Free Access
Issue
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 48, Number 1, 2012
Page(s) 125 - 138
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/2011057
Published online 20 March 2012
  • Adl S.M., Simpson A.G.B., Farmer M.A., Andersen R.A., Anderson O.R., Barta J.R., Bowser S.S., Brugerolle G., Fensome R.A., Fredeicq S., James T.Y., Karpov S., Kugrens P., Krug J., Lane C.E., Lewis L.A., Lodge J., Lynn D.H., Mann D.G., Mccourt R.M., Mendoza L., Moenstrup Ø., Mozley-Standridge S., Nerad T.A., Shearer C.A., Smirnov A.V., Spiegel F.W. and Taylor M.J.R., 2005. The new higher level classification of eukaryotes with emphasis on the taxonomy of protists. J. Euk. Microb., 52, 399–451. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • APHA, 1985. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste (12th edn), American Public Health Association, New York, 1268 p. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Basu B.K., Kalff J. and Pinel-Alloul B., 2000. The influence of macrophyte beds on plankton communities and their export from fluvial lakes in the St. Lawrence River. Freshw. Biol., 45, 373–382. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Basu B.K. and Pick F.R., 1996. Factor regulating phytoplankton and zooplankton biomass in temperate rivers. Limnol. Oceanogr., 41, 1572–1577. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bauernfeind E. and Humpesch U.H., 2001. Die Eintagsfliegen Zentraleuropas (Insecta: Ephemeroptera): Bestimmung und Ökologie, Verlag des Naturhistorischen Museums, Wien, 239 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Bednarek A.T. and Hart D.D., 2005. Modifying dam operations to restore rivers: ecological responses to Tennessee River dam mitigation. Ecol. Appl., 15, 997–1008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bogut I., Čerba D., Vidaković J. and Gvozdić V., 2010. Interactions of weed-bed invertebrates and Ceratophyllum demersum L. stands in a floodplain lake. Biologia, 65, 113–121. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bowden B., Glime J.M. and Riis T., 2006. Macrophytes and bryophytes. In: Hauer F.R. and Lamberti G.A. (eds.), Methods in Stream Ecology, Elsevier, London, 381–414. [Google Scholar]
  • Breitig G. and von Tümpling W., 1982. Ausgewaehlte Methoden der Wasseruntersuchung, Band II. Biologische, Mikrobiologische und Toxikologische Methoden, VEB Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena, 579 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Burkholder J.M. and Sheath R.G., 1984. The seasonal distribution, abundance and diversity of desmids (Chlorophyta) in a softwater, north temperate stream. J. Phycol., 20, 159–172. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Clarke K.R. and Gorley R.N., 2006. PRIMER v6: User Manual/Tutorial. PRIMER-E, Plymouth, 192 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Collier K.J., 1993. Flow preferences of larval Chironomidae (Diptera) inTongariro River, New Zealand. N. Z. J. Mar. Freshw. Res., 27, 219–226. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Descy J.P., Everbecq E., Gosselain V, Viroux L. and Smitz J.S., 2003. Modelling the impact of benthic filter-feeders on the composition and biomass of river plankton. Freshw. Biol., 48, 404–417. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Donner P.J., 1972. Die Rädertierbestände submerser Moose und weiterer Merotope im Bereich der Stauraüme der Donau an der Deutch-Österreichischen Landesgrenze. Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl., 44, 49–114. [Google Scholar]
  • Duggan I.C., 2001. The ecology of periphytic rotifers. Hydrobiologia, 446/447, 139–148. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dumnicka E., Galas J. and Koperski P., 2007. Benthic invertebrates in Karst Springs: does substratum or location define communities? Int. J. Lim., 92, 452–464. [Google Scholar]
  • Einsle U., 1993. Crustacea, Copepoda, Calanoida und Cyclopoida, Gustav Fischer Verlag, Berlin, 209 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Fenchel T.M., 1978. The ecology of micro- and meiobenthos. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 9, 99–121. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Foissner W. and Berger H., 1996. A user-friendly guide to the ciliates (Protozoa, Ciliophora) commonly used by hydrobiologists as bioindicators in rivers, lakes, and waste waters, with notes on their ecology. Freshw. Biol., 35, 375–482. [Google Scholar]
  • Glime J.M., 2007. Bryophyte Ecology. Volume 2. Bryological Interaction. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. http://www.bryoecol.mtu.edu/. [Google Scholar]
