Free Access
Issue
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 48, Number 1, 2012
Page(s) 3 - 11
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/2011051
Published online 22 February 2012
  • Berry F. and Breithaupt T., 2010. To signal or not to signal? Chemical communication by urine-borne signals mirrors sexual conflict in crayfish. BMC Biol., 8, 25. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bøhn T., Sandlund O.T., Amundsen P. and Primicerio R., 2004. Rapidly changing life history during invasion. Oikos, 106, 138–150. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Burton O.J., Phillips B.L. and Travis J.M.J., 2010. Trade-offs and the evolution of life-histories during range expansion. Ecol. Lett., 13, 1210–1220. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Clobert J., Le Galliard J.F., Cote J., Meylan S. and Massot M., 2009. Informed dispersal, heterogeneity in animal dispersal syndromes and the dynamics of spatially structured populations. Ecol. Lett., 12, 197–209. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cote J., Clobert J., Brodin T., Fogarty S. and Sih A., 2010a. Personality dependent dispersal: characterization, ontogeny and consequences for spatially structured populations. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B., 365, 4065–4076. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cote J., Weinersmith K., Brodin T. and Sih A., 2010b. Personality traits and dispersal tendency in the invasive mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis). Proc. R. Soc. B., 277, 1571–1579. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Crawford L., Yeomans W.E. and Adams C.E., 2006. The impact of introduced signal crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus on stream invertebrate communities. Aquat. Conserv.: Mar. Freshwat. Ecosyst., 16, 611–621. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cromarty S.I. and Kass-Simon G., 1998. Differential effects of a molting hormone, 20-hydroxyecdysone, on the neuromuscular junctions of the claw opener and abdominal flexor muscles of the American lobster. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A, 120, 289–300. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dana E.D., López-Santiago J., García-de-Lomas J., Garcia-Ocaña D.M., Gámez V. and Ortega F., 2010. Long-term management of the invasive Pacifastacus leniusculus (Dana, 1852) in a small mountain stream. Aquat. Invasions, 5, 317–322. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Davis K. and Huber R., 2007. Activity patterns, behavioural repertoires, and agonistic interactions of crayfish: A non-manipulative field study. Behaviour, 144, 229–247. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Debuse V.J., Addison J.T. and Reynolds J.D., 2001. Morphometric variability in UK populations of the European lobster. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc., 81, 469–474. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Diéguez-Uribeondo J., 2006. The dispersion of the Aphanomyces astaci-carrier Pacifastacus leniusculus by humans represents the main cause of disappearance of the indigenous crayfish Austropotamobius pallipes in Navarra. Bull. Fr. Peche Piscic., 380–381, 1303–1312. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Dorn N.J., Urgelles R. and Trexler J.C., 2005. Evaluating active and passive sampling methods to quantify crayfish density in a freshwater wetland. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 24, 346–356. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ďuriš Z., Drozd P., Horká I., Kozák P. and Policar T., 2006. Biometry and demography of the invasive crayfish Orconectes limosus in the Czech Republic. Bull. Fr. Peche. Piscic., 380–381, 1215–1228. [Google Scholar]
  • Fero K. and Moore P.A., 2008. Social spacing of crayfish in natural habitats: what role does dominance play?Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 62, 1119–1125. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fero K., Simon J., Jourdie V. and Moore P.A., 2007. Consequences of social dominance on crayfish resource use. Behaviour, 144, 61–82. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Figiel C.R. and Miller G.R., 1995. The frequency of chela autotomy and its influence on the growth and survival of the crayfish Procambarus clarkii (Girard, 1852) (Decapoda, Cambaridae). Crustaceana, 68, 472–483. [Google Scholar]
  • Garvey J.E. and Stein R.A., 1993. Evaluating how chela size influences the invasion potential of an introduced crayfish (Orconectes rusticus). Am. Midl. Nat., 129, 172–181. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gherardi F. and Cioni A., 2004. Agonism and interference competition in freshwater decapods. Behaviour, 141, 1297–1324. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Globevnik L. and Kaligarič M., 2005. Hydrological changes of the Mura River in Slovenia accompanied with habitat deteoration in the riverine space. Mater. Geoenviron., 52, 45–49. [Google Scholar]
