Free Access
Issue
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 45, Number 1, 2009
Page(s) 1 - 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/09007
Published online 03 April 2009
  • Anderson-Glenna M.J., Bakkestuen V. and Clipson N.J.W., 2008. Spatial and temporal variability in epilithic biofilm bacterial communities along an upland river gradient. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 64, 407-418. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • APHA., 1992. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, American Public Health Association, Washington DC. [Google Scholar]
  • Araya R., Tani K., Takagi T., Yamaguchi N. and Nasu M., 2003. Bacterial activity and community composition in stream water and biofilm from an urban river determined by fluorescent in situ hybridization and DGGE analysis. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 43, 111-119. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Barbiero R.P., 2000. A multi-lake comparaison of epilithic diatom communities on natural and artificial substrates. Hydrobiologia, 438, 157-170. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Battin T.J., Kaplan L.A., Newbold J.D. and Hansen C.M.E., 2003. Contributions of microbial biofilms to ecosystem processes in stream mesocosms. Nature, 426, 439-442. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Besemer K., Singer G., Limberger R., Chlup A.K., Hochedlinger G., Hödl I., Baranyi C. and Battin T.J., 2007. Biophysical controls on community succession in stream biofilms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 73, 4966-4974. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Biggs B.J.F., 1996. Patterns in Benthic Algae of Stream. In: Stevenson R.J., Bothwell M.L. and Lowe R.L. (eds.), Algal Ecology - Freshwater Benthic Ecosystem, Academic Press, San Diego, 31-56. [Google Scholar]
  • Boston H.L. and Hill W.R., 1991. Photosynthesis-light relations of stream periphyton communities. Limnol. Oceanogr., 36, 644-656. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bothwell M.L., 1993. Algal-nutrient dynamics. J. N. Amer. Benthol. Soc., 12, 313-333. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Boulêtreau S., Garabetian F., Sauvage S. and Sanchez-Pérez J.M., 2006. Assessing the importance of a self-generated detachment process in river biofilm models. Freshwat. Biol., 51, 901-912. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bourassa N. and Cattaneo A., 1998. Control of periphyton biomass in Laurentian streams (Quebec). J. N. Amer. Benthol. Soc., 17, 420-429. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brümmer I.H.M., Felske A.D.M. and Wagner-Döbler I., 2004. Diversity and seasonal changes of uncultured Planctomycetales in river biofilms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 70, 5094-5101. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Burns A. and Ryder D.S., 2001. Potential for biofilms as biological indicators in Australian riverine systems. Ecol. Manage. Restor., 2, 53-63. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cattaneo A. and Amireault M.C., 1992. How artificial are artificial substrata for periphyton. J. N. Amer. Benthol. Soc., 11, 244-256. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chapin F.S., Zavaleta E.S., Eviner E.S., Eviner V.T., Naylor R.L., Vitousek P.M., Reynolds H.L., Hooper D.U., Lavorel S., Sala O.E., Hobbie S.E., Mack M.C. and Diaz S., 2000. Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature, 405, 234-242. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cody D.G., Heath R.T. and Leff L.G., 2000. Characterization of benthic bacterial assemblages in a polluted stream using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Hydrobiologia, 432, 207-215. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Della Bella V., Puccinelli C., Marcheggiani S. and Mancini L., 2007. Benthic diatom communities and their relationship to water chemistry in wetlands of central Italy. Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim., 43, 89-99. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • DeNicola D.M., 1996. Periphyton responses to temperature at different ecological levels. In: Stevenson R.J., Bothwell M.L. and Lowe R.L. (eds.), Algal Ecology - Freshwater Benthic Ecosystems, Academic Press, San Diego, 149-181. [Google Scholar]
