Free Access
Issue
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 46, Number 1, 2010
Page(s) 47 - 52
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/2010006
Published online 19 March 2010
  • Brunberg A.K. and Blomqvist P., 2003. Recruitment of Microcystis (Cyanophyceae) from lake sediments: the importance of littoral inocula. J. Phycol., 39, 58–63. [Google Scholar]
  • Ghadouani A., Pinel-Alloul B. and Prepas E.E., 2003. Effects of experimentally induced cyanobacterial blooms on crustacean zooplankton communities. Freshw. Biol., 48, 363–381. [Google Scholar]
  • Ibelings B.W. and Mur L.R., 1992. Microprofiles of photosynthesis and oxygen concentration in Microcystis sp. scums. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 86, 195–203. [Google Scholar]
  • Ihle T., Jähnichen S. and Benndorf J., 2005. Wax and wane of Microcystis (Cyanophyceae) and microcystins in lake sediment: a case study in Quitzdorf Reservoir (Germany). J. Phycol., 41, 479–488. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Karlsson-Elfgren I. and Brunberg A.K., 2004. The importance of shallow sediments in the recruitment of Anabaena and Aphanizomenon (Cyanopheceae). J. Phycol., 40, 831–836. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Köhler J., 1992. Influence of turbulent mixing on growth and primary production of Microcystis aeruginosa in the hypertrophic Bautzen Reservoir. Arch. Hydrobiol., 123, 413–429. [Google Scholar]
  • Kromkamp J. and Walsby A.E., 1990. A computer model of buoyancy and vertical migration in cyanobacteria. J. Plankton Res., 12, 161–183. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Paerl H.W., 1983. Partitioning of CO2 fixation in the colonial cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa: mechanism promoting formation of surface scums. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 46, 252–259. [Google Scholar]
  • Paerl H.W., Bland P.T., Bowles N.D. and Haibach M.E., 1985. Adaptation to high-intensity, low-wavelength light among surface blooms of the cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 49, 1046–1052. [Google Scholar]
  • Reynolds C.S., Jaworski G.H.M., Cmiech H.A. and Leedale G.F., 1981. On the annual cycle of the blue-green alga Microcystis aeruginosa Kütz. emend. Elenkin. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B., 293, 419–477. [Google Scholar]
  • Shen H. and Song L., 2007. Comparative studies on physiological responses to phosphorus in two phenotypes of bloom-forming Microcystis. Hydrobiologia, 592, 475–486. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sommaruga R., Chen Y. and Liu Z., 2009. Multiple strategies of bloom-forming Microcystis to minimize damage by solar ultraviolet radiation in surface waters. Microb. Ecol., 57, 667–674. [Google Scholar]
  • Watanabe M.M. and Ichimura T., 1977. Fresh- and salt-water forms of Spirulina platensis in axenic cultures. Bull. Jpn. Soc. Phycol., 25, Suppl., 371–377. [Google Scholar]
  • Whitelam G.C. and Codd G.A., 1983. Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in the cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa. Planta, 157, 561–566. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yamamoto Y. and Nakahara H., 2005. Competitive dominance of the cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa in nutrient-rich culture conditions with special reference to dissolved inorganic carbon uptake. Phycol. Res., 53, 201–208. [Google Scholar]
  • Yamamoto Y. and Tsukada H., 2009. Measurement of in situ specific growth rates of Microcystis (cyanobacteria) from the frequency of dividing cells. J. Phycol., 45, 1003–1009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Yang Z., Kong F., Shi X., Zhang M., Xing P. and Cao H., 2008. Changes in the morphology and polysaccharide content of Microcystis aeruginosa (cyanobacteria) during flagellate grazing. J. Phycol., 44, 716–720. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zevenboom W. and Mur L.R., 1984. Growth and photosynthetic response of the cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa in relation to photoperiodicity and irradiance. Arch. Microbiol., 139, 232–239. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.