Open Access
Int. J. Lim.
Volume 60, 2024
Article Number 2
Number of page(s) 8
Published online 08 March 2024
  • Bollen KA, Jackman RW. 1990. Regression diagnostics: an expository treatment of outliers and influential cases, in Fox J. Scott L.J. (eds.), Modern Methods of Data Analysis. Newbury Park: Sage, pp. 257–291. [Google Scholar]
  • Bortolus A. 2008. Error cascades in the biological sciences: the unwanted consequences of using bad taxonomy in ecology. AMBIO 37 : 114–118. [Google Scholar]
  • Cahuzac B. 2001. Un intéressant témoignage du début du XIXe siècle, le manuscrit d'ichtyologie landaise de Jean Thore, écrit en 1811. Bull. Soc. Borda 462:287–344. [Google Scholar]
  • Carlander KD. 1969. Handbook of Freshwater Biology Vol. 1. Ames, IA: The Iowa State University Press, 752 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Craig JF. 1996. Population dynamics, predation and role in the community, in Craig J.F. (ed.), Pike: Biology and Exploitation. London: Chapman & Hall, pp. 202–217. [Google Scholar]
  • Denys GPJ. 2017. Cartographie des espèces de brochet récemment recensées en France: le brochet aquitain Esox aquitanicus et le brochet italien Esox cisalpinus: projet ATLASESOX. MNHN − FNPF report, Paris, 134 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Denys GPJ, Dettai A, Persat H, Hautecœur M, Keith P. 2014. Morphological and molecular evidence of three species of pikes Esox spp. (Actinopterygii, Esocidae) in France, including the description of a new species. C R Biol 337:521–534. [Google Scholar]
  • Denys GPJ, Tedesco PA, Oberdorff T, Gaubert P. 2016. Environmental correlates of body size distribution in Cyprinidae (Actinopterygians) depend on phylogenetic scale. Ecol Freshw Fish 25: 125–132. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Denys GPJ, Lauga T, Delmastro GB, Dettai A. 2018. S7 characterization of Western European pikes Esox spp. (Actinopterygii, Esociformes). Cybium 42: 221–228. [Google Scholar]
  • Dudgeon D, Arthington A, Gessner M, Kawabata Z, Knowler D, Lévêque C, Naiman R, Prieur-Richard A, Soto D, Stiassny M, Sullivan C. 2005. Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. BiolRev 81:163–182. [Google Scholar]
  • Froese R. 2006. Cube law, condition factor and weight-length relationships: history, meta-analysis and recommendations. J Appl Ichthyol 22: 241–253. [Google Scholar]
  • Froese R, Pauly D. 2023. FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. Retrieved from, version (02/2023). Accessed on 16 May 2023. [Google Scholar]
  • Giannetto D, Pompei L, Carosi A, Dolciami R, Ghetti L, Lorenzoni M. 2016. Length-weight relationships of three fish species from Trasimeno Lake, Italy. J Appl Ichthyol 32:1273–1275. [Google Scholar]
  • Glize E. 1993. La vie autour des lagunes de la Grande Lande (Fin du XIXe s. et début du XXe s.). Bull Soc Borda 430:165–175. [Google Scholar]
  • Hart PJB, Connellan B. 1984. Cost of prey capture, growth rate and ration size in pike, Esox lucius L., as functions of prey weight. J Fish Biol 25:279–292. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Huo TB, Yuan MY, Wang JL, Li PL, Liu W, Wu XC. 2017. Length-weight relationships of nine fish species from the Tongjiang section of the Songhua River, China. J Appl Ichthyol 33: 848–850. [Google Scholar]
  • Irz P. 2022. ASPE − Construire des relations taille-poids. RPubs by RStudio. [Google Scholar]
  • Irz P, Vigneron T, Poulet N, Cosson E, Point T, Baglinière E, Porcher J-P. 2022. A long-term monitoring database on fish and crayfish species in French rivers. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 423: 25. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Jeanroy C, Denys GPJ. 2019. Morphological traits allow distinguishing their hybrids from the Northern pike, Esox lucius, and the Aquitanian pike Esox aquitanicus (Actinopterygii, Esociformes). Cybium 43:227–232. [Google Scholar]
