Open Access
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 51, Number 1, 2015
Page(s) 1 - 10
Published online 06 January 2015
  • Abbaspour K.C., Yang J., Maximov I., Siber R., Bogner K., Mieleitner J., Zobrist J. and Srinivasan R., 2007. Spatially-distributed modelling of hydrology and water quality in the prealpine/alpine Thur watershed using SWAT. J. Hydrol., 333, 413–430. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Abouabdillah A., Oueslati O., De Girolamo A.M. and Lo Porto A., 2010. Modeling the impact of climate change in a Mediterranean catchment (Merguellil, Tunisia). Fresen. Environ. Bull., 19(10a), 2334–2347. [Google Scholar]
  • Argyroudi A., Chatzinikolaou Y., Poirazidis K. and Lazaridou M., 2009. Do intermittent and ephemeral Mediterranean rivers belong to the same river type? Aquat. Ecol., 43, 465–476. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Arnold J.G. and Fohrer N., 2005. SWAT2000: current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modeling. Hydrol. Process., 19(3), 563–572. [Google Scholar]
  • Buffagni A., Armanini D.G. and Erba S., 2009. Does lentic-lotic character of rivers affect invertebrate metrics used in the assessment of ecological quality? J. Limnol., 68, 95–109. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • CIS, 2003. Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC). River and lakes typology, reference conditions and classification systems. Guidance document No. 10. Luxenbourg, Lu, Office for Official Publications of the European Community. [Google Scholar]
  • De Girolamo A.M. and Lo Porto A., 2012. Land use scenario development as a tool for watershed management within the Rio Mannu Basin. Land Use Policy, 29, 691–701. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • De Girolamo A.M., Lo Porto A., Pappagallo G., Tzoraki O. and Gallart F., 2014. The hydrological status concept. Application at a temporary river (Candelaro, Italy). River Res. Appl. doi: 10.1002/rra.2786. [Google Scholar]
  • EC, 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and the Council Directive establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. Off. J. Eur. Commun., Brussels, 22/12/2000, L. 327, 1–72. [Google Scholar]
  • Gallart F., Prat N., García-Roger E.M., Latron J., Rieradevall M., Llorens P., Barberá G.G., Brito D., De Girolamo A.M., Lo Porto A., Buffagni A., Erba S., Neves R., Nikolaidis N.P., Perrin J.L., Querner E.P., Quiñonero J.M., Tournoud M.G., Tzoraki O., Skoukulidis N., Gomez R., Sanchez-Montoya M.M. and Froebrich J., 2012. A novel approach to analysing the regimes of temporary streams in relation to their controls on the composition and structure of aquatic biota. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1–18. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Garcıa-Roger E.M., Sanchez-Montoya M.M., Gomez R., Suarez M.L., Vidal-Abarca M.R., Rieradevall M., Latron J. and Prat N., 2011. Do seasonal changes in habitat features influence aquatic macroinvertebrate assemblages in permanent vs temporary Mediterranean streams? Aquat. Sci., 73, 567–579. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hargreaves G.H. and Samani Z.A., 1985. Reference crop evapotranspiration from temperature. Appl. Eng. Agric., 1, 96–99. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Illies J., 1978. Limnofauna Europaea, Gustav Fisher, Verlag, Stuttgart, 532 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Kirkby M.J., Gallart F., Kjeldsen T.R., Irvine B.J., Froebrich J., Lo Porto A., De Girolamo A. and the MIRAGE team, 2011. Classifying low flow hydrological regimes at a regional scale. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 3741–3750. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • MIRAGE Project Deliverable D3.3., 2011. Characterization of hydrological conditions at catchment scale, classification of hydrological regimes. [Google Scholar]