  • Glöer P., 2002. Die Süsswassergastropoden Nord-und Mitteleuropas. In: Bestimmungsschlüssel, Lebensweise, Verbreitung, ConchBooks, Hackenheim, 326 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Habdija I., Primc-Habdija B., Matoničkin R., Kučinić M., Radanović I., Miliša M. and Mihaljević Z., 2004. Current velocity and food supply as factors affecting the composition of macroinvertebrates in bryophyte habitats in karst running water. Biologia, 59, 577–593. [Google Scholar]
  • Hakenkamp C.C. and Morin A., 2000. The importance of meiofauna to lotic ecosystem functioning. Freshw. Biol., 43, 165–175. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Höll K., 1986. Wasser Untersuchung, Beurteilung, Aufbereitung, Chemie, Bakteriologie, Virologie, Biologie (7th edn), Walter de Gruyter Verlag, Berlin, 393 p. [Google Scholar]
  • John D.M., Whitton B.A. and Brook A.J., 2002. The Freshwater Algal Flora of the British Isles: An Identification Guide to Freshwater and Terrestrial Algae, Cambridge University Press, New York, 714 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Keithan E.D. and Lowe R.L., 1985. Primary productivity and spatial structure of phytolithic growth in streams in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park, Tennessee. Hydrobiologia, 123, 59–67. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Knapp J.M. and Lowe R.L., 2009. Spatial distribution of epiphytic diatoms on lotic bryophytes. Southeast. Nat., 8, 305–316. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Komárek J. and Anagnostidis K., 1999. Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa: Band 19/1: Cyanoprokaryota 1. Teil: Chroococcales, Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, 548 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Komárek J. and Anagnostidis K., 2005. Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa: Band 19/2: Cyanoprokaryota 2. Teil: Oscillatoriales, Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, 759 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Koste W., 1978. Die Rädertiere Mitteleuropas, Gebrüder Borntraeger. Berlin, Stuttgart, 673 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Kralj K., Plenković-Moraj A., Gligora M., Primc-Habdija B. and Sipos L., 2006. Structure of periphytic community on artificial substrata: influence of depth, slide orientation and colonization time in karstic Lake Visovačko, Croatia. Hydrobiologia, 560, 249–258. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Krammer K. and Lange-Bertalot H., 1986. Bacillariophyceae. 1. Teil: Naviculaceae. In: Ettl H., Gerloff J., Heynig H. and Mollenhauer D. (eds.), Süsswasser flora von Mitteleuropa, Band 2/1, Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, New York, 876 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Krammer K. and Lange-Bertalot H., 1991. Bacillariophyceae. 4. Teil: Achnanthaceae, Kritische Ergänzungen zu Navicula (Lineolatae) und Gomphonema, Gesamtliteraturverzeichnis Teil 1–4. In: Ettl H., Gärtner G., Gerloff J., Heynig H. and Mollenhauer D. (eds.), Süsswasserflora von Mitteleuropa, Band 2/4, Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, Jena, 437 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Krno I., Šporka F., Štefková E., Tirjaková E., Bitušík P., Bulánková E., Lukáš J., Illéšová D., Derka T., Tomajka J. and Černý J., 2006. Ecological study of a high-mountain stream ecosystem (Hincov potok, High Tatra Mountains, Slovakia). Acta Soc. Zool. Bohem., 69, 299–316. [Google Scholar]
  • Kuczyńska-Kippen N., 2005. On body size and habitat selection in rotifers in a macrophyte-dominatedlake Budzyńskie, Poland. Aquat. Ecol., 39, 447–454. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Linhart J., Fiurášková M. and Uvira V., 2002. Moss- and mineral substrata-dwelling meiobenthos in two different low-order streams. Arch. Hydrobiol., 154, 543–560. [Google Scholar]
  • Linhartová Š., Uvíra V. and Linhart J., 2005. Stream meiobenthos and flow velocity – do mossy and mineral substrata differ? Verh . Int. Verein. Limnol., 29, 1069–1071. [Google Scholar]
  • Madaliński K., 1961. Moss dwelling rotifers of Tatra streams. Pol. Arch. Hydrobiol., 9, 243–263. [Google Scholar]
  • Malard F., Turquin M.J. and Magniez G., 1997. Filter effect of karstic spring ecotones on the population structure of the hypogean amphipod Niphargus virei. In: Gilbert J., Mathieu J. and Fournier F. (eds.), Groundwater/Surface Water Ecotones: Biological and Hydrological Interactions and Management Options, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 40–50. [Google Scholar]
