Free Access
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 49, Number 1, 2013
Page(s) 31 - 41
Published online 18 April 2013
  • Adler P.B., HilleRisLambers J. and Levine J.M., 2007. A niche for neutrality. Ecol. Lett., 10, 95–104. [Google Scholar]
  • Alonso D., Etienne R.S. and Mckane A.J., 2006. The merits of neutral theory. Tree, 21, 451–457. [Google Scholar]
  • Austin M.P., Nicholls A.O. and Margules C.R., 1990. Measurement of the realized qualitative niche: environmental niches of five eucalyptus species. Ecol. Monogr., 60, 161–177. [Google Scholar]
  • Bispo P.C., Oliveira L.G., Bini L.M. and Souza K.D., 2006. Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera assemblages from riffles in mountain streams of centralBrazil: environmental factors influencing the distribution and abundance of immature. Braz. J. Biol., 66, 611–622. [Google Scholar]
  • Borcard D. and Legendre P., 2002. All-scale spatial analysis of ecological data by means of principal coordinates of neighbor matrices. Ecol. Model., 153, 51–68. [Google Scholar]
  • Borcard D., Legendre P. and Drapeau P., 1992. Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology, 73, 1045–1055. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brasil, 1983. Projeto RADAMBRASIL, Folha SD 22. Goiás: geologia, geomorfologia, pedologia, vegetação, uso potencial da terra. Ministério das Minas e Energia/Divisão de Publicação. [Google Scholar]
  • Brittain J.E., 1982. Biology of mayflies. Annu. Rev. Entomol., 27, 119–147. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Buss D.F. and Salles F.F., 2007. Using Baetidae species as biological indicators of environmental degradation in a Brazilian river basin. Environ. Monit. Assess., 130, 365–372. [Google Scholar]
  • Buss D.F., Baptista D.F., Silveira M.P., Nessimian J.L. and Dorvillé L.F.M., 2002. Influence of water chemistry and environmental degradation on macroinvertebrate assemblages in a river basin in south-eastBrazil. Hydrobiologia, 481, 125–136. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cabette H.S.R., Giehl N.F., Dias-Silva K., Luen L. and Batista, J.D., 2010. Distribuição de Nepomorpha e Gerromorpha (Insecta: Heteroptera) da Bacia Hidrográfica do Rio Suiá-Miçu, MT: Riqueza relacionada à qualidade do hábitat. In: Santos J.E., Galbiati C. and Moschini L.E. (eds.), Gestão e educação ambiental, água, biodiversidade e cultura, Rima, São Carlos, 113–137. [Google Scholar]
  • Case T.J., 1981. Niche packing and coevolution in competition communities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 78, 5021–5025. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Case T.J. and Gilpin M.E., 1974. Interference competition and Niche theory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 71, 3073–3077. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cassemiro F.A.Z. and Padial A.A., 2008. Teoria Neutra da Biodiversidade e biogeografia: aspectos teóricos, impactos na literatura e perspectivas. Oecol. Bras., 12, 706–719. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chase J.M., 2003. Community assembly: when should history matter? Oecologia, 136, 489–498. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chave J., 2004. Neutral theory and community ecology. Ecol. Lett., 7, 241–253. [Google Scholar]
  • Clements W.H., Carlise D.M., Courtney L.A. and Harrahy E.A., 2002. Integrating observational and experimental approaches to demonstrate causation in stream biomonitoring studies. Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 21, 1138–1146. [Google Scholar]
  • Corigliano M.C., Gualdoni C.M., Oberto A.M. and Raffaini G.B., 2001. Longitudinal distribution of the mayfly (Ephemeroptera) communities at the Chocancharava River Basin (Córdoba, Argentina). In: Dominguez E. (ed.), Trends in Research in Ephemeroptera and Plecoptera, Kluwer Academic/plenum Publishers, Tucuman, 89–95. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • De Marco P., 2006. Um longo caminho até uma teoria unificada para a ecologia. Oecol. Bras., 10, 120–126. [Google Scholar]
