Free Access
Issue
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 49, Number 1, 2013
Page(s) 31 - 41
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/2013036
Published online 18 April 2013
  • Adler P.B., HilleRisLambers J. and Levine J.M., 2007. A niche for neutrality. Ecol. Lett., 10, 95–104. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Alonso D., Etienne R.S. and Mckane A.J., 2006. The merits of neutral theory. Tree, 21, 451–457.
  • Austin M.P., Nicholls A.O. and Margules C.R., 1990. Measurement of the realized qualitative niche: environmental niches of five eucalyptus species. Ecol. Monogr., 60, 161–177. [CrossRef]
  • Bispo P.C., Oliveira L.G., Bini L.M. and Souza K.D., 2006. Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera assemblages from riffles in mountain streams of centralBrazil: environmental factors influencing the distribution and abundance of immature. Braz. J. Biol., 66, 611–622. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Borcard D. and Legendre P., 2002. All-scale spatial analysis of ecological data by means of principal coordinates of neighbor matrices. Ecol. Model., 153, 51–68. [CrossRef]
  • Borcard D., Legendre P. and Drapeau P., 1992. Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology, 73, 1045–1055. [CrossRef]
  • Brasil, 1983. Projeto RADAMBRASIL, Folha SD 22. Goiás: geologia, geomorfologia, pedologia, vegetação, uso potencial da terra. Ministério das Minas e Energia/Divisão de Publicação.
  • Brittain J.E., 1982. Biology of mayflies. Annu. Rev. Entomol., 27, 119–147. [CrossRef]
  • Buss D.F. and Salles F.F., 2007. Using Baetidae species as biological indicators of environmental degradation in a Brazilian river basin. Environ. Monit. Assess., 130, 365–372. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Buss D.F., Baptista D.F., Silveira M.P., Nessimian J.L. and Dorvillé L.F.M., 2002. Influence of water chemistry and environmental degradation on macroinvertebrate assemblages in a river basin in south-eastBrazil. Hydrobiologia, 481, 125–136. [CrossRef]
  • Cabette H.S.R., Giehl N.F., Dias-Silva K., Luen L. and Batista, J.D., 2010. Distribuição de Nepomorpha e Gerromorpha (Insecta: Heteroptera) da Bacia Hidrográfica do Rio Suiá-Miçu, MT: Riqueza relacionada à qualidade do hábitat. In: Santos J.E., Galbiati C. and Moschini L.E. (eds.), Gestão e educação ambiental, água, biodiversidade e cultura, Rima, São Carlos, 113–137.
  • Case T.J., 1981. Niche packing and coevolution in competition communities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 78, 5021–5025. [CrossRef]
  • Case T.J. and Gilpin M.E., 1974. Interference competition and Niche theory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 71, 3073–3077. [CrossRef]
  • Cassemiro F.A.Z. and Padial A.A., 2008. Teoria Neutra da Biodiversidade e biogeografia: aspectos teóricos, impactos na literatura e perspectivas. Oecol. Bras., 12, 706–719. [CrossRef]
  • Chase J.M., 2003. Community assembly: when should history matter? Oecologia, 136, 489–498. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Chave J., 2004. Neutral theory and community ecology. Ecol. Lett., 7, 241–253. [CrossRef]
  • Clements W.H., Carlise D.M., Courtney L.A. and Harrahy E.A., 2002. Integrating observational and experimental approaches to demonstrate causation in stream biomonitoring studies. Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 21, 1138–1146. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Corigliano M.C., Gualdoni C.M., Oberto A.M. and Raffaini G.B., 2001. Longitudinal distribution of the mayfly (Ephemeroptera) communities at the Chocancharava River Basin (Córdoba, Argentina). In: Dominguez E. (ed.), Trends in Research in Ephemeroptera and Plecoptera, Kluwer Academic/plenum Publishers, Tucuman, 89–95. [CrossRef]
  • De Marco P., 2006. Um longo caminho até uma teoria unificada para a ecologia. Oecol. Bras., 10, 120–126. [CrossRef]
  • Dias L.G., Molineri C. and Ferreira P.S.F., 2007. Ephemerelloidea (Insecta: Ephemeroptera) do Brasil. Pap. Avulsos de Zool., 47, 213–244.
