Free Access
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 49, Number 2, 2013
Page(s) 113 - 119
Published online 13 June 2013
  • Baeyens W., Gao Y., De Galan S., Bilau M., Van Larebeke N. and Leermakers M., 2009. Dietary exposure to total and toxic arsenic inBelgium: importance of arsenic speciation in North Sea fish. Mol. Nutr. Food Res., 53, 558–565. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Boudou A. and Ribeyre F., 1997. Mercury in the food web: accumulation and transfer mechanisms. In: Sigel, A. and Sigel, H. (eds), Metal Ions in Biological Systems, Mercury and its Effects on Environment and Biology, Marcel Dekker, New York.
  • Burger J. and Campbell K.R., 2004. Species differences in contaminants in fish on and adjacent to the Oak Ridge Reservation, Tennessee. Environ. Res., 96, 145–155. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Burger J., Gaines K., Boring S., Stephens W., Snodgrass J. and Gochfeld M., 2001. Mercury and selenium in fish from theSavannah River: species, trophic level, and locational differences. Environ. Res., A, 87, 108–118. [CrossRef]
  • Clarkson T. and Mago L., 2006. The toxicology of mercury and its chemical compounds. Critic. Rev. Toxicol., 36, 609–662. [CrossRef]
  • De La Rosa D., Olivares S., Lima L., Diaz O., Moyano S., Bastías J. and Muñoz O., 2009a. Estimate of mercury and methyl mercury intake associated with fish consumption from Sagua la Grande River, Cuba. Food Addit. Contam., B, 1–7. [CrossRef]
  • De La Rosa D., Lima L., Olivares S., Graham D., Enriquez I., Diaz O., Bastias J. and Muñoz O., 2009b. Assessment of total mercury levels in Clarias gariepinus from the Sagua la Grande River, Cuba. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 82, 101–105. [CrossRef]
  • De la Rosa-Medero D. and Campbell L., 2008. Implications of Clarias gariepinus (african catfish) propagation in cuban waters. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag., 4, 521–522. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Desta Z., Borgstrøm R., Rosseland B. and Dadebo E., 2007. Lower than expected mercury concentration in piscivorous African sharptooth catfish Clarias gariepinus (Burchell). Sci. Total Environ., 376, 134–142. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Díaz-Asencio M., Alonso-Hernández C., Bolanos Y., Gómez-Batista M., Morabito R., Hernández-Albernas J. and Sanchez-Cabeza J., 2009. One century sedimentary record of mercury and lead pollution in the Sagua estuary (Cuba) derived from 210Pb and 137Cs chronology. Mar. Pollut. Bull., 59, 108–115. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Donohue J. and Abernathy C., 1999. Exposure to inorganic arsenic from Fish and Shellfish. In: Chappell W., Abemathy C. and Calderon R. (eds), Arsenic Exposure and Health Effects, Elsevier Science, BV.
  • Dumont E., Vanhaecke F. and Cornelis R., 2006. Selenium speciation from food source to metabolites: a critical review. Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 385, 1304–1323. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Environment Canada, 2002. Canadian Tissue Residue Guidelines for the Protection of Wildlife Consumers of Aquatic Biota: Methylmercury, National Guidelines and Standard Office, Ottawa, Canada.
