EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 58 (2022) Int. J. Lim., 58 (2022) 16 References
Free Access
Issue
Int. J. Lim.
Volume 58, 2022
Article Number 16
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/2022016
Published online 23 December 2022
  • Alekseev VR, Tsalolikhin M. (Eds.). 2016. Keys for zooplankton and zoobenthos of freshwaters in the European part of Russia. Vol. 2: Zoobenthos. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press Ltd. 480 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Amoros C, Bornette G. 2002. Connectivity and biocomplexity in waterbodies of riverine floodplains. Freshw Biol 47: 761–776. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Antonyuk EV, Panchenko IM. 2017. Influence of the hydrological regime of the river Oka on the state of the fauna of amphibians in the Oka reserve. Samarskaya Luka − problems of regional and global ecology 26: 121–126. [Google Scholar]
  • Bashinskiy I. 2020. Beavers in lakes: a review of their ecosystem impact. Aquat Ecol 54: 1097–1120. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bashinskiy IV, Senkevich VA, Stoyko TG, Katsman EA, Korkina SA, Osipov VV. 2019. Forest-steppe oxbows in limnophase — Abiotic features and biodiversity. Limnologica 74: 14–22. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Blöschl G, Hall J, Viglione A, et al. 2019. Changing climate both increases and decreases European river floods. Nature 573: 108–111. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Brazier RE, Puttock A, Graham HA, Auster RE, Davies KH, Brown C. 2020. Beaver: Nature's ecosystem engineers. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Water 8: 1–29. [Google Scholar]
  • Brooks RT. 2000. Annual and seasonal variation and the effects of hydroperiod on benthic macroinvertebrates of seasonal forest (“vernal”) ponds in central Massachusetts, USA. Wetlands 20: 707. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Buijse AD, Coops H, Staras M, et al. 2002. Restoration strategies for river floodplains along large lowland rivers in Europe. Freshw Biol 47: 889–907. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Burgazzi G, Laini A, Ovaskainen O, Saccò M, Stubbington R, Viaroli P. 2020. Communities in high definition: Spatial and environmental factors shape the micro‐distribution of aquatic invertebrates. Freshw Biol 65: 2053–2065. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Crook C, Roubeyrie L. 2017. QGIS-Contour-Plugin [Computer Software]. Retrieved from https://github.com/ccrook/QGIS-Contour-Plugin [Google Scholar]
  • Downing JA. 2010. Emerging global role of small lakes and ponds: little things mean a lot. Limnetica 29: 9–24. [Google Scholar]
  • Dudgeon D, Arthington AH, Gessner MO, et al. 2006. Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biol Rev 81: 163–182. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Dufrêne M, Legendre P. 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol Monogr 67: 345–366. [Google Scholar]
  • Dyakov YV. 1975. Beavers of the European part of Soviet Union: morphology, ecology, ways and methods of economic use. Moskovskiy Rabochiy, Moscow. 480 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Frolova NL, Kireeva MB, Agafonova SA, Evstigneev VM, Efremova NA, Povalishnikova ES. 2015. Intra-annual flow distribution of plain rivers in the European territory of Russia and its changes. Water Manag. Russia: Prob Technol Manag 4: 4–20. [Google Scholar]
  • Glińska-Lewczuk K, Burandt P, Kujawa R, et al. 2016. Environmental factors structuring fish communities in floodplain lakes of the undisturbed system of the Biebrza River. Water (Switzerland) 8: 146. [Google Scholar]
  • Goetz D, Miranda LE, Kröger R, Andrews C. 2015. The role of depth in regulating water quality and fish assemblages in oxbow lakes. Environ Biol Fishes 98: 951–959. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Golubkov SM. 2021. Effect of climatic fluctuations on the structure and functioning of ecosystems of continental water bodies. Contemp Probl Ecol 14: 1–10. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gosner KL. 1960. A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica 16: 183–190. [Google Scholar]
