Free Access
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 50, Number 3, 2014
Page(s) 211 - 216
Published online 21 August 2014
  • Barnes J.B., Vaughan I.P. and Ormerod S.J., 2013. Reappraising the effects of habitat structure on river macroinvertebrates. Freshw. Biol., 58, 2154–2167. [Google Scholar]
  • Bournaud M., Tachet H., Berly A. and Cellot B., 1998. Importance of microhabitat characteristics in the macrobenthos microdistribution of a large river reach. Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim., 34, 83–98. [Google Scholar]
  • Boyero L. and Bailey R.C., 2001. Organization of macroinvertebrate communities at a hierarchy of spatial scales in a tropical stream. Hydrobiologia, 464, 219–225. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Buffagni A. and Erba S., 2007. Macroinvertebrati acquatici e Direttiva 2000/60/EC (WFD) – Parte A. Metodo di campionamento per i fiumi guadabili. IRSA-CNR Notiziario dei Metodi Analitici, 1, 2–27. [Google Scholar]
  • Buffagni A., Erba S. and Pagnotta R., 2008. Definizione dello Stato ecologico dei fiumi sulla base dei macroinvertebrati bentonici per la 200/60/EC (WFD): il sistema di classificazione MacrOper per il monitoraggio operativo. IRSA-CNR Notiziario dei Metodi Analitici, 1, 24–46. [Google Scholar]
  • Bray J.R. and Curtis J.T., 1957. An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecol. Monogr., 27, 325–349. [Google Scholar]
  • Brooks A.J., Haeusler T.I.M., Reinfelds I. and Williams S., 2005. Hydraulic microhabitats and the distribution of macroinvertebrate assemblages in riffles. Freshw. Biol., 50, 331–344. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Campaioli S., Ghetti P.F., Minelli A. and Ruffo S., 1994. Manuale per il riconoscimento dei macroinvertebrati delle acque dolci italiane Volume 1, Edizione del Museo di Storia Naturale di Trento, 357 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Campaioli S., Ghetti P.F., Minelli A. and Ruffo S., 1998. Manuale per il riconoscimento dei macroinvertebrati delle acque dolci italiane Volume 2, Edizione del Museo di Storia Naturale di Trento, 135 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Clarke K.R., 1993. Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust. J. Ecol., 18, 117–143. [Google Scholar]
  • Clarke R.T. and Hering D., 2006. Errors and uncertainty in bioassessment methods – major results and conclusions from the STAR project and their application using STARBUGS. Hydrobiologia, 566, 433–439. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Culp J.M., Walde S.J. and Davies R.W., 1983. Relative importance of substrate particle size and detritus to stream benthic macroinvertebrate microdistribution. Can. J. Fish Aquat. Sci., 40, 1568–1574. [Google Scholar]
  • Efron B. and Tibshirani R.J., 1993. An Introduction to the Bootstrap, Chapman & Hall, New York, 456 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Fenoglio S., Bo T., Agosta P. and Malacarne G., 2005. Temporal and spatial patterns of coarse particulate organic matter and macroinvertebrate distribution in a low-order Apennine stream. J. Freshw. Ecol., 20, 539–547. [Google Scholar]
  • Heino J., Louhi P. and Muotka T., 2004. Identifying the scales of variability in stream macroinvertebrate abundance, functional composition and assemblage structure. Freshw. Biol., 49, 1230–1239. [Google Scholar]
  • Lake P.S., 2000. Disturbance, patchiness, and diversity in streams. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 19, 573–592. [Google Scholar]
  • Legendre P. and Legendre L., 1998. Numerical Ecology, (2nd edn), Elsevier Scientific, Amsterdam, 853 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Li J., Herlihy A., Gerth W., Kaufmann P., Gregory S., Urquhart S. and Larsen D.P., 2001. Variability in stream macroinvertebrates at multiple spatial scales. Freshw. Biol., 46, 87–97. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Niemi G.J. and McDonald M.E., 2004. Application of ecological indicators. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. S., 35, 89–111. [Google Scholar]
  • Oksanen J., Guillaume Blanchet F., Kindt R., Legendre P., Minchin P.R., O'Hara R.B., Simpson G.L., Solymos P., Henry M., Stevens H. and Wagner H., 2013. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.0–8. [Google Scholar]
  • R Core Team, 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL [Google Scholar]
  • Vlek H.E., Šporka F. and Krno I., 2006. Influence of macroinvertebrates sample size in bioassessment of stream. Hydrobiologia, 566, 523–542. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Woodward G., 2009. Biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and food webs in freshwaters: assembling the jigsaw puzzle. Freshw. Biol., 54, 2171–2187. [Google Scholar]
  • Woodward G., Friberg, N. and Hildrew A.G., 2010. Science and non-science in the biomonitoring and conservation of fresh waters. In: de Carlo F. and Bassano A. (ed.), Freshwater Ecosystems and Aquaculture Research, Nova Science, Hauppauge, NY, USA, 277–288. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.