EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 45 / No 2 (2009) Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim., 45 2 (2009) 107-117 References
Free Access
Issue
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 45, Number 2, 2009
Page(s) 107 - 117
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/2009008
Published online 27 May 2009
  • Aka M., Pagano M., Saint-Jean L., Arfi R., Bouvy M., Cecchi P., Corbin D. and Thomas S., 2000. Zooplankton variability in 49 shallow tropical reservoirs of Ivory Coast (West Africa). Int. Rev. Hydrobiol., 85, 491–504. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Amoros C., 1984. Introduction pratique à la systématique des organismes des eaux continentales françaises. Crustacés cladocères. Bull. Soc. Linn. Lyon, 53, 72–145. [Google Scholar]
  • Andronikova I.N., 1993. Lake Classification with Respect to Biological Productivity. In: Teoreticheskie voprosy klassifikatsii ozer (Theoretical Problems of Lake Classification), St. Petersburg: Nauka. [Google Scholar]
  • Araújo M.A. and Pinto-Coelho R.M., 1998. Produção e consume de carbono orgânico na comunidade planctônica da represa da Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, MG. Rev. Bras. Biol., 58, 403–414. [Google Scholar]
  • Ariyadej C., Tansakul R., Tansakul P. and Angsupanich S., 2004. Phytoplankton diversity and its relationships to the physico-chemical environment in the Banglang Reservoir, Yala Province, Songklanakarin. J. Sci. Technol., 26, 5, 595–607. [Google Scholar]
  • Baykal T., Salman S. and Açikgöz Ü., 2006. The Relationship between Seasonal Variation in Phytoplankton and Zooplankton Densities in Hirfanlı Dam Lake (Kırşehir, Turkey). Turk. J. Biol., 30, 217–226. [Google Scholar]
  • Branco C.W.C. and Senna P.A.C., 1996. Relations among heterotrophic bacteria, chlorophyll-a, total phytoplankton, total zooplankton and physical and chemical features in the Paranoá reservoir, Brasília, Brazil. Hydrobiologia, 337, 171–181. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Burns N. and Bryers G., 2000. Protocol for Monitoring Trophic Levels of New Zealand lakes and Reservoirs, Lakes Consulting, Pauanui, New Zealand. [Google Scholar]
  • Cadjo S., Miletic A. and Djurkovic A., 2007. Zooplankton of the Potpec reservoir and the saprobiological analysis of water quality. Desalination, 213, 24–28. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Carlson R.E. and Simpson J., 1996. A Coordinator's Guide to Volunteer Lake Monitoring Methods, North American Lake Management Society, 96 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Carpenter S.R., Frost T.M., Kitchell J.F., Kratz T.K., Schindler D.W., Shearer J., Sprules W.G., Vanni M.J. and Zimmerman A.P., 1991. Patterns of primary production and herbivory in 25 North American lake ecosystems. In: Cole J., Lovett G. and Findlay S. (eds.), Comparative Analyses of Ecosystems: Patterns, Mechanisms, and Theories, Springer-Verlag, New York, 67–96. [Google Scholar]
  • Cherbi M., Lek-Ang S., Lek S. and Arab A., 2008. Distribution du zooplancton dans les lacs à climat méditerranéen. C. R. Biol., 331, 692–702. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chessel D. and Dolédec S., 1992. ADE Software (Version 3.6), multivariate Analyses and Graphical Display for Environmental Data, User's Manual. [Google Scholar]
  • D'Elia C.F., Steudler P.A. and Corwin N., 1977. Determination of total nitrogen in aqueous samples using persulfate digestion. Limnol. Oceanogr., 22, 760–764. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • De Eyto E., 2001. Chydorus sphaericus as a biological indicator of water quality in lakes. Verh. Int. Ver. Theor. Angew. Limnol., 27, 3358–3362. [Google Scholar]
  • Dejen E., Vijverberg J., Nagelkerke L.A.J. and Sibbing F.A., 2004. Temporal and spatial distribution of microcrustacean zooplankton in relation to turbidity and other environmental factors in a large tropical lake (L. Tana, Ethiopia). Hydrobiologia, 513, 39–49. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • DGEDA, 2004. Budget économique de l'agriculture et de la pêche, 95 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Fernández-Rosado M.J. and Lucena J., 2001. Space-time heterogeneities of the zooplankton distribution in La Concepción reservoir (Istán, Málaga; Spain). Hydrobiologia, 455, 157–170. [Google Scholar]
  • Frontier S., 1973. Étude statistique de la dispersion du zooplancton. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 12, 229–262. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Green J., 1993. Diversity and dominance in planktonic rotifers. Hydrobiologia, 255/256, 345–352. [Google Scholar]
  • Guevara G., Lozano P., Reinoso G. and Villa F., 2009. Horizontal and seasonal patterns of tropical zooplankton from the eutrophic Prado Reservoir (Colombia). Limnologica, 39, 128–139. [Google Scholar]
  • Horn H. and Horn W., 2008. Bottom-up or top-down – How is the autotrophic picoplankton mainly controlled? Results of long-term investigations from two drinking water reservoirs of different trophic state. Limnologica, 38, 302–312. [Google Scholar]
  • Karabin A., Ejsmont-Karabin J. and Kornatowska R., 1997. Eutrophication processes in a shallow, macrophyte-dominated lake-factors influencing zooplankton structure and density in Lake Łuknajno (Poland). Hydrobiologia, 342/343, 401–409. [Google Scholar]
  • Korovchinsky N.M., 1992. Sididae et holopediidae (Crustacea: Daphniiformes), Guides to the identification of the Microinvertebrates of the continental of the word 3, SPB Academic Publishing, 85 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Ludovisi A. and Poletti A., 2003. Use of thermodynamic indices as ecological indicators of the development state of lake ecosystems: 2. Exergy and specific exergy indices. Ecol. Model., 159, 223–238. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Margaritora F.G., 1985. Cladocera. Fauna d'Italia, Bologna, 399 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Murphy J. and Riley J.P., 1962. A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Annal. Chim. Acta., 27, 31–36. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • OCDE, 1982. Eutrophisation des eaux: méthodes de surveillance, d'évaluation et de lutte, OCDE, Paris, 165 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Osore M.K., Tackx M.L. and Daro M.H., 1997. The effect of rainfall and tidal rhythm on community structure and abundance of the zooplankton of Gazi bay, Kenya. Hydrobiologia, 356, 117–126. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pinto-Coelho R., Pinel-Alloul B., Méthot G. and Havens K.E., 2005. Crustacean zooplankton in lakes and reservoirs of temperate and tropical regions: variation with trophic status. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 62, 348–361. [Google Scholar]
  • Rodier J., 1984. Analyse de l'eau, Édition Dunod, Paris, 1135 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Rogozin A.G., 2000. Specific Structural Features of Zooplankton in Lakes Differing in Trophic Status: Species Populations. Russ. J. Ecol., 31, 405–410. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Shannon C.E. and Weaver G., 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communication, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Chicago, USA. [Google Scholar]
  • Utermöhl H., 1958. Zur Vervollkommung der quantitativen Phytoplankton methodik. Mitt. Int. Verein. Limnol., 9, 1–38. [Google Scholar]
  • Whitman R.L., Nevers M.B., Goodrich M.L., Murphy P.C. and Davis B.M., 2004. Characterization of Lake Michigan coastal lakes using zooplankton assemblages. Ecol. Indic., 4, 277–286. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zadereev Y.S. and Tolomeyev A.P., 2007. The vertical distribution of zooplankton in brackish meromictic lake with deep-water chlorophyll maximum. Hydrobiologia, 576, 69–82. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.