. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Smith M.A. and Green D.M., 2005. Dispersal and the metapopulation paradigm in amphibian ecology and conservation: are all amphibian populations metapopulations?Ecography, 28, 110–128. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Stevens C., Diamond A. and Gabor T., 2002. Anuran call surveys on small wetlands in Prince Edward Island, Canada restored by dredging of sediments. Wetlands, 22, 90–99. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Stuart S.N., Chanson J.S., Cox N.A., Young B.E., Rodrigues A.S.L., Fischman D.L. and Waller R.W., 2004. Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science, 306, 1783–1786. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Stumpel A.H.P. and van der Voet H., 1998. Characterizing the suitability of new ponds for amphibians. Amphib. Reptil., 19, 125–142. [Google Scholar]
  • Tejedo M. and Reques R., 1994. Plasticity in metamorphic traits of natterjack tadpoles: the interactive effects of density and pond duration. Oikos, 71, 295–304. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tejedo M. and Reques R., 1997. Bufo calamita. In: Pleguezuelos J.M. (ed.), Distribución y biogeografía de los anfibios y reptiles en España y Portugal, Asociación Herpetológica Española y Universidad de Granada, Granada, 155–157. [Google Scholar]
  • Vasconcelos D. and Calhoun A., 2006. Monitoring created seasonal pools for functional success: a six-year case study of amphibian responses, Sears Island, Maine, USA. Wetlands, 26, 992–1003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wake D.B. and Vredenburg V.T., 2008. Are we in the midst of the sixth mass extinction? A view from the world of amphibians. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 105, 11466–11473. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zacharias I., Dimitriou E., Dekker A. and Dorsman E., 2007. Overview of temporary ponds in the Mediterranean region: threats, management and conservation issues. J. Environ. Biol., 28, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  • Zedler J.B. and Callaway J.C., 1999. Tracking wetland restoration: do mitigation sites follow desired trajectories? Restor. Ecol., 7, 69–73. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.