  • Dias L.G., Molineri C. and Ferreira P.S.F., 2007. Ephemerelloidea (Insecta: Ephemeroptera) do Brasil. Pap. Avulsos de Zool., 47, 213–244. [Google Scholar]
  • Dias-Silva K., Cabette H.S.R., Juen L. and De Marco P., 2010. The influence of habitat integrity and physical-chemical water variables on the structure of aquatic and semi-aquatic Heteroptera. Zoologia, 27, 918–930. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Diniz-Filho J.A.F. and Bini L.M., 2005. Modelling geographical patterns in species richness using eigenvector-based spatial filters. Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 14, 177–185. [Google Scholar]
  • Domínguez E., Molineri C., Pescador M.L., Hubbard M. and Nieto C., 2006. Ephemeroptera of South America. Pensoft, Moscow, 646. [Google Scholar]
  • Francischetti C.N., Da-Silva E.R., Salles F.F. and Nessimian, J.L., 2004. A ephemeropterofauna (Insecta: Ephemeroptera) do trecho ritral inferior do Rio Campo Belo, Itatiaia, RJ: composição e mesodistribuição. Lundiana, 5, 33–39. [Google Scholar]
  • Gauch H.G., 1982. Multivariate Analysis in Community Ecology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gotelli N.J., Colwell R.K., 2001. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol. Lett., 4, 379–391. [Google Scholar]
  • Goulart M. and Callisto M., 2005. Mayfly diversity in the Brazilian tropical headwaters of Serra do Cipó. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol., 48, 983–996. [Google Scholar]
  • Gravel D., Canham C.D., Beaudet M. and Messier C., 2006. Reconciling niche and neutrality: the continuum hypothesis. Ecol. Lett., 9, 399–409. [Google Scholar]
  • Hawkins B.A., Diniz-Filho J.A.F., Jaramillo C.A. and Soeller S.A., 2007. Climate, niche conservatism, and the global bird diversity gradient. Am. Nat., 170, 16–27. [Google Scholar]
  • Hayhoe S.J., Neill C., Porder S., McHorney R., Lefebvre P., Coe M.T., Elsenbeer, H. and Krusche, V. 2011. Conversion to soy on the Amazonian agricultural frontier increases streamflow without affecting stormflow dynamics. Global Change Biol., 17, 1821–1833. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Heino, J., 2005. Functional biodiversity of macroinvertebrate assemblages along major ecological gradients of boreal headwater streams. J. Freshwater Biol., 50, 1578–1587. [Google Scholar]
  • Heino J., Muotka T. and Paavola R., 2003. Determinants of macroinvertebrate diversity in headwater streams: regional and local influences. J. Anim. Ecol, 72, 425–434. [Google Scholar]
  • Heino J., Parviainen J., Paavola R., Jehle M., Louhi P. and Muotka T., 2005. Characterizing macroinvertebrate assemblage structure in relation to stream size and tributary position. Hydrobiologia, 539, 121–130. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Heino J., Bini L.M., Karjalainen S.M., Mykra H., Soininen J., Vieira L.C.G. and Diniz-Filho J.A.F., 2010. Geographical patterns of micro-organismal community structure: are diatom ubiquitously distributed across boreal streams? Oikos, 119, 129–137. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hill M.O. and Gauch H.G., 1980. Detrended correspondence analysis, an improved ordination technique. Vegetation, 42, 47–58. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hubbell S.P., 2001. The unified neutral theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 448 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Hutchinson G.E., 1957. Population studies – animal ecology and demography: concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol., 22, 415–427. [Google Scholar]
  • Kovats Z.E., Ciborowsky J.J.H. and Corkum L.D., 1996. Inland dispersal of adult aquatic insects. Freshwater Biol., 36, 265–276. [Google Scholar]
  • Landeiro V.L., Magnusson W.E., Melo A.S., Espírito-Santo H.M.V., Bini L.M., 2011. Spatial eigenfunction analyses in stream networks: do watercourse and overland distances produce different result?Freshwater Biol., 56, 1184–1192. [Google Scholar]