  • Gonzalez H., 1991. Mercury pollution caused by a chlor- alkali plant. Water Air Soil Pollut., 56, 83–93. [CrossRef]
  • Hinck J., Schmitt C., Chojnacki K. and Tillitt D., 2009. Environmental contaminants in freshwater fish and their risk to piscivorous wildlife based on a national monitoring program. Environ. Monit. Assess., 152, 469–494. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Kapaj S., Peterson S., Liber K. and Bhattacharya P., 2006. Human health effects from chronic arsenic poisoning–a review. J. Environ. Sci. Health A, Tox. Hazard Subst. Environ. Eng., 41, 2399–2428. [CrossRef]
  • Khan M. and Wang F., 2009. Mercury–selenium compounds and their toxicological significance: toward a molecular understanding of the mercury–selenium antagonism. Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 28, 1567–1577. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Lemly A.D., 1993. Guidelines for evaluating selenium data from aquatic monitoring and assessment studies. Environ. Monit. Assess., 28, 83–100. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Lemly A.D., 1996. Assessing the toxic threat of selenium to fish and aquatic birds. Environ. Monitor. Assess., 43, 19–35. [CrossRef]
  • Lemly A.D., 1999. Selenium impacts on fish: an insidious time bomb. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assessment, 5, 1139–1151. [CrossRef]
  • Letavayová L., Vlckova V. and Brozmanova J., 2006. Selenium: from cancer prevention to DNA damage. Toxicology, 227, 1–14. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Lima A.P.S., Sarkis J.E.S., Shihomatsu H.M. and Müller R.C.S., 2005. Mercury and selenium concentrations in fish samples from Cachoeira do Piriá Municipality, ParáState, Brazil. Environ. Res., 97, 236–244. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Luoma S. and Presse T., 2009. Emerging opportunities in management of selenium contamination. Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 8483. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Moreau M., Surico-Bennett J., Vicario-Fisher M., Gerads R., Gersberg R. and Hurlbert S., 2007. Selenium, arsenic, DDT and other contaminants in four fish species in the Salton Sea, California, their temporal trends, and their potential impact on human consumers and wildlife. Lake Reservoir Manag., 23, 536–569. [CrossRef]
  • NC-493, 2006. Contaminantes metálicos en alimentos – Regulaciones sanitarias. Oficina Nacional de Normalización, Ciudad de La Habana, Cuba (In Spanish).
  • Olivares-Rieumont S., Lima L., Rivero S., Graham D. and Alonso-Hernandez C., 2012. Mercury levels in sediments and mangrove oysters, Crassostrea rizophorae, from the North Coast of Villa Clara, Cuba. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 88, 589–93. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Sanfeliu C., Sebastia L., Cristofol R. and Rodriguez-Farré E., 2003. Neurotoxicity of organomercurial compounds. Neurotox. Res., 5, 283–306. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Schram E., Pedrero Z., Cámara C., Der Heul J. and Luten J., 2008. Enrichment of African catfish with functional selenium originating from garlic. Aquaculture Res., 39, 850–860. [CrossRef]
  • Sirot V., Guérin T., Volatier J. and Leblanc, J., 2009. Dietary exposure and biomarkers of arsenic in consumers of fish and shellfish fromFrance. Sci. Total Environ., 407, 1875–1885. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Toledo-Pérez J., Llanes-Iglesias J., Millares-Dorado N. and Lazo-de la Vega Valdez J., 2007. Evaluación de dietas alternativas en la alimentación de Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822). REDVET. Revista electrónica de Veterinaria 1695–7504 Volumen VIII Número 6. (In Spanish).
  • UNEP Chemicals, 2002. Global Mercury Assessment, UNEP Chemicals, Geneva.
  • Williams G., West J., Koch I., Reimer K. and Snow E., 2009. Arsenic speciation in the freshwater crayfish, Cherax destructor Clark. Sci. Total Environ., 407, 2650–2658. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • World Health Organization, 1990. Environmental Health Criteria 101: Methylmercury. Programme of Chemical Safety, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Yang D.Y., Chen Y.W., Gunn J.M. and Belzile N., 2008. Selenium and mercury in organisms: interactions and mechanisms. Environ. Rev., 16, 71–92. [CrossRef]
  • Yang D.Y., Ye X., Chen Y.W. and Belzile N., 2010. Inverse relationships between selenium and mercury in tissues of young walleye (Stizosedion vitreum) from Canadian boreal lakes. Sci. Total Environ., 408, 1676–1683. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Zeng H., Uthus E. and Combs G., 2005. Mechanistic aspects of the interaction between selenium and arsenic. J. Inorg. Biochem., 99, 1269–1274. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Zheng W., Pan J. and Liu W., 1988. Culture of catfish in China. Aquaculture, 75, 35–44. [CrossRef]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.