  • Margaritora F., 1983. Cladoceri (Crustacea: Cladocera). Guide per il Reconoscimiento delle Specie Animali delle Acque Interne 22, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Roma, 167 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Matoničkin Kepčija R., Habdija I., Primc-Habdija B. and Miliša M., 2006. Simuliid silk pads enhance tufa deposition. Arch. Hydrobiol., 166, 387–409. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Miliša M., Habdija I., Primc-Habdija B., Radanović I. and Matoničkin Kepčija R., 2006a. The role of flow velocity in the vertical distribution of particulate organic matter on moss-covered travertine barriers of the Plitvice Lakes (Croatia). Hydrobiologia, 553, 231–243. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Miliša M., Matoničkin Kepčija R., Radanović I., Ostojić A. and Habdija I., 2006b. The impact of aquatic macrophyte (Salix sp. and Cladium mariscus (L.) Pohl.) removal on habitat conditions and macroinvertebrates of tufa barriers (Plitvice Lakes, Croatia). Hydrobiologia, 573, 183–197. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Miliša M., Živković V. and Habdija I., 2010. Destructive effect of quarry effluent on life in a mountain stream. Biologia, 65, 520–526. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Moog O., 2002. Fauna Aquatica Austriaca. Edition 2002. Wasserwirtschaftskataster Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft, Wien, http://www.wassernet.at. [Google Scholar]
  • Nilsson A., 1996. Aquatic Insects of North Europe 1, Apollo Books, Stenstrup, 274 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Nilsson A., 1997. Aquatic Insects of North Europe 2, Apollo Books, Stenstrup, 440 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Nusch E.A., 1980. Comparison of different methods for chlorophyll and phaeopigment determination. Arch. Hydrobiol., 14, 14–36. [Google Scholar]
  • Ogden C.G. and Hedley R.H., 1980. An Atlas of Freshwater Testate Amoebae, BAS Printers Limited, Over Wallop, Hamoshire, 222 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Page F.C. and Siemensma F.J., 1991. Nackte Rhizopoda und Heliozoea, Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, New York, 297 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Palmer M.A., 1990. Temporal and spatial dynamics of meiofauna within the hyporheic zone of Goose Creek, Virginia. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 9, 17–25. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Patrick R. and Reimer C.W., 1966. The diatoms of the United States, exclusive of Alaska and Hawaii, Volume 1-Fragilariaceae, Eunotiaceae, Achnanthaceae, Naviculaceae. Monogr. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila., 13, 688. [Google Scholar]
  • Patrick R. and Reimer C.W., 1975. The diatoms of the United States, exclusive of Alaska and Hawaii, Volume 2, Part 1-Entomoneidaceae, Cymbellaceae, Gomphonemaceae, Epithemaceae. Monogr. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila., 13, 213. [Google Scholar]
  • Radoman P., 1983. Hydrobioidea: A Superfamily of Prosobranchia (Gastropoda). I. Systematics. Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Monographs, Volume DXLVII, Department of Sciences, No 57, Sebian Academy of Sciences, Belgrade, 256 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Reiss J. and Schmid-Araya J.M., 2008. Existing in plenty: abundance, biomass and diversity of ciliates and meiofauna in small streams. Freshw. Biol., 53, 652–668. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ricci C.N., 1987. Ecology of bdelloids: how to be successful. Hydrobiologia, 47, 117–127. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rundle S.D., Robertson A.L. and Schmid-Araya J.M. (eds.), 2002. Freshwater Meiofauna: Biology and Ecology, Backhuys Publisher, Leiden, 369 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Sandlund O.T., 1982. The drift of zooplankton and microzoobenthos in the river Strandaelva, western Norway. Hydrobiologia, 94, 33–48. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Schmedtje U., 1995. Ökologische Grundlagen für die Beurteilung von Ausleitungsstrecken – Beziehungen zwischen der sohlnahen Strömung, dem Gewässerbett und dem Makrozoobenthos in Fließgewässern. Bayerisches Landesamt für Wasserwirtschaft (Hrsg.), Schriftenreihe, Heft 25, 158 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Sertić Perić M., Miliša M., Primc-Habdija B. and Habdija I., 2011. Seasonal and fine-scale spatial patterns of drift and seston in a tufa-depositing barrage hydrosystem. Fund. Appl. Limnol., 178, 131–145. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sleight M.A., Baldock B.M. and Baker H., 1992. Protozoan communities in chalk streams. Hydrobiologia, 248, 53–64. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Smith F. and Brown A.V., 2006. Effects of flow on meiofauna colonization in artificial streams and reference sites within the Illinois River, Arkansas. Hydrobiologia, 571, 169–180. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Soininen J., 2004. Assessing the current related heterogeneity and diversity patterns of benthic diatom communities in a turbid and a clear water river. Aquat. Ecol., 38, 495–501. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sørensen T., 1948. A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant society based on similarity of species content. Kgl. Danske Videnskab. Selsk., 5, 1–34. [Google Scholar]
