Free Access
Issue
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 48, Number 4, 2012
Page(s) 401 - 409
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/2012028
Published online 19 December 2012
  • Blott S.J. and Pye K., 2001. Gradistat: a grain size distribution and statistics package for the analysis of unconsolidated sediments. Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 26, 1237–1248. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Broadmeadow S. and Nisbet T.R., 2004. The effects of riparian forest management on the freshwater environment: a literature review of best management practice. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 8, 286–305. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Carle F.L. and Strub M.R., 1978. A new method for estimating population size from removal data. Biometrics, 34, 621–630. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cone R.S., 1989. The need to reconsider the use of condition indices in fishery science. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 118, 510–514. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ely D.T. and Wallace J.B., 2010. Long-term functional group recovery of lotic macroinvertebrates from logging disturbance. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 67, 1126–1134. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • England L.E. and Rosemond A.D., 2003. Small reductions in forest cover weaken terrestrial-aquatic linkages in headwater streams. Freshwater Biol., 49, 721–734. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • FAO, 2011. State of the World's Forests, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. [Google Scholar]
  • Gessner M.O. and Chauvet E., 2002. A case for using litter breakdown to assess functional stream integrity. Ecol. Appl., 12, 498–510. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Haggerty S.M., Batzer D.P. and Jackson C.R., 2004. Macroinvertebrate response to logging in coastal headwater streams of Washington, U.S.A. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 61, 529–537. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Harrison S., Herbohn J. and Niskanen A., 2002. Non-industrial, smallholder, small-scale and family forestry: what's in a name?Small-Scale Forestry, 1, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  • Hladyz S., Tiegs S.D., Gessner M.O., Giller P.S., Risnoveanu G., Preda E., Nistorescu M., Schindler M. and Woodward G., 2010. Leaf-litter breakdown in pasture and deciduous woodland streams: a comparison among three European regions. Freshwater Biol., 55, 1916–1929. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kiffney P.M., Richardson J.S. and Bull J., 2003. Responses of periphyton and insects to experimental manipulation of riparian buffer width along forest streams. J. Appl. Ecol., 40, 1060–1076. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kreutzweiser D.P., Good K.P., Capell S.S. and Holmes S.B., 2008. Leaf-litter decomposition and macroinvertebrate communities in boreal forest streams linked to upland logging disturbance. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 27, 1–5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lagrue C., Kominoski J.S., Danger M., Baudoin J.M., Lamothe S., Lambrigot D. and Lecerf A., 2011. Experimental shading alters litter breakdown in streams of contrasting riparian canopy cover. Freshwater Biol., 56, 2059–2069. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lecerf A. and Richardson J.S., 2010. Litter decomposition can detect effects of high and moderate levels of forest disturbance on stream condition. Forest Ecol. Manage., 259, 2433–2443. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Legendre P. and Legendre L., 1998. Numerical Ecology. 2nd English edition, Elsevier Science BV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
  • McKie B.G. and Malmqvist B., 2009. Assessing ecosystem functioning in streams affected by forest management: increased leaf decomposition occurs without changes to the composition of benthic assemblages. Freshwater Biol., 54, 2086–2100. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mellina E. and Hinch S.G., 2009. Influences of riparian logging and in-stream large wood removal on pool habitat and salmonid density and biomass: a meta-analysis. Can. J. Forest Res., 39, 1280–1301. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Montgomery D.R., 1997. What's best on the banks? Nature, 388, 328–329. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Moore R.D., Spittlehouse D.L. and Story A., 2005. Riparian microclimate and stream temperature response to forest harvesting—a review. J. Am. Water Res. Assoc., 41, 813–834. [Google Scholar]
  • Northcote T.G. and Hartman G.F., 2007. Fishes and Forestry: Worldwide Watershed Interactions and Management, Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK. [Google Scholar]
  • R Development Core Team, 2011. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org/. [Google Scholar]
  • Reid D.J., Quinn J.M. and Wright-Stow A.E., 2010. Responses of stream macroinvertebrate communities to progressive forest harvesting: influences of harvest intensity, stream size and riparian buffers. Forest Ecol. Manage., 260, 1804–1815. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Richardson J.S. and Thompson R.M., 2009. Setting conservation targets for freshwater ecosystems in forested catchments. In: Villard M.-A. and Jonsson B.G. (eds.), Setting Conservation Targets for Managed Forest Landscapes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 244–263. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Steinman A.D., Lamberti G.A. and Leavitt P.R., 2007. Biomass and pigments of benthic algae. In: Hauer F.R. and Lamberti G.A. (eds.), Methods in Stream Ecology, 2nd edn, Academic Press, Burlington, USA, 357–379. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Stone M.K. and Wallace J.B., 1998. Long-term recovery of a mountain stream from clear-cut logging: the effects of forest succession on benthic invertebrate community structure. Freshwater Biol., 39, 151–169. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sweeney B.W., Bott T.L., Jackson J.K., Kaplan L.A., Newbold J.D., Standley L.J., Hession W.C. and Horwitz R.J., 2004. Riparian deforestation, stream narrowing, and loss of stream ecosystem services. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 101, 14132–14137. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tachet H., Bournaud M., Richoux P., Dessaix P. and Pattee E., 2009. Initiation aux invertébrés des eaux douces, Association Française de Limnologie, Thonon-les-Bains, France. [Google Scholar]
  • Wallace J.B. and Gurtz M.E., 1986. Response of Baetis Mayflies (Ephemeroptera) to catchment logging. Am. Midl. Nat., 115, 25–41. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wallace J.B., Eggert S.L., Meyer J.L. and Webster J.R., 1997. Multiple trophic levels of forest stream linked to terrestrial litter inputs. Science, 277, 102–104. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wipfli M.S., 1997. Terrestrial invertebrates as salmonid prey and nitrogen sources in streams: contrasting old-growth and young-growth riparian forests in southeastern Alaska, USA. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 54, 1259–1269. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zar J.H., 1999. Biostatistical Analysis, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA. [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang Y., Richardson J.S. and Pinto X., 2009. Catchment-scale effects of forestry practices on benthic invertebrate communities in Pacific coastal streams. J. Appl. Ecol., 46, 1292–1303. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.