  • Griffiths S.W., Collen P. and Armstrong J.D., 2004. Competition for shelter among over-wintering signal crayfish and juvenile Atlantic salmon. J. Fish Biol., 65, 436–447. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Guan R. and Wiles P.R., 1999. Growth and reproduction of the introduced crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus in a British lowland river. Fish. Res., 42, 245–259. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gutowsky L.F.G. and Fox M.G., 2011. Occupation, body size and sex ratio of round goby (Neogobius melanostomus) in established and newly invaded areas in an Ontario river. Hydrobiologia, 671, 27–37. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Harioglu M.M. and Holdich D.M., 2001. Meat yields in the introduced freshwater crayish, Pacifastacus leniusculus (Dana) and Astacus leptodactylus Eschscholtz, from British waters. Aquac. Res., 32, 411–417. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hogger J.B., 1988. Ecology, population biology and behaviour. In: Holdich D.M. and Lowery R.S. (eds.), Freshwater crayfish: biology, management and exploitation, The University Press, Cambridge, 114–144. [Google Scholar]
  • Holdich D.M., Reynolds J.D., Souty-Grosset C. and Sibley P.J., 2009. A review of the ever increasing threat to European crayfish from non-indigenous crayfish species. Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst., 394–395, 11. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Hudina S., Faller M., Lucić A., Klobučar G. and Maguire I., 2009. Distribution and dispersal of two invasive crayfish species in the Drava River basin, Croatia. Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst., 394–395, 09. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Hudina S., Galic N., Roessink I. and Hock K., 2011. Competitive interactions between co-occurring invaders: identifying asymmetries between two invasive crayfish species. Biol. Invasions, 13, 1791–1803. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jelić M., 2009. Distribution of otter (Lutra lutra L.) in the continental part of Croatia. Report for State Institute for Nature Protection, Zagreb, Croatia, 112 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Kolar C.S. and Loge D.M., 2002. Predictions and risk assessment for alien fishes in North America. Science, 298, 1233–1236. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Laufer H. and Ahl J.S.B., 1995. Mating behavior and methyl farnesoate levels in male morphotypes of the spider crab, Libinia emarginata (Leach). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 193, 15–20. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lee S.Y., 1995. Cheliped size and structure: the evolution of a multifunctional decapod organ. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 193, 161–176. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lockwood J.L., Hoopes M.F. and Marchetti M.P., 2007. Ecological processes and the spread of non-native species. In: Lockwood J.L., Hoopes M.F. and Marchetti M.P. (eds.), Invasion ecology, Blackwell Publishing, USA, 158–184. [Google Scholar]
  • Maguire I., Hudina S. and Erben R., 2004. Estimation of noble crayfish (Astacus astacus) population size in the Velika Paklenica Stream (Croatia). Bull. Fr. Peche. Piscic., 372–373, 353–366. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Marchetti M.P., Moyle P.B. and Levine R., 2004. Alien fishes in California watersheds: characteristics of successful and failed invaders. Ecol. Appl., 14, 587–596. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mrakovčić M., Mustafić P., Ćaleta M., Zanella D., Buj I. and Marčić Z., 2008. Ichtiological biodiversity of the Mura River. University of Zagreb, Croatia, 125 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Parker G., 1974. Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behaviour. J. Theor. Biol., 47, 223–243. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Phillips B.L., 2009. The evolution of growth rates on an expanding range edge. Biol. Lett., 5, 802–804. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Phillips B.L., Brown G.P. and Shine R., 2010. Life-history evolution in range-shifting populations. Ecology, 91, 1617–1627. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pintor L.M., Sih A. and Bauer M., 2008. Differences in aggression, activity and boldness between native introduced populations of an invasive crayfish. Oikos, 117, 1629–1636. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pintor L., Sih A. and Kerby J., 2009. Behavioral correlations provide a mechanism for explaining high invasive densities and increased impact on native prey. Ecology, 90, 581–587. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pöckl M., 1999. Distribution of crayfish species in Austria with special reference to introduced species. Freshw. Crayfish, 12, 733–750. [Google Scholar]
