EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 54 (2018) Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim., 54 (2018) 27 References
Free Access
Issue
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 54, 2018
Article Number 27
Number of page(s) 8
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/2018018
Published online 22 August 2018
  • Agostinho AA, Gomes LC, Pelicice FM. 2007. Ecologia e manejo de recursos pesqueiros em reservatórios do Brasil. Eduem, Maringá, 501 p. [Google Scholar]
  • APHA. 1998. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. USA: American Public Health Association, Washington. [Google Scholar]
  • Attayde JL, Panosso R. 2011. Capacidade de suporte de oito açudes do Rio Grande do Norte para a piscicultura intensiva em tanques-rede. Anais do XIX Simpósio Brasileiro de Recursos Hídricos. Porto Alegre: ABRH [Google Scholar]
  • Beveridge M. 2004. Cage Aquaculture. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 368 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Brighenti LS, Staehr PA, Gagliardi LM, Brandão LPM, Elias EC, de Mello NAST, Barbosa FAR, Bezerra-Neto JF. 2015. Seasonal changes in metabolic rates of two tropical lakes in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. Ecosystems 18: 589–604. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bueno GW, Marengoni NG, Gonçalves Júnior AC, Boscolo WR, Teixeira R de A. 2008. Estado trófico e bioacumulação do fósforo total no cultivo de peixes em tanques-rede na área aqüícola do reservatório de Itaipu. Acta Sci Biol Sci 30: 237–243. [Google Scholar]
  • Bueno GW, Ostrensky A, Canzi C, Matos FT, Roubach R. 2015. Implementation of aquaculture parks in federal government waters in Brazil. Rev Aquac 7: 1–12. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Carlson RE. 1977. A trophic state index for lakes. Limnol Oceanogr 22: 361–369. [Google Scholar]
  • Crepaldi DV, Faria PMC, Teixeira EDA, Ribeiro LP, Costa ÂAP, Melo DD, Cintra APR, Prado SDA, Costa FAA, Drumond ML, Lopes VE, Moraes VE De. 2006. O surubim na aquacultura do Brasil. Rev Bras Reprodução Anim 30: 150–158. [Google Scholar]
  • Cunha DGF, Calijuri M do C, Lamparelli MC. 2013. A trophic state index for tropical/subtropical reservoirs (TSItsr). Ecol Eng 60: 126–134. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Darchambeau F, Sarmento H, Descy J-P. 2014. Primary production in a tropical large lake: the role of phytoplankton composition. Sci Total Environ 473–474: 178–188. [Google Scholar]
  • David GS, Carvalho ED, Lemos D, Silveira AN, Dall'Aglio-Sobrinho M. 2015. Ecological carrying capacity for intensive tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) cage aquaculture in a large hydroelectrical reservoir in Southeastern Brazil. Aquac Eng 66: 30–40. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Degefu F, Mengistu S, Schagerl M. 2011. Influence of fish cage farming on water quality and plankton in fish ponds: a case study in the Rift Valley and North Shoa reservoirs, Ethiopia. Aquaculture 316: 129–135. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Demétrio JA, Gomes LC, Latini JD, Agostinho AA. 2012. Influence of net cage farming on the diet of associated wild fish in a Neotropical reservoir. Aquaculture 330–333: 172–178. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Diemer O, Neu DH, Feiden A, Lorenz EK, Bittencourt F, Boscolo WR. 2010. Dinâmica nictimeral e vertical das características limnológicas em ambiente de criação de peixes em tanques-rede. Ciência Anim Bras 11: 24–31. [Google Scholar]
  • Dillon PJ, Rigler FH. 1974. A test of a simple nutrient budget model predicting the phosphorus concentration in lake water. J Fish Res Board Can 31: 1771–1778. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Esteves FA. 1998. Fundamentos de Limnologia. Interciência, Rio de Janeiro, 575 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Feiden IF, Oliveira JDS, de Diemer O, Feiden A. 2015. Qualidade da água, capacidade de suporte e melhor período para criação de peixes em tanques-rede no reservatório de Salto Caxias. Eng Sanit e Ambient 20: 589–594. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kasprzak P, Padisák J, Koschel R, Krienitz L, Gervais F. 2008. Chlorophyll a concentration across a trophic gradient of lakes: An estimator of phytoplankton biomass? Limnol − Ecol Manag Inl Waters 38: 327–338. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Konar M, Jason Todd M, Muneepeerakul R, Rinaldo A, Rodriguez-Iturbe I. 2013. Hydrology as a driver of biodiversity: controls on carrying capacity, niche formation, and dispersal. Adv Water Resour 51: 317–325. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mackereth FJH, Heron J, Talling JF. 1978. Water analysis: some revised methods for limnologists. Freshw Biol Assoc Sci Publ 121. [Google Scholar]