  • Špoljar M., Dražina T., Habdija I., Meseljević M. and Grčić Z., 2011. Contrasting zooplankton assemblages in two oxbow lakes with low transparencies and narrow emergent macrophyte belts (Krapina River, Croatia). Int. Rev. Hydrobiol., 96, 175–190. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Špoljar M., Habdija I. and Primc-Habdija B., 2007a. Transport of seston in the karstic hydrosystem of the Plitvice Lakes (Croatia). Hydrobiologia, 579, 199–209. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Špoljar M., Primc-Habdija B. and Habdija I., 2007b. The influence of the lotic and lentic stretches on the zooseston flux through the Plitvice Lakes (Croatia). Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim., 43, 29–40. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Srdoč D., Horvatinčić N., Obelić B., Krajcar-Bronić I. and Sliepčević A., 1985. Calcite deposition processes in karst waters with special emphasis on the Plitvice lakes, Yugoslavia. Carsus Jugosl., 11, 101–204. [Google Scholar]
  • Stanley E.H., Short R.A., Harrison J.W., Hall R. and Wiedenfeld R.C., 1990. Variation in nutrient limitation of lotic and lentic algal communities in a Texas (USA) river. Hydrobiologia, 206, 61–71. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • StatSoft, Inc., 2010. Statistica (Data Analysis Software System), v9.1, StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, OK, http://www.statsoft.com. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Stevenson R.J., Bothwell M.L., Lowe R.L. and Thorp J. H., 1996. Algal Ecology: Freshwater Benthic Ecosystem, Academic Press, San Diego, 753 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Stilinović B. and Plenković-Moraj A., 1995. Bacterial and phytoplanktonic research of Ponikve artificial lake on the island of Krk. Period. Biol., 97, 351–358. [Google Scholar]
  • Strayer D.L., May S.E., Nielsen P., Wollheim W. and Hausam S., 1997. Oxygen, organic matter, and sediment granulometry as controls on hyporheic animal communities. Arch. Hydrobiol., 140, 131–144. [Google Scholar]
  • Suren A.M., 1991. Bryophytes as invertebrate habitat in two New Zealand alpine streams. Freshw. Biol., 26, 399–418. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Suren A.M., 1992. Meiofaunal communities associated with bryophytes and gravels in shaded and unshaded alpine streams in New Zealand. N. Z. J. Mar. Freshwat. Res., 26, 115–125. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Suren A., 1993. Bryophytes and associated invertebrates in first-order alpine streams of Arthur's Pass, New Zealand. N. Z. J. Mar. Freshwat. Res., 27, 479–494. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wallace R.L. and Ricci C., 2002. Rotifera. In: Rundle S.D., Robertson A.L. and Schmid-Araya J.M. (eds.), Freshwater Meiofauna: Biology and Ecology, Backhuyus Publishers, Leiden, 15–45. [Google Scholar]
  • Waringer J. and Graf W., 1997. Atlas der Österreichischen Köcherfliegenlarven unter Einschluß angrenzender Gebiete, Facultas Universitätsverlag, Wien, 286 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Wilhartitz I.C., Kirschner A.K., Stadler H., Herndl G.J., Dietzel M., Latal C., Mach R.L. and Farnleitner A.H., 2009. Heterotrophic prokaryotic production in ultraoligotrophic alpine karst aquifers and ecological implications. FEMS Microbiol Ecol., 68, 287–99. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zabelina M.M., Kiselev I.A., Proškina A.I. and Šešukova V.S., 1951. Opredelitelj presnovodnih vodoroslei SSSR. In: Diatomovie vodorosli, Gosudarstvenoe izdateljstvo Sovjetskaja nauka, Moskva, 619 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Zimmermann-Timm H., Holst H. and Kausch H., 2007. Spatial dynamics of rotifers in a large lowland river, the Elbe, Germany: how important are retentive shoreline habitats for the plankton community? Hydrobiologia, 593, 49–58. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zwick P., 2004. Key to theWest Palaearctic genera of stoneflies (Plecoptera) in the larval stage. Limnologica, 34, 315–348. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.