Free Access
Issue
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 51, Number 2, 2015
Page(s) 89 - 100
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/2015003
Published online 13 March 2015
  • Agostinho A.A., Gomes L.C., Verıssimo S. and Okada E.K., 2004. Flood regime, dam regulation and fish in the Upper Paraná River: effects on assemblage attributes, reproduction and recruitment. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish., 14, 11–19. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Amoros C. and Bornette G., 2002. Connectivity and biocomplexity in waterbodies of riverine floodplains. Freshwat. Biol., 47, 761–776. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Araújo F.G., Pinto B.C.T. and Teixeira T.P., 2009. Longitudinal patterns of fish assemblages in a large tropical river in southeastern Brazil: evaluating environmental influences and some concepts in river ecology. Hydrobiologia, 618, 89–107. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Beckman B.R. and Larsen D.A., 2005. Upstream migration of Minijack (Age-2) Chinook salmon in the Columbia River: behavior, abundance, distribution, and origin. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 134, 1520–1541. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Borisenko E.S., 2008. In situ measurement of fish target strength using scanning hydroacoustic systems. In: Gerasimov Yu.V., Bazarov M.I., Malin M.I. and Tsvetkov A.I. (eds.), Materials of The Russian Conference “Hydroacoustic Ionvestigations in Inland Waters”, Institute of the Biology of Inland Waters, Russian Academy of Sciences, Borok, 2008. Printhouse, Moscow, 12–19. [Google Scholar]
  • Borisenko E.S., Degtev A.I., Mochek A.D. and Pavlov D.S., 2006. Hydroacoustic characteristics of mass fishes of Ob-Irtish basin. J. Ichthyol., 46, S227–S234. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Borisenko E.S., Gusar A.G. and Goncharov S.M., 1989. The target strength dependence of some freshwater species on their length-weight characteristics. Proc. Inst. Acoust., 11, 27–34. [Google Scholar]
  • Borisenko E.S., Mochek A.D. and Pavlov D.S., 2011. Hydroacoustic method for the study of fisheries resources in inland waters. In: Golovanov V.K., Gerasimov Yu.V. and Shatunovskii M.I. (eds.), Current State of Inland Bioresources, Vol. 1. Akvaros, Moscow, 74–85. [Google Scholar]
  • Brehmer P., 2003. New applications of hydroacoustic methods for monitoring shallow water aquatic ecosystems: the case of mussel culture grounds. Aquat. Living Resour., 16, 333–338. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Cai Y., Guo L., Douglas T.A. and Whitledge T.E., 2008. Seasonal variations in nutrient concentrations and speciation in the Chena River, Alaska. J. Geophys. Res., 113, G03035. [Google Scholar]
  • Fernandes C.C., 1997. Lateral migration of fishes in Amazon floodplains. Ecol. Freshwat. Fish, 6, 36–44. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Frouzova J., Kubecka J. and Mrkvicka T., 2011. Differences in acoustic target strength pattern between fish with one- and two-chambered swimbladder during rotation in the horizontal plane. Fish. Res., 109, 114–118. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hohausová E., Copp G.H. and Jankovský P., 2003. Movement of fish between a river and its backwater: diel activity and relation to environmental gradients. Ecol. Freshwat. Fish, 12, 107–117. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hrkal Z., Gadalia A. and Rigaudiere P., 2006. Will the river Irtysh survive the year 2030? Impact of long-term unsuitable land use and water management of the upper stretch of the river catchment (North Kazakhstan). Environ. Geol., 50, 717–723. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Huang F., Xia Z., Li F., Guo L. and Yang F., 2012. Hydrological changes of the Irtysh River and the possible causes. Water Resour. Manag., 26, 3195–3208. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jackson D.A., Peres-Neto P.R. and Olden J.D., 2001. What controls who is where in freshwater fish communities — the roles of biotic, abiotic, and spatial factors. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 57, 157–170. [Google Scholar]
  • Junk W., Bayley P. and Sparks R., 1989. The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems. In: Proceedings of the International Large River Symposium. Can. Spec. Publ. Aquat. Sci., 106, 110–127. [Google Scholar]
