Free Access
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 49, Number 1, 2013
Page(s) 51 - 63
Published online 29 April 2013
  • Acreman M. and Ferguson A., 2010. Environmental flows and the European Water Framework Directive. Freshwater Biol., 55, 32–48. [Google Scholar]
  • Armitage P.D., Lattmann K., Kneebone N. and Harris I., 2001. Bank profile and structure as determinants of macroinvertebrate assemblages-seasonal changes and management. Regul. River., 17, 543–556. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Asplund T.R. and Cook C.M., 1997. Effects of motor boats on submerged aquatic macrophytes. Lake Reserv. Manage., 13, 1–12. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Boedeltje G., Smolders A.J.P., Roelofs J.G.M. and Van Groenendael J.M., 2001. Constructed shallow zones along navigation canals: vegetation establishment and change in relation to environmental characteristics. Aquat. Conserv., 11, 453–471. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Boedeltje G., Smolders A.J.R., Lamers L.P.M. and Roelofs J.G.M., 2005. Interactions between sediment propagule banks and sediment nutrient fluxes explain floating plant dominance in stagnant shallow waters. Arch. Hydrobiol., 162, 349–362. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Boeters R., Havinga H., Litjens G. and Verheij H.J., 1997. Ten years of experience in combining ecology and navigation on Dutch waterways. Paper presented at the 29th International Navigation Congress, Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses. [Google Scholar]
  • Bornette G., Amoros C. and Lamouroux N., 1998. Aquatic plant diversity in riverine wetlands: the role of connectivity. Freshwater Biol., 39, 267–283. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Braun-Blanquet J., 1964. Pflanzensoziologie. Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde, Springer, Wenen/New York. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Caffrey J. and Beglin T., 1996. Bankside stabilisation through reed transplantation in newly constructed Irish canal habitat. Hydrobiology, 340, 349–354. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Carpenter S.R. and Lodge D.M., 1986. Effects of submersed macrophytes on ecosystem processes. Aquat. Bot., 26, 341–370. [Google Scholar]
  • Coops H., Boeters R. and Smit H., 1991. Direct and indirect effects of wave attack on helophytes. Aquat. Bot., 41, 333–352. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Coops H., Geilen N., Verheij H.J., Boeters R. and vanderVelde G., 1996. Interactions between waves, bank erosion and emergent vegetation: an experimental study in a wave tank. Aquat. Bot., 53, 187–198. [Google Scholar]
  • Cox D.R. and Hinkley D.V., 1974. Theoretical Statistics, Chapman and Hall, London. [Google Scholar]
  • CUR, 1999a. Natuurvriendelijke oevers: aanpak en toepassingen, Civieltechnisch Centrum Uitvoering Research en Regelgeving, publicatie 200, Gouda. [Google Scholar]
  • CUR, 1999b. Natuurvriendelijke oevers: belasting en sterkte, Civieltechnisch Centrum Uitvoering Research en Regelgeving, publicatie 201, Gouda. [Google Scholar]
  • CUR, 2003. Natuurvriendelijke oevers: oeversbeschermingsmaterialen, Civieltechnisch Centrum Uitvoering Research en Regelgeving, publicatie 202, Gouda. [Google Scholar]
  • De Roo S., Vanhaute L. and Troch P., 2012. How ship wave action influences the sediment budget of a nature friendly bank protection in a confined, non-tidal waterway. European Geosciences Union, General Assembly 2012-10453, Geophysical Research Abstracts 14. [Google Scholar]
  • Dhote S. and Dixit S., 2009. Water quality improvement through macrophytes – a review. Environ. Monit. Assess., 152, 149–153. [Google Scholar]
  • Dubois J.P., 1994. Uptake of macroelements by the helophyte Phalaris arundinacea L. Aquat. Sci., 56, 70–79. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dudgeon D., Arthington A.H., Gessner M.O., Kawabata Z.-I., Knowler D.J., Lévêque C., Naiman R.J., Prieur-Richard A.-H., Soto D., Stiassny M.L.J. and Sullivan C.A., 2006. Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biol. Rev., 81, 163–182. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • European Commission, 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 Establishing a Framework for Community Action in the Field of Water Policy. Off. J. Eur. Comm., 22 December 2000, L327/1. [Google Scholar]
  • Evette A., Labonne S., Rey F., Liebault F., Jancke O. and Girel J., 2009. History of bioengineering techniques for erosion control in rivers inWestern Europe. Environ. Manage., 43, 972–984. [Google Scholar]
  • Fischenich J.C., 2003. Effects of Riprap on Riverine and Riparian Ecosystems, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center/Environmental Laboratory, TR-03-4, Vicksburg. [Google Scholar]
  • Goodson J.M., Davenport A., Gurnell A.M. and Thompson K., 2004. Hydrochory, river flow regime and riparian vegetation. In: Webb B., Acreman M., Maksimovic C., Smithers H. and Kirby C. (eds.), Hydrology: Science and Practice for the 21st Century, Proceedings of the British Hydrological Society Conference held at Imperial College London, 12–16 July 2004, 99–105. [Google Scholar]