  • Morais M., Pinto P., Guilherme P., Rosado J. and Antunes I., 2004. Assessment of temporary streams: the robustness of metric and multimetric indices under different hydrological conditions. Hydrobiologia, 516, 229–249. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Munné A. and Prat N., 2004. Defining river types in a Mediterranean area: a methodology for the implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive. Environ. Manage., 33, 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  • Munné A. and Prat N., 2009. Use of macroinvertebrate-based multimetric indices for water quality evaluation in Spanish Mediterranean rivers: an intercalibration approach with the IBMWP index. Hydrobiologia, 628, 203–225. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Munné A. and Prat N., 2011. Effects of Mediterranean climate annual variability on stream biological quality assessment using macroinvertebrate communities. Ecol. Ind., 11, 651–662. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nash J.E. and Sutcliffe J.V., 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models. J. Hydrol., 10, 282–290. [Google Scholar]
  • Nerbonne B.A. and Vondracek B., 2001. Effects of local land use on physical habitat, benthic macroinvertebrates, and fish in the Whitewater River, Minnesota, USA. Environ. Manage., 28(1), 87–99. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Nikolaidis N.P., Demetropoulou L., Froebrich J., Jacobs C., Gallart F., Prat N., Lo Porto A., Campana C., Papadoulakis V., Skoulikidis N., Davy T., Bidoglio G., Bouraoui F., Kirby M., Tournoud M.G., Polesello S., Barberá G.G., Cooper D., Gomez R., Sanchez-Montoya M.M., Latron J., De Girolamo A.M. and Perrin J.L., 2013. Towards a sustainable management of Mediterranean river basins. Policy recommendations on management aspects of temporary river basins. Water Policy, 15, 830–849. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Poff N.L., Allan J.D., Bain M.B., Karr J.R., Prestegaard K.L., Richter B.D., Sparks R.E. and Stromberg J.C., 1997. The natural flow regime. Bioscience, 47, 769–784. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Prat N., Gallart F., Von Schiller D., Polesello S., García-Roger E.M., Latron J., Rieradevall M., Llorens P., Barberá G.G., Brito D., De Girolamo A.M., Lo Porto A., Buffagni A., Erba S., Nikolaidis N. P., Querner E.P., Tournoud M.G., Tzoraki O., Skoulikidis N., Gómez R., Sánchez-Montoya M.M., Tockner K. and Froebrich J., 2014. The MIRAGE Toolbox: an integrated assessment tool for temporary streams. River Res. Appl., doi: 10.1002/rra. [Google Scholar]
  • Refsgaard J.C., van der Sluijs P.J., Højberg A.L. and Vanrolleghem P.A., 2007. Uncertainty in the environmental modelling process – A framework and guidance. Environ. Modell. Softw., 22(11), 1543–1556. [Google Scholar]
  • Richter B.D., Baumgartner J.V., Powell J. and Braun D.P., 1996. A method for assessing hydrologic alteration within ecosystems. Conserv. Biol., 10, 1163–1174. [Google Scholar]
  • Rieradevall M., Bonada N. and Prat N., 1999. Community structure and water quality in Mediterranean streams of a Natural Park (Sant Llorenc¸ de Munt, NE Spain). Limnetica, 17, 45–56. [Google Scholar]
  • Srinivasan R., Ramanarayanan T.S., Arnold J.G. and Bednarz S.T., 1998. Large area hydrologic modelling and assessment part II: model application. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 34(1), 91–101. [Google Scholar]
  • Uhlenbrook S., Seibert J., Leibundgut C. and Rodhe A., 1999. Prediction uncertainty of conceptual rainfall-runoff models caused by problems to identify model parameters and structure. Hydrol. Sci. J., 44(5), 279–299. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ullrich A. and Volk M., 2009. Application of the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) to predict the impact of alternative management practices on water quality and quantity. Agric. Water Manage., 96(8), 1207–1217. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • USD-Soil Conservation Service (SCS), 1972. National engineering handbook. In: Section 4 Hydrology, USD-Soil Conservation Service (SCS), Washington, DC, U.S. Government Printing Office, 4–10. [Google Scholar]
  • Van Griensven A., Francos A. and Bauwens W., 2002. Sensitivity analysis and auto-calibration of an integral dynamic model for river water quality. Water Sci. Technol., 45(9), 325–332. [Google Scholar]
  • Winchell M., Srinivasan R., Di Luzio M. and Arnold J., 2007. ArcSWAT Interface for SWAT 2005 – User's Guide, Blackland Research Center, Temple, TX. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.