  • Kautza A. and Sullivan S.M.P., 2012. Relative effects of local- and landscape-scale environmental factors on stream fish assemblages: evidence from Idaho and Ohio, USA. Fund. Appl. Limnol., 180, 259–270. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kenward M.G. and Roger J.H., 1997. Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics, 53, 983–997. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Knudsen F.R. and Sægrov H., 2002. Benefits from horizontal beaming during acoustic survey: application to three Norwegian lakes. Fish. Res., 56, 205–211. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kudryavtsev V.I. and Borisenko E.S., 2009. Device for the Estimation of Fish Sizes During their Location. Russian Patent RU 2367151 C1, A01K61/00 (2006.01), Russian Federal Institute of Fisheries and Oceanography, VNIRO. [Google Scholar]
  • Lepori F., Palm D., Brännäs E. and Malmqvist B., 2005. Does restoration of structural heterogeneity in streams enhance fish and macroinvertebrate diversity? Ecol. Appl., 15, 2060–2071. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lucas M.C., Baras E., Thom T.J., Duncan A. and Slavík O. (eds.), 2001. Migration of Freshwater Fishes, Blackwell, Oxford. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lucas M.C., Walker L., Mercer T. and Kubecka J., 2002. A review of fish behaviours likely to influence acoustic fish stock assessment in shallow temperate rivers and lakes. Technical Report W2-063/TR/1. Environment Agency, Rio House, Waterside Drive, Aztec West, Almondsbury, Bristol, UK. [Google Scholar]
  • Lyozin V.A., 1999. Rivers of the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug. A reference book, Vektor Book, Tyumen (In Russian). [Google Scholar]
  • Makrakis M.C., Miranda L.E., Makrakis S., Fontes Júnior H.M., Morlis W.G., Dias J.H.P. and Garcia J.O., 2012. Diversity in migratory patterns among Neotropical fishes in a highly regulated river basin. J. Fish Biol., 81, 866–81. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Murchie K.J., Hair K.P.E., Pullen C.E., Redpath T.D., Stephens H.R. and Cooke S.J., 2008. Fish response to modified flow regimes in regulated rivers: research methods, effects and opportunities. River Res. Appl., 24, 197–217. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nunn A.D., Harvey J.P. and Cowx I.G., 2007. Benefits to 0+ fishes of connecting man made waterbodies to the lower River Trent, England. River Res. Appl., 23, 361–376. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nunn A.D., Copp G.H., Vilizzi L. and Carter M.G., 2010. Seasonal and diel patterns in the migrations of fishes between a river and a floodplain tributary. Ecol. Freshwat. Fish, 19, 153–162. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ostrand K. and Wilde G., 2002. Seasonal and spatial variation in a prairie stream-fish assemblage. Ecol. Freshwat. Fish, 11, 137–149. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pavlov D.S., 1994. The downstream migration of young fishes in rivers: mechanisms and distribution. Folia Zool., 43, 193–208. [Google Scholar]
  • Pavlov D.S. and Mochek A.D., 2009. Fish distribution in river systems as a dynamic phenomenon. Usp. Sov. Biol., 129, 528–537. [Google Scholar]
  • Pavlov D.S., Lupandin A.I. and Kostin V.V., 2007. Mechanisms of Downstream Migration of Young Fish Living in Rivers, Nauka, Moscow (In Russian). [Google Scholar]
  • Pavlov D.S., Mikheev V.N., Lupandin A.I. and Skorobogatov M.A., 2008. Ecological and behavioural influences on juvenile fish migrations in regulated rivers: a review of experimental and field studies. Hydrobiologia, 609, 125–138. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pavlov D.S., Mochek A.D., Borisenko E.S. and Degtev A.I., 2009. Investigation of spawning migrations of commercial fish species using hydroacoustic systems. In: Biological Resources of the White Sea and Inland Water Bodies of the North of Europe. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference, Petrozavodsk, Karelia, Russia. Petrozavodsk, 391–398. [Google Scholar]
  • Pavlov D.S., Mochek A.D., Borisenko E.S. and Degtev A.I., 2010. Hydroacoustic investigation of taxonomic composition and of vertical distribution of fish in the riverbed depression. J. Ichthyol., 50, 969–976. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pinherio J.C. and Bates D.M., 2000. Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS, Springer, New York. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Poff N. and Allan J., 1995. Functional organization of stream fish assemblages in relation to hydrological variability. Ecology, 76, 606–627. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pusey B.J., Arthington A.H. and Read M.G., 1995. Species richness and spatial variation in fish assemblage structure in two rivers of the Wet Tropics of Northern Queensland, Australia. Environ. Biol. Fish., 42, 181–199. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • R Core Team, 2013. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, http://www.r-project.org. [Google Scholar]