  • Dias-Silva K., Cabette H.S.R., Juen L. and De Marco P., 2010. The influence of habitat integrity and physical-chemical water variables on the structure of aquatic and semi-aquatic Heteroptera. Zoologia, 27, 918–930. [CrossRef]
  • Diniz-Filho J.A.F. and Bini L.M., 2005. Modelling geographical patterns in species richness using eigenvector-based spatial filters. Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 14, 177–185. [CrossRef]
  • Domínguez E., Molineri C., Pescador M.L., Hubbard M. and Nieto C., 2006. Ephemeroptera of South America. Pensoft, Moscow, 646.
  • Francischetti C.N., Da-Silva E.R., Salles F.F. and Nessimian, J.L., 2004. A ephemeropterofauna (Insecta: Ephemeroptera) do trecho ritral inferior do Rio Campo Belo, Itatiaia, RJ: composição e mesodistribuição. Lundiana, 5, 33–39.
  • Gauch H.G., 1982. Multivariate Analysis in Community Ecology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. [CrossRef]
  • Gotelli N.J., Colwell R.K., 2001. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol. Lett., 4, 379–391. [CrossRef]
  • Goulart M. and Callisto M., 2005. Mayfly diversity in the Brazilian tropical headwaters of Serra do Cipó. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol., 48, 983–996.
  • Gravel D., Canham C.D., Beaudet M. and Messier C., 2006. Reconciling niche and neutrality: the continuum hypothesis. Ecol. Lett., 9, 399–409. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Hawkins B.A., Diniz-Filho J.A.F., Jaramillo C.A. and Soeller S.A., 2007. Climate, niche conservatism, and the global bird diversity gradient. Am. Nat., 170, 16–27. [CrossRef]
  • Hayhoe S.J., Neill C., Porder S., McHorney R., Lefebvre P., Coe M.T., Elsenbeer, H. and Krusche, V. 2011. Conversion to soy on the Amazonian agricultural frontier increases streamflow without affecting stormflow dynamics. Global Change Biol., 17, 1821–1833. [CrossRef]
  • Heino, J., 2005. Functional biodiversity of macroinvertebrate assemblages along major ecological gradients of boreal headwater streams. J. Freshwater Biol., 50, 1578–1587. [CrossRef]
  • Heino J., Muotka T. and Paavola R., 2003. Determinants of macroinvertebrate diversity in headwater streams: regional and local influences. J. Anim. Ecol, 72, 425–434. [CrossRef]
  • Heino J., Parviainen J., Paavola R., Jehle M., Louhi P. and Muotka T., 2005. Characterizing macroinvertebrate assemblage structure in relation to stream size and tributary position. Hydrobiologia, 539, 121–130. [CrossRef]
  • Heino J., Bini L.M., Karjalainen S.M., Mykra H., Soininen J., Vieira L.C.G. and Diniz-Filho J.A.F., 2010. Geographical patterns of micro-organismal community structure: are diatom ubiquitously distributed across boreal streams? Oikos, 119, 129–137. [CrossRef]
  • Hill M.O. and Gauch H.G., 1980. Detrended correspondence analysis, an improved ordination technique. Vegetation, 42, 47–58. [CrossRef]
  • Hubbell S.P., 2001. The unified neutral theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 448 p.
  • Hutchinson G.E., 1957. Population studies – animal ecology and demography: concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol., 22, 415–427. [CrossRef]
  • Kovats Z.E., Ciborowsky J.J.H. and Corkum L.D., 1996. Inland dispersal of adult aquatic insects. Freshwater Biol., 36, 265–276. [CrossRef]
  • Landeiro V.L., Magnusson W.E., Melo A.S., Espírito-Santo H.M.V., Bini L.M., 2011. Spatial eigenfunction analyses in stream networks: do watercourse and overland distances produce different result?Freshwater Biol., 56, 1184–1192. [CrossRef]
  • Legendre P. and Gallagher E.D., 2001. Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia, 129, 271–280. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Legendre P. and Legendre L., 1998. Numerical Ecology, Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, 853 p.