  • Grime J.P., 2001. Plant Strategies, Vegetation Processes, and Ecosystem Properties, Wiley, Chichester. [Google Scholar]
  • Gurnell A.M., Boitsidis A.J., Thompson K. and Clifford N.J., 2006a. Seed bank, seed dispersal and vegetation cover: colonization along a newly-created river channel. J. Veg. Sci., 17, 665–674. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gurnell A.M., Morrissey I.P., Boitsidis A.J., Bark T., Clifford N.J., Petts G.E. and Thompson K., 2006b. Initial adjustments within a new river channel: interactions between fluvial processes, colonizing vegetation, and bank profile development. Environ. Manage., 38, 580–596. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Haslam S.M., 1987. Chapter 26: management and related interference. River Plants of Western Europe: The Macrophytic Vegetation of Watercourses of the European Economic Community, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 405–419. [Google Scholar]
  • Herzon I. and Helenius J., 2008. Agricultural drainage ditches, their biological importance and functioning. Biol. Conserv., 141, 1171–1183. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hodgson J.G., Grime J.P., Hunt R. and Thompson K., 1995. The Electronic Comparative Plant Ecology, Chapman & Hall, London. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hofmann H., Lorke A. and Peeters F., 2008. The relative importance of wind and ship waves in the littoral zone of a large lake. Limnol. Oceanogr., 53, 368–380. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hoitsma T., 1999. Banking on bioengineering. Civil Eng., 69, 60–62. [Google Scholar]
  • Hooimeijer R.H., 1997. Sedimentatie in Natte Stroken, Technische Universiteit Delft, Faculteit der civiele Techniek, Vakgroep Waterbouwkunde, Delft. [Google Scholar]
  • Hou W.S., Chang Y.H., Wang H.W. and Tan Y.C., 2010. Using the behavior of seven amphibian species for the design of banks of irrigation and drainage systems inTaiwan. Irrig. Drain., 59, 493–505. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hunt R., Hodgson J.G., Thompson K., Bungener P., Dunnett N.P. and Askew A.P., 2004. A new practical tool for deriving a functional signature for herbaceous vegetation. Appl. Veg. Sci., 7, 163–170. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • IUCN, 2003. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional Levels: Version 3.0, IUCN Species Survival Commission, Gland and Cambridge. [Google Scholar]
  • Jenkins M., 2003. Prospects for biodiversity. Science, 302, 1175–1177. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Jongman R.H., ter Braak C.J.F. and van Tongeren O.F.R., 1995. Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology, Pudoc, Wageningen. [Google Scholar]
  • Karle K.F., Emmett W.W. and Moore N., 2005. Analysis of 11 bioengineered stream bank erosion control structures in Alaska. Transport. Res. Rec., 1941, 122–128. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Leps J. and Smilauer P., 2003. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data Using Canoco, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. [Google Scholar]
  • Londo G., 1988. Nederlandse Freatofyten, Pudoc, Wageningen. [Google Scholar]
  • Mace G.M., Collar N.J., Gaston K.J., Hilton-Taylor C., Akcakaya H.R., Leader-Williams N., Milner-Gulland E.J. and Stuart S.N., 2008. Quantification of extinction risk: IUCN's system for classifying threatened species. Conserv. Biol., 22, 1424–1442. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mainstone C.P. and Parr W., 2002. Phosphorus in rivers – ecology and management. Sci. Tot. Environ., 282–283, 25–47. [Google Scholar]
  • Malmqvist B. and Rundle S., 2002. Threats to the running water ecosystems of the world. Environ. Conserv., 29, 134–153. [Google Scholar]
  • Merritt D.M. and Wohl E.E., 2002. Processes governing hydrochory along rivers: hydraulics, hydrology, and dispersal phenology. Ecol. Appl., 12, 1071–1087. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mitsch W.J. and Jørgensen S.E., 2003. Ecological engineering: a field whose time has come. Ecol. Eng., 20, 363–377. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mouton A., Buysse D., Stevens M., Van den Neucker T. and Coeck J., 2012. Evaluation of riparian habitat restoration in a lowland river. River Res. Appl., 28, 845–857. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Murphy K., Willby N.J. and Eaton J.W., 1995. Ecological impacts and management of boat traffic on navigable inland waterways. In: Harper D.M. and Ferguson A.J.D. (eds.), The Ecological Basis for River Management, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 427–442. [Google Scholar]
  • Pinheiro J. and Bates D., 2000. Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS. Statistics and Computing Series, Springer-Verlag, New York. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pinheiro J., Bates D., DebRoy S., Sarkar D. and R Development Core Team, 2011. nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3. [Google Scholar]
