EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 47 / No 4 (2011) Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim., 47 4 (2011) 313-323 References
Free Access
Issue
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 47, Number 4, 2011
Page(s) 313 - 323
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/2011045
Published online 21 December 2011
  • Abrantes F., 1988. Diatom assemblages as upwelling indicators in surface sediments in Portugal. Mar. Geol., 85, 15–39. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Abrantes F., Gil I., Lopes C. and Castro M., 2005. Quantitative diatom analyses – a faster cleaning procedure. Deep-Sea Res. I, 52, 189–198. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • APHA, 1992. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, American Public Health Association, New York. [Google Scholar]
  • Blanco S., Bécares E., Cauchie H., Hoffmann L. and Ector L., 2007. Comparison of biotic indices for water quality diagnosis in the Duero Basin (Spain). Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl., 161, 267–286. [Google Scholar]
  • Borics G., Várbíró G., Grigorszky I., Krasznai E., Szabó S. and Kiss K.T., 2007. A new evaluation technique of potamo-plankton for the assessment of the ecological status of rivers. Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl., 161 (3–4), 465–486. [Google Scholar]
  • Cabecinha E., Cortes R., Cabral J.A., Ferreira T., Lourenço M. and Pardal M.Â., 2009. Multi-scale approach using phytoplankton as a first step towards the definition of the ecological status of reservoirs. Ecol. Indicators, 9, 240–255. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cao Y., Williams D.D. and Larsen D.P., 2002. Comparison of ecological communities: the problem of sample representativeness. Ecol. Monogr., 72, 41–56. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cao Y., Williams W.P. and Bark A.W., 1997. Effects of sample size (replicate number) on similarity measured in river benthic Aufwuchs community analysis. Water Environ. Res., 69, 107–114. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • CDC, 2010. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. http://www.cdc.gov/epiinfo/europe.htm (downloaded 10 October 2010). [Google Scholar]
  • Centis B., Tolotti M. and Salmaso N., 2010. Structure of the diatom community of the River Adige (North-Eastern Italy) along a hydrological gradient. Hydrobiologia, 639, 37–42. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Domingues R.B. and Galvão H., 2007. Phytoplancton and environmental variability in a dam regulated temperate estuary. Hydrobiologia, 586, 117–134. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • DWD, 2010. Mean values of the precipitation and temperature for the period 1961–1990. www.dwd.de (last accessed 18 June 2010). [Google Scholar]
  • Fohrer N., Schmalz B., Tavares F. and Golon J., 2007. Ansätze zur Integration von landwirtschaftlichen Drainagen in die Modellierung des Landschaftswasserhaushalts von mesoskaligen Tieflandeinzugsgebieten. Hydrol. Wasserbewirtschaftung, 51, 164–169. [Google Scholar]
  • Friedrich G. and Pohlmann M., 2009. Long-term plankton studies at the lower Rhine/Germany. Limnologica, 39, 14–39. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ha K., Kim H.W. and Joo G.J., 1998. The phytoplankton succession in the lower part of hypertrophic Nakdong River (Mulgum), South Korea. Hydrobiologia, 369/370, 217–227. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hillebrand H., Dürselen C.D., Kirschtel D., Pollingher U. and Zohary Y., 1999. Biovolume calculation for pelagic and benthic microalgae. J. Phycol., 35, 403–424. [Google Scholar]
  • Hötzel G. and Croome R., 1999. A Phytoplankton Methods Manual for Australian Freshwaters. Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation, Canberra. [Google Scholar]
  • Huang X.F., 2000. Survey, observation and analysis of lake ecology, Standard Press of China, Beijing. [Google Scholar]
  • Jeong K.S., Kim D.K., Jung J.M., Kim M.C. and Joo G.J., 2008. Non-linear autoregressive modelling by temporal recurrent neural networks for the prediction of freshwater phytoplankton dynamics. Ecol. Indicators, 211, 292–300. [Google Scholar]
  • Köhler J., Bahnwart M. and Ockenfeld K., 2002. Growth and loss processes of riverine phytoplankton in relation to water depth. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol., 87, 241–254. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kraatz W.C., 1940. A comparison of plankton counts from the trap-net and water bottle centrifuge techniques. Ohio J. Sci., 40, 151–161. [Google Scholar]
  • Lange-Bertalot H., 2000a. Iconographia diatomologica. Annotated diatom micrographs, 7. Diversity-taxonomy-identification. Diatom flora of marine coastes I, Koeltz Scientific Books, Koenigstein, Germany. [Google Scholar]
  • Lange-Bertalot H., 2000b. Iconographia diatomologica. Annotated diatom micrographs, 9. Phytogeography-diversity-taxonomy. Diatoms of Andes, Koeltz Scientific Books, Koenigstein, Germany. [Google Scholar]
  • Lange-Bertalot H., 2005. Iconographia diatomologica. Annotated diatom micrographs, 15. Taxonomy-biogeography-diversity. Diatoms of Uruguay, Koeltz Scientific Books, Koenigstein, Germany. [Google Scholar]
  • Lange-Bertalot H., 2007. Iconographia diatomologica. Annotated diatom micrographs, 18. Diversity-taxonomy-biogeography. Tropical diatoms of South America II, Koeltz Scientific Books, Koenigstein, Germany. [Google Scholar]
  • Lepš J. and Šmilauer P., 2003. Multivariate analysis of ecological data using CANOCO, Cambridge University Press, New York. [Google Scholar]
