Free Access
Issue
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 47, 2011
River ecosystem health assessment: the value in the management and restoration
Page(s) S63 - S71
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/2011020
Published online 08 July 2011
  • Allan J.D., 1995. Stream Ecology: Structure and Function of Running Waters, Chapman & Hall, London, 404 p.
  • Balmford A., Bruner A., Cooper P., Costanza R., Farber S, Green R.E., Jenkins M., Jefferiss P., Jessamy V., Madden J., Munro K., Myers N., Naeem S., Paavola J., Rayment M., Rosendo S., Roughgarden J., Trumper K. and Turner R.K., 2002. Economic reasons for conserving wild nature. Science, 297, 950–953. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Beecher H.A., Dott E.R. and Fernau R.F., 1988. Fish species richness and stream order in Washington State streams. Environ. Biol. Fish., 22, 193–202. [CrossRef]
  • Belliard J., Boët P. and Tales E., 1997. Watershed and longitudinal patterns of fish community structure in the Seine River basin, France. Environ. Biol. Fish., 50, 133–147. [CrossRef]
  • Bruton M.N., 1995. Have fish had their chips? The dilemma of threatened fishes. Environ. Biol. Fish., 43, 1–27. [CrossRef]
  • Buisson L., Blanc L. and Grenouillet G., 2007. Modeling stream fish species distribution in a river network: the relative effects of temperature versus physical factors. Ecol. Freshwater Fish, 17, 144–157.
  • Diddle E.D., Killgore K.J. and Harrel S.L., 1997. Assessment of fish-plant interactions, Miscellaneous paper A-96-6, U.S. Army Engineering Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, 23 p.
  • Eaton A.D., Clesceri L.S., Rice E.W., Greenberg A.E. and Franson M.A.H., 2005. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 21st edn., American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, 1368 p.
  • Eitzmann J.L. and Paukert C.P., 2010. Longitudinal differences in habitat complexity and fish assemblages structure of a Great Plains river. Am. Midl. Nat., 163, 14–32. [CrossRef]
  • Gauch H.G., 1982. Multivariate Analysis in Community Ecology, Cambridge University Press, New York, 320 p.
  • Gehrke P.C., Gilligan D.M. and Barwick M., 2002. Changes in fish community of the Shoalhaven River 20 years after construction of Tallowa dam, Australia. River Res. Appl., 18, 265–286. [CrossRef]
  • Goldstein R.M. and Meador M.R., 2005. Multilevel assessment of fish species traits to evaluate habitat degradation in streams of the upper Midwest. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage., 25, 180–194. [CrossRef]
  • Grenouillet G., Pont D. and Hérissé C., 2004. Within-basin fish assemblage structure: the relative influence of habitat versus stream spatial position on local species richness. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 61, 93–102. [CrossRef]
  • Habit E., Belk M.C. and Parra O., 2007. Response of the riverine fish community to the construction and operation of a diversion hydropower plant in central Chile. Aquat. Conserv., 17, 37–49. [CrossRef]
  • Horwitz R.J., 1978. Temporal variability patterns and the distribution patterns of stream fishes. Ecol. Monogr., 48, 307–321. [CrossRef]
  • Hughes R.M. and Gammon J.R., 1987. Longitudinal changes in fish assemblages and water quality in the Williamette River, Oregon. Am. Fish. Soc., 116, 196–209. [CrossRef]
  • Hughes R.M. and Omernik J.M., 1981. Use and misuse of the terms watershed and stream order. In: American Fisheries Society of Warmwater Streams Symposium, 320–326.
  • Hughes R.M. and Omernik J.M., 1983. An alternative for characterizing stream size. In: Fontaine T.D.III and Barter S.M. (eds.), Dynamics of Lotic Ecosystems, Ann Arbor Science, Michigan, 87–101.
  • Ibanez C., Oberdorff T., Teugels G., Mamononekene V., Lavoué S., Fermon Y., Paugy D. and Toham A.K., 2007. Fish assemblages structure and function along environmental gradients in rivers of Gabon (Africa). Ecol. Freshwater Fish, 16, 315–334. [CrossRef]
  • Jackson D.A., Peres-Neto P.R. and Olden J.D., 2001. What controls who is where in freshwater fish communities – the roles of biotic, abiotic, and spatial factors. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 58, 157–170.
  • Jang M.H., Kim J.G., Park S.B., Jeong K.S., Cho G.I. and Joo G.J., 2002. The current status of the distribution of introduced fish in large river systems of South Korea. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol., 87, 319–328. [CrossRef]
  • Jang M.H., Lucas M.C. and Joo G.J., 2003. The fish fauna of mountain streams in South Korean national parks and its significance to conservation of regional freshwater fish biodiversity. Biol. Conserv., 114, 115–126. [CrossRef]
  • Jang M.H., Cho G.I. and Joo G.J., 2005. The impact of unregulated fishing on the size distribution of a fish population in a temperate upland stream pool. J. Freshwater Ecol., 20, 191–193. [CrossRef]
  • Jang M.H., Joo G.J. and Lucas M.C., 2006. Diet of introduced largemouth bass in Korean rivers and potential interactions with native fishes. Ecol. Freshwater Fish, 15, 315–320. [CrossRef]
  • Jang M.H., Yoon J.D., Shin J.H. and Joo G.J., 2008. Status of freshwater fish around the Korean Demilitarized Zone and its implications for conservation. Aquat. Conserv., 18, 819–828. [CrossRef]
  • Kim I.S., 1995. The conservation and status of threatened freshwater fishes in Korea. In: Lee H.J. and Kim I.S. (eds.), Proceedings of Ichthyofauna and Characteristics of Fresh-Water Ecosystems in Korea, The Ecological Society of Korea and The Korean Society of Ichthyology, Seoul, 31–50.