  • Legendre P. and Gallagher E.D., 2001. Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia, 129, 271–280. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Legendre P. and Legendre L., 1998. Numerical Ecology, Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, 853 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Lloyde N.J., MacNally R. and Lake P.S., 2005. Spatial autocorrelation of assemblages of benthic invertebrates and its relationship to environmental factors in two upland rivers in southeastern Australia. Divers. Distrib., 11, 375–386. [Google Scholar]
  • Lloyde N.J., Mac Nally R., Lake P.S., 2006. Spatial scale of autocorrelation of assemblages of benthic invertebrates in two upland rivers in South-eastern Australia and its implications for biomonitoring and impact assessment in streams. Environ. Monit. Assess., 115, 69–85. [Google Scholar]
  • Marimon B.S., Lima E.S., Duarte T.G., Chieregatto L.C. and Ratter J.A., 2006. Observations on the vegetation of northearstern Mato Grosso, Brazil. IV. An analysis of the Cerrado-Amazonian Forest Ecotone. Edin. J. Bot., 63, 323–341. [Google Scholar]
  • McCafferty W.P., 1983. Aquatic entomology: the Fishermen's and Ecologists’ Illustrated Guide Insects and their Relatives, Jones and Bartlett Publishers, London. [Google Scholar]
  • McGill B.J., Maurer B.A. and Weiser M.D., 2006. Empirical evaluation of neutral theoretical. Ecology, 87, 1411–1423. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Nessimian J.L., Venticinque E.M., Zuanon J., De Marco P., Gordo M., Fidelis L., Batista J.D. and Juen L., 2008. Land use, habitat integrity, and aquatic insect assemblages in Central Amazonian streams. Hydrobiologia, 10.1007, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  • Paller M.H., Specht W.L. and Dyer S.A., 2006. Effects of stream size on taxa richness and other commonly used benthic bioassessment metrics. Hydrobiologia, 568, 309–316. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pell M.C., Finlayson B.L. and McMahon T.A., 2007. Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11, 1633–1644. [Google Scholar]
  • Poff N.L., DeCino R.D. and Ward J.V., 1991. Size-dependent drift responses of mayflies to experimental hydrologic variation: active predator avoidance of passive hydrodynamic displacement?Oecologia, 88, 577–586. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Popielarz P.A. and Neal Z.P., 2007. The niche as a theoretical toll. Annu. Rev. Sociol., 33, 65–84. [Google Scholar]
  • Ramette A. and Tiedje J.M., 2007. Multiscale responses of microbial life to spatial distance and environmental heterogeneity in a patchy ecosystem. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 104, 2761–2766. [Google Scholar]
  • Rangel T.F.L.B., Diniz-Filho J.A.F. and Bini L.M., 2006. Towards an integrated computational tool for spatial analysis in macroecology and biogeography. Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 15, 321–327. [Google Scholar]
  • Rangel T.F.L.V.B., Diniz-Filho J.A.F. and Bini L.M., 2010. SAM: a comprehensive application for Spatial Analysis in Macroecology. Ecography, 33, 46–50. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ratter J.A., Askew G.P., Montgomery R.F. and Gifford D.R., 1978. Observations on the vegetation of northeastern Mato Grosso II.Forest and Soils of the Rio Suiá–Miçu area. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 293, 191–208. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ricklefs R.E., 1987. Community diversity: relative roles of local and regional processes. Science, 235, 167–171. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ricklefs R.E. and Schluter D., 1993. Species diversity: regional and historical influences. In: Ricklefs R.E. and Schluter D. (eds.), Species Diversity in Ecological Communities, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 350–363. [Google Scholar]
  • Rios R.I., 2004. A Teoria do Nicho Ecológico: Benefícios e malefícios. In: Coelho A.S., Loyola R.D. and Souza M.B.G. (eds.), Ecologia teórica: desafios para o aperfeiçoamento da ecologia no Brasil, O lutador, Belo Horizonte, 24–44. [Google Scholar]