  • Majaneva M., Autio R., Huttunen M., Kuosa H. and Kuparinen J., 2009. Phytoplankton monitoring: the effect of sampling methods used during different stratification and bloom conditions in the Baltic Sea. Boreal Environ. Res., 14, 313–322. [Google Scholar]
  • Mischke U. and Behrendt H., 2007. Handbuch zum Bewertungsverfahren von Fließgewässern mittels Phytoplankton zur Umsetzung der EU-Wasserrahmenrichtlinie in Deutschland, WeißenseeVerlag, Berlin. ISBN 978-3-89998-105-6, 88 pp. (in German). [Google Scholar]
  • Paasche E. and Ostergren I., 1980. The annual cycle of plankton diatom growth and silica production in the inner Oslofjord. Limn. Oceanogr., 25, 481–494. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Padisák J. and Adrian R., 1999. Biovolumen. In: Tümpling V.W. and Friedrich G. (eds.), Methoden der biologischen wasseruntersuchung 2. Biologische gewässeruntersuchung, Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena, Chapter 5.1, 334–367. [Google Scholar]
  • Padisák J., Krienitz L. and Scheffler W., 1999. Phytoplankton. In: Tümpling V.W. and Friedrich G. (eds.), Biologischen wasseruntersuchung 2. Biologische gewässeruntersuchung, Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena, Chapter 3.6 , 35–53. [Google Scholar]
  • Piirsoo K., Pall P., Tuvikene A. and Viik M., 2008. Temporal and spatial patterns of phytoplankton in a temperate lowland river (Emajõgi, Estonia). J. Plank. Res., 30, 1285–1295. [Google Scholar]
  • Plenković-Moraj A., Gligora M., Kralj K. and Mustafić P., 2007. Diatoms in monitoring of Drava River, Croatia. Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl., 161 (3–4), 511–525. [Google Scholar]
  • Porter S.D., 2008. Algal attributes: an autecological classification of algal taxa collected by the National Water-Quality Assessment Program. U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 329, http://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/ds329/ (accessed October 2010). [Google Scholar]
  • Reavie E., Jicha T., Angradi T., Bolgrien D. and Hill B., 2010. Algal assemblages for large river monitoring: comparison among biovolume, absolute and relative abundance metrics. Ecol. Indicators, 10, 167–177. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Round F.E., Crawford R.M. and Mann D.G., 1990. The diatoms: biology and morphology of the genera, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. [Google Scholar]
  • Sabater S., Artigas J., Duran C., Pardos M., Romani A.M., Tornes E. and Ylla I., 2008. Longitudinal development of chlorophyll and phytoplankton assemblages in a regulated large river (the Ebro River). Sci. Total Environ., 404, 196–206. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Schmalz B. and Fohrer N., 2010. Ecohydrological research in the German lowland catchment Kielstu. IAHS Publ., 336, 115–120. [Google Scholar]
  • Simonsen R., 1987. Atlas and catalogue of the diatom types of Friedrich Hustedt, Volumes 1–3, Catalog. J. Cramer, Berlin. [Google Scholar]
  • Stevenson R.J. and Hashim S., 1989. Variation in diatom community structure among habitats in sandy streams. J. Phycol., 25, 678–686. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sumorok B., Zelazna-Wieczorek J. and Kostrzewa K., 2009. Qualitative and quantitative phytoseston changes in two different stream-order river segments over a period of twelve years (Grabia and Brodnia, central Poland). Inst. Oceanogr., 38, 55–63. [Google Scholar]
  • Tangen K., 1978. Nets. In: Sournia A. (ed.), Phytoplankton manual, UNESCO, Norwich, p. 50. [Google Scholar]
  • Trifonova I.S. and Pavlova O.A., 2004. Assessment of the trophic state of Lake Ladoga tributaries and the Neva River by phytoplankton. Water Resour., 31, 679–688. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Trifonova I.S., Pavlova O.A. and Rusanov A.G., 2007. Phytoplankton as an indicator of water quality in the rivers of the Lake Ladoga basin and its relation to environmental factors. Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl., 161 (3–4), 527–549. [Google Scholar]
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), 1997. Lake Michigan Mass Balance, Methods Compendium, Vol. 3: LMMB 065 (ESS Method 340.2), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Great Lakes National Program Office, Chicago. [Google Scholar]
  • van Dam H., Mertens A. and Sinkeldam J., 1994. A coded checklist and ecological indicator values of freshwater diatoms from the Netherlands. Netherlands J. Aquat. Ecol., 28, 117–133. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang Y.K., Stevenson R.J. and Metzmeier L., 2005. Development and evaluation of a diatom-based index of biotic integrity for the Interior Plateau Ecoregion, USA. J. North Am. Bentholog. Soc., 24, 990–1008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Weilhoefer C.L. and Pan Y.D., 2007. A comparison of diatom assemblages generated by two sampling protocols. J. North Am. Bentholog. Soc., 26, 308–318. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wu N.C., Schmalz B. and Fohrer N., 2011. Distribution of phytoplankton in a German lowland river in relation to environmental factors. J. Plankt. Res., 33, 807–820. [Google Scholar]
  • Wu N.C., Tang T., Zhou S.C., Fu X.C., Jiang W.X., Li F.Q. and Cai Q.H., 2007. Influence of cascaded exploitation of small hydropower on phytoplankton in Xiangxi River. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol., 18, 1091–1096. [Google Scholar]
  • Xu Y.Y., Cai Q.H., Ye L., Zhou S.C. and Han X.Q., 2009. Spring diatom blooming phases in a representative eutrophic bay of the Three-Gorges Reservoir, China. J. Freshw. Ecol., 24, 191–198. [Google Scholar]
  • Zhou G.J., Kuang Q.J., Hu Z.Y. and Cai Q.H., 2006. Study on the succession of algae and the trend of water-bloom occurred in Xiangxi Bay. Acta Hydrobiol. Sin., 30, 42–46. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.