  • Devault D.A., Merlina G., Lim P., Probst J.L. and Pinelli E., 2007. Multi-residues analysis of pre-emergence herbicides in fluvial sediments: application to the mid-Garonne River. J. Environ. Monitor., 9, 1009-1017. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Dodds W., 2006. Eutrophication and trophic state in rivers and streams. Limnol. Oceanogr., 5, 671-680. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dodds W.K., Jones J.R. and Welch E.B., 1997. Suggested classification of stream trophic state: distributions of temperate stream types by chlorophyll, total nitrogen, and phosphorus. Water Res., 32, 1455-1462. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dorigo U., Leboulanger C., Berard A., Bouchez A., Humbert J.F. and Montuelle B., 2007. Lotic biofilm community structure and pesticide tolerance along a contamination gradient in a vineyard area. Aquat. Microb. Ecol., 50, 91-102. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dumestre J.F., Casamayor E., Massana R. and Predos-Alio C., 2002. Changes in bacterial and archaeal assemblages in an equatorial river induced by the water eutrophisation of Petit Saut dam reservoir (French Guiana). Aquat. Microb. Ecol., 26, 209-221. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Eulin A. and Le Cohu R., 1998. Epilithic diatom communities during the colonization of artificial substrates in the River Garonne (France). Comparaison with the natural communities. Arch. Hydrobiol., 143, 79-106. [Google Scholar]
  • Hill H.L., 1996. Effects of light. In: Stevenson R.J., Bothwell M.L. and Lowe R.L. (eds.), Algal Ecology - Freshwater Benthic Ecosystems, Academic Press, San Diego, 121-148. [Google Scholar]
  • Hullar M.A.J., Kaplan L.A. and Stahl D.A., 2006. Recurring seasonal dynamics of microbial communities in stream habitats. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 72, 713-722. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Jackson C.R., 2003. Changes in community properties during microbial succession. Oikos, 101, 444-448. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jackson C.R., Churchill P.F. and Roden E.E., 2001. Successional changes in bacterial assemblage structure during epilithic biofilm development. Ecology, 82, 555-566. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lane C.M., Taffs K.H. and Corfield J.L., 2003. A comparison of diatom community structure on natural and artificial substrata. Hydrobiologia, 493, 65-79. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lawrence J.R., Kopf G., Headley J.V. and Neu T.R., 2001. Sorption and metabolism of selected herbicides in river biofilm communities. Can. J. Microbiol., 47, 634-641. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lawrence J.R., Swerhone G.D.W., Wassenaar L.I. and Nee T.R., 2005. Effects of selected pharmaceuticals on riverine biofilm communities. Can. J. Microbiol., 51, 655-669. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lock M.A., Wallace R.R., Costerson J.W., Ventullo R.M. and Charlton S.E., 1984. River epilithon: toward a structural-functional model. Oikos, 42, 10-22. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Loreau M., Naeem S., Inchausti P., Bengstsson J., Grime J.P., Hector A., Hooper D.U., Huston M.A., Raffaelli D., Schmid B., Tilman D. and Wardle D.A., 2001. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Ecology, 294, 804-808. [Google Scholar]
  • Lyautey E., Teissier S., Charcosset J.Y., Rols J.L. and Garabetian F., 2003. Bacterial diversity of epilithic biofilm assemblages of an anthropised river section using DGGE analysis of a 16S rDNA fragment. Aquat. Microb. Ecol., 33, 217-224. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lyautey E., Jackson C.R., Cayrou J., Rols J.L. and Garabetian F., 2005a. Bacterial community succession in natural river biofilm assemblages. Microb. Ecol., 50, 589-601. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lyautey E., Lacoste B., Ten-Hage L., Rols J.L. and Garabetian F., 2005b. Analysis of bacterial diversity in river biofilms using 16S rDNA PCR-DGGE: methodological settings and fingerprints interpretation. Water Res., 39, 380-388. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Manz W., Wendt-Potthoff K., Neu T.R., Szewzyk U. and Lawrence J.R., 1999. Phylogenetic composition, spatial structure, and dynamics of lotic bacterial biofilms investigated by fluorescent in situ hybridization and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Microb. Ecol., 37, 225-237. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Morin S., Duong T.T., Dabrin A., Coynel A., Herlory O., Baudrimont M., Delmas F., Durrieu G., Schäfer J., Winterton P., Blanc G. and Coste M., 2008. Long-term survey of heavy-metal pollution, biofilm contamination and diatom community structure in the Riou Mort watershed, South-west France. Environ. Pollut., 151, 532-542. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Murdock J.N. and Dodds W.K., 2007. Linking benthic algal biomass to stream substratum topography. J. Phycol., 43, 449-460. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Muyzer G. and Smalla K., 1998. Application of denaturing gel electrophoresis (DGGE) temperature gradient gel electrophoresis (TGGE) in microbial ecology. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek, 73, 127-141. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Muyzer G., De Wall E.C. and Uitterlinden A.G., 1993. Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of PCR-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 59, 695-700. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Peterson C.G., 1996. Response of benthic algal communities to natural physical disturbance. In: Stevenson R.J., Bothwell M.L., Lowe R.L. and Thorp J.H. (eds.), Algal Ecology - Freshwater Benthic Ecosystems, Academic Press, San Diego, 375-402. [Google Scholar]
  • Prygiel J. and Coste M., 1993. The assessment of water quality in the Artois-Picardie water basin (France) by the use of diatom indices. Hydrobiologia, 269, 343-349. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Roeselers G., van Loosdrecht M. and Muyzer G., 2007. Heterotrophic pioneers facilitate phototrophic biofilm development. Microb. Ecol., 54, 578-585. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Romani A.M., Guasch H., Munoz I., Ruana J., Vilalta E., Schwartz T., Emtiazi F. and Sabater S., 2004. Biofilm structure and function and possible implications for riverine DOC dynamics. Microb. Ecol., 47, 316-328. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sabater S., Guasch H., Romani A. and Munoz I., 2002. The effect of biological factors on the efficiency of river biofilms in improving water quality. Hydrobiologia, 469, 149-156. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sabater S., Guasch H., Ricart M., Romani A., Vidal G., Klunder C. and Schmitt-Jansen M., 2007. Monitoring the effect of chemicals on biological communities. The biofilm as an interface. Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 387, 1425-1434. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Santegoeds C.M., Ferdelman T.G., Muyzer G. and de Beer D., 1998. Structural and functional dynamics of sulfate-reducing populations in bacterial biofilms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 64, 3731-3739. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Schauer M., Massana R. and Pedros-Alio C., 2000. Spatial differences in bacterioplankton composition along the Catalan coast (NW Mediterranean) assessed by molecular fingerprinting. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 33, 51-59. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • SCOR-Unesco., 1966. Determination of photosynthetic pigments in sea water. Monogr. Oceanogr. Method Unseco., 1. [Google Scholar]
  • Steinman A.D. and Lamberti G.A., 1996. Biomass and pigments of benthic algae. In: Hauer F.R. and Lamberti G.A. (eds.), Stream ecology, Academic Press, San Diego, 295-313. [Google Scholar]
  • Stevenson R.J., 1983. Effects of current and conditions simulating autogenically changing microhabitats on benthic diatom immigration. Ecology, 64, 1514-1524. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Teissier S., Torre M., Delmas F. and Garabetian F., 2007. Detailing biogeochimical N budgets in riverine epilithic biofilms. J. N. Amer. Benthol. Soc., 26, 178-190. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tlili A., Dorigo U., Montuelle B., Margoum C., Carluer N., Gouy V., Bouchez A. and Berard A., 2008. Responses of chronically contaminated biofilms to short pulses of diuron - An experimental study simulating flooding events in a small river. Aquat. Toxicol., 87, 252-263. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tornes E., Cambra J., Goma J., Leira M., Ortiz R. and Sabater S., 2007. Indicator taxa of benthic diatom communities: a case study in Mediterranean streams. Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim., 43, 1-11. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Van Hannen E.J., Zwart G., Van Agterveld M.P., Gons H.J., Ebert J. and Laanbroek H.J., 1999. Changes in bacterial and eukaryotic community structure after mass lysis of filamentous cyanobacteria associated with viruses. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 65, 795-801. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wetzel R.G. (ed.), 1983. Periphyton of freshwater ecosystem, Dr W. Junk, Boston. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.