  • Potts S.G., Biesmeijer J.C., Bommarco R., Felicioli A., Fischer M., Jokinen P., Kleijn D., Klein A., Kunin W.E., Neumann P., Penev L.D., Petanidou T., Rasmont P., Roberts S.P.M., Smith H.G., Sørensen P.B., Steffan-Dewenter I., Vaissière B.E., Vilà M., Vujić A., Woyciechowski M., Zobel M., Settele J. and Schweiger O., 2011. Developing European conservation and mitigation tools for pollination services: approaches of the STEP (Status and Trends of European Pollinators) project. J. Apicult. Res., 50, 152–164. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • R Development Core Team, 2011. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [Google Scholar]
  • Rolletschek H., 1999. The impact of reed-protecting structures on littoral zones. Limnologica, 29, 86–92. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Russ J.M. and Montgomery W.I., 2002. Habitat associations of bats in Northern Ireland: implications for conservation. Biol. Conserv., 108, 49–58. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Schiereck G.J., 2004. Introduction to Bed, Bank and Shore Protection, Spon Press, New York. [Google Scholar]
  • Schulz M., Kozerski H.-P., Pluntke T. and Rinke K., 2003. The influence of macrophytes on sedimentation and nutrient retention in the lower River Spree (Germany). Water Res., 37, 569–578. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Shannon C.E., 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J., 27, 379–423. [Google Scholar]
  • Shi R.H., Xu S.G. and Li X.G., 2009. Assessment and prioritization of eco-revetment projects in urban rivers. River Res. Appl., 25, 946–961. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Shields F.D., Bowie A.J. and Cooper C.M., 1995. Control of streambank erosion due to bed degradation with vegetation and structure. Water Resour. Bull., 31, 475–489. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Smarts M.M., Radar R.R., Nielsen D.N. and Claflin T.O., 1985. The effect of commercial and recreational traffic on the resuspension of sediment in Navigation Pool 9 of theUpper Mississippi River. Hydrobiologia, 126, 263–274. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Smolders A.J.P. and Roelofs G.J.M., 1993. Sulphate mediated iron limitation and eutrophication in aquatic ecosystems. Aquat. Bot., 46, 247–253. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Söhngen B., Koop J., Knight S., Rythönen J., Beckwith P., Ferrari N., Iribarren J., Kevin T., Wolter C. and Maynord S., 2008. Considerations to reduce environmental impacts of vessels. Report of PIANC INCOM Working Group 27, Part I, PIANC Report Series. [Google Scholar]
  • Steiger J., Tabacchi E., Dufour S., Corenblit D. and Peiry J.L., 2005. Hydrogeomorphic processes affecting riparian habitat within alluvial channel-floodplain river systems: a review for the temperate zone. River Res. Appl., 21, 719–737. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tabacchi E., Lambs L., Guilloy H., Planty-Tabacchi A.M., Muller E. and Decamps H., 2000. Impact of riparian vegetation on hydrological processes. Hydrol. Process., 14, 2959–2976. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ter Braak C.J.F. and Smilauer P., 2002. Canoco Reference Manual and Canodraw for Windows User's Guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4.5), Biometris, Wageningen. [Google Scholar]
  • Van Landuyt W., Vanhecke L. and Hoste I., 2006. Rode Lijst van de vaatplanten van Vlaanderen en het Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest. In: Van Landuyt W., Hoste I., Vanhecke L., Van den Bremt P., Vercruysse E. and De Beer D. (eds.), Atlas van de Flora van Vlaanderen en het Brussels Gewest, Instituut voor Natuur-en Bosonderzoek, Nationale Plantentuin van België and FloWer, Brussels, 69–80. [Google Scholar]
  • Vermaat J.E. and De Bruyne R.J., 1993. Factors limiting the distribution of submerged waterplants in the lowland River Vecht (The Netherlands). Freshwater Biol., 30, 147–157. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Weber A., Lautenbach S. and Wolter C., 2012. Improvement of aquatic vegetation in urban waterways using protected artificial shallows. Ecol. Eng., 42, 160–167. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wichert G.A. and Rapport D.J., 1998. Fish community structure as a measure of degradation and rehabilitation of riparian systems in an agricultural drainage basin. Environ. Manage., 22, 425–443. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Willby N.J. and Eaton J.W., 1996. Backwater habitats and their role in nature conservation on navigable waterways. Hydrobiologia, 340, 333–338. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wolter C. and Arlinghaus R., 2003. Navigation impacts on freshwater fish assemblages: the ecological relevance of swimming performance. Rev. Fish Biol. Fisher., 13, 63–89. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.