  • Rosenberg D.M. and Resh V.H., 1993. Introduction to freshwater biomonitoring and benthic macroinvertebrates. In: Rosenberg D.M. and Resh V.H. (eds.), Freshwater biomonitoring and benthic macroinvertebrates, Chapman and Hall, New York, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  • Rossete A.N., 2008. Componente: meio físico e uso atual da terra. In: Cabette H.S.R. (ed.), Uso de indicadores ambientais na gestão de recursos hídricos na Bacia Hidrográfica do Rio Pindaíba – MT, Editora Unemat, Nova Xavantina, 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  • Salles F.F., Da-Silva E.R., Hubbard M.D. and Serrão J.E., 2004. As espécies de Ephemeroptera (Insecta) registradas para o Brasil. Biota Neotrop., 4, 1–34. [Google Scholar]
  • Sattler T., Borcard D., Arlettaz R., Bontadina F., Legendre P., Obrist M.K., Morreti M., 2010. Spider, bee, and bird communities in cities are shaped by environmental control and high stochasticity. Ecology, 91, 3343–3353. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Scarano F.R. and Dias A.T., 2004. A importância de espécies no funcionamento de comunidades e ecossistemas. In: Coelho A.S., Loyola R.D. and Souza M.B.G. (eds.), Ecologia teórica: desafios para o aperfeiçoamento da ecologia no Brasil, O Lutador, Belo Horizonte, 32–46. [Google Scholar]
  • Schwartzman S. and Zimmerman B., 2005. Conservation alliances with indigenous people of the Amazon. Conserv. Biol., 19, 721–727. [Google Scholar]
  • Shimano Y., Cabette H.S.R., Salles F.F. and Juen L., 2010. Composição e distribuição da fauna de Ephemeroptera (Insecta) em áreas de transição Cerrado-Amazônia, Brasil. Iheringia, 100, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • Siegloch A.E., Froehlich C.G. and Kotzian C.B., 2008. Composition and diversity of Ephemeroptera (Insecta) nymph communities in the middle section of the Jacuí River and some tributaries, southern Brazil. Iheringia, 98, 425–432. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sode A. and Wiberg-Larsen P., 1993. Dispersal of adult Trichoptera at a Danish forest brook. Freshwater Biol., 30, 439–446. [Google Scholar]
  • Souza H.M.L., Juen L. and Cabette H.S.R., 2010. Diversidade beta de Baetidae (Ephemeroptera) em córregos da Bacia Hidrográfica do Rio Pindaíba (MT). In: Santos J.E., Galbiati C. and Moschini L.E. (eds.), Gestão e educação ambiental, água, biodiversidade e cultura, Rima, São Carlos, 109–123. [Google Scholar]
  • Strahler H.N., 1957. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Am. Geophys. Union, 38, 913–920. [Google Scholar]
  • Thompson R. and Towsend C., 2006. A truce with neutral theory: local deterministic factors, species traits and dispersal limitation together determine patterns of diversity in streams invertebrates. J. Anim. Ecol., 75, 476–484. [Google Scholar]
  • Vannote R.L., Minshall G.W., Cummins K.W., Sedell J.R. and Cushing C.E., 1980. The river continuum concept. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 37, 130–137. [Google Scholar]
  • Vanschoenwinkel B., De Vries C., Seaman M. and Brendonck L., 2007. The role of metacommunity processes in shaping invertebrate rock pool communities along a dispersal gradient. Oikos, 116, 1255–1266. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vergnon R., Dulvy N.K. and Freckleton R.P., 2009. Niches versus neutrality: uncovering the drivers of diversity in a species-rich community. Ecol. Lett., 12, 1079–1090. [Google Scholar]
  • Vison M.R. and Hawkins C.P., 1998. Biodiversity of stream insects: variation at local, basin and regional scales. Annu. Rev. Entomol., 43, 271–193. [Google Scholar]
  • Volkov I., Banavar J.R., Hubbell S.P. and Maritan A., 2003. Neutral theory and relative species abundance in ecology. Nature, 424, 1035–1037. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zar J.H., 1990. Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, New York, 944 p. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.