  • Rakowitz G., Berger B., Kubecka J. and Keckeis H., 2008. Functional role of environmental stimuli for the spawning migration in Danube nase Chondrostoma nasus (L.). Ecol. Freshwat. Fish, 17, 502–514. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Reichard M., Jurajda P. and Ondračková M., 2002. The effect of light intensity of the drift of young-of-the- year cyprinid fishes. J. Fish Biol., 61, 1063–1066. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rosso J. and Quiros R., 2009. Interactive effects of abiotic, hydrological and anthropogenic factors on fish abundance and distribution in natural run of the river shallow lakes. River Res. Appl., 25, 713–733. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Scarabotti P.A., López J.A. and Pouilly M., 2011. Flood pulse and the dynamics of fish assemblage structure from neotropical floodplain lakes. Ecol. Freshwat. Fish, 20, 605–618. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Simmonds J. and MacLennan D. (eds.), 2005. Fisheries Acoustics. Blackwell, Oxford. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sonny D., Jorry S., Wattiez X., and Philippart J.-C., 2006. Inter-annual and diel patterns of the drift of cyprinid fishes in a small tributary of the Meuse River, Belgium. Folia Zool., 55, 75–85. [Google Scholar]
  • Stanford J.A., Lorang M.S. and Hauer F.R., 2005. The shifting habitat mosaic of river ecosystems. Verh. – Int. Ver. Theor. Angew. Limnol., 29, 123–136. [Google Scholar]
  • Tátrai I., Specziár A., György A.I. and Bíró P., 2009. Comparison of fish size distribution and fish abundance estimates obtained with hydroacoustics and gill netting in the open water of a large shallow lake. Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Limnol., 44, 231–240. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Thorpe J.E. and Morgan R.I.G., 1978. Periodicity in Athlantic salmon Salmo salar L., smolt migration. J. Fish Biol., 12, 541–548. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tockner K., Lorang M.S. and Stanford J.A., 2010. River flood plains are model ecosystems to test general hydrogeomorphic and ecological concepts. River Res. Appl., 26, 76–86. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Urabe M., 2006. Demonstration of migration of juvenile cyprinid fish using parasite biomarkers. Landsc. Ecol. Eng., 2, 209–216. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Van den Brink F., 1996. Biodiversity in the lower Rhine and Meuse river-floodplains: its significance for ecological river management. Netherlands J. Aquat. Ecol., 30, 129–149. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vincent W., 2008. Introduction to the limnology of high latitude lake and river ecosystems. In: Vincent W.F. and Laybourn-Parry J. (eds.), Polar Lakes and Rivers – Limnology of Arctic and Antarctic Aquatic Ecosystems. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1–23. [Google Scholar]
  • Ward J.V., Tockner K., Arscott D.B. and Claret C., 2002. Riverine landscape diversity. Freshwat. Biol., 47, 517–539. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ward J.V., Tockner K. and Schiemer F., 1999. Biodiversity of floodplain river ecosystems: ecotones and connectivity. Regul. Rivers Res. Manag., 15, 125–139. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Warton D. and Hui F., 2011. The arcsine is asinine: the analysis of proportions in ecology. Ecology, 92, 3–10. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Welcomme R.L., Winemiller K.O. and Cowx I.G., 2006. Fish environmental guilds as a tool for assessment of ecological condition of rivers. River Res. Appl., 22, 377–396. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Winfield I.J., Emmrich M. and Guillard J., 2013. Guidelines for standardisation of hydroacoustic methods. Deliverable 3–4.3. Water bodies in Europe: integrative systems to assess ecological status and recovery, Seventh Framework Programme, 1–30. [Google Scholar]
  • Wolter C. and Bischoff A., 2001. Seasonal changes of fish diversity in the main channel of the large lowland River Oder. Regul. Rivers Res. Manag., 17, 595–608. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wolter C. and Sukhodolov A., 2008. Random displacement versus habitat choice of fish larvae in rivers. River Res. Appl., 24, 661–672. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Yuma M., Maruyama A. and Rusuwa B., 2000. Behavior and distribution of upstream-migrating juvenilerhinogobius sp. (The orange form). Ichthyol. Res., 47, 379–384. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.