  • Pyšek P. and Richardson D.M., 2010. Invasive species, environmental change and management, and ecosystem health. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour., 35, 25–55. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ramalho R.O., Correia A.M. and Anastacio P.M., 2008. Effects of density on growth and survival of juvenile Red Swamp Crayfish, Procambarus clarkii (Girard), reared under laboratory conditions. Aquac. Res., 39, 577–586. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rehage J.S. and Sih A., 2004. Dispersal behavior, boldness, and the link to invasiveness: a comparison of four Gambusia species. Biol. Invasions, 6, 379–391. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ricciardi A., 2001. Facilitative interactions among aquatic invaders: is an “invasional meltdown” occurring in the Great Lakes? Can. J. Fish Aquat. Sci., 58, 2513–2525. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rypien R.L. and Palmer A.R., 2007. The effect of sex, size and habitat on the incidence of puncture wounds in the claws oft he porcelain crab Petrolisthes cinctipes (Anomura: Porcellanidae). J. Crustac. Biol., 27, 59–64. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sala O.E., Chapin F.S., Armesto J.J., Berlow J., Bloomfield J., Dirzo R., Huber-Sanwald E., Huenneke L.F., Jackson R.B., Kinzig A., Leemans R., Lodge D.M., Mooney H.A., Oesterheld M., Poff N.L., Sykes M.T., Walker B.H., Walker M., Wall D.H., 2000. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science, 287, 1770–1774. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sallai Z., 2002. Investigation of the fish fauna of the Drava-Mura River System. Halászat, 95, 80–91. [Google Scholar]
  • Savolainen R., Ruohonen K., Railo E., 2004. Effect of stocking density on growth, survival and cheliped injuries of stage 2 juvenile signal crayfish Pasifastacus leniusculus Dana. Aquac. Res., 231, 237–248. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Schroeder L. and Huber R., 2001. Fighting strategies in small and large individuals of the crayfish, Orconectes rusticus. Behaviour, 128, 1437–1449. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sint D., Dalla Via J. and Füreder L., 2007. Phenotypical characterization of indigenous freshwater crayfish populations. J. Zool., 273, 210–219. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Skurdal J., Taugbøl T., Fjeld E. and Qvenild T., 1988. Cheliped loss in Astacus astacus. Freshwat. Crayfish, 7, 165–170. [Google Scholar]
  • Söderbäck B., 1991. Interspecific dominance relationship and aggressive interactions in the freshwater crayfishes Astacus astacus (L.) and Pacifastacus leniusculus (Dana). Can. J. Zool., 69, 1321–1325. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Söderbäck B., 1995. Replacement of the native crayfish Astacus astacus by the introduced species Pacifastacus leniusculus in a Swedish lake: possible causes and mechanisms. Freshwat. Biol., 33, 291–304. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sommerwerk N., Hein T., Schneider-Jacoby M., Baumgartner C., Ostojić A., Paunović M., Bloesch J., Siber R. and Tockner K., 2009. The Danube River Basin. In: Tockner K., Robinson C.T. and Uehlinger U. (eds.), Rivers of Europe, Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam, 59–112. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Souty-Grosset C., Holdich D., Noel P., Reynolds J.D. and Haffner P., 2006. Atlas of crayfish in Europe, Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, 187 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Stancliffe-Vaughan A., 2009. Non-native crayfish – a community research and trapping initiative on the River Lark, Suffolk. Crayfish News: IAA Newsletter, 31, 5–7. [Google Scholar]
  • Strayer D.L., 2010. Alien species in fresh waters: ecological effects, interactions with other stressors, and prospects for the future. Freshwat. Biol., 55, 152–174. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Streissl F. and Hödl W., 2002. Growth, morphometrics, size at maturity, sexual dimorphism and condition index of Austropotamobius torrentium Schrank. Hydrobiologia, 477, 201–208. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Usio N., Konishi M. and Nakano S., 2001. Species displacement between an introduced and a ‘vulnerable’ crayfish: the role of aggressive interactions and shelter competition. Biol. Invasions, 3, 179–175. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vorburger C. and Ribi G., 1999. Aggression and competition for shelter between a native and an introduced crayfish in Europe. Freshwat. Biol., 42, 111–119. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Weinländer M. and Füreder L., 2009. The continuing spread of Pacifastacus leniusculus in Carinthia (Austria). Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst., 394–395, 17. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Westman K. and Savolainen R., 2002. Growth of the signal crayfish, Pacifastacus leniusculus, in a small forest lake in Finland. Boreal. Environ. Res., 7, 53–61. [Google Scholar]
  • Westman K., Pursiainen M. and Vilkman R., 1978. A new folding trap model which prevents crayfish from escaping. Freshwat. Crayfish, 4, 235–242. [Google Scholar]
  • Westman K., Savolainen R. and Pursiainen M., 1999. Development of the introduced North American signal crayfish, Pacifastacus leniusculus (Dana), population in a small Finnish forest lake in 1970–1977. Boreal. Environ. Res., 4, 387–407. [Google Scholar]
  • Zar J., 1996. Biostatistical analyses, Prentice Hall, London, 660 p. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.