  • Ono EA, Kubitza F. 2003. Cultivo de peixes em tanques-rede. Acqua Imagem, Jundiaí, 112 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Poff NL, Allan JD, Bain MB, Karr JR, Prestegaard KL, Richter BD, Sparks RE, Stromberg JC. 1997. The natural flow regime. Bioscience 47: 769–784. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rangel LM, Silva LHS, Rosa P, Roland F, Huszar VLM. 2012. Phytoplankton biomass is mainly controlled by hydrology and phosphorus concentrations in tropical hydroelectric reservoirs. Hydrobiologia 693: 13–28. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ross LG, Telfer TC, Falconer L, Soto D, Aguilar-Manjarrez J. 2013. Site Selection and Carrying Capacities for Inland and Coastal Aquaculture. FAO, Roma, 295 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Schindler DW, Hecky RE, Findlay DL, Stainton MP, Parker BR, Paterson MJ, Beaty KG, Lyng M, Kasian SEM. 2008. Eutrophication of lakes cannot be controlled by reducing nitrogen input: Results of a 37-year whole-ecosystem experiment. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105: 11254–11258. [Google Scholar]
  • Signor AA, Feiden A, Bittencourt F, Potrich FR, Deparis A, Boscolo WR. 2011. Fósforo na alimentação de pacu (Piaractus mesopotamicus). Rev Bras Zootec 40: 2646–2650. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Silva JR, Rabenschlag DR, Feiden A, Boscolo WR, Signor AA, Bueno GW. 2012. Produção de Pacu em tanques-rede no reservatório de itaipu, Brasil: retorno econômico. Arch Zootec 61: 245–254. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Silva LHS, Huszar VLM, Marinho MM, Rangel LM, Brasil J, Domingues CD, Branco CC, Roland F. 2014. Drivers of phytoplankton, bacterioplankton, and zooplankton carbon biomass in tropical hydroelectric reservoirs. Limnol − Ecol Manag Inl Waters 48: 1–10. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Streit NM, Canterle LP, Canto MWD, Hecktheuer LHH. 2005. As clorofilas. Ciência Rural 35: 748–755. [Google Scholar]
  • Strickland JDH, Parsons TR. 1972. A Pratical Handbook of Sea Water Analysis. Fish Research. Board of Canada, Ottawa, 310 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Toledo Jr A, Talarico M, Chinez S, Agudo E. 1983. Aplicação de modelos simplificados para avaliação e processo de eutrofização em lagos e reservatórios. Anais do XIX Congresso Interamericano de Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental, Santiago, Chile. [Google Scholar]
  • Tundisi JG. 2005. Gerenciamento integrado de bacias hidrográficas e reservatórios: estudos de casos e perspectivas. In: Nogueiramg, R Henry, and A Jorcim eds. Ecologia de reservatórios: impacto potenciais, ações de manejo e sistemas em cascata, São Carlos, Rima, pp. 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  • Varol M, Gökot B, Bekleyen A, Şen B. 2012. Spatial and temporal variations in surface water quality of the dam reservoirs in the Tigris River basin, Turkey. Catena 92: 11–21. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Varol M, Şen B. 2009. Assessment of surface water quality using multivariate statistical techniques: a case study of Behrimaz Stream, Turkey. Environ Monit Assess 159: 543–553. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Venturoti GP, Veronez AC, Salla R.V., Gomes LC. 2015. Variation of limnological parameters in a tropical lake used for tilapia cage farming. Aquac Rep 2: 152–157. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wetzel RG, Likens GE. 1991. Limnological Analyses. Spring-Verlang, New York, 391 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Xenopoulos Ma, Lodge DM, Alcamo J, Marker M, Schulze K, Van Vuuren DP. 2005. Scenarios of freshwater fish extinctions from climate change and water withdrawal. Glob Chang Biol 11: 1557–1564. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.