  • Kim I.S. and Park J.Y., 2002. Freshwater Fish of Korea, Kyo-Hak Publishing, Seoul, 467 p.
  • Kouamé K.A., Yao S.S., Bi G.G., Kouamélan E.P., N'Douba V. and Kouassi N.J., 2008. Influential environmental gradients and patterns of fish assemblages in a West African basin. Hydrobiologia, 603, 159–169. [CrossRef]
  • Kouamélan E.P., Teugels G.G., N'Douba V., Bi G.G. and Koné T., 2003. Fish diversity and its relationships with environmental variables in a West African basin. Hydrobiologia, 505, 139–146. [CrossRef]
  • Kuehne R.A., 1962. A classification of streams, illustrated by fish distribution in an eastern Kentucky creek. Ecology, 43, 608–614. [CrossRef]
  • Lindberg G.U., 1972. Large-scaled fluctuation of sea level in the Quaternary Period, Nauka, Moscow, 760 p. (in Russian).
  • Martinez P.J., Chart T.E., Trammell M.A., Wullschleger J.G. and Bergersen E.P., 1994. Fish species composition before and after construction of a main stem reservoir on the White River, Colorado. Environ. Biol. Fish., 40, 227–239. [CrossRef]
  • Matthews W.J., 1998. Patterns in Freshwater Fish Ecology, Chapman & Hall, New York, 784 p.
  • Matthews W.J. and Robison H.W., 1988. The distribution of the fishes of Arkansas: a multivariate analysis. Copeia, 1988, 358–374. [CrossRef]
  • Matthews W.J., Hough D.J. and Robison H.W., 1992. Similarities in fish distribution and water quality patterns in streams of Arkansas: congruence of multivariate analysis. Copeia, 1992, 296–305. [CrossRef]
  • Maturakis E.G., Woolcott W.S. and Jenkins R.E., 1987. Physiographic analyses of the longitudinal distribution of fishes in the Rappahannock River, Virginia. Assoc. Southeast. Biol. Bull., 34, 1–14.
  • MOE/NIER, 2008. The survey and evaluation of aquatic ecosystem health in Korea, The Ministry of Environment/National Institute of Environmental Research, Korea (in Korean with English summary).
  • Moyle P.B. and Cech J.J.Jr., 2000. Fishes: An Introduction to Ichthyology, 4th edn., Prentice Hall Inc., New Jersey, 744 p.
  • Naiman R.J., Melillo J.M., Lock M.A., Ford T.E. and Reice S.E., 1987. Longitudinal patterns of ecosystem processes and community structure in a subarctin river continuum. Ecology, 68, 1139–1156. [CrossRef]
  • Needbling T.E. and Quist M.C., 2010. Relationships between fish assemblages and habitat characteristics in Iowa's non-wadeable rivers. Fish. Manage. Ecol., 17, 369–385. [CrossRef]
  • Nelson J.S., 1994. Fishes of the World, 3rd edn., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 624 p.
  • Nishimura S., 1974. Origin and History of the Japan Sea: An Approach from Biogeographic Standpoint, Tsukiji Shokan, Tokyo, 274 p. (in Japanese).
  • Oberdorff T., Guilbert E. and Lucchetta J.C., 1993. Patterns of fish species richness in the Seine River basin, France. Hydrobiologia, 259, 157–167. [CrossRef]
  • Oberdorff T., Pont D., Hugueny B. and Chessel D., 2001. A probabilistic model characterizing riverine fish assemblages of French rivers: a framework for environmental assessment. Freshwater Biol., 46, 399–415. [CrossRef]
  • Paller M.H., 1994. Relationships between fish assemblage structure and stream order in South Carolina coastal plain streams. Am. Fish. Soc., 123, 150–161. [CrossRef]
  • Penczak T. and Mann R.H.K., 1990. The impact of stream order on fish population in the Pilica drainage basin, Poland. Pol. Arch. Hydrobiol., 37, 243–261.
  • Ricciardi A. and Rasmussen J.B., 1999. Extinction rates of North American freshwater fauna. Conserv. Biol., 13, 1220–1222. [CrossRef]
  • Sala O.E., Chapin F.S. III., Armesto J.J., Berlow R., Bloomfield J., Dirzo R., Huber-Sanwald E., Huenneke L.F., Jackson R.B., Kinzig A., Leemans R., Lodge D., Mooney H.A., Oesterheld M., Poff N.L., Sykes M.T., Walker B.H., Walker M. and Wall D.H., 2000. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science, 287, 1770–1774. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Schlosser I.J., 1987. A conceptual framework for fish communities in small warm water streams. In: Matthews W.J. and Heins D.C. (eds.), Community and Evolutionary Ecology of North American Stream Fishes, University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, 17–24.
  • Schlosser I.J., 1990. Environmental variation, life history attributes, and community structure in stream fishes: implications for environmental management and assessment. Environ. Mange., 14, 621–628.
  • Strahler A.N., 1957. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 38, 913–920.
  • Ter Braak C.J.F. and Šmilauer P., 2002. CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user's guide: software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5), Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, 500 p.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.