  • Lloyde N.J., MacNally R. and Lake P.S., 2005. Spatial autocorrelation of assemblages of benthic invertebrates and its relationship to environmental factors in two upland rivers in southeastern Australia. Divers. Distrib., 11, 375–386. [CrossRef]
  • Lloyde N.J., Mac Nally R., Lake P.S., 2006. Spatial scale of autocorrelation of assemblages of benthic invertebrates in two upland rivers in South-eastern Australia and its implications for biomonitoring and impact assessment in streams. Environ. Monit. Assess., 115, 69–85. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Marimon B.S., Lima E.S., Duarte T.G., Chieregatto L.C. and Ratter J.A., 2006. Observations on the vegetation of northearstern Mato Grosso, Brazil. IV. An analysis of the Cerrado-Amazonian Forest Ecotone. Edin. J. Bot., 63, 323–341. [CrossRef]
  • McCafferty W.P., 1983. Aquatic entomology: the Fishermen's and Ecologists’ Illustrated Guide Insects and their Relatives, Jones and Bartlett Publishers, London.
  • McGill B.J., Maurer B.A. and Weiser M.D., 2006. Empirical evaluation of neutral theoretical. Ecology, 87, 1411–1423. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Nessimian J.L., Venticinque E.M., Zuanon J., De Marco P., Gordo M., Fidelis L., Batista J.D. and Juen L., 2008. Land use, habitat integrity, and aquatic insect assemblages in Central Amazonian streams. Hydrobiologia, 10.1007, 1–12.
  • Paller M.H., Specht W.L. and Dyer S.A., 2006. Effects of stream size on taxa richness and other commonly used benthic bioassessment metrics. Hydrobiologia, 568, 309–316. [CrossRef]
  • Pell M.C., Finlayson B.L. and McMahon T.A., 2007. Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11, 1633–1644. [CrossRef]
  • Poff N.L., DeCino R.D. and Ward J.V., 1991. Size-dependent drift responses of mayflies to experimental hydrologic variation: active predator avoidance of passive hydrodynamic displacement?Oecologia, 88, 577–586. [PubMed]
  • Popielarz P.A. and Neal Z.P., 2007. The niche as a theoretical toll. Annu. Rev. Sociol., 33, 65–84. [CrossRef]
  • Ramette A. and Tiedje J.M., 2007. Multiscale responses of microbial life to spatial distance and environmental heterogeneity in a patchy ecosystem. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 104, 2761–2766. [CrossRef]
  • Rangel T.F.L.B., Diniz-Filho J.A.F. and Bini L.M., 2006. Towards an integrated computational tool for spatial analysis in macroecology and biogeography. Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 15, 321–327. [CrossRef]
  • Rangel T.F.L.V.B., Diniz-Filho J.A.F. and Bini L.M., 2010. SAM: a comprehensive application for Spatial Analysis in Macroecology. Ecography, 33, 46–50. [CrossRef]
  • Ratter J.A., Askew G.P., Montgomery R.F. and Gifford D.R., 1978. Observations on the vegetation of northeastern Mato Grosso II.Forest and Soils of the Rio Suiá–Miçu area. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 293, 191–208. [CrossRef]
  • Ricklefs R.E., 1987. Community diversity: relative roles of local and regional processes. Science, 235, 167–171. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Ricklefs R.E. and Schluter D., 1993. Species diversity: regional and historical influences. In: Ricklefs R.E. and Schluter D. (eds.), Species Diversity in Ecological Communities, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 350–363.
  • Rios R.I., 2004. A Teoria do Nicho Ecológico: Benefícios e malefícios. In: Coelho A.S., Loyola R.D. and Souza M.B.G. (eds.), Ecologia teórica: desafios para o aperfeiçoamento da ecologia no Brasil, O lutador, Belo Horizonte, 24–44.