  • Grudzinski BP, Cummins H, Vang TK. 2019. Beaver canals and their environmental effects. Prog Phys Geogr Earth Environ 1–23. [Google Scholar]
  • Hammer Ø, Harper D, Ryan PD. 2001. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron 4: 9 [Google Scholar]
  • Hill MJ, Death RG, Mathers KL, Ryves DB, White JC, Wood PJ. 2017. Macroinvertebrate community composition and diversity in ephemeral and perennial ponds on unregulated floodplain meadows in the UK. Hydrobiologia 793: 95–108. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hood GA, Larson DG. 2014. Ecological engineering and aquatic connectivity: a new perspective from beaver-modified wetlands. Freshw Biol 60: 198–208. [Google Scholar]
  • Joniak T, Kuczýnska-Kippen N. 2016. Habitat features and zooplankton community structure of oxbows in the limnophase: Reference to transitional phase between flooding and stabilization. Limnetica 35: 37–48. [Google Scholar]
  • Kivinen S, Nummi P, Kumpula T. 2020. Beaver-induced spatiotemporal patch dynamics affect landscape-level environmental heterogeneity. Environ Res Lett 15: 094065. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kloskowski J, Nieoczym M, Stryjecki R. 2020. Between-habitat distributions of pond tadpoles and their insect predators in response to fish presence. Hydrobiologia 847: 1343–1356. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Koc J, Kobus S, Glińska-Lewczuk K. 2009. The significance of oxbow lakes for the ecosystem of afforested river valleys. J Water L Dev 13: 115–131. [Google Scholar]
  • Krylov AV. 2015. Interannual changes in the summer zooplankton in the lakes of the Khopyor River flood plain. Biol Bull 42: 891–898. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kuczyńska-Kippen NM, Nagengast B. 2006. The influence of the spatial structure of hydromacrophytes and differentiating habitat on the structure of rotifer and Cladoceran communities. Hydrobiologia 559: 203–212. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lawniczak-Malińska A, Ptak M, Celewicz S, Choiński A. 2018. Impact of lake morphology and shallowing on the rate of overgrowth in hard-water eutrophic lakes. Water 10: 1827. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Legendre P, Legendre L. 1998. Numerical Ecology, 2nd English ed. Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
  • Lisitsyna LI, Papchenkov VG. 2000. Flora vodoemov Rossii: Opredelitel' sosudistykh rastenii (Flora of Water Bodies of Russia: Identification Guide to Vascular Plants) Moscow: Nauka. [In Russian] [Google Scholar]
  • Magurran AE. 1988. Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton University Press [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mann HB, Whitney DR. 1947. On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Ann Math Stat 18: 50–60. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Myers JL, Well A, Lorch RF. 2010. Research design and statistical analysis. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. [Google Scholar]
  • Naus CJ, Reid Adams S. 2018. Fish nursery habitat function of the main channel, floodplain tributaries, and oxbow lakes of a medium-sized river. Ecol Freshw Fish 27: 4–18. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nitsche KA. 2021. Negative Einflüsse von Wildschweinen (Sus scrofa) in Ansiedlungen des Elbe-Bibers (Castor fiber albicus Matschie, 1907) im Gebiet um Dessau. Säugetierkund Inform 58: 3–12. [Google Scholar]
  • Nunn AD, Tewson LH, Cowx IG. 2012. The foraging ecology of larval and juvenile fishes. Rev Fish Biol Fisheries 22: 377–408. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Obolewski K, Glińska-Lewczuk K, Strzelczak A, Osadowski Z. 2013. Restitution Of Oxbow Lakes In The Słupia River Valley (Northern Poland). In: AWARE: Approaches in WetlAnd Restoration − Focus on Fen Landscapes. pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  • Pander J, Mueller M, Geist J. 2018. Habitat diversity and connectivity govern the conservation value of restored aquatic floodplain habitats. Biol Conserv 217: 1–10. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pankov AB, Pankova NL. 2016. Settlements of beavers Castor fiber L. on drying water bodies of floodplain lands of Okskiy nature reserve. In: Proceedings of Mordovskiy State Nature Reserve im. P.G. Smidovich, 17: 168–174. [Google Scholar]
