EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 55 (2019) Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim., 55 (2019) 19 References
Open Access
Issue
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 55, 2019
Article Number 19
Number of page(s) 6
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/2019018
Published online 11 October 2019
  • Abrahamsson SAA. 1971. Density, growth and reproduction in populations of Astacus astacus and Pacifastacus leniusculus in an isolated pond. Oikos 22: 373–380. [Google Scholar]
  • Abrahamsson S. 1983. Trappability, locomotion, and diel pattern of activity of the crayfish Astacus astacus and Pacifastacus leniusculus Dana. Freshw Crayfish 5: 239–253. [Google Scholar]
  • Barbaresi S, Santini G, Tricarico E, Gherardi F. 2004. Ranging behaviour of the invasive crayfish, Procambarus clarkii (Girard). J Nat Hist 38: 2821–2832. [Google Scholar]
  • Blake M, Nyström P, Hart P. 1994. The effect of weed cover on juvenile signal crayfish (Pacifasticus leniusculus Dana) exposed to adult crayfish and non-predatory fish. Ann Zool Fennici 31: 297–306. [Google Scholar]
  • Bohl E. 1999. Motion of individual noble crayfish Astacus astacus in different biological situations: in-situ studies using radio telemetry. Freshw Crayfish 12: 677–687. [Google Scholar]
  • Bubb DH, Lucas MC, Thom TJ. 2002. Winter movements and activity of signal crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus in an upland river, determined by radio telemetry. Hydrobiologia 483: 111–119. [Google Scholar]
  • Bubb DH, Thom TJ, Lucas MC. 2006. Movement, dispersal and refuge use of co‐occurring introduced and native crayfish. Freshw Biol 51: 1359–1368. [Google Scholar]
  • Daněk T, Musil J, Vlašánek P et al. 2018. Telemetry of co-occurring noble crayfish (Astacus astacus) and stone crayfish (Austropotamobius torrentium): diel changes in movement and local activity. Fund Appl Limnol 191: 339–352. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gherardi F, Tricarico E, Ilhéu M. 2002. Movement patterns of an invasive crayfish, Procambarus clarkii, in a temporary stream of southern Portugal. Ethol Ecol Evol 14: 183–197. [Google Scholar]
  • Goessmann C, Hemelrijk C, Huber R. 2000. The formation and maintenance of crayfish hierarchies: behavioral and self-structuring properties. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 48: 418–428. [Google Scholar]
  • Harrison ML, Hoover TM, Richardson JS. 2006. Agonistic behaviours and movement in the signal crayfish, Pacifastacus leniusculus: can dominance interactions influence crayfish size-class distributions in streams? Can J Zool 84: 1495–1504. [Google Scholar]
  • Holdich DM, Reynolds JD, Souty-Grosset C, Sibley PJ. 2009. A review of the ever increasing threat to European crayfish from non-indigenous crayfish species. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 394-395: 11. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Hudina S, Maguire I, Klobučar GIV. 2008. Spatial dynamics of the noble crayfish (Astacus astacus, L.) in the Paklenica National Park. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 388: 01. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • IUCN. 2019. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2019-2. https://www.iucnredlist.org [Google Scholar]
  • Kadlecová K, Bílý M, Maciak M. 2012. Movement patterns of the co-occurring species Astacus astacus (noble crayfish) and Austropotamobius torrentium (stone crayfish). Fund Appl Limnol 180: 351–360. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Keller TA, Moore PA. 1999. Effects of ontogeny and odors on behavior: the influence of crayfish size and fish odors on crayfish movement. Mar Freshw Behav Phys 33: 35–50. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lagrue C, Podgorniak T, Lecerf A, Bollache L. 2014. An invasive species may be better than none: invasive signal and native noble crayfish have similar community effects. Freshw Biol 59: 1982–1995. [Google Scholar]
  • Loughman ZJ, Skalican KT, Taylor ND. 2013. Habitat selection and movement of Cambarus chasmodactylus (Decapoda: Cambaridae) assessed via radio telemetry. Freshw Sci 32: 1288–1297. [Google Scholar]
  • Momot MT. 1966. Upstream movement of crayfish in an intermittent Oklahoma stream. Am Midl Nat 75: 150–159. [Google Scholar]
  • Musil M, Buřič M, Policar T, Kouba A, Kozák P. 2010. Comparison of diurnal and nocturnal activity between noble crayfish (Astacus astacus) and spinycheek crayfish (Orconectes limosus). Freshw Crayfish 17: 189–193. [Google Scholar]
  • Paine RT. 1976. Size-Limited Predation: an observational and experimental approach with the mytilus-pisaster interaction. Ecology 57: 858–873. [Google Scholar]
  • Polis GA. 1984. Age structure component of niche width and intraspecific resource partitioning: can age groups function as ecological species? Am Nat 123: 541–564. [Google Scholar]
  • Reynolds J, Souty-Grosset C. 2011. Management of freshwater biodiversity: crayfish as bioindicators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 374 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Robinson CA, Thom TJ, Lucas MC. 2000. Ranging behaviour of a large freshwater invertebrate, the white‐clawed crayfish Austropotamobius pallipes . Freshw Biol 44: 509–521. [Google Scholar]
  • Schütze S, Stein H, Born O. 1999. Radio telemetry observations on migration and activity patterns of restocked noble crayfish Astacus astacus (L.) in the small river Sempt, north-east of Munich, Germany. Freshw Crayfish 12: 688–695. [Google Scholar]
  • Skurdal J, Fjeld E, Hessen DO, Taugbøl T, Dehli E. 1988. Depth distribution, habitat segregation and feeding of the crayfish Astacus astacus in Lake Steinsfjorden. Nord J Freshw Res 64: 113–119. [Google Scholar]
  • Skurdal J, Taugbøl T. 2002. Astacus . In: Holdich DM (ed.), Biology of Freshwater Crayfish. Oxford: Blackwell Science, pp. 467–510. [Google Scholar]
  • Sogard SM. 1997. Size-selective mortality in the juvenile stage of teleost fishes: a review. Bull Mar Sci 60: 1129–1157. [Google Scholar]
  • Stein RA. 1977. Selective predation, optimal foraging, and the predator‐prey interaction between fish and crayfish. Ecology 58: 1237–1253. [Google Scholar]
  • Stein RA, Magnuson JJ. 1976. Behavioral response of crayfish to a fish predator. Ecology 57: 751–761. [Google Scholar]
  • Sutherland WJ. 1996. From individual behaviour to population ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 213 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Thiem JD, Ebner BC, Clear RC. 2010. Validating variation in radio-signal strength as an index of aquatic fauna activity. Aust J Zool 58: 50–55. [Google Scholar]
  • Webb M, Richardson A. 2004. A radio telemetry study of movement in the giant Tasmanian freshwater crayfish, Astacopsis gouldi . Freshw Crayfish 14: 197–204. [Google Scholar]
  • Weber S, Traunspurger W. 2017. Invasive red swamp crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) and native noble crayfish (Astacus astacus) similarly reduce oligochaetes, epipelic algae, and meiofauna biomass: a microcosm study. Freshw Sci 36: 103–112. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.