  • Rosenberg D.M. and Resh V.H., 1993. Introduction to freshwater biomonitoring and benthic macroinvertebrates. In: Rosenberg D.M. and Resh V.H. (eds.), Freshwater biomonitoring and benthic macroinvertebrates, Chapman and Hall, New York, 1–9.
  • Rossete A.N., 2008. Componente: meio físico e uso atual da terra. In: Cabette H.S.R. (ed.), Uso de indicadores ambientais na gestão de recursos hídricos na Bacia Hidrográfica do Rio Pindaíba – MT, Editora Unemat, Nova Xavantina, 1–21.
  • Salles F.F., Da-Silva E.R., Hubbard M.D. and Serrão J.E., 2004. As espécies de Ephemeroptera (Insecta) registradas para o Brasil. Biota Neotrop., 4, 1–34.
  • Sattler T., Borcard D., Arlettaz R., Bontadina F., Legendre P., Obrist M.K., Morreti M., 2010. Spider, bee, and bird communities in cities are shaped by environmental control and high stochasticity. Ecology, 91, 3343–3353. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Scarano F.R. and Dias A.T., 2004. A importância de espécies no funcionamento de comunidades e ecossistemas. In: Coelho A.S., Loyola R.D. and Souza M.B.G. (eds.), Ecologia teórica: desafios para o aperfeiçoamento da ecologia no Brasil, O Lutador, Belo Horizonte, 32–46.
  • Schwartzman S. and Zimmerman B., 2005. Conservation alliances with indigenous people of the Amazon. Conserv. Biol., 19, 721–727. [CrossRef]
  • Shimano Y., Cabette H.S.R., Salles F.F. and Juen L., 2010. Composição e distribuição da fauna de Ephemeroptera (Insecta) em áreas de transição Cerrado-Amazônia, Brasil. Iheringia, 100, 1–8. [CrossRef]
  • Siegloch A.E., Froehlich C.G. and Kotzian C.B., 2008. Composition and diversity of Ephemeroptera (Insecta) nymph communities in the middle section of the Jacuí River and some tributaries, southern Brazil. Iheringia, 98, 425–432. [CrossRef]
  • Sode A. and Wiberg-Larsen P., 1993. Dispersal of adult Trichoptera at a Danish forest brook. Freshwater Biol., 30, 439–446. [CrossRef]
  • Souza H.M.L., Juen L. and Cabette H.S.R., 2010. Diversidade beta de Baetidae (Ephemeroptera) em córregos da Bacia Hidrográfica do Rio Pindaíba (MT). In: Santos J.E., Galbiati C. and Moschini L.E. (eds.), Gestão e educação ambiental, água, biodiversidade e cultura, Rima, São Carlos, 109–123.
  • Strahler H.N., 1957. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Am. Geophys. Union, 38, 913–920. [CrossRef]
  • Thompson R. and Towsend C., 2006. A truce with neutral theory: local deterministic factors, species traits and dispersal limitation together determine patterns of diversity in streams invertebrates. J. Anim. Ecol., 75, 476–484. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Vannote R.L., Minshall G.W., Cummins K.W., Sedell J.R. and Cushing C.E., 1980. The river continuum concept. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 37, 130–137. [CrossRef]
  • Vanschoenwinkel B., De Vries C., Seaman M. and Brendonck L., 2007. The role of metacommunity processes in shaping invertebrate rock pool communities along a dispersal gradient. Oikos, 116, 1255–1266. [CrossRef]
  • Vergnon R., Dulvy N.K. and Freckleton R.P., 2009. Niches versus neutrality: uncovering the drivers of diversity in a species-rich community. Ecol. Lett., 12, 1079–1090. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Vison M.R. and Hawkins C.P., 1998. Biodiversity of stream insects: variation at local, basin and regional scales. Annu. Rev. Entomol., 43, 271–193. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Volkov I., Banavar J.R., Hubbell S.P. and Maritan A., 2003. Neutral theory and relative species abundance in ecology. Nature, 424, 1035–1037. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Zar J.H., 1990. Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, New York, 944 p.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.