  • Pankova NL, Pankov AB. 2018. Beavers of Oksky reserve. In: Beavers in the reserves of the European part of Russia. Proceedings of State Nature Reserve «Rdeysky», vol 4. Velikiye Luki Printing House, Velikiye Luki, 202–252. [Google Scholar]
  • Pavlov DS, Mochek AD. 2009. Distribution of fish in river systems as a dynamic phenomenon. Adv Mod Biol 129: 528–537. [Google Scholar]
  • Pechmann JHK, Scott DE, Gibbons JW, Semlitsch RD. 1989. Influence of wetland hydroperiod on diversity and abundance of metamorphosing juvenile amphibians. Wetlands Ecol Manag 1: 3–11. [Google Scholar]
  • Penttinen OP, Holopainen IJ. 1992. Seasonal feeding activity and ontogenetic dietary shifts in crucian carp, Carassius carassius. Environ Biol Fish 33: 215–221. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Persson L, Crowder LB. 1998. Fish-habitat interactions mediated via ontogenetic niche shifts. In: Jeppesen E, Søndergaard M, Søndergaard M, Christoffersen K (eds) The Structuring Role of Submerged Macrophytes in Lakes. Ecological Studies (Analysis and Synthesis), vol 131 New York, NY: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  • Pyrzanowski K, Zięba G, Leszczyńska J, Adamczuk M, Dukowska M, Przybylski M. 2021. Food resource partitioning between juvenile and mature weatherfish Misgurnus fossilis. Ecol Evolut 11: 4460–4469. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rosell F, Bozsér O, Collen P, Parker H. 2005. Ecological impact of beavers Castor fiber and Castor canadensis and their ability to modify ecosystems. Mamm Rev 35: 248–276. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Samas A. 2015. Impact of the keystone species, the Eurasian beaver (Castor fiber), on habitat structure and its significance to mammals. Summary of doctoral dissertation Biomedical Sciences, Ecology and Environmental Science (03 B) Vilnius, 2015. 130 p [Google Scholar]
  • Schriever TA, Cadotte MW, Williams DD. 2014. How hydroperiod and species richness affect the balance of resource flows across aquatic-terrestrial habitats. Aquat Sci 76: 131–143. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Skelly DK, Richardson JL. 2010. Larval sampling. In: Dodd CK (ed) Amphibian ecology and conservation: A handbook of techniques. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 55–70 [Google Scholar]
  • Skowron R, Jaworski T. 2017. Changes in lake area as a consequence of plant overgrowth in the South Baltic Lakelands (Northern Poland). Bull Geogr Phys Geogr Ser 12: 19–30. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sokal RR, Rohlf JF. 1981. Biometry. The principles and practice of statistics in biological research. 2nd ed. New York: Freeman WH. [Google Scholar]
  • StatSoft, Inc. 2004. STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 7. www.statsoft.com [Google Scholar]
  • Sun Z, Zhao C, Zhu W, et al. 2021. Microhabitat features determine the tadpole diversity in mountainous streams. Ecol Indic 126: 107647. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Turner MG, Chapin FS. 2005. Causes and consequences of spatial heterogeneity in ecosystem function. In: Lovett GM, Turner MG, Jones CG, Weathers KC (eds.), Ecosystem Function in Heterogeneous Landscapes. New York, NY: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  • Vehkaoja M, Nummi P, Rask M, Tulonen T, Arvola L. 2015. Spatiotemporal dynamics of boreal landscapes with ecosystem engineers: beavers influence the biogeochemistry of small lakes. Biogeochemistry 124: 405–415. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Westbrook CJ, Cooper DJ, Anderson CB. 2017. Alteration of hydrogeomorphic processes by invasive beavers in southern South America. Sci Total Environ 574: 183–190. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • WWF. 2012. Living Planet Report 2012. Gland, Switzerland: WWF International, 164 p [Google Scholar]
  • Yermokhin MV, Ivanov GA, Tabachishin VG. 2018. Structure Transformation of the anuran amphibian spawning communities in floodplain lakes of the medveditsa river valley (saratov region) under conditions of long-term reduction of water content. Povolzhskiy J Ecol 4: 404–417. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.