  • Kapuscinski KL, Belonger BJ, Fajfer BJ, Lychwick TJ, 2007. Population dynamics of muskellunge in Wisconsin waters of Green Bay, Lake Michigan, 1989–2005. Environ Biol Fish 79:27–36. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Keith P, Poulet N, Denys G, Changeux T, Feunteun E, Persat H. 2020. Les Poissons d'eau douce de France, 2nd edn, Mèze and Paris: Biotope Editions, Publications scientifiques du Muséum, 704 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Kennedy PJ, Rennie MD. 2023. Variation in female-biases sexual size dimorphism of Northern Pike (Esox lucius) associated with environment and life history. bioRxiv, 2023. 03.06. 531313. [Google Scholar]
  • Keys AB. 1928. The weight-length relationship in fishes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 14:922–925. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kozłowski M, Szczepkowski M, Piotrowska I, Wunderlich K, Szczepkowska B. 2012. Impact of feed ration on growth, feed conversion, and variation in body weights of juvenile pike, Esox lucius L., reared in recirculating aquaculture system. Arch Pol Fish 20: 145–152. [Google Scholar]
  • Kuriakose S. 2014. Estimation of length weight relationship in fishes: training manual on fish stock assessment and management. CMFRI, FRAD 50: 215–220. [Google Scholar]
  • Lagardère J-P. 2020. La pêche occasionnelle et libre de la Grande Lande. Bull Soc Borda 538: 207–228. [Google Scholar]
  • Maasri A, Jähnig S, Adamescu M, et al. 2021. A global agenda for advancing freshwater biodiversity research. Ecol Lett 25:255–263. [Google Scholar]
  • Mann RHK, 1996. Fisheries and economics in Craig J.F. (ed.), Pike: Biology and Exploitation. New York: Chapman & Hall, 1; pp. 219–241. [Google Scholar]
  • Parey S, Malek F, Laurent C, Dacunha-Castelle D. 2007. Trends climate evolution: statistical approach for very high temperatures in France. Clim Change 81:331–352. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Park Y-S, Grenouillet G, Esperance B, Lek S. 2006. Stream fish assemblages and basin land cover in a river network. Sci Total Environ 365:140–153. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Parker J, Fritts M, Deboer J. 2018. Length-weight relationships for small Midwestern US fishes. J Appl Ichthyol 34: 1081–1083. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • R Core Team. 2022. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [Google Scholar]
  • Raat AJP. 1988. Synopsis of biological data on the northern pike Esox lucius Linnaeus, 1758, FAO Fisheries Synopsis, No 30. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 179 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Ricker WE. 1975. Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. J Fish Res Board Can 191: 1–382. [Google Scholar]
  • Santoul F, Soulard A, Figuerola J, Céréghino R, Mastrorillo S. 2004. Environmental factors influencing local fish species richness and differences between hydroregions in South-Western France. Int Rev Hydrobiol 89:79–87. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tales E, Keith P, Oberdorff T. 2004. Density-range size relationships in French riverine fishes. Oecologia 138: 360–370. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • UICN Comité français, MNHN, SFI and AFB, 2019. La Liste rouge des espèces menacées en France − Chapitre Poissons d'eau douce de France métropolitaine, UICN France, MNHN, SFI & AFB, Paris, 16 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Utts JM. 1982. The rainbow test for lack of fit in regression. Commun. Stat. − Theory Methods 11: 2801–2815. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Verreycken H, Van Thuyne G, Belpaire C. 2011. Length-weight relationships of 40 freshwater fish species from two decades of monitoring in Flanders (Belgium). J Appl Ichthyol 27: 1416–1421. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.